logo
Head of nursing ‘can't recall' risk assessment behind Sandie Peggie's suspension

Head of nursing ‘can't recall' risk assessment behind Sandie Peggie's suspension

Independent17-07-2025
The head of nursing at NHS Fife has told an employment tribunal she cannot recall seeing a risk assessment which led to the suspension of nurse Sandie Peggie.
Gillian Malone said she perceived that allegations about Ms Peggie confronting transgender medic Dr Beth Upton were 'unacceptable'.
Ms Peggie was suspended after she complained about having to share a changing room with Dr Upton at the Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife – where they both worked – on Christmas Eve 2023.
She was placed on special leave and then suspended after Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment and cited concerns about 'patient care'.
Ms Peggie has lodged a claim against Fife health board and Dr Upton, citing the Equality Act 2010, including sexual harassment; harassment related to a protected belief; indirect discrimination and victimisation.
On Thursday, Ms Malone, told the tribunal she perceived a Datix report from January 3, 2024 regarding a conflict on Christmas Eve to be 'a discriminatory allegation'.
She said she had no role in the investigation, that she had never met Ms Peggie, and had no awareness of 'tension' between either the nurse or Dr Upton.
But she said she was aware of the nurse's concerns due to an email from August 2023.
Ms Malone told the tribunal the decision to suspend Ms Peggie was made following a risk assessment carried out by Esther Davidson, the nurse's line manager, however when asked if she had seen the risk assessment, she said: 'I can't recall.'
Giving evidence, she said: 'When I read content of Datix I thought the comments were concerning.
'At this time they were allegations, I did believe there was behaviour in there which could constitute bullying and harassment which were of concern and could require investigation.'
She added: 'Within original Datix there is a comment that there has been other work-related incidents.'
During cross-examination by Ms Peggie's barrister, Naomi Cunningham, Ms Malone – the most senior staff member to appear at the tribunal – said she agrees there are two biological sexes and that sex is a 'medically salient fact'.
Ms Cunningham read from an email sent by an HR worker, which said: 'We discussed suspension being last resort and options to mitigate risk…
'Esther felt it would be almost impossible to keep them apart so spoke to Gillian Malone… she believes there is a patient safety issue due to seriousness of the allegation and therefore wishes to suspend.'
Ms Cunningham said: 'It looks as though you were essentially behind the decision to suspend.'
Ms Malone said: 'It was Esther who completed the risk assessment.'
She was also asked about an email titled 'Formal Complaint' sent by Dr Upton on June 11.
Ms Cunningham then suggested the reason Ms Peggie was suspended was 'because she had told Dr Upton she wasn't happy about him using the women's changing room'.
Ms Cunningham said: 'That is the first documentary trace shown to the tribunal of the document 'Formal Complaint' which contains earlier incidents, being passed on to anyone from hospital management at all. Do you say that document was already in the hands of somebody, either as a printed out statement or sent as an email, before June 11?'
Ms Malone said: 'I'm not aware of that.'
Ms Cunningham said: 'Do you agree that if the tribunal finds that the reason for suspension was about the incident on Christmas Eve and wasn't about the prior allegations relating to patient care, that wasn't sufficient justification for suspension?'
Ms Malone said: 'The justification for suspension was based on a risk assessment which wasn't undertaken by me.'
Asked to identify what she perceived to be most unacceptable in the allegations made by Dr Upton, Ms Malone replied: 'I find it unacceptable that any colleague would confront another colleague in the manner described.'
She added that Ms Peggie should have raised concerns through her line manager rather than 'face-to-face on Christmas Eve'.
Ms Cunningham said: 'If the tribunal finds that the claimant didn't ask about his genes, would you say otherwise that was a point she was entitled to make, that he shouldn't be there? If she said to Dr Upton 'I don't think you should be here because you're a man', even if she didn't say anything about chromosomes?'
Ms Malone said: 'I think that was already raised back in August, I wouldn't have expected that to be face-to-face on Christmas Eve.'
Ms Cunningham added: 'I'm suggesting that by challenging Dr Upton's presence in the changing room she was complaining he was harassing her; it was her rejection of that harassment which gave rise also to the disciplinary and suspension, it was her refusal to tolerate what he was doing.'
Ms Malone said: 'It was the manner in which she raised it.'
The tribunal continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NHS tribunal involving nurse in trans changing room row adjourns until September
NHS tribunal involving nurse in trans changing room row adjourns until September

The Guardian

time20 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

NHS tribunal involving nurse in trans changing room row adjourns until September

The employment tribunal brought by a NHS Fife nurse who objected to sharing a changing room alongside a transgender woman doctor has adjourned ahead of closing submissions to be heard in September. Sandie Peggie, who has worked as a nurse for more than 30 years, claimed she was subject to unlawful harassment under the Equality Act when she was expected to share a changing room with a trans woman, Dr Beth Upton. The tribunal heard a further two weeks of witness evidence concluding on Tuesday. It is being watched closely for how it may be influenced by April's landmark judgment by the supreme court, which ruled the legal definition of a woman in the Equality Act 2010 did not include transgender women who held gender recognition certificates. The ruling has since been publicly welcomed by Peggie and her supporters. In earlier evidence, Peggie said she had felt 'embarrassed and intimidated' when Upton started to get changed alongside her, leading to a heated exchange on Christmas Eve in 2023, the details of which are disputed. NHS Fife has previously described Peggie's action as 'unnecessary and vexatious'. Upton is also disputing it. Recalled to give evidence a second time on Tuesday, Peggie told her lawyer Naomi Cunningham, that a number of other women shared her concerns about Upton but were reluctant to come forward because of the 'very toxic' situation with the health board. She named 13 NHS Fife workers including receptionists and a consultant who agreed that a transgender woman should not be using the women's changing rooms. Peggie was also questioned about allegations made by colleagues who previously gave evidence that she used racist slurs in chat messages and described Upton as a 'weirdo'. Defending comments about flooding in Pakistan as 'dark humour', she also admitted she had used racial slurs but said she was 'brought up like that', and said it was not a 'politically correct way'. She said when she asked for a photograph of Upton and used the phrase 'that weirdo', it was a picture from a night out 'where he looked like a man in a dress'. Under questioning by Jane Russell KC, representing Upton and NHS Fife, she denied 'waging a hate campaign against Dr Upton'. Peggie told the tribunal: 'I don't have any bad feelings about trans people, I just don't believe they should be in the women's changing room. I still believe a trans woman is a man and shouldn't be in the female changing room.' Peggie was suspended after she complained about having to share a changing room with Upton at the hospital on Christmas Eve in 2023 and was then placed on special leave and later suspended after Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment and cited concerns about 'patient care'. At the start of the second evidence hearing, NHS Fife confirmed Peggie had been cleared of the separate gross misconduct allegations after a 18-month internal process. Earlier in evidence, Gillian Malone, the head of nursing at NHS Fife told the tribunal she could not recall seeing the risk assessment which led to Peggie's suspension . Last week, the two senior lawyers clashed after Russell argued that Peggie's legal team were 'confusing' those giving evidence by referring to the doctor as 'he' and 'him' and 'creating a hostile environment for my witnesses'. In January, the employment judge Sandy Kemp rejected an NHS Fife request to impose an order preventing the use of male pronouns or terms to refer to Upton, concluding it was 'unfair' to ask Peggie and her lawyers to use terms they consider 'inaccurate'.

Why there won't be a Sandie Peggie judgment anytime soon
Why there won't be a Sandie Peggie judgment anytime soon

The Herald Scotland

time5 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Why there won't be a Sandie Peggie judgment anytime soon

But while all witnesses have now given evidence, we are still a very long way from a judgment. In fact, do not expect a judgment for months yet. Ms Peggie is suing her employer and Dr Beth Upton after she complained about having to share a changing room with the transgender medic at Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, on Christmas Eve 2023. The nurse was placed on special leave after Dr Upton made an allegation bullying, harassment and patient safety concerns. Ms Peggie was cleared of all gross misconduct allegations against her after NHS Fife's investigation found "insufficient evidence". Read more: However, the legal case continued with senior medics, nurses and digital forensic experts giving evidence. But where do we go from here? Next steps Evidence concluded on Tuesday, July 29, with both Naomi Cunningham, acting on behalf of claimant Ms Peggie, and Jane Russell KC, for NHS Fife, closing their cases. Employment Judge Sandy Kemp told the tribunal that written submissions - either partial or submission - needed to be submitted by noon on Tuesday. A skeleton argument in the legal context is a concise written outline of a legal team's argument. It serves as a roadmap for the judge and outlines the main issues at hand. Supplementary submissions can then be submitted up to August 25. This is additional information or documents that backs up the original legal argument. Read more: Dates are already in the diary for September 1 and 2. Both legal teams will return to the tribunal in Dundee to provide oral submissions. This is when the public will get to hear how the legal teams sum up their case and we'll get a sense of how strong the arguments are. Both Ms Cunningham and Ms Russell KC agreed to appear in person, not by video link. That then leaves a period of uncertainty. It is for the Employment Judge to go away and consider all of the evidence and written and oral submissions. Judgements can be handed down on the day but do not expect that in this instance. This employment tribunal has been extremely complex with thousands of pages of evidence to consider. Employment lawyers have told The Herald it is therefore likely a period of "avizandum" will follow. In Scots Law, this is when a judge decides to take time for private consideration before delivering a judgment. Realistically, we are looking at a minimum of six to eight weeks. But do not be surprised if this takes longer.

I spent my childhood in and out of hospital. At 19, I finally realised I had a terminal disease
I spent my childhood in and out of hospital. At 19, I finally realised I had a terminal disease

The Guardian

time6 hours ago

  • The Guardian

I spent my childhood in and out of hospital. At 19, I finally realised I had a terminal disease

Yvonne Hughes was 19, and attending the funeral of a friend with cystic fibrosis, when she realised: 'Oh shit, I'm going to die of this.' She had met him during shared hospital stays in childhood, and although Hughes had always known she had CF, she had never understood her illness as terminal until that day in 1992, when she stood at the back of the crowded chapel in Glasgow. For three days afterwards, she couldn't stop crying. 'I had a kind of meltdown. That's probably the first time I thought that this thing I had was going to kill me.' Over the next few months, Hughes, who was studying at the University of Glasgow, listened to her mum, dad and older sister chatting during family meals as if she was a ghost at the table. 'I pulled back from them. I deliberately didn't talk or include myself,' she says. 'I wanted them to get used to sitting and chatting without me, so that when I died, they wouldn't notice I wasn't there.' It's a harrowing responsibility for a teenager to take, but self-erasure must have felt like a way to pre-empt death, perhaps to resist it. When she was growing up, cystic fibrosis was considered 'a childhood disease' – because about half of those diagnosed did not survive their teens. A genetic condition in which the body creates thick, sticky mucus, it makes digestion difficult, damages lung function and can lead to respiratory failure. It affects about 160,000 people globally. Now 52, and enjoying what she calls a 'second chance' at life more than 30 years later, Hughes has emerged as a comedian. We are speaking on a video call before her one-hour show, Absolutely Riddled, which she is performing at the Edinburgh fringe, based on her experiences of living with the condition. 'I want to be true to myself and my story,' she says. Why does she think she survived when so many didn't? For most of her childhood, Hughes, who works as a community development worker in Renfrewshire, didn't regard herself as struggling for survival. Her parents didn't sit her down in childhood to explain her illness; she had been diagnosed at six weeks old. But there were hospital visits and tablets and eating often made her vomit. Gradually, she says, she 'put together those two words, cystic and fibrosis, with something that I had'. At school, she kept her illness hidden, taking her medication at home. She was popular; joined the Brownies, then Guides. 'I'm a very level-headed person, but I keep a lot in my mind. I remember when I was younger thinking: 'There's no point telling people about this because everyone is dealing with something. I'm nothing special.' I just got on with it.' Roughly one in every 2,500 people are born with cystic fibrosis in the UK, Australia and the US. Hughes's older sister does not have the illness and the family had no idea what it meant for their lives, or for Hughes herself. Only as she grew older did Hughes build a sense of the precariousness of her life. 'My mum said to me: 'We thought you were going to die, every day. We just didn't know.' It became their new normal to keep me alive.' If she got a chest infection, pleurisy or pneumonia, she would go into hospital, and over the years made friends on the CF ward, a fragile community. When the curtains were closed around a bed for a long time, Hughes and the other children knew not to go past. She reasoned with herself, to allay her fears: 'People were dying around me but I put it down to: 'Maybe they had a really bad infection, maybe they were worse than me.'' In childhood, she developed 'a lot of level-headed thought processes around why those people died'. She found solace in the Cystic Fibrosis Trust magazine, and dreamed of attending one of the advertised camps. 'Luckily, I didn't,' she says, because in the early 1990s, scientists discovered that the camps were a hotbed for the spread of bacteria, present in the lungs and phlegm of children with CF. Many cross-infected each other, some with fatal consequences. Did Hughes struggle to accept that sense of herself, as both vulnerable and a threat? 'Absolutely,' she says. Hospitals implemented a policy of segregation, according to bacteria carried. Hughes has the pseudomonas bacteria, and after her friend's funeral in 1992, she stopped seeing people with cystic fibrosis in case they had different bacteria or bugs that might lead to cross-infection. She has stayed in touch by phone with one old friend. 'We shared growing up in the hospital ward and I do love speaking to him.' But after that funeral, 'I became reckless,' she says. 'I thought: 'Well, life's for living. I'm just going to do what I want.' I didn't care very much for myself. I thought: 'What's the point?' I spiralled.' Her 20s and 30s passed in a blur of 'festivals, partying, travelling when I could, flying by the seat of my pants … ' She had hoped to meet someone, and to have children. 'I thought it would happen. And it never did.' In her 30s, her lung function got so low – 45%, then 36% – that she wouldn't have been able to sustain a pregnancy anyway. 'That was something I tried to grieve. But over the course of a year, I thought: 'I'd rather be alive.' My mantra became: 'I'd rather have a full and short life than a long and unhappy one.' These kinds of philosophical things got me through.' Hughes doesn't have a mantra now – 'other than trying to be funny'. The frequency of her performances range from three times a week to every few weeks, depending on her health needs. But even in her reckless phase, she embodied a stoicism, too. She worked throughout – at a call centre, a radio station, the CF Trust. 'I just had to keep going, pay my bills and mortgage.' Did she ever wonder: 'Why me?' She has had years of spitting out and swallowing mucus – 'constant, constant' – hankies everywhere, non-stop sterilising of stuff, endless medication and pain, unable to take the next breath for granted. As a child, when she went into hospital, there was a faint sense of privilege at being given Lucozade and new slippers, things her sister didn't get. But no one else in her family has the illness. Didn't she feel aggrieved? 'It's a difficult question,' she says. 'I've thought about 'Why me?' in a positive sense – that it was me because I could handle it. Or, I'm glad … because this has made me the way I am.' She has also thought, 'Why at all? Why did cystic fibrosis come into being? Why have this weird disease that just kind of ruins lives?' While Hughes survived childhood by reminding herself that she wasn't special, the differences between her life and others' sharpened as she entered her 40s. She became an aunt, and bore close witness to her peers' life transitions while she kept on being 'just Yvonne – the one that never reached any potential'. 'I couldn't have a career because I would always get ill. I never moved social class. I always remained working class.' Her dad was a welder, her mother a GP receptionist. 'Everything I did, I did myself. But it was day by day, week by week. There was never a plan. I always felt I could never get ahead of myself.' In 2018, aged 45, with deteriorating health, Hughes took redundancy from her job as public affairs officer at the CF Trust. Eating was difficult. Her weight hovered around 7 stone. She braced herself for the possibility of a lung transplant, but as her lung capacity dropped to 30%, she was deemed too ill for the waiting list. 'I was like: 'OK, that door's closed. At this point, there isn't anything else on the horizon to keep me alive.'' She completed an end-of-life form, and met the palliative care team. She thought: 'I'll see my days out with my parents, make memories and know I did well to get to 48.' Then, in 2020, the UK government granted access to a new drug, Kaftrio. Hughes had read about its worldwide trials. When the delivery driver knocked on the door, she told him: 'You're going to save my life.' At that point, her lung function was down to 26%. Within an hour or two of the first tablet, she started coughing. 'They call it the purge,' she says. There was so much mucus – dark, watery and horribly fascinating – she captured it in a cup, put a lid on it, and stowed it in a drawer in her bedroom. 'I kept that cup for a long time,' she says. Maybe she already knew it was a relic. The Kaftrio turned Hughes's life 'a whole 180, literally overnight'. There are side-effects – insomnia, weight gain, which have brought other challenges – but before long, she says, 'I could breathe again without coughing. I went back to work within the year. I could run, I could dance, I could speak, I could stand up straight and cook. I used to always be bent over, catching my breath. And then all of a sudden that was gone. It was a miracle.' Energised, she decided to enrol in an evening course. Acrylic painting, maybe, or playing the keyboard? But at the University of Strathclyde's Centre for Lifelong Learning, it was the flyer for comedy that caught her eye. 'I had always loved going to gigs. Something clicked and I enrolled.' She performed a five-minute set for the course finale – and immediately wanted to do it again. 'I started applying for clubs, Monkey Barrel and the Stand Comedy Club [both in Edinburgh]. I got Red Raw [the Stand's beginners' slot] and went from there. I want to change my life,' she says, 'and I am doing comedy to see if I can change my life.' Nearly four years ago, Hughes met her partner, Alan, online. Having spent a lifetime feeling unable 'to rely on a future', she has had to learn to picture one – and to override her old instinct to absent herself to mitigate later losses. Sometimes, this means catching herself in the act of 'pulling back' from Alan, and letting the pleasure she takes in his company teach her to quiet her mind. Life now is so different, it requires a conscious effort to remember how hard it was from one moment to the next. 'I used to breathe so shallowly that I had to take a – haa! – sharp intake of breath – to feel I was breathing,' she says. The sound punctuated even the simplest actions – after getting into a car, for instance, after reaching for her seatbelt, after pulling it across her, after fastening it. 'Now I can get in the car, pull the seatbelt over and go. I can walk and talk. I can laugh without wetting myself or going into a convulsion of coughing, pulling a muscle or breaking a rib,' she says. 'It is a horrible, horrible disease. It suffocates you. It takes every inch of your breath away. And now it is something I can live with and not die from. I'll probably live to get my pension.' Comedy has brought 'fun, joy and laughter' back into Hughes's life. But it has also given her something that nothing else has. 'I had never found anything for me in my life. I'd never married. I had no children. So I had no community. Nothing,' she says. 'There were people getting their careers and their lives sorted. Comedy was the one thing that was for me. And it still is. Just for me.' Yvonne Hughes: Absolutely Riddled is at Snug at Gilded Balloon Patter House, Edinburgh, until 15 August

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store