Conrad Black: Israel is delivering a lethal blow to global terrorism

National Post

21-06-2025

We are at a decisive moment in the history of the Jews. 'Never Again!' was the rallying cry of the Jewish people after approximately half the world's Jews were gassed and incinerated in the death camps of the Third Reich, six million Jews, along with at least six-million non Jews who were also murdered by the Nazis (including three million Soviet POWs and as many as 500,000 Romani). The Jews did not have a state in the 25 centuries between the Persian occupation of the kingdom of Judea of Saul and David and Solomon, and the creation of the State of Israel as an explicitly Jewish country in 1948. For all of that time, the Jews were reviled as 'rootless cosmopolitans, usurers and sharpers' because they were excluded from the professions. They had no place of safety from the perennial evils of antisemitism. As Jewish scholar Dara Horn has written, the world 'loves dead Jews.' Those that retained a sense of optimistic goodwill, like Anne Frank, expiated the rest of us.
Article content
Article content
The wars inflicted upon Israel by its Arab neighbours in 1948, 1967, and 1973 — while the existence of the Jewish state was contested — did not aim to kill the entire Jewish people. King Hussein of Jordan and President Sadat of Egypt were civilized statesmen who ultimately composed their differences with Israel. The fanatical Islamic pseudo-theocracy in Iran openly and proudly espouses its objective of destroying the Jewish state and its Jewish population. This is the first existential challenge the Jews have faced since the defeat of the Nazis.
Article content
Article content
Article content
War is odious and tragic, but the spectacle of Israel which has 1.33 per cent of Iran's landmass and 10.7 per cent of its population emancipating itself from the spectre of nuclear destruction by hammering this evil regime is edifying, and the whole world should salute the courage and the determination of the Jewish State and the solidarity with it of the United States.
Article content
It is inexpressibly disappointing to see the spread of spurious moral relativism over events in the Middle East. Calls for a ceasefire in Gaza are really just calls for a return to the status quo ante bellum in which Hamas continually provoked and intermittently invaded Israel, and on October 7, brutally murdered 1200 people and kidnapped 251 others, some of whom were murdered in custody.
Article content
Article content
The predictable clichéd request of the G7 leaders (except for President Donald Trump who retains a grasp of geopolitical facts) for ' de-escalation ' in the Israel-Iran conflict, is effectively a call to enable and encourage Iran to complete and deploy nuclear weapons. The widespread lamentations about American withdrawal from the Iran nuclear agreement are utter nonsense, since that agreement would, at this point, give Iran an outright green light to join the ranks of nuclear military powers. Although some of the neighbouring Arab countries have uttered pro forma statements of disapproval of the Israeli attack on Iran, the Saudis and Egyptians in particular, had been urging the United States for years to interdict the Iranian nuclear program, and they are all informally urging Israel forward, as Prime Minister Netanyahu confirmed on Wednesday.
Article content
The world's nuclear nonproliferation system is a farce, and if Iran were responsibly governed, even as responsibly as North Korea and Pakistan which are nuclear powers, the Iranian government would have a good point in claiming that the existing nuclear powers are not disarming at all, and are simply conducting an elite club of super-armed states righteously discouraging other countries from joining them. All that can be said for the present regime is that it is probably preferable to what will certainly happen if Iran does become a nuclear military power: an unlimited number of countries will do the same and avoidance of nuclear war will no longer be based on a policy of restraint in developing and deploying nuclear weapons, but rather in a policy of general deterrence, and in a few cases, intricate and extraordinarily expensive anti-missile defences, which only the United States and a few other countries would be financially and scientifically capable of building.