
The semiconductor race: Why America relies on Taiwan and China wants to catch up
The United States leads the world in chip design, with companies like NVIDIA, Intel, and AMD pushing boundaries in AI, gaming, and data processing. However, when it comes to manufacturing, America is a little bit behind. Nearly 90% of the world's most advanced chips are made in Taiwan, not the U.S. (2). That means American innovation still depends on foreign factories — and that dependence has raised serious concerns about national security and economic stability.
Taiwan, through TSMC, has become the world's chip factory. With unmatched technological capabilities and a tightly coordinated supply chains, Taiwan produces chips as small as 3 nanometers — thousands of times thinner than a human hair. South Korea, through Samsung, also plays a key role. But Taiwan's dominance in the most advanced chips makes it a critical link in the global tech supply chain.
Meanwhile, China has invested billions into building its own chip industry, but it's still years behind. Facing U.S. export bans on key tools and software, China struggles to produce chips smaller than 14 nanometers. While companies like SMIC have made progress, they are not yet competitive with TSMC or Samsung. The Chinese government's ambition is clear — reduce reliance on imports, catch up in manufacturing, and eventually lead in both innovation and scale. But as one report notes, even after years of investment, China still produces only about 16% of the chips it needs, relying heavily on foreign suppliers to meet domestic demand. The question remains: how long will it take for China to catch up, or will it ever?
While China is making significant progress, limits remain clear. According to Rest of World, China heavily subsidizes its semiconductor industry, achieving breakthroughs in chip design and memory—such as HiSilicon's Ascend series and YMTC's 294-layer NAND chips—but still lags far behind in chip production equipment, especially lithography.
SMIC has produced 7nm chips and is working on 5nm with Huawei, but lacks the EUV machines TSMC uses; its older equipment leads to low yields, high costs, and limited scale. India also notes that SMEE, China's light‑exposure tech, is '15–20 years behind ASML'. Analysts like Chris Miller argue SMIC is consistently about five years behind TSMC, and while China's chipmakers gradually improve, so do their competitors.
So, can China truly catch up? It may narrow some gaps, but closing the lead in design, production tools, and industrial scale will likely take many more years—and may never fully materialize without access to cutting-edge equipment and global partnerships.
Semiconductors are not just technology, but as a mirror reflecting a country's capacity and ambition. The U.S. still excels in design, Taiwan leads in manufacturing, and China is fiercely determined to catch up—yet real bottlenecks remain. In a world shaped by AI, chips define more than tools; they outline our future. Related

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
20 minutes ago
- Politico
Businesses got some clarity on Trump's trade deal. They aren't reassured.
That's a reference to the fact that Trump's much-hyped trade agreements were verbal — there hasn't been any documentation backing up what the two sides agreed to. Already, major trading partners like the European Union and Japan have cast doubt on whether they could meet their investment and purchasing pledges, and Vietnam has not even publicly confirmed it agreed to the terms Trump announced in their supposed deal inked in early July. 'I think the lens has become a little clearer' in terms of tariff rates, said Stephen Lamar, the president of American Apparel and Footwear association, which represents brands like J Crew and L.L. Bean that rely heavily on imports from countries like China and Vietnam. Lamar predicted that many of those duties 'are probably going to be it for a while,' but added, 'We don't yet have enough information to make the kinds of long term decisions that need to be made right now, and even the shorter term decisions of, 'how I'm going to price my spring collection?'' The White House has largely dismissed complaints from business warnings that the tariffs will drive up costs for importers and, ultimately, American consumers. Trump has singled out specific companies, like Wal-Mart, demanding that they 'eat the tariffs' and has repeatedly suggested to business leaders that they should avoid the duties by shifting production to the U.S. 'President Trump's trade deals have unlocked unprecedented market access for American exports to economies that in total are worth over $32 trillion with 1.2 billion people,' said Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson. 'As these historic trade deals and the Administration's pro-growth domestic agenda of deregulation and The One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts take effect, American businesses and families alike have the certainty that the best is yet to come.' The administration also claims economists overestimated how much the tariffs would affect the economy, pointing to the fact that inflation is still largely meeting its targets and that there has yet to be a recession, like some economists predicted. 'I think they are looking at the current numbers as support for the lack of impact of these tariffs,' said Greg Ahearn, the president and CEO of the Toy Association, whose members are largely small and mid-sized businesses that have a harder time absorbing higher duties. 'But I think most people believe wholeheartedly that the impact of these tariffs is going to be felt in the months ahead. And the reason why is that production and manufacturing and the goods as they flow through the supply chain takes time.' Ahearn pointed to Friday's weak jobs report, including signs that there were actually fewer new jobs created in May and June than previously estimated, as evidence the impact of Trump's trade policies are just starting to show up in the data. There are already signs that the tariffs have begun driving up prices on purchases such as furniture, apparel and toys, which helped push up the inflation rate in June. And Lamar warned that, 'Once those prices go up, they have a hard time coming down.' Many business leaders fear that this week's worrying economic numbers are only the beginning of a more sustained downturn. 'Inflation and price increases are coming,' Ahearn said. 'Layoffs have already been occurring. And supply is going to be lower as we head into the holiday season. These are all happening.'
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Did Micron Stock Drop Today?
Key Points Samsung says the market for HBM memory for artificial intelligence (AI) functions is getting oversupplied. Samsung will cut prices on the most powerful HBM3E product in an attempt to win market share. Wells Fargo says this is bad news for Micron. 10 stocks we like better than Micron Technology › Shares of computer memory-maker Micron Technology (NASDAQ: MU) tumbled 5.2% through 11:25 a.m. ET Thursday -- but as far as I can tell, it wasn't anything Micron did to deserve this. Instead, it was Samsung that's to blame. What Samsung said about high-bandwidth memory (HBM) As WCCFTech reports this morning, Samsung has just announced it's lowering prices on HBM3E (that's "High Bandwidth Memory 3 Enhanced," currently the most capable kind of HBM memory, designed for use in artificial intelligence and machine learning). Samsung explained that on the one hand, it hasn't been able to win as much HBM business from Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) as it would like, while on the other hand, the HBM market seems oversupplied right now. And the solution to both problems -- to help Samsung move product -- is to lower prices. Is Micron stock a sell? For Micron, this poses a problem -- because Micron also wants to sell HBM3E memory, and now Samsung has effectively declared a price war in the HBM market. In order to fight it, Micron will have to lower its own prices (hurting Micron's revenue and profit), or else it will lose market share to Samsung (also hurting Micron's revenue and profit!) And if that sounds like a lose-lose proposition for Micron, that's because it is. In a note on The Fly this morning, Wells Fargo warned that Samsung's action will "impact market prices," drying up much of the premium in prices between HBM3E and plain-vanilla DRAM memory, perhaps as early as H2 2025 (i.e., now). Priced at just 20x trailing earnings, Micron stock may not look too expensive. But if profits are about to dry up as Samsung's price cuts take hold, Micron stock could look expensive in a hurry. Savvy investors might want to sell before that happens. Should you invest $1,000 in Micron Technology right now? Before you buy stock in Micron Technology, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Micron Technology wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $638,629!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,098,838!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,049% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Wells Fargo is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Did Micron Stock Drop Today? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Miami Herald
33 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Ford CEO Says Its Newest EVs Are Ready for Its "Model T Moment"
During Ford's second-quarter earnings call with investors on the evening of July 30, Ford CEO Jim Farley revealed that the automaker is set to reveal its new strategy centered around a new line of electric vehicles underpinned by a new platform. In his remarks, Farley said that the future plans would be a "Model T moment," referring to the 120-year-old model that was the world's first mass-produced, affordable car. He hinted at a transformative breakthrough that would help position Ford to sell a new line of electric cars aimed at competing against low-cost Chinese models from known names like BYD. "On Aug. 11, that will be a big day for all of us at Ford. We will be in Kentucky to share more about our plans to design and build a breakthrough electric vehicle and a platform in the U.S.," Farley said. "This is a Model-T moment for us at Ford. A chance to bring a new family of vehicles to the world that offer incredible technology, efficiency, space, and features." In the past, the Ford CEO admitted his admiration for his Chinese competition. Late last year, he revealed on a podcast appearance that he daily drove a Xiaomi SU7 that Ford used for benchmarking, adding that he was having a hard time giving it up. On the earnings call with Wall Street insiders, he acknowledged that Ford is falling behind its East Asian rivals, pegging them as their new competition to beat. Farley noted to the investors and Wall Street insiders listening in that the next EVs developed by its internal California-based "Skunkworks division" are set to be released within "the next year or two - starting," adding that its strategy against its Chinese counterparts "is to go and really push ourselves to radically reengineer and transform our engineering, supply chain and manufacturing process." "We really see, not the global (automakers) as our competitive set for our next generation of EVs, we see the Chinese. Companies like Geely, BYD," Farley said. "That's how we built our vehicle. How we've engineered what kind of supply chain we've used and the kind of low content in our manufacturing." Despite this, Farley's announcement underscores that Ford has yet to make any money selling its electric vehicles. Its internal "Model e" division, which is dedicated solely to EVs, has been hemorrhaging money for several quarters. During Q2 2025, Ford reported that the Model e division lost $1.3 billion, a worse quarter than the division's loss of $1.1 billion just a year earlier. Farley told the Wall Street analysts on July 30 that over the past three years, the automaker saw EV consumer demand and government regulations and support rapidly change, which pushed it to think carefully about its next moves. As part of its new EV strategy, Ford's CEO said it will offer EVs in select body styles in segments where it "can actually make money on EVs." Another part of that strategy is its investment in LFP, or lithium-iron-phosphate batteries -a cheaper, longer-lasting form of EV battery, particularly used in Chinese-market electric vehicles. Starting next year, it plans to build them at the BlueOval Battery Park in Marshall, Michigan, which he touts as "a big advantage for the company." But despite this, Ford feels that its investment in EVs is part of a larger lineup puzzle, which includes gas-powered cars like hybrids and extended range electric vehicles. "We think that's a much better move than a $60,000 to $70,000 all-electric crossover," Farley said. "We think [offering a variety of powertrains] is really what customers are going to want long term, and we're investing a lot in more durable internal combustion engine powertrains." This development feels like a preview of the end result of something that Farley and his Blue Oval engineers have been working on since he and other Ford executives learned of the level of innovation that Chinese automakers were capable of. In a September 2024 profile written by Mike Colias and published by The Wall Street Journal, Farley was described less as a traditional businessman than as a hands-on executive obsessed with his competition. The piece centered around a trip to China in 2023, during which Farley and other Ford executives got the full picture of their Chinese competition. According to the Journal, Farley's fascination with Chinese automakers began when he and Ford CFO John Lawler test-drove an electric SUV made by Changan, Ford's joint venture partner in China. "Jim, this is nothing like before," Lawler said to Farley after the drive, per the Journal. "These guys are ahead of us." In light of the signing of the "Big Beautiful Bill" and its provisions against EVs, Ford's EV announcement comes at an interesting time. Nonetheless, I wonder what kind of vehicle Farley will reveal in Kentucky come August 11. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.