Edmunds stylish SUV test: Buick Envista vs. Nissan Kicks
It all starts with their designs. The redesigned 2025 Kicks has the sporty vibe of a fashionable sneaker with vibrant two-tone color options. It's fair to say it's more youthful. The Envista definitely isn't Grandma's Buick. It has a coupe-like look that could pass as something coming from Europe. There are plenty of other differences, too. Edmunds' auto experts compare these two small SUVs to help you decide which is the better buy.
Fuel economy and performance
The Envista has a turbocharged three-cylinder engine that's surprisingly peppy around town and when merging onto the highway despite its modest output of 137 horsepower and 162 lb-ft of torque. Fuel economy is an EPA-estimated 30 mpg in combined city/highway driving. One potential downside: The Envista is not available with all-wheel drive.
The Kicks has a four-cylinder engine with 141 horsepower and 140 lb-ft of torque. Though the Kicks has a similar horsepower output, Edmunds' editors have found the vehicle slower in real-world driving, especially when you want a quick burst of speed for getting on the highway. All-wheel drive is available, though, which might be advantageous for buyers living in areas with snowy and icy winters. The EPA estimates that the Kicks gets 31 mpg combined with front-wheel drive or 30 mpg combined with all-wheel drive.
Advantage: Envista
Interior room and comfort
The Envista and Kicks are both small SUVs, but the Buick is longer and has a coupe-like roofline. As such, the Envista has less rear headroom but more rear legroom than the Kicks. There's about 4 more inches of rear legroom. That's a lot and can be useful if you need to install a bulky rear-facing child safety seat.
We do prefer the Kicks' front seating. Its comfortable driver's seat is similar to what you'll find in pricier Nissans, whereas the Envista's is rather flat and doesn't have enough bolstering to help keep you from sliding around when going around turns.
The Envista lacks the soft, cushy ride you might expect from a Buick. Still, it isn't uncomfortable and it maintains a better composure over bumps than the Kicks.
Advantage: Envista
Cargo space
In real-world testing, both the Envista and Kicks managed to hold more pieces of luggage in their trunks than we were expecting given their cargo volume specs. Their cargo areas are very different, though, which means it's smart to look beyond the official volumes.
The Envista has a longer, more trunk-like cargo area. The Kicks has a taller, boxier space that results not only in greater capacity on paper and in practice but in better versatility too. The components needed for the Kicks' available all-wheel-drive system reduce cargo space, but even then the Kicks will still have more space than the Envista.
Advantage: Kicks
Features and value
The $23,220 base Kicks S trim level is pretty dour-looking on the inside and has a small 7-inch touchscreen. It starts at $23,220 including destination fees. Thankfully, the more expensive Kicks SV ($25,070) and SR ($27,570) get padded, upholstered surfaces on the dash and doors, plus a colorful, feature-packed 12.3-inch touchscreen. It's a surprisingly cool and high-quality environment for the money.
The Envista interior has a more refined design, and there's less of a difference between trim levels with better overall materials quality. Every trim has a 10-inch touchscreen that's easier to use than the Kicks' base system but not quite as appealing as its 12.3-inch upgrade.
The Envista's base Preferred trim level starts at $25,195. That's more than the base Kicks, but its feature content is closer to the similarly priced Kicks SV. From there, the value equation tilts back and forth depending on the optional packages you choose, but ultimately, these two are similarly priced and equipped. The most expensive Envista Avenir with the Advanced Safety package goes for $30,790, while the priciest front-wheel-drive Kick SR with the Premium package is $29,520.
Advantage: tie
Edmunds says
The Nissan Kicks offers cool design, lots of features, strong fuel economy and surprising practicality, but the Envista's superior passenger space and performance add up to a stronger SUV overall. Its more re
_____
This story was provided to The Associated Press by the automotive website Edmunds. James Riswick is a contributor at Edmunds.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
4 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Edmunds SUV test: The new Nissan Armada takes a run at the Chevrolet Tahoe
Fuel-efficient SUVs and crossovers are quite popular these days, but there's still a need for a full-size SUV that can carry up to eight passengers and tow a heavy load. The Chevrolet Tahoe and Nissan Armada are among a small selection of models that can handle the assignment. Both have truck-based designs that provide plenty of muscular capability. Redesigned for 2025, the Armada has fresh styling, a new turbocharged V6 engine and an updated interior. For its part, the Tahoe could easily be considered a benchmark. Its robust V8 power and capability have helped it earn its place in plenty of American driveways over the years, and the 2025 Tahoe features revised styling and new technology features. Which of these full-size SUVs is the better buy? Edmunds' automotive experts compared them to find out. Performance and fuel economy The Armada has a new turbocharged V6 that cranks out 425 horsepower and 516 lb-ft of torque. This is plenty for both high-speed cruising power and ample low-end thrust. That tops the Tahoe's standard V8, which makes 335 horsepower and 383 lb-ft, as well as the optional V8 with 420 horsepower and 460 lb-ft. The Armada's power advantage showed up at the Edmunds test track. It sprinted from zero to 60 mph in 6.3 seconds. A Tahoe with its base V8 is considerably slower, needing 7.7 seconds to get to 60 mph, though the more powerful V8 helps close the gap. The Tahoe can play an ace card with its optional six-cylinder diesel engine. Its power output of 277 horsepower and 460 lb-ft won't blow you away, but it does get up to an EPA-estimated 24 mpg in combined city/highway driving. That's the best mpg of the Tahoe lineup as well as the Armada's V6, which gets up to an EPA-estimated 18 mpg. We like the Armada's strong standard power, but the Tahoe's optional diesel shouldn't be overlooked if you prioritize fuel efficiency. Winner: tie Towing Despite its power advantage, the Armada doesn't offer much towing supremacy. Its 8,500-pound limit edges the Tahoe by just 100 pounds. Both models offer similar towing features, including a trailer hitch, wiring, and trailer brake and sway controls. Upper-trim Armadas add extras such as an integrated brake controller and hill descent control, while the Tahoe's optional Max Trailering package does roughly the same. But the devil's in the details. The Tahoe's 8,400-pound towing limit requires that Max Trailering package. That can make finding the best Tahoe for your needs a bit trickier. In base form, the Tahoe can still tow up to 7,900 pounds. Impressive, but that's 600 pounds shy of the Armada's. WINNER: Armada Comfort and cargo Both SUVs have a smooth ride quality considering their truck-based origins. The Armada and the Tahoe are also each available with an adaptive air suspension system that helps to further enhance ride and comfort and provides the ability to raise or lower the vehicle's ride height. Inside, the Armada impressed us with its excellent seat comfort. The Tahoe's seats, in comparison, feel hard and thinly padded. Both models offer similar headroom and legroom, though the Tahoe treats second-row passengers with 3 extra inches of legroom. The Tahoe provides more cargo space, with about 5 more cubic feet (25.5 cubic feet) behind the third row and about 25% more capacity with all rear seats folded. WINNER: Tie Features and value Pricing for the 2025 Tahoe starts at $62,095, including destination, for a rear-wheel-drive LS trim. Nissan kicks off with the Armada SV trim that costs $59,530. Both come with a similar set of features to start out. You get wireless connectivity for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto smartphone integration, large digital gauge clusters and many standard advanced driver aids, such as adaptive cruise control. Both SUVs also offer available hands-free driving systems, though we've found Chevy's Super Cruise system to be more useful and capable than Nissan's ProPilot Assist system. The most expensive Tahoe and Armada trim levels ring up at the register at about $80,000. With three engines and dozens of options, the Tahoe can be tailored to more specific tastes than the Armada. It also delivers higher maximum fuel economy, though you'll need the pricey diesel engine to get it. In general, the Armada will cost less while providing comparable features and capability. Winner: Armada Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Edmunds says The Tahoe and Armada are both strong picks for a full-size family SUV. But the Armada's fresher design, extra power and towing capacity, and slightly lower pricing make it more compelling overall. ____________ This story was provided to The Associated Press by the automotive website Edmunds. Dan Frio is a contributor at Edmunds.
CBC
6 days ago
- CBC
What Trump's environmental plan targeting key pollution rules means for carmakers
The Environmental Protection Agency's plan this week to relax rules aimed at cleaning up auto tailpipe emissions is the latest Trump administration move to undo incentives for automakers to go electric. As part of a larger effort to undo climate-based governmental regulations, the EPA said it wants to revoke the 2009 finding that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. That would cripple the legal basis for limiting emissions from things like power plants and motor vehicles. President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending law already targets EV incentives, including the imminent removal of a credit that saves buyers up to $7,500 USD on a new electric car. The tax law approved in early July also includes another provision that will hit Tesla and other EV makers in the pocketbook — repealing fines for automakers that don't meet federal fuel economy standards. Automakers can buy credits under a trading program if they don't meet the mileage standards. EV makers like Tesla, which don't rely on gasoline, earn credits that they can sell to other carmakers. The arrangement has resulted in billions of dollars in revenue for Tesla and millions for other EV makers like Rivian. That is all set to go away under the new law. Trump has also challenged federal EV charging infrastructure money and blocked California's ban of new gas-powered vehicle sales. It adds up to less pressure on automakers to continue evolving their production away from gas-burning vehicles. And that's significant because transportation - which also includes ships, trains and planes - is the sector that contributes the most to planet-warming emissions in the U.S. Push and pull on tailpipe and mileage rules Stringent tailpipe emissions and mileage rules were part of the Biden administration's pledge to clean up the nation's vehicles and reduce use of fossil fuels by incentivizing growth in EVs. EVs do not use gasoline or emit greenhouse gases. The Trump administration and the auto industry have said both rules were unreasonable for manufacturers. Automakers could meet EPA tailpipe limits with about 56 per cent of new vehicle sales being electric by 2032 — they're currently at about 8 per cent — along with at least 13 per cent plug-in hybrids or other partially electric cars, and more efficient gasoline-powered cars that get more miles to the gallon. The Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy pressured the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration earlier this year to reverse the rules, and has recently said Biden's inclusion of EVs in calculating them was illegal. NHTSA will likely reset or significantly weaken them. The fines that are going away Then there are the fines that automakers will no longer face for falling short on the fuel economy rules. "With the signing of the One Big Beautiful Bill, new penalties for automakers not complying with an illegal fuel economy standard designed to push EVs will be zero," NHTSA spokesman Sean Rushton said in a statement. Some legacy automakers have paid hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties for not meeting them. Just last year, Jeep-maker Stellantis paid $264-million for model years 2019 and 2020, and General Motors paid $178 million US for the 2016 and 2017 model years. Automakers that didn't meet the standards could also instead buy credits from carmakers that did — or even surpassed them — such as Tesla. That provision earned Tesla $3.9 billion in 2024 — revenue it will no longer see. Elon Musk sharply criticized the big tax-and-spending bill in June, saying it "gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the law's effect on those credits. The agency wrote to carmakers earlier this month informing them the penalties wouldn't be issued from the model year 2022 onward. Some automakers confirmed receiving the letter but declined to comment further. Experts say without them, the law "invites automakers to cheat on government fuel economy rules by setting fines to $0, ensuring consumers will buy more gas guzzlers, pay more at the pump and enrich Big Oil," said Dan Becker, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign. Ann Carlson, an environmental law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, and a former acting NHTSA administrator under Biden, called it a "stunning decision" for NHTSA to essentially forgive the fines from 2022 onward. She said it amounted to a windfall for companies that chose to pay penalties rather than produce more efficient cars. Carlson said backing away from future fines also "poses a dilemma for auto manufacturers who may feel bound to comply with the law, even if there is not a financial consequence for failing to do so." Where auto manufacturers go from here It takes a while for carmakers to shift their product lines, and experts say automakers might be locked into their technology and manufacturing decisions for the next few model years. But changes could come for model year 2027 and beyond, they said. EVs aren't as profitable as gas-engine cars, so automakers may make fewer of them if they no longer have to offset emissions from their gasoline models. Already, some automakers have pulled back on their ambitions to go all-electric with a slower pace of EV sales growth. "Automakers also know every presidential administration eventually comes to an end, so they won't abandon their EV development efforts," said Karl Brauer, executive analyst at "But they will reduce their near-term efforts in this area."
Winnipeg Free Press
06-08-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Edmunds: The best used hybrid sedans for under $25,000
Everybody wants to save money. Buying a lightly used car instead of a new car is one way to do that. Choosing a fuel-efficient hybrid model is another way. Combine those approaches, and you might be surprised to discover what you can drive even when you're on a tight budget. The five hybrid sedans listed below in alphabetical order are worthy of consideration due to their low prices, great EPA-estimated fuel economy, and favorable crash test ratings. Edmunds' automotive experts think they're the best used hybrid sedans for under $25,000. 2018-2024 Honda Accord Hybrid Thanks to its spacious back seat and large trunk, the Honda Accord Hybrid can easily accommodate a family of four or five, making it an ideal car for summer road trips and big-box shopping excursions. This midsize sedan's model lineup ranges from basic to sporty or luxurious, and depending on the version, you can expect EPA-estimated combined fuel economy of between 43 mpg and 48 mpg. Favorable crash test ratings are a bonus. Look for: Honda added a Sport trim level in 2022. A redesign for 2023 brought a more sophisticated and refined version of Honda's hybrid powertrain, which became standard on all higher-priced Accords that year. 2018-2024 Honda Accord Hybrid pricing (under 50,000 miles): approximately $19,000-$25,000 2019-2022 Honda Insight If the Accord Hybrid is too large, consider the smaller Insight sedan as an alternative. It gets better gas mileage, comfortably accommodates four people, and boasts a trunk as spacious as the trunks of some midsize cars. Honda based this version of the Insight on the popular Civic sedan, giving the Insight different styling and a more upscale-feeling interior. According to EPA combined estimates, you can expect 48 mpg to 52 mpg, depending on which trim level you choose. The Insight also boasts exceptionally good crash test ratings. Look for: Honda added blind-spot warning with rear cross-traffic alert to the Insight EX and Touring in 2021. 2019-2022 Honda Insight pricing (under 25,000 miles): approximately $21,000 to $25,000 2021-2025 Hyundai Elantra Hybrid Aside from its distinctive styling and impressive technology, what helps the Hyundai Elantra Hybrid stand apart is its dual-clutch automatic transmission. That design eliminates the typical acceleration drone common to hybrids, making the Elantra more satisfying to drive. It doesn't negatively impact fuel economy either. According to EPA combined estimates, this reasonably roomy compact car averages 50-54 mpg. Look for: The Blue trim level offers the best fuel economy. In 2024, Hyundai updated the styling, added more driver assist features, and improved the infotainment system. 2021-2025 Hyundai Elantra Hybrid pricing (under 25,000 miles): approximately $18,000 to $25,000 2018-2024 Toyota Camry Hybrid Toyota has been building Camry Hybrids for nearly two decades, and the car has earned a reputation for efficiency and longevity. Since 2018, a sense of style has also been a part of the recipe, and with the SE and XSE trim levels, there are hints of sportiness. The Camry isn't the roomiest midsize sedan available, but its EPA estimates of 46 mpg to 52 mpg, track record of durability, and impressive crash test ratings help make up for that. Look for: The LE trim level offers the best fuel economy. Toyota introduced a sporty and upscale XSE version in 2021 and an SE Nightshade Edition in 2022. 2018-2024 Toyota Camry Hybrid pricing (under 50,000 miles): approximately $20,000 to $25,000 2020-2025 Toyota Corolla Hybrid Compared to a Camry Hybrid, you won't give up too much passenger or cargo space by choosing the smaller Toyota Corolla Hybrid. This thrifty model went on sale in 2020 but only in a basic LE trim level. In 2023, Toyota expanded the lineup to include sporty SE and upscale XLE versions and also enhanced the powertrain, driver assist systems, and infotainment technology. You can even get a Corolla Hybrid with all-wheel drive. The EPA expects this Toyota to achieve an average fuel economy of 44-52 mpg, depending on the specific year and configuration. Look for: If your budget allows, consider buying a 2023 or newer model. In 2024, the SE Nightshade Edition came with spiffy bronze-finish wheels 2020-2025 Toyota Corolla Hybrid pricing (under 25,000 miles): approximately $19,000 to $25,000 Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Edmunds says If you're set on buying a used hybrid sedan under $25,000, there are several great choices available. At that price, the smaller models have fewer miles and are more widely available. However, if you need a family-size car that achieves 45 mpg or better, the Accord Hybrid and Camry Hybrid prove that you don't need to spend a lot to get a lot for your money. ____________ This story was provided to The Associated Press by the automotive website Edmunds. Christian Wardlaw is a contributor at Edmunds.
