Remains found in 2001 in Ohio confirmed to be Pontiac man missing since 1994
The remains of a person found in 2001 in Northeast Ohio have been positively identified as Anthony Bernard Gulley of Pontiac, Michigan.
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost's office hosted a press conference with Stark County Sheriff Eric Weisburn Tuesday to
give the announcement
and discuss the case, which is suspected to be a homicide. Family members of Gulley who still live in Michigan were watching on livestream video, the officials said.
"This is kind of a bittersweet announcement," Yost said during the press conference.
"We have been able to give Stark County John Doe his name back," the sheriff said.
Ohio BCI Criminal Intelligence Analyst Samantha Reeb and Traci Onders from the DNA Doe Project also spoke on behalf of their agencies, which were involved in the investigation.
Gulley, then age 24, was reported missing Sept. 11, 1994, after he failed to show up for work, the AG's office said. News reports at the time indicate that he may have been a murder victim; but his remains could not be found. His burned-out car was found Sept. 12, 1994, in Akron, Ohio.
The records that were filed at the time with the Pontiac Police Department were transferred later to the Oakland County Sheriff's Office, as the city no longer has its own law enforcement agency.
In the meantime, the remains of a person found in 2001 in Canton, which is in northeast Ohio near Akron, were found. New technology and genetic DNA databases have evolved to the point where matches between missing people and unidentified remains are possible in cases where this couldn't be done years ago – and that's what happened in this case.
The
DNA Doe project
was founded in 2017 to help law enforcement agencies and medical examiner offices work on solving the cases of unidentified people. The organization said its success stories include some of the first identifications credited to genetic genealogy.
With genetic genealogy, DNA samples found at crime scenes are compared to samples from people who voluntarily provide their DNA to assist in such research.
Reeb said the laboratory work on Gulley's case took months to complete, but once that step finished, they found a possible lead very quickly through the DNA databases. With that information, law enforcement officials got DNA samples from Gulley's family members and confirmed the connection.
"It has been an honor for us to give Mr. Gulley his name back," the sheriff said.
In the meantime, researchers at Ohio State University found evidence of what they believe to be a bullet wound that could have caused his death.
There also had been both a clay facial reconstruction and digital facial reconstruction images prepared of the Stark County John Doe.
The theory related at the press conference is that Gulley was killed in Pontiac, and then his body was taken to northeast Ohio.
But the detailed answers will never be learned.
The man believed to be the suspect in this case, George Frederick "Ricky" Washington, died Sept. 30, 1994 of a self-inflicted wound after a confrontation with law enforcement, according to reports at the press conference.
"The answers to when and how he died – and why his body ended up in Canton only to be discovered seven years later – likely died with Washington in 1994," the press release said.
A death certificate has been filed in Michigan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Group Appeals to Farm Rio to End Partnership With Starbucks
A group of 17 labor unions, human rights organizations and watchdog nonprofits including Coffee Watch are calling on the lifestyle brand Farm Rio to end its partnership with Starbucks or change its policies. The coffee chain has come under fire this spring for allegations of child labor, trafficking workers and unsafe working conditions on a Brazilian coffee farm. A civil 'John Doe' lawsuit was filed against Starbucks in late April in the U.S. by eight individuals with the support of the International Rights Advocates. More from WWD From The Archive: Rio de Janeiro Fashion Scene, 1974 Todd Snyder Opens Nashville Store in 12South Neighborhood Dior Beauty Opens New Boutique in Miami A Starbucks spokesperson said Wednesday that the claims asserted are 'without merit' and the company plans to 'vigorously defend the Starbucks brand.' Coffee Watch filed a petition under section 307 of the Tariff Act asking U.S. Customs and Border Protection 'to block slavery-tainted Brazilian coffee in Starbucks' supply chains from entering the United States,' according to the letter, which was shared with WWD. In a statement, the Seattle-based company said, 'Starbucks is committed to ethical sourcing of coffee including helping to protect the rights of people who work on the farms where we purchase coffee from,' adding that its Coffee and Farmer Equity Practices include the use of 'robust third-party verification and audits.' Starbucks said it does not purchase coffee from all of the farms within Cooxupé's cooperative, which includes more than 19,000 coffee farm members. The spokesperson said, 'Starbucks purchases coffee from a small fraction of those farms, and only those who have been verified through our C.A.F.E. Practices, which are among the most stringent in the industry and have been continuously improved since their inception in 2004.' Starbucks and Farm Rio revealed their partnership last month for a limited-edition collection of colorful drinkware and mini cold-cup keychains that launched in the coffee chain's stores in the U.S. and Canada. They are also being sold in its outposts in Brazil and in select markets in Latin America and in the Caribbean. On Wednesday, a public relations firm working on behalf of the organizations that have appealed to Farm Rio's chief executive officer put the word out about their letter. Supporters of the letter are asking that Starbucks sever the partnership immediately or make it contingent on such demands as allowing employees worldwide to unionize and eradicating child labor from every part of its supply chain, ensuring farmworkers receive a living wage and publicly committing to upholding labor rights across its supply chain. The representative for the senders of the letter also provided a link to a video post that was made by the organization Contracs on 'X' that shows three protesters holding signs outside of a Farm Rio store in an unidentified shopping center in Brazil. Representatives at Farm Rio could not be reached for comment Wednesday. An outside public relations company that works with Farm Rio acknowledged a request for comment about the request to end the Starbucks partnership and said it had been shared with Farm Rio, but there was not a response at press time. Separately, Starbucks has been dealing with pushback from some employees in the U.S. about its new uniform policy. More than 1,000 workers — many of whom are associated with Starbucks Workers United — in 75 locations held a one-day strike in opposition to the mandatory dress code. Workers United is less than 5 percent of Starbucks' workforce, representing about 570 of its 10,000-plus stores, according to another Starbucks spokesperson. The letter to Farm Rio also noted that a fair contract with unionized workers in the U.S. has not been reached. Best of WWD Young Brooke Shields' Style Evolution, Archive Photos: From Runway Modeling & Red Carpets to Meeting Princess Diana The Most Memorable French Open Tennis Outfits With Serena Williams, Naomi Osaka & More [PHOTOS] Beyoncé's 'Cowboy Carter Tour' Outfits, Live Updates: Schiaparelli, Burberry, Loewe and More
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
True Crime Tuesday: Mysterious death of Tete Gulley
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — A family is still searching for answers six years after the death of a transgender woman. Tete Gulley's body was found hanging from a tree in Rocky Butte Park on May 27th, 2019. The 31-year-old moved to Portland from Kansas City shortly before her death. Officials have ruled the case a suicide, but as the hosts of the Murder in the Rain podcast explain, Gulley's family disagrees. AM Extra was joined by the hosts of the Murder in the Rain podcast to talk more about the case. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Family sues Kansas City, KC Sports Commission & several others for 2024 Chiefs parade shooting
Editor's note: A 'straw purchaser' is someone who buys a firearm for someone who is prohibited by law from possessing one, or for someone who does not want their name associated with it. KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Several people are suing the individuals and companies connected with the 2024 Chiefs parade shooting that killed one person and injured 22 others, including 11 children. Erika Reyes is suing on behalf of herself and her two children. All three of them were shot during the parade celebration on Feb. 14, 2024, according to a lawsuit filed in Jackson County on Monday. Kathleen Martinez is suing on behalf of herself and her children, one of which was shot during the parade. Esmeralda Ortiz is suing on behalf of herself and her child. Neither of them were shot during the parade, but the lawsuit alleges that the two suffered severe emotional distress and anxiety after watching their family get shot. Attorneys told FOX4 that the plaintiffs in this lawsuit are family. Two of them are cousins and two are related by marriage, according to attorneys. The three women are suing the city itself, as well as the Greater Kansas City Sports Commission and Union Station. They are suing the following individuals: Dominic Miller Lyndell Mays Terry Young John Doe 1 John Doe 2 John Doe 3 Fedo Antonia Manning Ronnel Dewayne Williams Jr. Chaelyn Hendrick Groves They are also suing the following entities and businesses: Union Station Kansas City, Inc. City of Kansas City The Greater Kansas City Sports Commission O'Neill Events & Marketing Flyover Event Co. LLC Frontier Justice LS, LLC The Ammo Box L.L.C. R.K. Shows Mo Inc. The lawsuit argues that 'the defendants each caused or contributed to cause the injuries' sustained by Reyes, Ortiz, Martinez and their children. According to the lawsuit, the deadly shooting was the 'direct and proximate result of the negligence, carelessness, violations and failures' of the city and Union Station – as well as the Greater Kansas City Sports Commission, O'Neill Events & Marketing and Flyover Event Co. 'Responsibility for the shooting and injuries does not solely lie with the perpetrators of the shooting—systemic failures and negligence at multiple levels contributed to this tragedy,' the lawsuit states. 'It was a preventable calamity, borne of systemic failures and negligence from the top down.' The lawsuit argues that the parade's 'inadequate security measures left hundreds of thousands of invitees vulnerable.' According to the lawsuit, the parade was 'completely devoid of physical security measures, such as checkpoints and metal detectors, which are necessary at mass gathering events.' The lawsuit says the parade celebration was held on property owned by Union Station and the city, and the shooting took place in part on property owned by Union Station. Since this was not the first time that gun violence occurred at Union Station, the lawsuit argues that Union Station and the city 'knew or should have known the consequences of inadequate security measures, including the injury and death of their invitees.' However, both failed to adequately plan the security and implement physical security measures, such as checkpoints, barriers and security equipment (magnetometers, X-Ray machines), according to the lawsuit. From May 2022 to January 2022, the lawsuit says Manning purchased 40 firearms – more than half of which were bought from Frontier Justice. 'Manning frequented Frontier Justice because he knew it to be an easy place to purchase firearms where no one would question his purchases,' the lawsuit states. The lawsuit says Manning entered into a plea agreement, admitting that he was buying firearms as a 'straw purchaser' – which Frontier Justice should have known given the repetitive nature of Manning's purchases. Frontier Justice and Ammo Box – two gun sellers – are both accused of negligently selling firearms to Manning and Williams, respectively. By selling them the firearms, the lawsuit argues that Frontier Justice and Ammo Box 'acted with complete indifference or with reckless disregard for the rights of others.' The lawsuit says Ammo Box employees had an obligation to use their judgment and refuse to sell Williams a firearm. It argues that Ammo Box should have known Williams was a straw purchaser for Groves. The lawsuit argues that Frontier Justice and Ammo Box, along with R.K. Shows Mo Inc. – which according to its own website is one of the largest gun and knife show promoters in the U.S. – 'facilitate violence for profit.' 'They use sales and marketing practices to create and feed a consumer base of young, impulsive men to line their pockets,' the lawsuit states. 'Gun sellers play a pivotal role in safeguarding our communities by ensuring that the deadly weapons they sell do not end up in the wrong hands,' the lawsuit argues. Frontier Justice and Ammo Box 'abandoned this role and their community,' the lawsuit says. According to the lawsuit, the gun sellers turned a blind eye and enabled criminals to easily obtain deadly weapons – leading to the tragedy on Feb. 14, 2024. The lawsuit also accuses Frontier Justice and Ammo Box of lax sales practices while arguing that R.K. Shows is guilty of lax supervision at its gun shows – selling tickets to 'kids' as low as $6 at its event on Nov. 25, 2023 at the KCI Expo Center. 'Gun shows are particularly problematic when it comes to straw purchases,' the lawsuit argues. 'According to the ATF, 30 percent of guns involved in federal illegal gun trafficking investigations are connected in some way to gun shows.' The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) provides broad immunity to gun sellers. However, attorneys told FOX4 that gun sellers do not have immunity for negligent entrustment – which is what Frontier Justice and Ammo Box are being sued for. Many of the victims injured in the shooting were collateral damage of the two groups who opened fire on one another during the crowded parade celebration. Miller, Mays, Young and John Doe 1, 2 and 3 are accused of 'escalating a dispute that they knew or should have known to be likely to turn violent.' The lawsuit also accuses them of negligence, as well as 'failing to properly aim or control their weapons when returning fire' – which resulted in several parade attendees being hit by gunfire. FOX4 has reached out to most of the defendants in this lawsuit – except for Manning, Williams, Groves and John Doe 1, 2 and 3. The city provided the following statement: 'The City of Kansas City recognizes the widespread impact the Super Bowl rally shooting had on our community. The City condemns the criminal actions that brought violence to what should have been a celebratory event. While the City has not yet been served with the petition, we will review it carefully once received and respond in accordance with the law.' The Kansas City Sports Commission refused to comment, and we have not received any other responses at this time. Reyes, Martinez and Ortiz are demanding a jury trial to determine the amount of damages they are owed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
