logo
A 1993 Declassified CIA Document That Exposes Pakistan's Fear Of India

A 1993 Declassified CIA Document That Exposes Pakistan's Fear Of India

NDTV01-05-2025

New Delhi:
The terrorist attack on tourists in Pahalgam's Baisaran Valley left 26 people dead and over 20 were wounded. A meadow where families came to rest became a burial ground for their loved ones. The Resistance Front (TRF), a group believed to be an offshoot of the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and backed by Pakistan's deep state, is linked to the attack. Pakistan denies involvement. The script is familiar.
But behind this latest tragedy lies a decades-old reality - one that the US intelligence saw coming. In 1993, the CIA declassified a secret assessment. Buried inside it is the idea that Pakistan fears India. Not just economically or militarily, but existentially. The document, a National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), studied the India-Pakistan dynamic and offered one conclusion: if war erupts, it will likely start with something like Kashmir, and Pakistan will be on the back foot from the beginning.
The 1993 Forecast
The NIE was prepared under Bruce Riedel, a seasoned CIA hand. It came at a time when India had just seen the demolition of the Babri Masjid (1992), and Pakistan was grappling with internal instability. Nuclear weapons were a silent threat, not yet tested, but very real.
The CIA analysts saw a slim "20 per cent" chance of full-scale war. But what worried them was the chain reaction - miscalculation, provocation, retaliation. A major terrorist incident, a misread military exercise, or sudden communal riots could trigger it.
The document also noted something critical - neither India nor Pakistan wanted war. But Pakistan, feeling dwarfed by India's growing power, was likely to act out of fear. This included supporting proxy groups in Kashmir or forming informal alliances with terrorists to offset India's influence.
The report didn't name TRF. That group didn't exist back then. But it warned of Pakistan's strategy of arming and training anti-India terrorists to "liberate Kashmir."
Pakistan's Strategic Fear
At the core of the CIA report was an uncomfortable truth for Islamabad. The balance of power had already tilted in India's favour. Economically, militarily, and diplomatically, New Delhi was rising, and Pakistan couldn't catch up. The gap wasn't just in firepower; it was also in stability.
India, for all its internal challenges, had stable governments and a growing economy. India was, at the time, led by Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao, with Dr Manmohan Singh as the finance minister.
Pakistan oscillated between military rule, political crises, and economic breakdowns. Fear, not confidence, drove its Kashmir policy.
The CIA assessment explicitly said that a shift in military balance could push Pakistan to open nuclear deployment or seek asymmetric warfare. That included terrorism - low-cost, high-impact operations designed to bleed India without open confrontation.
The 1993 document predicted that Pakistan might embrace Islamism not out of belief but as a tool. If an economic collapse came, or if a military dictator took charge, Pakistan could "join with militants" to distract the public and provoke India.
It also warned that India's domestic politics - if dominated by religious polarisation - could fuel more communal unrest, making Pakistan's meddling easier to justify at home.
The US' Role
The NIE wasn't just for internal CIA use. It was meant to brief the White House and State Department. Bill Clinton had taken office, and South Asia was gaining attention. The former US President would visit India seven years later in 2000, right on the day of the Chittisinghpura Massacre, where Pakistan's Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) killed 35 Sikh villagers.
The CIA warned to be careful. Confidence-building measures like hotlines and nuclear pacts were useful, but in a real crisis, they "might prove irrelevant." Verification was weak. Trust was thinner. Once violence began, leaders would rely on instinct, not protocol.
The NIE also captured what the Pahalgam attack has now reignited: "a spectacular terrorist outrage that one side could attribute to the other" might be all it takes.
Today, in Delhi, policymakers are flipping through that same scenario. More than thirty years later, the 1993 CIA document reads less like a historical paper and more like a warning label for the present.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Victor Gao claims all land north of Ganga for China. People say he's a ‘diplomatic fighter'
Victor Gao claims all land north of Ganga for China. People say he's a ‘diplomatic fighter'

The Print

time39 minutes ago

  • The Print

Victor Gao claims all land north of Ganga for China. People say he's a ‘diplomatic fighter'

Gao's comments reflect a broader Chinese narrative that selectively contests colonial-era agreements, particularly the Simla Accord of 1914. His views have found enthusiastic support online , with some seeing him as a ' diplomatic fighter '. They are also calling the 'Ganges River boundary' proposition as a 'Victor Gao Line', praising it as a masterstroke and a leap in strategic thinking . Others have labelled India's stance as a product of its ' inner demons ' and its belief in a 'fictional colonial border'. The India-China border issue has long shaped the contours of bilateral ties. Despite the deadly 2020 Galwan clash and limited disengagement since, core issues remain unresolved, largely because Beijing prefers ambiguity, keeping the dispute alive as a means of strategic leverage. Everything north of the Ganga River belongs to China.' This provocative claim by Victor Gao, vice president of the Center for China and Globalization, recently sparked a heated online debate in China. Gao's remarks are more than just rhetorical bravado; they signal a strategic tactic—using history and symbolism as a key argument in Chinese discourse to apply pressure in the border dispute. This line of thinking positions China's argument as a civilisational counterpoint: if India can uphold the colonial-era McMahon Line as sacrosanct, why shouldn't China invoke the Ganges—the 'Mother River'—as a more authentic civilisational boundary? On Chinese platforms, many argue that the McMahon Line was never legitimate to begin with. According to them, it was the result of collusion between British India and Tibetan representatives, which pushed the boundary northward and robbed China of over 90,000 square kilometres of 'ancestral territory'. Gao's rhetorical pivot is being celebrated online as a display of strategic finesse. 'India decries colonialism in principle but clings to colonial boundaries in practice. It preserves what is advantageous and discards the rest. That is a rogue double standard,' quipped a Baidu user. Far from being dismissed as fringe nationalism, Gao's claim aligns with a larger push to challenge Western norms and redraw borders on Chinese terms—both literal and conceptual. This narrative caters to domestic audiences while sending a broader geopolitical signal: postcolonial boundaries are not fixed, and China reserves the right to question them. Also read: Trump's anti-immigrant rhetoric is tearing LA apart—a city built by Mexican settlers in 1781 China's narrative arsenal Chinese strategic messaging does not stop at redrawing history. The strategic community within China frames India's stance as rooted in historical insecurity and inflated ambition. Hu Shisheng, director at the South Asia Institute of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, portrays India as a power intoxicated by imagined grandeur. According to him, India sees itself as the 'heir to the British colonial legacy' and views China's rise as a direct challenge to its regional dominance. He argues that India suffers from 'three miscalculations': underestimating China's will to defend its sovereignty, overestimating support from the United States, and misjudging its own military capabilities. Liu Zongyi, senior fellow at the Centre for South Asia Studies at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies, goes further. He accuses India of reneging on every major political guideline since 2005, especially after the 2020 clashes. He claims that India has turned the border dispute into a geopolitical bargaining chip, leveraging it to deepen ties with the West. Ridicule on social media The online debate has also taken an ugly turn. Supporters of Gao's views have resorted to racist and derogatory tropes. Some Chinese internet users circulated mocking videos and memes about the Ganges River, labelling it polluted and unsanitary. Others suggested it needed a 'gas mask river chief', citing industrial waste and high E coli levels in Varanasi. Chinese users contrasted this with what they called Beijing's 'responsible' stewardship of transboundary rivers, such as data sharing on the Brahmaputra. 'India dumps an average of 1.3 billion litres of toxic wastewater into the Ganges every day, turning the holy river into a 'sewage ditch where corpses float,'' wrote a Weibo user. A Chinese influencer, who was banned from entering India after a derogatory video following Operation Sindoor, commented: 'Good, I never wanted to drink Ganges water anyway.' These remarks, meant to provoke, betray an insidious cultural condescension masquerading as strategic commentary. Also read: Don't count countries above India in per capita GDP. Look at the population instead Content to avoid resolution The online frenzy reveals a deeper truth: Beijing is more interested in shaping narratives than in sincerely resolving the dispute. If China could resolve the dispute with 12 other neighbours, it could have done so with New Delhi. But China's border issue with India is a 'leftover from history'—one it intends to pass on to the next generation of leaders. Xi Jinping is going nowhere for now, and there is no clarity on who comes next. What is clear is that China sees the dispute as a long-term leverage point. For now, Beijing is content to avoid resolution, distract with historical revisionism, and provoke through offensive rhetoric. This is hardly the posture of a country seeking peace or genuine reconciliation with its neighbour. If anything, the commentary and its support signal a growing assertiveness in Chinese claims over Indian territory, and the possibility that new fronts could be opened. Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation. She tweets @sanahashmi1. Views are personal. (Edited by Prasanna Bachchhav)

India and EU Close to Finalizing Historic Free Trade Deal Covering Goods, Services & Investments
India and EU Close to Finalizing Historic Free Trade Deal Covering Goods, Services & Investments

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

India and EU Close to Finalizing Historic Free Trade Deal Covering Goods, Services & Investments

India and the European Union are on the brink of sealing a historic Free Trade Agreement (FTA), with only a few issues left to resolve. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal confirmed from Bern that negotiations are 'really very near' completion, emphasizing mutual respect and commitment to fast-tracking the deal. Resumed in 2022, the talks span 23 major chapters, including goods, services, investment, digital trade, IPRs, and sustainable development. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar supports concluding an 'ambitious and balanced' deal by the end of 2025. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas called India and the EU 'natural partners' representing 25% of global GDP and population. In 2023–24, India-EU goods trade hit $137.4 billion, with services trade at $51.45 billion. The FTA is set to redefine global trade alignments, opening massive opportunities for collaboration, innovation, and strategic economic growth.#indiaeufta #piyushgoyal #indiaeu #tradenews #fta2025 #eupartnership #strategicdialogue #euindiarelations #globaltrade #jaishankar #toi #toibharat #bharat #breakingnews #indianews Read More

Intel Coup: Iran Gains Access To Israel's Sensitive Defence & Nuclear Files, Warns To Expose Secrets
Intel Coup: Iran Gains Access To Israel's Sensitive Defence & Nuclear Files, Warns To Expose Secrets

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Intel Coup: Iran Gains Access To Israel's Sensitive Defence & Nuclear Files, Warns To Expose Secrets

/ Jun 11, 2025, 12:40PM IST Iran claims to have accessed highly classified information from Israel's missile and nuclear programs, including data from dual-use scientific projects. The Iranian Ministry of Intelligence says some of the material will be used by its armed forces and shared with anti-Israel groups. Reports suggest the breach may involve documents from the Soreq Nuclear Research Center, a facility monitored by the IAEA. IAEA Chief Rafael Grossi confirmed the agency inspects Soreq but said no other Israeli sites are under their watch. Israel has not commented on the alleged breach. Iran calls the intel haul a "treasure trove" that could boost its military strength. As tensions rise, global security experts warn this could mark a dangerous new phase in regional hostilities.#IsraelIran #IntelligenceLeak #MissileProgram #NuclearSecrets #MiddleEastTensions #CyberWarfare #iaea #SoreqFacility #NationalSecurity #DefenseLeak

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store