Tax on ultra-rich: 'France has the opportunity to lead the way,' say Nobel Prize-winning economists
They have never been so wealthy and yet contribute little, relative to their ability to pay, to the public coffers: From Bernard Arnault to Elon Musk, billionaires have lower tax rates than the average taxpayer.
Pioneering research conducted in partnership with tax authorities in several countries demonstrates it: Ultra-wealthy individuals pay around 0% to 0.6% of their wealth in individual income tax – around 0.6% in a country like the United States and 0.1% in a country like France.
When including all other mandatory levies (corporate taxes, social security contributions, consumption taxes, etc.) and expressing their tax payments as a fraction of income, their effective tax rates turn out to be lower than those of middle-class or upper-middle-class taxpayers.
How did we get here? In short, because the ultra-wealthy can easily structure their wealth to avoid income tax, which is supposed to be the cornerstone of tax justice. In European countries, this optimization is achieved through the creation of family holding companies, in which dividends accumulate sheltered from taxation. In the US, the use of holding companies to dodge taxes has been prohibited since the 1930s, which explains why the wealthy are more heavily taxed there than in Europe – though some have still managed to find workarounds.
Fortunately, this situation is not the result of a natural law or some ancient fate: It stems from human decisions and political choices. There is no inevitability here. Not only is it necessary to impose a stronger burden of justice on billionaires, but more importantly, it is possible.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
40 minutes ago
- Euronews
France to invest billions in defence of Europe's freedom, Macron says
French President Emmanuel Macron announced a plan on Sunday for an additional €6.5 billion in military spending over the next two years, citing what he described as "a greater threat" to freedom in Europe than at any point since World War II. The French leader set out these plans in a speech in which he called for intensified efforts to protect Europe and to support Ukraine in the face of Russia's ongoing full-scale invasion. 'Since 1945, freedom has never been so threatened, and never so seriously,' Macron said in the French president's traditional speech to the military on the eve of Bastille Day. 'To be free in this world, we must be feared. To be feared, we must be powerful,' he said. France plans to allocate €64 billion for defence in 2027, according to the plan outlined by Macron. This figure is double the €32 billion the country was spending on defence when he became president in 2017. He insisted France can afford higher military spending even as it seeks to reduce its national debt. While conservatives and far-right parties broadly support his push for greater defence investment, left-wing parties have accused the government of prioritising military spending over social welfare. Macron warned that Europe faces mounting dangers from Russia's war in Ukraine, conflicts in the Middle East and foreign-led disinformation campaigns, including propaganda targeting children. He also instructed France's military and defence leadership to launch a 'strategic dialogue' with European partners about the potential role of France's nuclear arsenal in Europe's security architecture. In a rare step, France and the UK recently agreed to deepen cooperation on nuclear defence. Macron's speech came as US President Donald Trump is expected to make an announcement about Russia on Monday and as the head of NATO travels to Washington for two days of talks.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
EU climate VP seeks 'fair competition' with China on green energy
Deep frictions exist over economic relations between the 27-nation bloc and Beijing. Brussels is worried that a manufacturing glut propelled by massive state subsidies could add to a yawning trade deficit and result in a flood of cheap Chinese goods undercutting European firms. Speaking during a visit to Beijing ahead of a major EU-China summit in the city this month, Teresa Ribera dismissed China's claims that the bloc was engaging in "protectionism". "We Europeans don't want to go down a race towards low incomes, lower labour rights or lower environmental standards," said Ribera, who also serves as the bloc's competition chief. "It is obvious that we could not be in a good position if there could be an ... over-flooding in our markets that could undermine us with prices that do not reflect the real cost," she said. The EU imposed extra import taxes of up to 35 percent on Chinese electric vehicle imports in October and has investigated Chinese-owned solar panel manufacturers. Asked whether EU moves against Chinese green energy firms could harm the global transition to renewables, Ribera said: "It is fair to say that, yes, we may benefit in the very short term." However, she also warned "it could kill the possibility" of long-term investment in the bloc's future. Global disruption Ribera's visit comes as Beijing seeks to improve relations with the European Union as a counterweight to superpower rival the United States, whose President Donald Trump has disrupted the global order and pulled Washington out of international climate accords. "I don't think that we have witnessed many occasions in the past where a big economy, a big country, decides to isolate in such a relevant manner," she told AFP. "It is a pity. "The Chinese may think that the United States has given them a great opportunity to be much more relevant in the international arena," Ribera said. The visit also comes as the bloc and the United States wrangle over a trade deal. Trump threw months of negotiations into disarray on Saturday by announcing he would hammer the bloc with sweeping tariffs if no agreement was reached by August 1. Ribera vowed on Monday that the EU would "defend the interests of our companies, our society, our business". Asked if a deal was in sight, she said: "Who knows? We'll do our best." However, she insisted that EU digital competition rules -- frequently condemned by Trump as "non-tariff barriers" to trade -- were not on the table. "It's a question of sovereignty," Ribera said. © 2025 AFP
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
How Serbia's turn to the West provoked Putin's reaction
US President Donald Trump hoped to bring a swift end to Russia's war in Ukraine, but six months into the office, he was only left to voice disappointment with Russia's Vladimir Putin following their phone call last week, over Putin's ongoing reluctance to end the three-year-long war in Europe. Putin is digging in for a long political battle of influence with Washington. Serbia, a Western Balkan country also friendly to Russia, seems to be now a new target, after it has come to light that Serbia was supplying Ukraine with arms for quite some time, since the war began. Moscow called it 'stab in the back' and 'betrayal' with Russia's spy agency posting a statement suggesting rockets for multiple rocket launchers and mortar shells, or components for them, where sold through two companies from Bulgaria and the Czech Republic, making this a second official rebuke from Moscow to Belgrade, within a month. Aleksandr Dugin, well-known Russian far-right philosopher, often referred in Russian media as 'Putin's brain' who was sanctioned by the US Department of Treasury in 2015 for his involvement in Russia's war suggested that 'Serbian President (Aleksandar) Vučić has lost legitimacy', also lending support for the ongoing protests against corruption, negligence and poor quality constructions in Serbia that never stopped following deadly canopy collapse in Novi Sad on 1 November 2024. Recently, the Serbian president announced a halt to all military equipment exports. Besides arming Ukraine, Putin didn't like Serbia's recent major agreements with the West. Last July, Serbia, the EU, and Germany signed a battery supply chain deal giving the EU access to raw materials mined in Serbia. With a significant lithium deposit, particularly in the Jadar Valley, Serbia has the potential to become a major European supplier of the crucial battery metal. Germany's then-Chancellor Olaf Scholz praised the deal as a mega project that could reduce Europe's dependency on China. If implemented, the $2.4 billion (€2bn) Jadar lithium project could cover 90% of Europe's current lithium needs. In Belgrade, tens of thousands of protesters rallied against the deal, fearing irreparable pollution of the Jadar valley, despite officials' warnings of their alleged plot to topple Vučić and his government. Many were waving the flag of combined Russian and Serbian colours. While Putin may have hoped to get hold of the lithium vast reserves in Serbia, just last week Russian troops have taken over the site of one of the Ukraine's most valuable lithium deposits near the village of Shevchenko in Donetsk region, leaving just two out of four lithium deposits in central Ukraine under the government control. Serbia also signed a €2.7 billion deal to purchase Rafale jets from France's Dassault Aviation, signalling a major shift in Serbia's security and political stance, moving away from Russia, its traditional ally and weapons supplier. Finally, the US EXIM Board of Directors approved a preliminary commitment to Serbia's Telekom Group for $50 million (€42.8m) to support the preparation and rollout of their 5G telecommunications network. This transaction further reinforces EXIM's China and Transformational Exports Program (CTEP) as 5G security is a high government priority and falls under one of the 10 transformational export areas supported by EXIM. All this was enough for Moscow to decide to attempt to destabilise the government in Belgrade. It is to be seen if Putin has yet crossed Trump's 'red line' and if Washington is willing to unleash more painful sanctions on Russia. One thing is clear – Moscow's continued defiance and rogue activities in its neighbourhoods have awakened the Trump administration. Ambassador John B. Craig, former US Ambassador to Oman and Special Assistant to President Bush for Combating Terrorism. He is a Senior Fellow at the Transatlantic Leadership Network in Washington and a member of the advisory board of the Institute for Politics and the Economy of Southeast Europe.
