"Huge thing": Eknath Shinde lauds PM Modi for Operation Sindhu
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], June 23 (ANI): Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde on Monday lauded Prime Minister Narendra Modi for Operation Sindhu to bring back Indians from conflict-affected Iran and Israel.
He also praised PM Modi for giving a befitting reply to Pakistan through Operation Sindoor.
'It is a huge thing that the PM is doing to bring back our people from Iran, where a war is waging right now. People are returning back in thousands of numbers. Similarly, during Ukraine-Russia war, PM Modi brought back Indian students from there... I extend heartfelt gratitude to him for this... We are proud of PM Modi, who also gave a befitting reply to Pakistan with Operation Sindoor,' Shinde told ANI.
Union Minister of State for External Affairs Pabitra Margherita said on Sunday that the Indian government has scheduled three additional evacuation flights from Iran over the next two to three days as part of Operation Sindhu.
Speaking to reporters after receiving a new batch of 285 Indian nationals evacuated from the conflict-hit Iran at the Delhi Airport, Margherita said that 162 Indian nationals who had crossed into Jordan from Israel would be repatriated 'within a day or two.'
'We have scheduled to have three more flights from Iran in the next two to three days. In the same way, we are in constant contact with Indian nations in Iran as well as Israel... 162 Indian nationals have crossed the border to Jordan, and within a day or two, they will be brought back to India,' the minister said.
The group of 285 evacuees, who arrived on a special flight from Mashhad, included people from several states such as Bihar, Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Maharashtra.
'Special evacuation flight has arrived in New Delhi Airport... carrying 285 Indian nationals... Mainly from 10 states... Bihar, Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Maharashtra... The total number now stands at 1713,' Margherita added.
On early Sunday, United States, under Operation Midnight Hammer, targeted three key nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan in Iran.
Iran condemned the attacks, calling them a violation of international law and vowed to continue its nuclear program.
Tensions between Israel and Iran escalated on June 13 when Israel launched Operation 'Rising Lion,' targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Iran responded with retaliatory strikes. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
34 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC stays deportation of ex-LTTE member
The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the deportation of a Sri Lankan Tamil refugee, Bhaskaran Kumarasamy, a former member of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), who fled to India in 2004 during the final years of the country's civil war, citing a serious threat to his life if sent back. A bench of justices KV Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh passed the interim order (HT Photo) A bench of justices KV Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh passed the interim order while hearing Kumarasamy's plea challenging the Madras high court's decisions from 2021 and 2024 that upheld the Tamil Nadu government's decision to deport him. The bench sought a response from the Centre and the Tamil Nadu government on the current status of the man's deportation. 'Considering that the deportation order is five years and six months old, we would like to be apprised of the status of the deportation. Meanwhile, the deportation is stayed,' said the bench, posting the matter for further hearing on August 4. Kumarasamy's counsel urged the court to intervene, pointing out that his client was in danger of being killed upon his return to Sri Lanka and should be permitted to appear before the Swiss embassy in New Delhi to pursue a pending application for asylum. The court acknowledged the concern and also observed that Kumarasamy may explore the possibility of applying for Indian citizenship under the newly enacted Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), if eligible. Kumarasamy, a former cadre of the LTTE, fled from Jaffna's Nalloor area in 2004 with his wife Sakuntala and daughters, Sobana and Sobiha -- then aged eight and six. The family entered India through Rameswaram and were lodged at the Mandapam refugee camp in Tamil Nadu. Kumarasamy claims to have given up arms before leaving Sri Lanka. In 2019, the Tamil Nadu government issued a deportation order against him, and since then, he has been entangled in a prolonged legal battle to stay in India. The Madras high court initially stayed the deportation in August 2020, noting the credible threat to his life in Sri Lanka. 'For the past 13 years, he is in India. Moreover, his family members, father, brother, brother's wife and daughter, were reportedly murdered by the Sri Lankan army,' the court noted at the time, adding that deporting him would not serve the interests of justice. However, the high court reversed course in June 2021. Dismissing his plea to visit the Swiss embassy in Delhi to process his asylum request, the court held that Kumarasamy could no longer be considered a refugee under Indian law. It relied on the Tamil Nadau police's Q Branch's assertion that Sri Lanka was now safe for returnees and pointed out that Kumarasamy had briefly travelled to Sri Lanka in 2014 for eye surgery -- a fact that, according to the court, weakened his claim of a credible threat. Kumarasamy was also among 19 Sri Lankan Tamil refugees booked in 2016 by Tamil Nadu's Q Branch under multiple laws, including the Foreigners Act and other penal charges related to conspiracy, trafficking and cheating. He was arrested and moved from Bagayam refugee camp to the Tiruchirappalli special camp, and later to Puzhal central jail. Though he and the others were acquitted of all charges in 2019, Kumarasamy remained confined to the special camp in Tiruchirappalli. In 2020, he began the process of seeking asylum in Switzerland, where a sizeable diaspora of Sri Lankan Tamil refugees resides. According to Kumarasamy, the Swiss embassy in Delhi had asked him to appear for an interview as part of his application process. However, he was unable to obtain the necessary travel permission from the Tamil Nadu authorities. He claims that despite submitting official communication from the embassy, both the district collector of Tiruchirappalli and the local revenue inspector denied him permission to travel to Delhi. In February 2021, Kumarasamy filed a petition in the high court to be allowed to travel to Delhi. But in June that year, the court not only dismissed his plea but also agreed with the authorities' contention that he no longer qualified for refugee protections.
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India must use its influence to support de-escalation and a return to negotiations
During the early hours of Sunday, the US launched Operation Midnight Hammer, a series of precision strikes on Iran's key nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. President Donald Trump declared that Iran's enrichment infrastructure had been 'completely and totally obliterated' and warned 'either peace or tragedy' lies ahead. Secretary of State Marco Rubio ruled out 'regime change', expressing the US's willingness to negotiate, and affirming that it will not take any military action unless Iran escalates. The strikes came shortly after a diplomatic window had seemingly opened. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy had met Rubio and Middle East Special Envoy Steve Witkoff in Washington, after which Trump's press secretary announced a two-week window for diplomacy. This followed Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's outreach, suggesting that Iran was open to indirect talks. Trump walked out of the G7 summit to prioritise these developments. However, Vice President J D Vance and Witkoff's visit to Turkey fell through as Iran decided not to go ahead with talks without Israel halting its attacks. The last straw, reportedly, was the E3-Iran foreign ministerial meeting in Geneva, which failed to shift Tehran's position on enrichment. The US strikes were launched within 48 hours. Iran's initial reaction was somewhat fiery. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned the US action as 'extremely dangerous, lawless, and criminal behavior,' warning of 'everlasting consequences' and declaring that 'all options are open'. Iran also accused the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of indirectly enabling the strikes. Despite fears of radiological fallout, both Iran's Regulatory Authority and the IAEA confirmed that no off-site radiation spike has been detected so far. Still, Isfahan remains a concern as it is a uranium conversion facility, with gaseous uranium compounds that are both chemically toxic and radiologically active. The IAEA also convened an emergency meeting of the Board of Governors in Vienna on Monday for further assessments. Iran has retaliated by firing a number of missiles at Tel Aviv, Haifa, and other locations in Israel. The decision of the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei on further retaliation is awaited. Will Iran escalate further or respond in a calibrated manner, as it did after the assassination of Qassem Soleimani in 2020? Over 4,00,000 US troops are stationed in the region, and the risk of broader conflict is immense. There is also uncertainty about the domestic political implications inside Iran: Will the public rally around the flag, or will frustration turn inwards? Will Iran activate its regional proxies to strike US bases or will it attempt to close the Strait of Hormuz? And can it do so effectively, given that its own missile capabilities have been reduced because of the strikes by Israel and the US? A non-binding Iranian parliamentary resolution adopted on Sunday calls for the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, but most analysts view this as rhetoric aimed at placating hardliners. However, two empty supertankers after entering the waterway did a U-turn yesterday, indicating first signs of diversion. Russia and China have condemned the strikes. Beijing called them a 'serious violation of international law' and pushed for a UNSC reaffirmation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Yet, neither power appears willing to get involved and have limited themselves to statements supporting Iran. Foreign Minister Araghchi travelled to Moscow for political and diplomatic support and to explore the role of Russia as a mediator, potentially involving China or multilateral mechanisms. India has remained cautious and balanced. Operation Sindhu was launched on June 18 to evacuate Indian nationals. Iran made a special gesture of opening its airspace for the evacuation of Indian nationals. Over 1,100 have already been brought home via special charter flights from Mashhad, Yerevan, and Ashgabat. Prime Minister Modi spoke to the Iranian President and emphasised de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy, reiterated by External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar. For India, these developments cannot be viewed from a distance. The wider regional and global implications are grave. A broader conflict may ignite multi-front warfare involving the Houthis and Iran-backed militias in Iraq. US troops in the region face increased risk. Oil prices have increased amid disruption Strait of Hormuz, a narrow channel through which nearly 20 per cent of the world's oil and significant quantities of gas flow, is a critical lifeline. Its disruption would have immediate consequences for India's economy and its diaspora in the Gulf. Although India has built strategic reserves and diversified supply lines, a sudden spike in energy prices could accelerate inflation and deepen global market instability. Beyond energy, India must also recalibrate its strategic posture. We have close ties with Iran (particularly under the Chabahar framework), deep strategic relations with Israel, and increasing defence interoperability with the United States. In this moment of potential rupture, we must continue to avoid taking sides while using our influence to support de-escalation and a return to the negotiating table. What lies ahead is uncertain. Much depends on whether Ayatollah Khamenei, like in 1988, chooses to 'drink the chalice of poison' and accept a deal to avoid existential collapse. At that time, Ayatollah Khamenei ended the war with Iraq, recognising the cost of indefinite conflict. Today, the circumstances are different but the logic of strategic retreat may still apply. Khamenei's silence — over 24 hours now — has led many to believe Iran may opt for a face-saving de-escalation. India, which has always emphasised dialogue, multilateralism, and restraint, must be prepared to play a constructive role. It must also prepare economically and diplomatically for the turbulence that may follow. What remains unknown is the fate of Iran's residual nuclear expertise. Enrichment facilities can be rebuilt, and knowledge cannot be bombed. As the IAEA and others have observed, Iran's technical capacity — rooted in decades of experience — still matters. Which is why negotiations remain essential. The writer is former governor of India to IAEA, Vienna
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Middle East conflict: How Trump convinced Iran to accept ceasefire pact with Israel; US president's call with Qatar Emir
Donald Trump The United States sought Qatar's diplomatic help to convince Iran for the ceasefire with Israel, while the Americans got ally Israel to accept the ceasefire proposal, according to the US media. Also Read | 'Complete and total ceasefire': Trump announces end of Israel-Iran conflict "President Trump spoke with Qatar's Emir and informed him the US got Israel to agree to the ceasefire. The president asked Qatar to help persuade Iran for the same, following which vice president JD Vance coordinated with Qatar's prime minister on the details," news outlets quoted a diplomatic source as saying. "This effort proved successful and, following discussions with the Qatari PM, the Iranians agreed. The deal was coordinated at the highest level by the president and vice president and the Qatari Emir and prime minister directly," the person added. Further, the source lauder Qatar for "setting aside its grievances" and "prioritizing regional security" to get the deal done. The person was referring to Iran's retaliatory missile attacks on America's Al Udeid air base, which is located in Qatar. This was the Islamic Republic's response to Operation Midnight Hammer, under which the United States struck three key nuclear facilities in Iran on Sunday.
