Out Of Touch Or On A Mission? Patrick's Anti-THC Rant
Patrick spoke to a room full of reporters about the bill's intent to protect the overall health of Texans, particularly for minors in the Lone Star State, by cutting all access to THC products that have continued to grow in popularity since the state-wide legalization of hemp in 2019.
On a city-wide level, as previously covered by The Dallas Express, Dallas voters passed Proposition R in November of last year, making possession of under 4 ounces of marijuana the 'lowest priority' for local law enforcement.
However, both efforts have continued to receive pushback from Patrick and other leaders like Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Paxton's office has even sued a handful of municipalities for approving the relaxed laws on marijuana enforcement.
'This unconstitutional action by municipalities demonstrates why Texas must have a law to 'follow the law.' It's quite simple: the legislature passes every law after a full debate on the issues, and we don't allow cities the ability to create anarchy by picking and choosing the laws they enforce,' Paxton said in a press release published last year.
SB 3, which has passed both legislative chambers, now seeks to ban all forms of THC, including Delta-8 and Delta-9 variants, currently sold regularly in gas stations and 'smoke shops,' while exempting 'non-intoxicating' cannabinoids like CBD and CBG.
However, some details surrounding the bill seem to remain a bit cloudy.
The bill will also allegedly allow for the state to maintain and continue running its Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Program, allowing limited medical use of low-THC cannabis products. However, Patrick has not yet clarified if the bill will impact the application process for the program.
Critics argue that the ban could have significant economic repercussions, as previously reported by The Dallas Express, potentially dismantling Texas's $8 billion hemp industry and cutting off nearly 50,000 jobs.
'If this ban is passed, it would criminalize both consumers as well as sellers/distributors. Businesses in Texas would have to stop selling these products altogether, which would likely result in a lot of businesses closing up shop altogether,' Ben Michael, an attorney at Michael & Associates, previously told DX.
'This would also likely mean that larger companies based in other states would be limited with where or who they could sell to, leading to potential legal battles. Consumers in Texas could also face fines or charges for buying these products, even if they are for medical purposes, because it seems as though the ban essentially has no exceptions,' Michael added.
Yet, Patrick seems deadset on pushing the ban forward.
'We cannot in good conscience leave Austin without banning THC, which is harming our children, and destroying Texans' lives and families,' The Texas Lieutenant General declared via X.
Governor Greg Abbott has yet to say whether he will sign SB 3 into law. If enacted, the ban will take effect in September of this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Texas Senate approves congressional redistricting map
The Texas Senate on Tuesday approved a congressional redistricting bill after Texas Governor Greg Abbott on Sunday threatened to expand the number of seats redistricted in Texas to as many as 10 if state House Democrats don't return soon. File Photo by Francis Chung/UPI | License Photo Aug. 12 (UPI) -- The Texas Senate voted 19-2 along party lines on Tuesday to approve a congressional redistricting map that is identical to a version in the Texas House. The measure, Senate Bill 4, redraws the state's U.S. House of Representatives districts. Nine of the 11 Democrats in the Texas Senate walked out immediately before the chamber voted to approve the new redistricting map. The only Democrats who remained were Sens. Judith Zaffirini of Laredo and Chuy Hinojosa of McCallen, The Dallas Morning News reported. The other nine Democrats briefly met with reporters outside of the Senate chamber. "There's only one party here that has actually abdicated its responsibility, and that's the Republican Party," Sen. Nathan Johnson, D-Dallas, said. The measure now goes to the state House of Representatives, which has not been able to conduct business since its Democratic Party members walked out on Aug. 4. Many are staying in New York City, Chicago and Los Angeles to prevent a quorum that is required to conduct business in the Texas House. Texas Gov. Greg Abbot on Sunday threatened to call for a series of special legislative sessions to keep the Texas House in session indefinitely. He also has threatened to expand the number of revised congressional districts to as many as 10 to punish the state's House Democratic caucus if they don't return soon. If the House eventually convenes and approves the redistricting bill, at least one legal challenge will be filed. "Under this new, even worse, millions of Texans ... will have their voices silenced," John Bisognano, president of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, said in a prepared statement. Bisognano accused the Texas GOP of "targeting Texans of color" in the redistricting effort. "Make no mistake, if Texas Republicans enact this discriminatory map, they will face swift, significant resistance from the people and in the courts," he said. If enacted, the new U.S. House districts would be created before the 2026 mid-term elections and potentially flip five seats currently held by Texas Democrats to the Republican Party. The Texas GOP undertook the redistricting task upon the suggestion of President Donald Trump in mid-July. Trump in July accused Democrats of gerrymandering in the respective states in which they control the legislatures and suggested Texas revise its congressional districts. Harmeet Dhillon, the Justice Department's assistant attorney general for civil rights, in July described four U.S. House districts in Texas as "coalition districts" that are comprised of different racial groups who generally support the same candidate. Such districts are not protected by the Voting Rights Act and are subject to redistricting, Dhillon said.
Chicago Tribune
3 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Valparaiso council overrides mayor's veto of reimagined Advisory Human Relations Council
As Valparaiso Mayor Jon Costas predicted, the city council responded to his veto of a revised Advisory Human Relations Council with a 5-2 override vote Monday. 'I think we know how this vote is going to go, so let's call the vote,' Costas said Monday after council member Robert Cotton, D-2nd, motioned for a vote to negate the mayor's veto. Another vote and further debate of the ordinance were not included on the council agenda released late Thursday, which prompted council member Ellen Kapitan, D-At-large, to rebuke Costas for waiting until after the agenda was created before notifying the council of his veto. As with the last council meeting on July 28, the ordinance, which was crafted and introduced by Kapitan and at-large member Emilie Hunt, drew the same supportive votes from Cotton, Barbara Domer, D-3rd, and Diana Reed, D-1st. Peter Anderson, R-5th, and Jack Pupillo, R-4th, once again voted against having the mayor's veto dissolved. Kapitan asked that Costas repeat for the public the reasoning behind his veto, as communicated in his email Thursday. 'I decided not to sign Ordinance No. 8 as passed at last month's council meeting because, as I've been clear all along this process, I believe that the current make-up and function of the AHRC as it is now is very effective to advise me in my role as the city's executive,' Costas explained. 'I've continued to urge the council to create their own Human Relations Council or a similar committee by selecting their own member to serve on that body rather than absorbing my existing appointed member and adding to that number. As I've said publicly, I don't wish for there to be mayor appointments to this council's created advisory group. I haven't seen the collaboration I'd hope for this, and as a result, I felt that vetoing this [ordinance] was warranted.' Of the 10 residents who addressed the mayor and council before the override, the divided sides were split evenly with five residents in favor of the council-created combined committee and five voices favoring the mayor retaining his existing advisory group. 'I fully support the mayor's veto of this ordinance,' James Ferguson said when addressing the mayor and council members. 'After last meeting's discussion about this ordinance, I decided to attend the Advisory Human Relations Council meeting on July 22, and I kind of expected some of the city council members to be there. Instead, there were the Advisory Human Relations Council members all there wondering what's going on.' Alison Quackenbush, a middle school civics teacher who serves as the chair of the existing Advisory Human Relations Council as appointed by Costas, said Tuesday she, like most of the members of the mayor's appointed council, 'are still processing what is happening' and 'are unsure of what comes next.' Hunt and Kapitan have publicly expressed their displeasure with 'a lack of programming and events' organized by the existing advisory council and insist it is part of that group's 'mission.' Quackenbush has publicly responded that she and the other members are volunteers assisting as appointments by the mayor and have never been directed to oversee and promote specific events and programming. In addition to Quackenbush, other appointed voting members of the existing council are Elisabeth Cohon, Debi Sibray, Mark Fesenmyer, Patrick Lyp, Carolyn Rodea, David Muniz, Mike Hendren and Jack Tipold, in addition to non-voting members Katie Shideler, Olivia Krutz and Valparaiso Police Chief Andrew McIntyre. 'Just because I was appointed a member of this group for the mayor doesn't mean I will want to serve on a newly formed council, depending on what the direction and mission is for the group,' Tipold said at the July 22 Advisory Human Relations Committee. Other members echoed Tipold's sentiment while Costas told those assembled he 'wasn't in a place to provide any advisement or further information' because he wasn't clear on what the council's purpose was for their re-imagined group. In March, a news release announced the city of Valparaiso's Human Relations Council's 'invitation to the community' to apply for its new Community Cultural Educational grants. 'We are looking to support events or efforts that further the mission of the HRC, which is to increase awareness, appreciation and dialogue among diverse and traditionally underrepresented groups, such as race, religion, national origin, age, gender/gender identity, sexual orientation, veteran status and individuals with disabilities,' Quackenbush said in the distributed press release. 'This grant is designed to spark ideas and support efforts that advance inclusion and education, whether that's in programming, events or other outreach.' She said then the $10,000 grant pool was funded by the Valparaiso Mayor's Office and was to be disbursed in the form of matching grants ranging from $500 to $2,000 per project. The plan is for grants to be awarded twice annually. Applications for the first cycle were due April 30. Quackenbush said they had three organizations apply for grants: the Valparaiso Creative Council, LGBTQ Outreach of Porter County, and Hilltop Neighborhood House. However, though each was approved by her council and recommended for funding, ultimately, all three were rejected when presented to the mayor's office. 'We were able to find two out of the three funding for their projects through other funding means,' Quackenbush said.
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Texas AG asks judge to arrest Beto O'Rourke for redistricting battle fundraising
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking a judge to jail Beto O'Rourke, claiming the former Democratic congressman violated a court order by fundraising to support the dozens of state Democratic lawmakers who have fled the state amid its redistricting battle. The attorney general's request builds on a previous order, granted by a Texas county judge earlier this month, barring O'Rourke and his nonprofit, Powered by People, from raising money to help fund the Democratic lawmakers' exodus from the state more than a week ago. Paxton claimed in his filing to the Tarrant County court on Aug. 12 that O'Rourke violated the fundraising block by soliciting donations through the Democrats' ActBlue platform. "He's about to find out that running your mouth and ignoring the rule of law has consequences in Texas," Paxton said in a statement released alongside the filing. "It's time to lock him up." Paxton's move is the latest in growing escalations between Democrats and Republicans in the Lone Star state, as the standoff over GOP attempts to redraw congressional boundaries in Texas. The redistricting attempt could add another five Republican seats to Congress ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, and is seen as blatant gerrymandering efforts by Democrats. In response, Democrats decamped the state en masse, many taking refuge in blue-led states like Illinois and New York, to prevent the vote from taking place in Austin, Texas, where the Republicans' firm majority would all but guarantee the revised maps pass. Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott ordered the arrest of the dozens of Democratic lawmakers who have fled while Paxton asked the state Supreme Court to oust them from office over their absence, arguing they abandoned their seats. Texas redistricting: Which states have threatened to redraw their own maps in response to Texas GOP plans? In the first sentence of the court filing, Paxton quoted the former congressman at an Aug. 9 Fort Worth event saying: "There are no refs in this game, f--- the rules," claiming O'Rourke was "disparaging' the previous court order. In response, O'Rourke posted the full clip of his speech at the event to X, saying that Paxton took his words out of context in the filing. In the full recorded video of the speech, O'Rourke is speaking about the Democrats' attempts to put forward their own revised maps in states like California, New Jersey, Maryland, and Illinois, telling the crowd that blue states should redistrict now and "not wait for Texas to move first." "You may say to yourself, 'Well, those aren't the rules,'" O'Rourke says immediately after speaking about the Democrats' redistricting efforts. "There are no refs in this game, f--- the rules, we are going to win. Whatever it takes, we are going to take this to them in every way that we can." O'Rourke said in his post on X on Aug. 12 that the attorney general's office lied in its filing. "We're seeking maximum sanctions in response to his abuse of office," he said. "Taking the fight directly to this corrupt, lying thug." Along with jail time, the attorney general is also requesting O'Rourke be held in contempt and fined $500. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
