Darshan Thoogudeepa case: Kannada actor's wife Vijayalakshmi takes over social media, and the Supreme Court cancels bail
Posting on
Darshan
's official social media account, she said that from now on, she will share Darshan's movie updates and promotions. She also requested that fans who love Darshan unite and express their love and positive thoughts for him.
a
Vijayalakshmi
to share updates
Her post read, 'My Dear #DBoss Celebrities, Your Challenging Star carries each one of you in his heart. Until he returns to connect with you directly, I will be handling his social media to share updates and movie promotions on his behalf.
The love, prayers, and patience you continue to show him and our family give him and our family immense strength. Let's hold on to that unity and positivity—he will be back soon, with the same love and energy you've always known.
With gratitude and love, Vijayalakshmi Darshan," said Vijayalakshmi through Darshan's social media page.
SC cancels Darshan's interim bail
Meanwhile, Darshan's interim bail was cancelled on the orders of the Supreme Court. He was subsequently arrested and taken for questioning at the Annapurneshwari Nagar police station in Bengaluru. It has been reported that he will be produced in court later. Along with Darshan, four others, including actress
Pavithra Gowda
, have been arrested.
The Supreme Court noted that the Karnataka High Court had granted bail without adequately considering intimidation and other illegal acts against witnesses.
The government cites Darshan's influence as a threat to the investigation
The Karnataka government filed a petition in the Supreme Court, urging that Darshan should not be granted bail in this case. Similarly, the government's legal advisor, A.S. Ponnanna, said, 'If bail is granted in such an important case, the investigation and court proceedings will be affected. Since Darshan is a powerful person, there is a risk that he will use his influence to block the case," he said. The body of the 33-year-old victim from Chitradurga in the Renukaswamy murder case was found in Kamakshipalya, Bangalore, on June 9, 2024.
"Get the latest news updates on Times of India, including reviews of the movie
Coolie
and
War 2
."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
29 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Guwahati Police summons ‘The Wire' editor despite Supreme Court protection
The Crime Branch in Guwahati has issued a summons to The Wire 's founding editor Siddharth Varadarajan in a first information report pertaining to an article on Operation Sindoor. The summons, issued on August 12, came despite the Supreme Court granting protection from arrest to Varadarajan and members of the foundation running the news outlet in another FIR filed by the Assam Police. Ankur Jain, the joint commissioner of police in Guwahati, told Scroll that the summons was issued as the Supreme Court order had come on a case filed in 'some other district'. In the latest notice, Varadarajan has been directed to appear before the investigating officer at the Crime Branch Police Station in Panbazar on August 22 at 11.30 am. The earlier case against Varadarajan was registered at Morigaon police station on July 11 under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which pertains to acts endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India. It followed the publication of an article about Operation Sindoor titled ''IAF Lost Fighter Jets to Pak Because of Political Leadership's Constraints': Indian Defence Attache'. The fresh summons issued to Varadarajan cites the same charges, in addition to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections pertaining to promoting enmity between different groups, publishing false or misleading information and criminal conspiracy. On August 12, a Supreme Court bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi granted protection from arrest to Vardarajan while hearing a writ petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 152. The petition was filed by the Foundation for Independent Journalism, which owns The Wire, and Varadarajan. The petitioners argued that the law was a repackaged version of the colonial sedition law. The bench issued a notice to the Union government and tagged the plea with another petition challenging the validity of the provision. Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan, appearing for the petitioners, argued that the news article was a factual report of a seminar organised by a university in Indonesia and statements made by an Indian defence attaché on the military tactics used during Operation Sindoor. She added that the article also carried the Indian embassy's response to the defence attaché's remarks, which had also been reported by several other news outlets. In May 2022, the Supreme Court had ordered proceedings and criminal prosecutions for sedition under Section 124A of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code to be kept in abeyance. Critics have argued in the Supreme Court, in a separate matter, that Section 124A was slipped in again into the law in the guise of Section 152 when the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita replaced the Indian Penal Code in July 2024.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ex-MP Mohan Delkar suicide case: Supreme Court rejects son's plea against quashing of FIR by Bombay HC
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a plea against an order of the Bombay High Court quashing the FIR against nine persons for allegedly abetting the suicide of former Lok Sabha MP Mohan Delkar in 2021. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency The Bombay High Court on September 8, 2022 quashed the case against nine persons in the case, including Praful Khoda Patel, administrator of the Union territories of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, The FIR was registered after the death of Delkar, a seven-time MP from Dadra and Nagar Haveli, who was found dead in a Mumbai hotel in 2021. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 Most Beautiful Female Athletes in the World Click Here Undo His alleged suicide note detailed harassment and intimidation, prompting police action against several persons, including top bureaucrats and political figures. A bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran had reserved the verdict on August 4 on the plea of Abhinav Delkar, son of the late MP. Live Events The top court upheld the high court verdict.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC affirms quashing of FIR against administrator in parliamentarian suicide case
The Supreme Court on Monday affirmed the Bombay high court's decision to quash a first information report (FIR) in the abetment to suicide case related to parliamentarian Mohanbhai S Delkar, bringing final relief to nine accused, including Praful Khoda Patel, administrator of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, and Lakshadweep. The Supreme Court confirmed the Bombay high court's September 2022 order. (HT PHOTO) A bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran pronounced the judgment. Reading out the operative part of the judgment, Justice Chandran said the top court has confirmed the high court's September 2022 order and dismissed the appeal filed by Delkar's son, Abhinav. The FIR, lodged at Mumbai's Marine Drive police station on March 9, 2021, invoked sections 306 (abetment of suicide), 506 (criminal intimidation), 389 (putting a person in fear of accusation to commit extortion) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code, along with the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. It alleged that Delkar, a prominent tribal leader from the Dhodia Patel community and a seven-term Member of Parliament from Dadra and Nagar Haveli, was subjected to sustained harassment by the local administration to wrest control of an educational institution he ran and to deter him from contesting the next election. Delkar, 58, was found dead on February 22, 2021, in a hotel room on Marine Drive in Mumbai. A suicide note and minutes of a parliamentary privileges committee were recovered from the spot. His son, Abhinav Delkar, recorded a statement that was treated as the FIR. Nine persons, including Patel, were named as accused in the FIR. Quashing the FIR in 2022, the high court held that the allegations, at best, reflected Mohanbhai S Delkar's impressions of humiliation and ill-treatment and were not backed by material showing any specific, proximate acts of instigation or intentional aid, elements necessary to make out abetment under Section 306 IPC. The high court noted material placed by the petitioners to show that Delkar was accorded due protocol at public functions, and found no prima facie instance of harassment rising to the level of a criminal offence. The high court added that it was a fit case for quashing 'to prevent abuse of law.' The high court, while quashing the case, accepted the arguments of the accused that Delkar was never disrespected at public functions and that proper protocols were observed in keeping with his stature. It ruled that the allegations of humiliation and harassment were 'impressions carried out by the deceased' and that the FIR lacked any prima facie evidence of a 'positive act' required to establish abetment under Section 306 of IPC. The nine persons named in the FIR included Praful Patel and some officials and police officers in the Dadra and Nagar Haveli administration. Mohan Delkar, a prominent tribal leader, first entered Parliament in 1989 and represented Dadra and Nagar Haveli six times consecutively until 2009. After a brief interlude, he returned as an Independent lawmaker in 2019, defeating Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)'s Natu Patel by 9,001 votes. His wife represents the constituency in the Lok Sabha, having joined the BJP with their son Abhinav in 2024.
