White House announces new $200-million ballroom as part of Trump's latest makeover of 'The People's House'
It will be the latest change introduced to what's known as 'The People's House' since the Republican President returned to office in January. It also will be the first structural change to the Executive Mansion itself since the addition of the Truman balcony in 1948.
Mr. Trump has substantially redecorated the Oval Office through the addition of golden flourishes and cherubs, presidential portraits and other items, and installed massive flagpoles on the north and south lawns to fly the American flag. Workers are currently finishing up a project to replace the lawn in the Rose Garden with stone.
Mr. Trump for months has been promising to build a ballroom, saying the White House doesn't have space big enough for large events and scoffing at the notion of hosting heads of state and other guests in tents on the lawn as past administrations have done for state dinners attended by hundreds of guests.
The East Room, the largest room in the the White House, can accommodate about 200 people.
Mr. Trump said he's been planning the construction for some time.
'They've wanted a ballroom at the White House for more than 150 years but there's never been a president that was good at ballrooms,' Mr. Trump told reporters Thursday (July 30, 2025). 'I'm good at building things and we're going to build quickly and on time. It'll be beautiful – top, top of the line.'
He said the new ballroom would not interfere with the mansion itself.
'It'll be near it but not touching it and pays total respect to the existing building, which I'm the biggest fan of,' he said of the White House. "It's my favorite. It's my favorite place. I love it.'
Mr. Trump said the ballroom will serve administrations to come.
'It'll be a great legacy project,' he said. 'I think it will be really beautiful,' he added.
The 90,000-square-foot ballroom will be built where the East Wing sits with a seated capacity of 650 people. The East Wing houses several offices, including the first lady's. Those offices will be temporarily relocated during construction and that wing of the building will be modernised and renovated, said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt.
'Nothing will be torn down,' she said.
White House chief of staff Susie Wiles said the President, whose early career was in real estate and construction, and his White House are 'fully committed' to working with the appropriate organisations to preserve the mansion's 'special history.'
'President Trump is a builder at heart and has an extraordinary eye for detail,' Ms. Wiles said in a statement.
Ms. Leavitt said at her briefing Thursday (July 30, 2025) that Mr. Trump and other donors have committed to raising the approximately $200 million in construction costs. She did not name any of the other donors.
Renderings of what the future ballroom will look like were posted on the White House website.
The President chose McCrery Architects, based in Washington, as lead architect on the project. The construction team will be led by Clark Construction. Engineering will be provided by AECOM.
Mr. Trump also has another project in mind. He told NBC News in an interview that he intends to replace what he said was a 'terribly' remodeled bathroom in the famous Lincoln Bedroom with one that is closer in style to the 19-th century.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ready to pay price to protect farmers, says Modi as Trump increases tariff rate
India would make no compromise with the interests of its farmers and the country is ready to pay any price for it, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Thursday, remarks apparently made in response to President Donald Trump's decision to impose an effective tariff rate of 50% on exports to the US. Prime Minister Narendra Modi. (PTI) A day earlier, India fired back at Trump's move by calling it 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable', vowing to protect national interests amid a growing fallout between the two countries that have long been strategic partners. 'The interests of our farmers are our topmost priority. India will never compromise the interests of its farmers, its cattle rearers and fisherfolk,' Modi said, addressing an event in New Delhi to commemorate the centenary birth anniversary of MS Swaminathan, the architect of the country's green revolution. 'I know I'll have to pay a big price for this personally, but I'm prepared. India today is prepared to protect its farming community at any cost.' The White House said on Wednesday that Trump signed an executive order imposing a 25% levy on Indian imports for the country's purchases of Russian oil, which comes on top of a 25% tariff he had announced last week. India and the US failed to hammer a bilateral trade pact after several rounds of negotiations, despite Trump's hint in the middle of the talks that a 'beautiful big deal' was imminent. India's refusal to open up its farm, fishery, and dairy sectors was one of the main sticking points. On Thursday, Modi made it clear that India would continue protecting the agriculture sector, which accounts for nearly 18% of the country's gross domestic product and employs millions of poor cultivators who mostly own tiny land parcels. 'The strength of our farmers and agriculture is the very basis for the development of our country. That's why our policies are not just aimed at helping our farmers, but to increase their confidence,' Modi said. Trump's taunt that India could buy oil from Pakistan did not sit well with New Delhi, and the country has also rejected repeated claims by Trump that he brokered a truce between India and Pakistan by using trade as a lever. The MS Swaminathan Foundation also conferred the first MS Swaminathan Prize for Food and Peace to Nigerian scientist Ademola A Adenle, the founder of Africa Sustainability Innovation-Academy. Modi released a commemorative ₹100 coin and a postage stamp in honour of Swaminathan, who collaborated with Norman Borlaug, a Nobel laureate, to customise for India a high-yielding wheat variety Borlaug developed for poverty-stricken Mexico in the 1950s. This wheat type paved the way for an Indian green revolution.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
Free speech on trial: Stanford newspaper sues Trump administration over political targeting of students
Framing the policy as an 'ideological purge,' a Stanford lawsuit challenges Trump-era immigration powers that allegedly target noncitizens for engaging in protected political expression read more The Stanford Daily, Stanford University's student-run newspaper, has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging its use of federal immigration law to target pro-Palestinian Arab activists. The newspaper argues that the government's actions unlawfully curtail students' First Amendment rights, according to a report in Israel National News. The Stanford Daily and two former noncitizen college students brought the case, fearing that their pro-Palestinian Arab views or activism could make them vulnerable to deportation. As such, the lawsuit challenges the Trump administration's use of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to deport noncitizens based on their political views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Attorneys for the plaintiffs, from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), stated that international students on staff have been avoiding writing about the war in Gaza or have removed previously published articles out of fear. They noted that since March 2025, the administration began targeting lawfully present noncitizens for deportation based on protected speech, leading to self-censorship among students at The Stanford Daily due to fears of visa revocation, arrest, detention and deportation, according to CNN. The lawsuit focuses on two INA provisions. The first grants the Secretary of State the authority to remove a noncitizen whose views 'would compromise a compelling United States foreign policy interest.' The second provision allows the Secretary to revoke a visa at any time, at their discretion. The lawsuit seeks a federal judge's order to bar the administration from using these provisions to deport noncitizens, particularly staff members of The Stanford Daily, based on their protected speech. The Stanford Daily stated in its lawsuit that the administration has caused its foreign writers to self-censor to avoid being targeted. The student newspaper brought the suit because of two anonymous members of the newspaper, who have had to 'self-censor' their published and. The newspaper argued that the government's effort has impermissibly chilled students' First Amendment rights. Stanford, along with other campuses across the US, experienced an increase in anti-Israel protests following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack and the subsequent war in Gaza. In June 2024, a committee analyzing antisemitism at Stanford found 'widespread and pernicious' antisemitism at the university. In April, 12 individuals were charged with felony vandalism related to a pro-Palestinian Arab demonstration at Stanford University, during which demonstrators occupied the university president's office and caused significant damage. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The lawsuit is a representation of a legal challenge to the Trump administration's so-called ideological deportation policy, which aims to deport noncitizens based on their political views.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
From deterrence to danger: How Trump policy is fuelling global nuclear risks
With a slew of decisions over many years, US President Donald Trump has raised the risk of a nuclear catastrophe to the highest level in years, undoing decades of nuclear arms reduction and non-proliferation efforts. read more A Dongfeng-41 intercontinental strategic nuclear missiles group formation marches to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China in Beijing, on October 1, 2019 (Photo: Shen Shi/Imagine China/Reuters) In the latest episode of dangerous nuclear sabre-rattling, Russia on Monday ended the moratorium on the deployment of nuclear-capable intermediate range missiles. The development came days after US President Donald Trump deployed nuclear submarines near Russian waters in response to threats of war from Dmitry Medvedev, a top ally of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. With such back and forth actions over the past years, often triggered by impulsive decision-making of Trump, decades of nuclear arms reduction and nuclear non-proliferation efforts are being undone and the world is now closest that it has been to a nuclear catastrophe in decades. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It's not just that nuclear powers like the United States, Russia, and China, that are building more nuclear weapons and modernising delivery platforms. But more countries, such as those traditionally under the US security umbrella in Europe and East Asia, are considering developing own nuclear weapons as well. While every country, whether Poland in Europe or South Korea in Asia, has its own rationale, the reason underpinning all such pursuits is Trump's disruption of the international world order that he began in his first term. As a result, the likes of Poland, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, and even Japan, conversations around the development of a nuclear weapon are no longer taboo. His mistaken strategy of 'maximum pressure' had already put Iran on the brink of developing a nuclear weapon, necessitating the three-war earlier this year. Trump & Putin flex nuclear muscles Over the past two weeks, the war of words between the United States and Russia finally led to real-world consequences. Since the launch of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Putin and his top allies like Medvedev had frequently invoked nuclear weapons. Medvedev frequently threatened Western capitals with nuclear strikes over their support of Ukraine. Last month, Medvedev finally overstepped with his personal feud with Putin on X. After he threatened the United States with a direct war, Trump ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines near Russia. Days later, Russia responded by withdrawing from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Trump had already withdrawn the United States from the INF in his first term in 2019. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Under the treaty, which was originally signed in 1987 between the United States and Soviet Union, the two countries had agreed to ban and gradually dismantle intermediate- and short-range nuclear missiles between the range of 500 to 5,500 kilometres. Trump kills arms control treaties The INF is not the only arms control treaty that Trump has quit. In 2020, Trump withdrew the United States from the Open Skies Treaty with Russia, which allowed the two countries to fly over each other's territories with sensor equipment to assure that none of them were preparing for conflict. In his usual hubris, Trump had said that he would make new treaties with Russia for INF and Open Skies. Those deals, of course, never happened. Instead, in 2023, Russia quit the New START treaty, which was the last remaining arms control agreement with the United States. Under the New START treaty signed in 2010, which succeeded the Moscow Treaty of 2002, the two countries agreed to 1,550 strategic nuclear warheads and up to 800 delivery platforms of various types. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump nudges friends & foes alike towards nukes With his actions, Trump has consistently nudged allies and adversaries alike towards nuclear weapons since his first term. In the first term, Trump withdrew the United Stats from the Iran nuclear deal of 2015 and applied the 'maximum pressure' strategy. While his idea was to pressure Iran into negotiating a new deal that purportedly favoured the United States, it turned out to be a spectacular failure and pushed Iran towards the brink of developing a nuclear weapon. Israel used Iran's near-nuclear weapons status as a pretext for war earlier this year that eventually dragged the United States into the conflict as well. As Trump has virtually withdrawn the longstanding security commitment to Europe under Nato's collective defence principle out of his friendship with Putin and has threatened to abandon Asian allies like Japan and South Korea as well, there is anxiety in these countries that their adversaries —Russia in Europe and China and North Korea in Asia— could use the US abandonment as an encouragement for a more muscular policy or even pursue outright attacks and invasions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Such concerns have led to real conversations in countries like Poland, South Korea, and Japan about developing nuclear weapons as ultimate deterrence. In West Asia, Saudi Arabia is believed to have similar discussions as well.
