
Loaded for Bear: Social unrest and mass protests rise ‘exponentially' across Africa
When viewed through a continent-wide prism, the service delivery protest phenomenon in South Africa is clearly not just a local development, but a reflection of wider regional trends and simmering discontent across Africa with economic stagnation and state failure.
Fed up with corrupt elites, widening inequality, political repression and withering economic opportunities, Africans are taking to the streets in unprecedented waves of protest.
'Social unrest is on the rise across the continent,' the World Bank says in its latest Africa's Pulse report, a bi-annual assessment of developments on the world's poorest continent.
'Although most have been peaceful, there has been an exponential increase in mass demonstrations over the past 20 years. The increase in protests has accelerated since the early 2010s, increasing by 12% on average each year over a decade.'
'Service delivery protests' erupted in South Africa two decades ago and the term has, like 'load shedding', become embedded in the country's vocabulary.
When viewed through this continent-wide prism, the service delivery protest phenomenon in South Africa is clearly not just a local development, but a reflection of wider regional trends and simmering discontent across Africa with economic stagnation and state failure.
'While protests tend to be highly localised events, they are all triggered to some extent by citizens' dissatisfaction with their livelihoods, including the cost of living, job opportunities and access to public services,' the World Bank notes.
'Protesters regularly attribute their lack of opportunities to the government's failure to manage the economy and its corruption and inability to deliver on its distributive mandate. In 2024, youth protests in Botswana, Kenya and Uganda highlighted corruption as a major grievance, and protesters in Ghana and Nigeria focused on poor economic management and fiscal decisions that they perceived as unfair.'
Where there is smoke…
Where there is smoke, there is fire and these blazes, fanned by the winds of discontent, are mirroring recent wildfires stoked by climate change in their size and intensity.
'Particularly large and enduring events have occurred across the continent since 2019… Protests have arisen across levels of economic development, political regime types and countries, including in Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa and Sudan. In 2024, there were 7,224 demonstrations in the region, comprising 5,911 protests and 1,313 riots, compared to 2,780 a decade earlier,' the report says.
Mobile phones and social media have obviously been key drivers of protests, especially among Africa's swelling youth demographic – sometimes with positive outcomes.
'The #EndSARS protest in Nigeria called for the dissolution of the Special Anti-Robbery Squad, which was notorious for police brutality, and led to its effective disbanding,' the report says.
That was a victory for civil society and accountability.
But outright repression and onerous regulation are constraints on social media in several African countries – and digital access is extremely limited in many places.
Another key driver of protest in Africa is the region's explosive demographic situation. The region's population is simply growing too fast for new entrants to be absorbed into the labour market.
'The fast growth of the working-age population, averaging 3% annually since the late 2000s, has not been met with matching levels of job growth. Moreover, it is expected that the youth population (ages 15 to 34) will nearly double, from 499 million in 2024 to 846 million by 2050,' the report says.
There is a vicious cycle at work here.
'The link between economic grievance and political stability runs both ways: poor economic opportunity exacerbates political discontent, while the risk of conflict and violence can severely undermine economic activity and investment. Annual growth in countries in conflict is about 2.5 percentage points lower on average, with the impact on per capita GDP increasing over the duration of the conflict,' the report says.
This is a wake-up call for African governments – protesters are demanding accountability as seen in the flare-ups after last year's bitterly-contested election in Mozambique, where the ruling Frelimo Party seems incapable of relinquishing its grip on power ahead of an expected windfall from offshore gas projects.
Things have clearly reached a boiling point. The report notes that there has been no significant decline in inequality in Africa since 2000, and the blessings of economic growth have been uneven.
While extreme poverty has declined, it is a dismal category in which almost 40% of Africans still find themselves trapped.
'It is not surprising, therefore, that income is highly concentrated at the top levels of earnings: the richest 10% in the region receive almost 56% of total income, matching some of the highest levels worldwide,' the report says.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
The poor will always be last: The mirage of unity and the necessity of disruption
As South Africa once again contemplates a Government of National Unity (GNU), it is tempting to celebrate the idea of political stability, inter-party cooperation, and the so-called 'maturity' of our democracy. But beneath this surface lies a more troubling pattern; one that reveals the persistent exclusion of the poor, the co-optation of transformation discourse, and the retreat of the state from its moral obligation to disrupt patterns of inherited inequality. History has repeatedly shown us that, when elites call for unity, it is often a euphemism for consolidating power and preserving privilege. The original GNU of the post-1994 settlement, for all its symbolism, was a delicate compromise between political liberation and economic continuity. It preserved existing capital structures, deferred radical land reform, and entrenched a neoliberal macroeconomic framework that has since calcified into orthodoxy. It is no coincidence that Black poverty, youth unemployment, and rural underdevelopment remain defining features of our post-apartheid condition. Today, more than 30 million people live below the upper-bound poverty line. Approximately 60% of youth are unemployed, while more than 3.7 million people remain on the housing backlog, waiting for the dignity of a stable roof. Black Africans remain the least likely to own land. As of 2022, only 8.8% of land in private hands was black-owned, and a significant portion of this is not productive or urban land. These figures are not just numbers; they represent a systematic denial of opportunity to the very people who were promised transformation. Instead of material redress, millions of poor South Africans are locked in a downward spiral of dependency on social grants, a system which, while necessary for survival, is neither developmental nor liberatory. Over 18 million people depend on grants, and yet, every year, the promise of employment, industrial inclusion, and quality public services rings hollow. For over a decade, ambitious rhetoric about inclusive growth and social impact has failed to translate into measurable outcomes. The burden of this failure is borne disproportionately by indigenous South Africans, Black people and Africans in particular, who continue to suffer the most in a democratic society that has yet to reckon with the economic architecture of apartheid. The poor are not an unfortunate side-effect of incomplete transformation; they are a structural outcome of a society designed to exclude them. South Africa's political economy remains profoundly racialised, extractive, and elite-driven. The so-called 'black middle class' and a newly-minted billionaire class are often paraded as evidence of progress. Yet they serve largely as buffers, intermediaries between the desperation of the majority and the opulence of the few, without redistributing power in any meaningful sense. The emerging political consensus today, as represented by discussions of a GNU or coalition-based governance, is disturbingly void of any real commitment to economic justice. Instead, it pivots around the technocratic language of fiscal discipline, market confidence, and investor friendliness, language that insulates elite decision-making from democratic accountability. In this context, calls for unity function as a depoliticising mechanism. They silence dissent, dismiss radical alternatives, and pathologise the anger of the poor as destabilising or immature. Authentic transformation is not a product of elite negotiations behind closed doors; it is the outcome of struggle, disruption, and radical reimagination. If we are to honour the constitutional promise of substantive equality, we must reject the cynical notion that consensus is always virtuous. In truth, some interests are irreconcilable. A society cannot simultaneously defend property rights and guarantee land justice. It cannot shield monopolistic capital while claiming to empower informal economies. And it cannot continue to pacify the masses with promises of reform while the instruments of wealth creation remain in the hands of a tiny, racially exclusive elite. So what will it take to change the system? What will it take for Black South Africans, and Africans in particular, to participate fully in the economy and shape its architecture? It begins with reclaiming the narrative. We must stop accepting incrementalism as a virtue. True transformation requires a redistributive economic model that acknowledges historical injustice and deliberately dismantles racialised capital concentration. We must ask: what will it take to accelerate the pace of progress to see Africans leading as the majority in the corporate sector within JSE-listed companies? As of 2023, Black African CEOs led less than 15% of JSE's top 100 companies. This is not a failure of skills; it is a failure of imagination and will. It reflects the enduring gatekeeping of corporate South Africa and the superficial commitments to transformation targets that are never enforced. We must support Black businesses, not through token funding schemes or ceremonial procurement programmes, but through deliberate state-backed incubation, eased regulatory entry, access to markets, and ownership of infrastructure. SMMEs, particularly Black-owned enterprises, hold the key to mass employment, yet they face the highest barriers to financing, compliance, and market access. We must also cultivate a new generation of Black industrialists, farmers, and tech entrepreneurs. This is not about romanticising the idea of 'start-ups' in a vacuum. It is about building the ecosystem for innovation, from broadband and logistics infrastructure to research funding and digital education, so that we are not merely consumers of global technology but producers of indigenous solutions. We must build our own Silicon Valley, a Southern African tech frontier that draws from our realities, not imported templates. Finally, we must confront the painful truth that the current political elite, across party lines, is increasingly indistinguishable from the economic elite. Many of those who today speak the language of the poor have built careers by exploiting their pain. Their allegiance is not to justice, but to power. They wear the language of liberation like a mask while participating in the architecture of continued dispossession. In the end, unity without justice is a betrayal. It is unity for the sake of comfort for billionaires to retain their portfolios, for technocrats to deliver stability, and for political parties to secure positions. But for the poor, it is merely another season of waiting. Another promise postponed. Another betrayal repackaged as progress. Let us not be seduced by elegant formulations of compromise. Let us instead ask: who benefits, who decides, and who pays the price for this so-called unity? Only then can we begin to imagine a politics that does not merely include the poor, but is led by them.

TimesLIVE
5 days ago
- TimesLIVE
World Bank to resume Uganda funding after halt over anti-LGBT law
The World Bank said on Thursday it will resume funding to Uganda, nearly two years after the global lender suspended new financing to the country in response to an anti-LGBT law that imposes penalties including death and life imprisonment. The bank halted funding to the East African country in August 2023 after Uganda's parliament passed the Anti-Homosexuality Act (AHA), saying the law contradicted its values. The bank had worked with Ugandan authorities to put in place strong measures to mitigate against potential harm from the law, a World Bank spokesperson told Reuters via e-mail. "We have now determined the mitigation measures rolled out over the last several months in all ongoing projects in Uganda to be satisfactory," said the spokesperson, who asked not to be named. "Consequently the bank has prepared three new projects in sectors with significant development needs — social protection, education, and forced displacement/refugees — which have been approved by the Board."


Eyewitness News
5 days ago
- Eyewitness News
World Bank lifts lending freeze over Uganda anti-LGBTQ law
NAIROBI - The World Bank is lifting a freeze on lending to Uganda it put in place in response to a 2023 law criminalising homosexuality, after taking steps to counter discrimination, it said Wednesday. Uganda's anti-LGBTQ law, one of the most severe in the world, provides for harsh sentences for same-sex relations or "promoting" homosexuality, including the death penalty in some cases. After longtime President Yoweri Museveni signed it into law in May 2023, the World Bank halted all new loans to Uganda, saying projects it financed had to adhere to its non-discriminatory policies. Since then, "the World Bank worked with the government and other stakeholders in the country to introduce, implement and test measures that prevent discrimination in World Bank-funded projects," a spokesman told AFP. "We have now determined the mitigation measures rolled out over the last several months in all ongoing projects in Uganda to be satisfactory," he added. "Consequently, the Bank has prepared new projects in sectors with significant development needs," which will be presented to the World Bank's board, he said. "All new projects have the mitigations measures embedded in them," he added. "The World Bank cannot deliver on its mission to end poverty and boost shared prosperity on a liveable planet unless all people can participate in, and benefit from, the projects we finance." Uganda has lost between $586 million and $2.4 billion a year because of the anti-LGBTQ law, notably because of frozen financing, British charity Open for Business estimated last year.