BOSTON PIZZA ROYALTIES INCOME FUND ANNOUNCES RESULTS OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING VOTING
VANCOUVER, BC, July 3, 2025 /CNW/ - Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund (the " Fund") (TSX: BPF.UN) is pleased to announce the voting results from its annual general meeting of unitholders held on Thursday, July 3, 2025 in Richmond, British Columbia.
Marc Guay, Paulina Hiebert and Shelley Williams were re-elected to the Board of Trustees of the Fund for the ensuing year. Marc Guay will continue in the role of Chair of the Fund.
A total of 5,455,891 units and other securities with voting entitlements for the Fund (together, the " Voting Units") were represented at the meeting, being 22.23% of the Fund's issued and outstanding Voting Units. Detailed results of the ballot votes are provided below:
At the meeting, by a vote by show of hands, KPMG LLP was appointed as the auditor of the Fund for the ensuing year and the Trustees of the Fund were authorized to fix the remuneration of the auditor.
ABOUT US
The Fund is a limited purpose open ended trust with an excellent track record for investors since its IPO in 2002. Including the May 2025 distribution which was paid on June 30, 2025, the Fund has paid out 269 monthly distributions and three special distributions totaling $465.5 million or $28.03 per unit. The Fund earns revenue based on the franchise system sales of the 372 Boston Pizza restaurants in the Fund's royalty pool.
Boston Pizza is the premier casual dining brand in Canada. The first Boston Pizza restaurant opened in Edmonton, Alberta in 1964 and over 60 years later Boston Pizza proudly remains a 100% Canadian company serving communities from coast-to-coast-to-coast. It boasts a vast network of local franchise owners who collectively operate the largest number of dining rooms, sports bars, and patios across the nation, complemented by robust takeout and delivery services. Boston Pizza International Inc. has been recognized as a Franchisees' Choice Designation winner and a Platinum Member of Canada's 50 Best Managed Companies for many years, and has received awards from Great Place To Work in the categories of Best Workplaces: in Canada – 100-999 Employees, in British Columbia, in Retail & Hospitality, for Mental Wellness, for Women, for Giving Back, and with Most Trusted Executive Teams.
The trustees of the Fund have approved the contents of this news release.
SOURCE Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
13 minutes ago
Flight attendant union asks jobs minister not to intervene in Air Canada negotiations
The Canadian Union of Public Employees released a statement on Friday afternoon urging Federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu not to intervene in negotiations by invoking Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code, thereby permitting collective bargaining to continue and allowing the parties to negotiate a resolution. Air Canada had previously asked CUPE to consider binding interest arbitration, which would bring an arbitrator into the negotiations to make decisions on key agenda items that the two sides haven't been able to agree on. After CUPE declined that request earlier this week, Air Canada then asked Hajdu to make a referral under Section 107 that the negotiation be sent to arbitration. Hajdu gave CUPE until noon on Friday to respond. We thank the union for their response. We strongly urge the parties to work with federal mediators and get a deal done. Time's precious and Canadians are counting on you, Hajdu's press secretary said in a statement to CBC News. Air Canada warned Friday it is cancelling around 500 flights previously scheduled to take off today in anticipation of the work stoppage, with a full stoppage looming Saturday. The airline said on X that as of noon on Friday, 294 flights had been cancelled and more than 55,000 passengers had been impacted. It said it would notify customers of cancellations through email and text message, adding it recommends against going to the airport unless they have a confirmed booking and their flight still shows as operating. An Angus Reid Institute poll released on Friday suggested that four in five Canadians — about 84 per cent — believe it's unfair that Air Canada flight attendants are only paid for work when the plane is in the air. This is a key sticking point in negotiations that led to the impasse. The weighted survey came from a randomized sample of 1,507 Canadian adults, with a margin of error of +/- 2.0 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. With files from CBC's Jenna Benchetrit
Vancouver Sun
13 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Proposed national class action filed against Amazon for breaching privacy of Alexa users
A proposed class action lawsuit has been filed in the B.C. Supreme Court against Amazon over its Alexa technology. The lawsuit, submitted by B.C. law firm Charney Lawyers , alleges that Alexa products have collected more personal data from Canadian users than Amazon has disclosed. It also alleges that the tech giant retained the information, even when users tried to delete it, using it for business purposes such as training artificial intelligence and developing targeted advertising. The class action was filed in B.C., on behalf of representative plaintiff, Joseph Stoney, but its aim is to be national in scope. If the class action is certified by the court, it would cover all Canadian residents who had an Amazon Alexa account between 2014 and July 19, 2023. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'Had they learned about this after signing up for Alexa, users would have discontinued their accounts,' the statement of claim asserts. The essence of the lawsuit is the allegation that Amazon failed to obtain meaningful, informed consent for retention and use of this data. As a result, the alleged data collection and use breached both privacy and consumer protection laws in Canada. 'In its terms of service Amazon made explicit commitments to Alexa users regarding their privacy. However, rather than protecting users privacy, Amazon: (1) kept the data it took from Alexa indefinitely; (2) used that data to train its algorithms, machine learning programs and AI; and (3) failed to fully delete the data when customers asked it to.' The suit sets out that since 2014, Amazon has been developing and selling Amazon 'Echo' devices, which are controlled by its cloud-based voice assistant, Alexa. Alexa can activate intentionally or accidentally, the claim says. Once Alexa begins streaming audio to the cloud, the audio interaction is transcribed to text, the lawsuit states. Then it is processed by an algorithm that instructs the Alexa how to respond to the user. If a request has been processed, a copy of the audio file, the transcription, the resulting instructions to Alexa, and any associated metadata is stored in an Amazon database, the claim alleges. Prior to 2020, users had no way to delete Alexa interaction-related data, and it was stored indefinitely, says the claim. And even though Amazon introduced a deletion function in 2020, it adds, Amazon only deleted the audio file, while retaining a transcription, the instructions, and associated metadata. 'When a user chose to delete the data on one or more of their interactions with Alexa, Amazon changed what was visible to the user so that it appeared that the interactions had been completely deleted even though Amazon was actually retaining everything except the audio file,' the claim says. Charney Lawyers also argues that some of this data may have been collected accidentally when Alexa mistook regular sounds for its 'wake word.' This means conversations users never intended for the device might have been picked up, transcribed and saved. The claim notes that in May 2023, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a complaint against Amazon, alleging the company falsely represented that Alexa app users could delete voice recordings, transcripts and metadata. And instead, Amazon allegedly only deleted voice recordings, keeping transcripts and associated metadata. In July 2023, Amazon agreed to pay a US$25-million fine and 'effectively admitted to a number of instances of unlawful data misuse.' The suit seeks damages, repayment of any profits Amazon gained from the use of the data, as well as repayment of the amount users paid for Alexa products and services. For potential participants in the suit, there is a registration page set up by Charney Lawyers for people who want updates or to potentially take part in the action. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Calgary Herald
13 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Telus strikes back at Cogeco and defends Joly's decision to uphold CRTC's wholesale internet rules
'So it's always been in our DNA to compete and be present across the country,' said Benhadid. During the interview, he often highlighted Cogeco's business model, which includes investments abroad, notably its failed attempt to conquer the Portuguese market two decades ago. 'Cogeco's strategy is to compete in the U.S., outside of Canada,' said Benhadid. The Telus executive's comments came a few days after the CEO for Cogeco told National Post he wanted to 'ring the alarm bell' because he never thought that 'such a damaging, dangerous decision' as the one Joly made on Aug. 6 'would or could be made.' 'We had high hopes that this new government would make better decisions for business and the Canadian economy,' Frédéric Perron said. 'And what we saw last week, by the minister's decision, is more reminiscent of old Trudeau era, superficial policies.' Many key industry players expected Minister Joly to announce her rejection of the CRTC's decision. But for Telus's CTO, these comments came as a surprise. 'I am surprised, because objectively they don't stand in front of the economic theories test,' Benhadid said. At a time when Prime Minister Mark Carney wants to see Canadian companies invest in Canada, several players in the telecommunications industry say that Joly's decision will not encourage them to do so. Financial analyses they're citing, including from Bank of America and National Bank, predict that such decision would lead to 'a decline in future investments in telecommunications infrastructure.' This file has also become a political melodrama in some corners of Parliament Hill. Since Joly announced her decision on a hot and dry summer evening last week, she has remained silent and did not offer any other comments than the statement she released. On Thursday afternoon, the Bloc Québécois asked the minister to review the decision. 'Maintaining this status quo makes no sense, especially since even two of the three major telecommunications players opposed it. By doing so, Minister Joly will prevent smaller telecommunications players from becoming competitive and growing, and it is the citizens who will pay the price,' said the Bloc's Industry critic Gabriel Ste-Marie. But for Telus, the regulatory issue is settled, and its leadership team is ready to move forward. The company recently announced it will expand broadband services in Ontario and Quebec with $2-billion investment in areas that don't already have fibre. 'So the areas that companies are saying they're not going to invest in we will. And after five years, they will have access to this fibre,' he said. 'So, their strategy is to not compete in Canada. Their strategy is to do something else. And now they're trying to justify their strategic choices.' National Post atrepanier@ Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.
