
Planet Formation Theory Is Still Ensnared By A Chicken Or Egg Problem
We don't yet know how that first planet gets formed, Nienke van der Marel an astronomer at Leiden University in The Netherlands, tells me in her office. We understand how clumping can be caused by physical forces within the disk once there's a planet in that disk, van der Marel tells me, but the biggest question is still how that first planet formed.
Ongoing observations by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile's Northern Atacama Desert are largely responsible for the lion's share of our current knowledge about how protoplanetary disks form from millimeter-sized particles and grow into full-fledged planetary systems like ours.
In 2013, using some of the first ALMA observations van der Marel and colleagues detected the existence of a dust trap in a protoplanetary disk around the young A-type star Oph-IRS 48, located some 400 light-years away in the Northern constellation of Ophiuchus.
A dust trap is a location where millimeter-sized pebbles, are concentrated in one part of the disk, and where they can continue to grow all the way from planetesimals (planetary building blocks ranging from a few km to a few hundred km in diameter) to full-fledged planets.
That first planet will carve a gap along its orbit and then at the outer edge of that gap, you naturally get a maximum in the density and a bump in the gas density, says van der Marel. So now, the pebbles that come from the outer disk still drift inwards, but then at that maximum pressure location, they get trapped, she says.
But as soon as these particles reach typical pebble sizes (1 mm across), they will start to experience drag forces from the gas in the disk and rapidly move inwards toward the star, says van der Marel.
Disappearing Pebbles
So, within a hundred years, any pebble that you form out here in the outer region of the disk has moved all the way inwards and onto the star and is lost; it doesn't have time to continue growing all the way to planetesimals, says van der Marel. So, you need something that stops the pebbles from drifting inwards, she says. And the phenomenon that was proposed to stop it was a dust trap, says van der Marel.
Planetary Disk Pressure Bumps
'Pressure bumps' or 'dust traps' present in the disk will halt these inward moving pebbles and trap them, says van der Marel. This whole idea creates a major chicken or egg problem, because if you need a planet to create dust traps, then dust traps are necessary to form planetesimals and planets, she says.
Alternative Scenarios
If indeed planets are the only source of dust traps, then we do have a chicken or egg problem to form the first planet, Olja Panic, an astrophysicist at the University of Leeds in the U.K., tells me in Reykjavik. But recent research has been directed towards identifying possible scenarios under which these dust traps can arise without the need for planets to cause them, says Panic.
This could include various types of gravitational disk instabilities, whether generated from a passing star or during the disk's earliest formation.
It is also possible that there are other mechanisms that create the first dust traps, such as magnetic fields, ionization structures (which would arrange molecules so that they have a net electrical charge), or even planetary snowlines. That is, regions in a young planetary disk where temperatures are so cold that water, ammonia, carbon monoxide or even methane can freeze into ice grains. Some researchers posit that this increase in ice density might even trigger the formation of gas giant planets like Jupiter.
The idea is that these first dust traps would then concentrate these planetary pebbles until the first planet forms within the dust trap.
But that has yet to be confirmed observationally.
When Might This Problem Be Solved?
Although ALMA's array of 66 telescopes work have allowed astronomers to see incredible detail in these disks of gas and dust around young stars, future telescopes will reveal even more detail about how these stars spawn planets.
In the coming decades, a lot of new telescopes will teach us more about the composition of exoplanets which may also tell us how they form, says van der Marel. Just like ALMA, the Next Generation Very Large Array (NGVLA) in New Mexico is another up and coming radio array which will observe at even longer wavelengths where we can trace even larger dust grains, she says. That may help us to understand where most planet formation takes place, says van der Marel.
Is our solar system an anomaly?
We don't have the data right now to say for certain whether we are an anomaly or not, says van der Marel.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
New Study Shows Smartwatch Stress Sensors Have No Idea What They're Doing
You might want to think twice before you put a lot of stock in the latest stress charts from your fitness wearable. A recent study from the Netherlands' Leiden University, published in the Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, has found that when smartwatches and similar devices record readings on stress, fatigue, or sleep, they're frequently getting it wrong. Researchers studied 800 young adults using the same Garmin Vivosmart 4 smartwatch model. They compared the data the smartwatches produced with the reports that the users created four times per day about how sleepy or stressed they were feeling. Lead author and associate professor Eiko Fried said the correlation between the wearable data and the user-created data was, "basically zero." A representative for Garmin did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Stressed or sex? Your watch doesn't know So why do wearables like fitness smartwatches get it so wrong? Their sensors are fairly limited in what they can do. Watches like these need to be worn correctly at all times (a loose or tight watch may give poor readings, for example), and they typically use basic information like pulse rate and movement to make guesses about health. Those guesses don't always reflect real-world scenarios. A wearable may identify high stress when the real cause of the change was a workout, excitement over good news, or sex. There are so many potential alternatives to stress or fatigue that the watches in the study never really got it right -- and the devices sometimes guessed the complete opposite emotional state from what users recorded. The Dutch study did note that Garmin's Body Battery readings, which specifically measure physical fatigue, were more reliable than stress indicators, but still inaccurate. And sleep sensing performed the best of them all, with Garmin watches showing a two-thirds chance of noting the differences between a good night's sleep and a bad one. It's also worth noting that smartwatch sensors can become more accurate as technology improves. It would be interesting to run a similar study with the much newer Garmin Vivosmart 5 to see if anything has improved, as well as see if other models like the latest versions of the Apple Watch have similar accuracy results.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Early galaxy looked like lumpy ‘cosmic grapes'
A cluster of 'Cosmic Grapes' is challenging current theoretical models on how galaxies formed during the universe's earliest eons. After combining observations from the Atacam Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and the James Webb Space Telescope, astronomers now possess an unprecedented look at about 15 gargantuan 'star-forming clumps' inside a single rotating disk that formed only 900 million years after the big bang. 'Early galaxies form through dark matter and gas assembly, evolving into dynamically hot, chaotic structures driven by mergers and feedback,' the international research team explained in their Nature Astronomy study published on August 7. 'By contrast, remarkably smooth, rotating disks are observed in massive galaxies only 1.4 billion years after the Big Bang, implying rapid dynamical evolution.' Understanding how this cosmic evolution unfolded requires the ability to study young galaxies—something previously made difficult by limitations in observational tools' sensitivity and spatial resolution. Even with the Hubble Space Telescope's groundbreaking abilities, the 'Cosmic Grapes' galaxy only appeared as a smooth, singular disk-like formation. Using more recent and advanced projects like JWST and ALMA, astronomers were able to refocus on the mystery target with some help from a cosmic neighbor. According to a study announcement from the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, the Cosmic Grapes structure 'happened to be perfectly magnified by a foreground galaxy cluster through gravitational lensing.' The opportunity allowed researchers to devote over 100 hours of quality telescope time to the individual system, making it one of the early universe's most extensively analyzed galaxies. Instead of the individual disk seen in Hubble's images, the exponentially greater resolution from JWST and ALMA showcased a wholly different situation—a rotating galaxy stuffed with giant, lumpy stellar formations resembling the vineyard fruit. The reveal is also the first time that astronomers successfully linked an early galaxy's smaller internal structures to their larger, collective rotation. The data was so detailed that they even managed to achieve a spatial resolution of 10 parsecs, or about 30 light-years. What's particularly striking is that Cosmic Grapes isn't an oddball or extreme example given what astronomers understand of galactic evolution. Instead, it exists on the standard, main sequence of galaxies when it comes to attributes like star formations, mass, chemical composition, and size. This suggests many of the era's galaxies that have been previously documented as smooth may more resemble the clumpy, dynamic structure seen through JWST and ALMA. 'Because existing simulations fail to reproduce such a large number of clumps in rotating galaxies at early times, this discovery raises key questions about how galaxies form and evolve,' the National Radio Astronomy Observatory's announcement explained. 'It suggests that our understanding of feedback processes and structure formation in young galaxies may need significant revision.' Solve the daily Crossword


Forbes
14 hours ago
- Forbes
NASA's Hubble Tracks Alien Comet Moving At 36-Miles/Sec Towards Sun
Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope have captured the sharpest-ever image of comet 3I/ATLAS — an 'interstellar interloper' — revealing it to be the fastest ever comet seen so far. The comet, first spotted by the NASA-funded Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) on July 1, 2025, comes from another star system. It's only the third confirmed interstellar object ever detected. 36 Miles Per Second 3I/ATLAS is traveling through our solar system at a staggering 130,000 miles (209,000 kilometers) per hour — or 36 miles per second (58 kilometers per second) — the highest velocity ever recorded for a solar system visitor. It appears to be behaving like a normal solar system comet, with Hubble capturing a dust plume ejected from the sun-facing side of the comet alongside a dust tail streaming away from the nucleus. Astronomers believe this record-breaking speed is the result of countless gravitational encounters during its interstellar voyage. "It's like glimpsing a rifle bullet for a thousandth of a second. You can't project that back with any accuracy to figure out where it started on its path,' said David Jewitt of the University of California, Los Angeles, science team leader for the Hubble observations, in a press release. Largest Ever Interstellar Object Far larger than either of the other two interstellar comets found in recent years — 1I/'Oumuamua in 2017 and 2I/Borisov in 2019 — the arrival of 3I/ATLAS offers scientists a rare opportunity to study a visitor from another star system. However, it's proving difficult to observe. Hubble's new observations suggest the comet's icy nucleus could be as large as 3.5 miles (5.6 kilometers) in diameter, but it may also be as small as 1,000 feet (320 meters), say the authors of a new paper published on arXiv, a platform for disseminating research, but which isn't yet peer-reviewed. It's due to be published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. Other large telescopes have had a similar problem, including the James Webb Space Telescope, TESS (Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite), the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory and the W.M. Keck Observatory. Where Did 3I/ATLAS Come From? The speed at which 3I/ATLAS is traveling makes observations very difficult. 'No one knows where the comet came from,' said Jewitt. 'This latest interstellar tourist is one of a previously undetected population of objects bursting onto the scene that will gradually emerge." The detection of 3I/ATLAS has been possible because of powerful sky survey capabilities, something that's about to be bolstered even further with the opening of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory. It has already detected interstellar object 3I/ATLAS and may detect up to 50 more during its 10-year mission, according to a new model. "We've crossed a threshold," said Jewitt. Threat To Earth 3I/ATLAS poses no threat to Earth — in fact, it's passing through the opposite side of the sun to where Earth currently is and will make its closest approach to the sun in October, when it will be behind the sun and be lost in its glare from Earth's point of view. It will pass relatively close to Mars. 3I/ATLAS should remain visible to ground-based telescopes until September, when it will pass too close to the sun to observe, but it's expected to reappear by early December as it departs the inner solar system. Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.