logo
Recruiter Randstad's core profit meets market estimates in Q2

Recruiter Randstad's core profit meets market estimates in Q2

Yahoo6 days ago
(Reuters) -Dutch recruiter Randstad reported a second-quarter core profit in line with market expectations on Wednesday, citing improvements in some key markets, increased recruitment outsourcing demand and further cost reductions.
The world's largest employment agency posted quarterly earnings before interest, taxes and amortization (EBITA), and before one-offs, of 171 million euros ($200.63 million), roughly in line with the average forecast of 170 million from analysts polled by Randstad.
Recruiters including Randstad, Adecco and Hays have voiced concerns about the worsening job market driven by an escalating global trade war and economic struggles in major European markets like Germany and France.
In the second quarter, the underlying core profits in these markets still faced difficulties, with a narrowing EBITA loss in Germany and an organic earnings decline of 14% in France.
Randstad said it expected its gross margin and operating expenses to be slightly lower in the third quarter than in the previous three months.
($1 = 0.8523 euros)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

European Port Congestion is ‘Here to Stay' Through 2025
European Port Congestion is ‘Here to Stay' Through 2025

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

European Port Congestion is ‘Here to Stay' Through 2025

Congestion at European ports has been a common theme throughout the first half of the year, and there's very little sign that it will letting up any time soon. Vessels are enduring wait times of up to 10 days for a berth in the Port of Rotterdam's World Gateway Terminal, according to a customer advisory from HMM (Hyundai Merchant Marine) released Tuesday. More from Sourcing Journal China Threatens to Block $23B Port Deal Without Cosco Stake: Report What's the Status on Digital Product Passport Implementation? Trump Touts Trade Truce With Indonesia, Indicates India Might Not Be Far Behind The port's other major terminal, ECT, has a two-day wait for late arriving ships, but is enduring low labor turnout and longer-than-usual waiting times for trucks during peak hours. On Tuesday, Europe's largest seaport acknowledged what it called 'exceptional congestion' that has led to the wait times, mainly on land. 'Various causes, such as the transition to new sailing schedules (phasing in and out of services), high call sizes, changing alliances, work interruptions and challenging weather conditions at the beginning of the year have led to increasing waiting times on the land side of the deep-sea terminal operations,' the Netherlands-based port said. Although the Rhine River has experienced low water levels in 2025, the situation has 'not yet had a demonstrable negative effect on container handling' in the first half of the year, according to the port. Linerlytica data says Rotterdam has the fifth-most 20-foot equivalent units (TEUs) at anchorage among all ports, only behind three of China's biggest ports (Shanghai, Ningbo and Qingdao) and Singapore. Operational issues have befallen the Port of Antwerp-Burges as well, with its Noordzee Terminal seeing an average waiting time of 1.5 days, according to HMM. While the ocean carrier said dwell times were slowly improving, it also noted the period where containers can be accepted at the terminal's yard has been reduced from seven days to five days. Like Rotterdam, Antwerp has also dealt with heavy trucking congestion outside the port, complicating matters PSA, the terminal's operator, is suggesting truckers to consider truck slots during the night, and is imposing extra costs for those picking up cargo during peak hours. The port also attributed its own problems to other areas, including multiple labor strikes in recent months and supply chain shifts. 'Container ship arrivals remain irregular due to disruptions dating back to the Covid crisis, further exacerbated by rerouting around the Cape of Good Hope to avoid the Red Sea. The recent reshuffling of container alliances has temporarily led to simultaneous vessel calls and high cargo volumes,' said the port in a press release. 'Poor schedule reliability is complicating terminal planning: containers remain on site longer, and vessels are arriving with increasingly large loads.' Adding to the concerns at Europe's top two ports, as well as others like Hamburg and Bremerhaven in Germany and Valencia and Algeciras in Spain, more ships are flowing throughout the continent, particularly throughout Northern Europe. Intra-North European service capacity has grown by 17 percent, or 43,000 TEUs, compared to July 2024, according to data from Alphaliner. Carriers deployed more ships (235 compared to 223) in intra-North European services with a larger average size (1,253 TEUs vs. 1,128 TEUs). 'In terms of seasonality, July is typically the month wherein the most cargo is loaded from Far East to Europe, which means arrival into European ports in August and September,' said Lars Jensen, CEO of container shipping consultancy Vespucci Maritime, in a LinkedIn post. 'The lack of progress in removing port congestion in Europe is worrying seen in the light of this coming peak load of cargo.' According to E2open's Ocean Shipping Index, Rotterdam and Hamburg were the top two global ports contributing to longer export time performance in the second quarter. Vessels out of Rotterdam took 42 days to get to their destination on average, a three-day (7 percent) increase from the year prior. Ships sailing from Hamburg had an average journey of 43 days, or two days (5 percent) more than the prior-year period. 'The bad news is [port congestion is] here to stay for the remainder of 2025, causing operational disruption and pushing freight rates up,' said Peter Sand, chief analyst at freight benchmarking platform Xeneta, in commentary posted July 8. As of Friday, average spot rates from the Far East to Northern Europe were up 18 percent compared to end-June, Sand noted. The trade lane has seen container prices skyrocket 78 percent since the end of May to $3,410 per 40-foot equivalent unit, driven heavily by the congestion. 'Carriers have been forced to revise service schedules, whether that is avoiding port calls in congestion hot spots or calling at ports they would not ordinarily do so,' said Sand. 'This causes disruption that becomes exponentially difficult to unwind and another painful headache for shippers.' This month, Gemini Cooperation partners Hapag-Lloyd and Maersk announced their NE4/AE5 service on the Asia-to-Europe trade lane will temporarily operate with a revised port rotation starting in September. Hamburg will be called before Bremerhaven, and ports in Aarhus, Denmark and Gothenburg, Sweden will be added to the rotation. With these adjustments, the carriers aim to improve schedule reliability and address the fluctuating congestion. Additionally, Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) has adjusted its Asia-to-Northern Europe services, taking two port calls out of Antwerp. The Swan service will swap out Antwerp for the U.K.'s Port of Felixstowe, while its Britannia service will drop an inbound call at the Belgian gateway. Changing port calls isn't the only way carriers are trying to improve service throughout the ongoing disruptions. Hapag-Lloyd is introducing a 125-euro ($146) booking cancellation fee from Northern Europe as of Aug. 15. This fee applies to containers that are cancelled, reduced, rebooked within five calendar days before the scheduled estimated time of departure, or not loaded for any other reason. The fee is valid for all trades and container types. 'This update supports our efforts to reduce operational disruptions and maintain a high level of service reliability by minimizing the impact of last-minute booking changes, improving planning accuracy and equipment availability and ensuring fair access to vessel space for all customers,' Hapag-Lloyd said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Star demands £300k to replace Luis Diaz at Liverpool
Star demands £300k to replace Luis Diaz at Liverpool

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Star demands £300k to replace Luis Diaz at Liverpool

Liverpool must pay an awful lot of money if they're to sign an ideal replacement for Luis Diaz. The Colombian will join Bayern Munich shortly. Luis Diaz will leave Liverpool in the next few days. The winger is off the Bayern Munich, with the Reds having fully agreed a deal with the Bundesliga champions. Shop the LFC Store LFC Kits Shop Now LFC x New Era Shop Now LFC Signed Merch Shop Now LFC x Titleist Shop Now Diaz was always a possible exit this summer. Liverpool were open to a deal at the right price - it just took a little while to get to that price. Barcelona tried and failed to sign Diaz on the relative cheap, as did Bayern. Interest from Saudi Arabia never appeared to turn the player's head. But Bayern have eventually paid an amount Liverpool are happy with - and after Diaz made it clear he wanted to leave. Now comes the difficult bit: finding a replacement for the squad. And Liverpool's standout option may not be an option after his latest demands. Rodrygo Goes wants an awful lot of money Rodrygo Goes has been consistently linked with Liverpool over the last couple of weeks. He is expected to leave Real Madrid after falling out of favour under new boss Xabi Alonso. And the player is reportedly waiting on an offer from the Reds. Only, we're not certain it'll arrive. AS claims Rodrygo is chasing €10m net in yearly salary. After a bit of maths, that comes out to roughly £300k per week - an enormous sum for a player Liverpool would be taking a chance on. There is no question that Rodrygo is a massive talent and someone we'd love to have at Liverpool. He's completely unproven as a leading star, however, and that's 'leading star' money he's after there.

Higher US tariffs part of the price Europe was willing to pay for its security and arms for Ukraine
Higher US tariffs part of the price Europe was willing to pay for its security and arms for Ukraine

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Higher US tariffs part of the price Europe was willing to pay for its security and arms for Ukraine

BRUSSELS (AP) — France's prime minister described it as a 'dark day' for the European Union, a 'submission' to U.S. tariff demands. Commentators said EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen's handshake with President Donald Trump amounted to capitulation. The trouble is, Europe depends mightily on the United States, and not just for trade. Mirroring Trump, Von der Leyen gushed that the arrangement she endorsed over the weekend to set U.S. tariff levels on most European exports to 15%, which is 10% higher than currently, was 'huge.' Her staff texted reporters insisting that the pact, which starts to enter force on Friday, is the 'biggest trade deal ever.' A month after NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte ingratiated himself with Trump by referring to him as 'daddy,' the Europeans had again conceded that swallowing the costs and praising an unpredictable president is more palatable than losing America. 'It's not only about the trade. It's about security. It's about Ukraine. It's about current geopolitical volatility. I cannot go into all the details,' EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič told reporters Monday. 'I can assure you it was not only about the trade,' he insisted, a day after 'the deal' was sealed in an hour-long meeting once Trump finished playing a round of golf with his son at the course he owns in Scotland. The state of Europe's security dependency Indeed, Europe depends on the U.S. for its security and that security is anything but a game, especially since Russia invaded Ukraine. U.S. allies are convinced that, should he win, President Vladimir Putin is likely to take aim at one of them next. So high are these fears that European countries are buying U.S. weapons to help Ukraine to defend itself. Some are prepared to send their own air defense systems and replace them with U.S. equipment, once it can be delivered. 'We're going to be sending now military equipment and other equipment to NATO, and they'll be doing what they want, but I guess it's for the most part working with Ukraine,' Trump said Sunday, sounding ambivalent about America's role in the alliance. The Europeans also are wary about a U.S. troop drawdown, which the Pentagon is expected to announce by October. Around 84,000 U.S. personnel are based in Europe, and they guarantee NATO's deterrent effect against an adversary like Russia. At the same time, Trump is slapping duties on America's own NATO partners, ostensibly due to concerns about U.S. security interests, using Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, a logic that seems absurd from across the Atlantic. Weaning Europe off foreign suppliers 'The EU is in a difficult situation because we're very dependent on the U.S. for security,' said Niclas Poitiers at the Bruegel research institution in Brussels. 'Ukraine is a very big part of that, but also generally our defense is underwritten by NATO.' 'I think there was not a big willingness to pick a major fight, which is the one (the EU) might have needed with the U.S.' to better position itself on trade, Poitiers told The Associated Press about key reasons for von der Leyen to accept the tariff demands. Part of the agreement involves a commitment to buy American oil and gas. Over the course of the Russia-Ukraine war, now in its fourth year, most of the EU has slashed its dependence on unreliable energy supplies from Russia, but Hungary and Slovakia still have not. 'Purchases of U.S. energy products will diversify our sources of supply and contribute to Europe's energy security. We will replace Russian gas and oil with significant purchases of U.S. LNG, oil and nuclear fuels,' von der Leyen said in Scotland on Sunday. In essence, as Europe slowly weans itself off Russian energy it is also struggling to end its reliance on the United States for its security. The Trump administration has warned its priorities now lie elsewhere, in Asia, the Middle East and on its own borders. That was why European allies agreed at NATO's summit last month to spend hundreds of billions of dollars more on defense over the next decade. Primarily for their own security, but also to keep America among their ranks. The diplomacy involved was not always elegant. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' Rutte wrote in a private text message to Trump, which the U.S. leader promptly posted on social media. Rutte brushed off questions about potential embarrassment or concern that Trump had aired it, saying: 'I have absolutely no trouble or problem with that because there's nothing in it which had to stay secret.' A price Europe feels it must pay Von der Leyen did not appear obsequious in her meeting with Trump. She often stared at the floor or smiled politely. She did not rebut Trump when he said that only America is sending aid to Gaza. The EU is world's biggest supplier of aid to the Palestinians. With Trump's threat of 30% tariffs hanging over European exports — whether real or brinksmanship is hard to say — and facing the prospect of a full-blown trade dispute while Europe's biggest war in decades rages, 15% may have been a cheap price to pay. 'In terms of the economic impact on the EU economy itself, it will be negative,' Poitiers said. 'But it's not something that is on a comparable magnitude like the energy crisis after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, or even COVID.' 'This is a negative shock for our economy, but it is something that's very manageable,' he said. It remains an open question as to how long this entente will last. ___ Mark Carlson in Brussels contributed to this report. Lorne Cook, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store