logo
Deal or no deal? Zimbabwe still divided over land 25 years after white farmers evicted

Deal or no deal? Zimbabwe still divided over land 25 years after white farmers evicted

Yahoo25-06-2025
A quarter of a century after their land was seized during a chaotic land reform programme that made global headlines, a small group of white Zimbabwean farmers have accepted a controversial compensation deal from the government.
Once the backbone of the country's agricultural sector, many of them are now elderly, visibly frail, battling illness and financially desperate.
"I believe this is the only opportunity. We can't wait 10 years for another deal, " 71-year-old Arthur Baisley told the BBC.
Still recuperating from back surgery, Mr Baisley was among those who arrived earlier this year at a conference room in the capital, Harare - some aided by walking sticks and walking frames - to discuss the deal.
The catch is that these farmers have now been paid only 1% of their total compensation in cash - the rest is being issued as US dollar-denominated treasury bonds that mature in 10 years – with 2% interest paid twice a year.
The land reform programme, sparked by the invasion of white-owned farms around the country by supporters of the late Robert Mugabe, was launched in 2000 by the then president, who was desperate to shore up political support at the time when Zimbabwe had about 2,500 white farmers owning 4,000 farms - half of the country's best farmland.
The seizures became Africa's biggest modern-day land revolution, and was meant to redress colonial-era land grabs, when black people were forced to leave their land. But it set the country on a collision path with Western nations - economic sanctions followed, companies exited and the economy collapsed.
This compensation deal has been pushed by Mugabe's successor President Emmerson Mnangagwa, who is keen to mend fences. The money being given to the farmers, as stipulated by the constitution, is for infrastructure and improvements to the land - like buildings and dams, not the value of the land itself, which Zimbabwe's government insists rightfully belongs to the country's original inhabitants.
Overall this is estimated to total $3.5bn (£2.6bn). However, the recent cash pay-out totalled just $3.1m for 378 farms.
Mr Baisley said it was not the best deal but was reasonably fair - and his decision to accept it has come with the realisation that the takeovers cannot be undone.
"It was difficult for my family in the beginning but life goes on, you have to move on," he said, adding that he would start selling some of the bonds immediately to offset medical bills and to care for his sickly parents.
It is a significant shift, a softening of hard lines previously drawn by both sides.
Mugabe used to pound the lectern at party rallies saying the white farmers should go to the UK, the former colonial power, for their compensation - although quietly he was paying out select farmers.
The white farmers meanwhile had insisted on a $10bn full cash settlement. Both sides have settled on the $3.5bn figure.
However, unlike Mr Baisley, the majority of white farmers are holding out for a deal which would see all the cash paid upfront.
Deon Theron, who in 2008 was forced off the farm he had bought after independence, leads more than 1,000 farmers who have rejected the offer.
Boxes of his possessions, hastily packed during his departure, still fill the veranda of his Harare home where he told me the deal was not fair as there was no guarantee that the bonds would be honoured in 10 years' time.
The 71-year-old said it was clear that the government did not have the money – and he wanted to see the international community, including the UK, help with negotiations as the government was refusing to budge, or even meet the dissenting group.
"The British can't go and sit in the pavilion and watch what's happening because they are part of it. They are linked with our history. They can't walk away from it," he told the BBC.
In an agreement brokered in the run-up to independence, the UK was to support land reform financially - but it floundered towards the end of the 1990s when the Labour government came to power and relations soured.
The need to re-engage Britain on the compensation was the battle cry of many of the war veterans who led the farm invasions. They had fought in the 1970s war against white-minority rule - and felt let down by the slow pace of land reform following independence.
But like the white farmers, the war veterans are also split over the government's handling of the compensation.
One faction is suing the government for "clandestinely" agreeing to pay $3.5bn in compensation, saying the offer should have been agreed in parliament.
One of its leaders, Godfrey Gurira, said that given the myriad economic challenges cash-strapped Zimbabwe faced, it should not have prioritised white farmers.
"It's such a colossal amount... for a nation of our size. People are suffering they can hardly make ends meet, the hospitals have nothing, then we have the luxury to pay $3.5bn. In our opinion it's an unnecessary act of appeasement," he told the BBC.
A second lawsuit challenges an aspect of a new land policy that demands that new farmers pay for the land in order to obtain title deeds to own the land outright.
In the wake of the redistribution, the 250,000 people who replaced the 2,500 white farmers were only entitled to 99-year leases. However this meant it was near-impossible for them to get bank loans as their security of tenure was not guaranteed.
Last year, the government said farmers could apply to own their land outright – with title deeds - but they needed to pay between $100 and $500 per hectare (2.47 acres).
That money will go towards the compensation deal to white farmers, according to the government.
Those challenging this say forcing black farmers to effectively buy back the land contradicts the law.
And the black farmers themselves are divided over the issue.
The land reform programme has had mixed results. Many new farmers did not have the skills, the finances and labour to farm successfully. But the country's agricultural sector is now rebounding with pockets of successful farmers.
In 2002, Solomon Ganye arrived on a bicycle to receive a 20-hectare bare piece of land in Harare South.
It was part of the sprawling 2,700-hectare farm that had been divided among 77 people.
He found the initial years a struggle - suffering from a lack of finances and climate shocks. But slowly through Chinese money ploughed into the tobacco sector, and after handing the business over to his sons - both agriculture graduates in their 20s - things have improved.
They have built an enviable enterprise with 200 permanent workers, and have expanded into dairy and livestock farming. They are applying for the title deeds of their land and have even acquired more in recent years from the government.
Aaron Ganye, his oldest son, told the BBC that without the land reform programme, his family would probably not have been able to buy a farm because in the past the structure of ownership saw vast tracts of land being held by a single family.
"I'm very happy because to be honest we've taken farming to another level because now we're living a good life through farming. We're doing more than what the white guys were doing in terms of quality of tobacco and the leaf is good," the 25-year-old said proudly.
"We've invested in technology. It's not easy. I'm now motivating more farmers to do good work here," he said.
He does believe that new farmers should contribute to compensation payments but based on the value of infrastructure they inherited.
On the political front, tensions are also easing - and the UK government no longer has any Zimbabwean on its sanction list having recently delisted four military and government officials it had accused of human rights abuses.
The UK's Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office told the BBC this was because they were no longer in the positions they held at the time they were added to the list in 2021.
Nonetheless, it is a significant development, marking the end of more than 20 years of sanctions against Zimbabwe.
The country now hopes that the farmers' compensation issue can be properly sorted out to get Western support for ongoing talks on restructuring its massive foreign debt.
There is no question that 25 years on, calm has returned to almost all farming fronts.
Agriculture is rebounding, this year farmers have sold over 300,000 tonnes of tobacco at auction - the highest tobacco production ever.
But compromise is needed on all sides for the country to fully jump over the hurdle of land reform and its fallout.
How a self-styled knight giving away cars and wads of cash got people talking
I cannot forgive Mugabe's soldiers – massacre survivor
Is Zimbabwe extending an olive branch to its white farmers?
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Focus on Africa
This Is Africa
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Analysis: Did Trump really end six — or seven — wars?
Analysis: Did Trump really end six — or seven — wars?

CNN

time2 hours ago

  • CNN

Analysis: Did Trump really end six — or seven — wars?

Donald Trump The Middle East AsiaFacebookTweetLink Follow President Donald Trump is not just trying to end the vicious war in Ukraine. He's claiming he's already ended almost one war for each month of his second term — spanning the Middle East; Africa; and Central, South and Southeast Asia. 'I've done six wars — I've ended six wars,' Trump said in his meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders on Monday. 'Look, India-Pakistan, we're talking about big places, you just take a look at some of these wars. You go to Africa and take a look at them.' The White House proclaimed in a statement this month that 'President Trump is the President of Peace,' listing a total of seven claimed bilateral agreements between Armenia and Azerbaijan; Cambodia and Thailand; Israel and Iran; India and Pakistan; Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo; Egypt and Ethiopia; and Serbia and Kosovo, as well as the Abraham Accords, a normalization pact signed in Trump's first term between Israel and some Arab states. On Tuesday, the president told 'Fox and Friends' that 'we ended seven wars.' Some of this is classic Trumpian hyperbole. And the president's team is scanning the globe looking for fires to extinguish to claim quick wins for his transparent campaign for a Nobel Peace Prize. Trump hasn't suddenly reinvented American foreign policy. Every administration works to halt wars and to advance US interests. Most don't take constant victory laps — indeed, such triumphalism can often destroy quiet diplomacy. Yet Trump has saved lives. In some cases, he's used presidential power in novel ways to stop sudden conflicts from escalating into full-scale wars. But his success raises new questions that also apply to Ukraine. Is Trump in it for the long haul or just for deals he can hype, much as he licensed products as a businessman and stamped his name on them? And will Trump's evisceration of the US Agency for International Development and downsizing of the State Department deprive him of the tools the US needs to turn breakthroughs into lasting peace agreements that solve underlying causes of wars? Trump kept insisting Monday — as he tried finesse his adoption of Russia's opposition to an immediate Ukraine ceasefire — that he was more interested in final deals. Ironically however, some of his 'six wars' deals are closer to ceasefires than peace agreements that permanently end generational disputes. And in the case of Iran and Israel, Trump's claims to have made peace after their 12-day conflict are complicated by US involvement in strikes against Tehran's nuclear program. While an informal truce is in place, there's no sign a slow-boiling state of war involving all three nations since Iran's Islamic Revolution in 1979 will end. Trump is also conveniently forgetting his failed attempt to end the war between Israel and Hamas. And global outrage over reports of widespread starvation in Gaza and the president's staunch support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could thwart his hopes for a Nobel Prize — whatever happens with Ukraine. His record is also blotted by the failure of his first-term peace efforts with North Korea. Leader Kim Jong Un now has more nuclear weapons than before Trump offered him fruitless, photo-op summits. Some of Trump's biggest successes have been behind the scenes. 'I'm struck by the fact that the ones that were helpful, especially India-Pakistan, were conducted in a professional way, quietly, diplomatically … laying the ground and finding common ground between the parties,' said Celeste Wallander, a former assistant secretary of defense who is now with the Center for a New American Security. The most recent triumph was a joint peace declaration signed by Armenia and Azerbaijan on their long-running conflict in the Caucasus. The agreement, inked at a lavish White House ceremony, commits the two former Soviet republics to recognizing each other's borders and to renouncing violence against the other. But complex negotiations loom on knotty constitutional and territorial issues before a full peace agreement. This deal is notable for two things — the way foreign states flatter Trump to get what they want, and an imperialistic streak in much of his peacemaking. The rivals, for instance, agreed to open a transportation corridor to which the US will have full development rights and to call it the 'Trump Route for Peace and Prosperity.' Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev declared, 'President Trump, in six months, did a miracle.' This is smart deal for the US as it counters the influence of rival powers Russia and Iran in the region. But it will need Trump's constant attention. 'Wishes and verbal declarations are not enough,' two former US ambassadors to Azerbaijan, Robert Cekuta and Richard Morningstar, wrote in a recent Atlantic Council commentary. They called on Trump to deploy officials from the State Department, the Commerce Department and other agencies to lock in the agreement. Another of Trump's recent triumphs came in Southeast Asia, where he threatened to shelve trade deals with both Thailand and Cambodia to halt a border war last month that killed at least 38 people. The leverage pressed home in calls to leaders of each country was effective, and it might not have occurred to another president. But Trump didn't work alone. The agreement was brokered by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet knew the drill, however. He nominated Trump for the Nobel Prize for 'extraordinary statesmanship.' Pakistan took a similar step, as part of a successful diplomatic offensive to win over Trump and to disadvantage its nuclear-armed rival India after the president intervened in a border clash in May. But the government of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, an erstwhile Trump buddy, dismissed Washington's claims of a pivotal role. And other states, including Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Britain, were also involved. Trump's claims to have ended a war are selective. The agreement is fragile and doesn't solve the territorial dispute that sparked the fighting — over the Himalayan region of Kashmir, which has caused three full-scale wars. Trump has proclaimed a 'glorious triumph for the cause of peace' in a deal brokered between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. This contains important first steps on recognizing borders, renouncing war and disarming militia groups. However, no one expects the conflict to end soon, since the main Rwanda-backed M23 rebel group has rejected the agreement. Some analysts see the initiative, also brokered by Qatar, as a US attempt to secure mineral rights as part of an African 'great game' against China. Trump's claim to have brokered peace between Egypt and Ethiopia is a stretch. He's referring to a dispute over a Nile dam in the latter nation that Egypt fears will reduce the flow in its share of the key strategic waterway. He has called for a deal over the dam, but no binding agreement has been reached. The White House claims on Serbia and Kosovo originate in Trump's first term, when the rivals agreed to economic normalization steps. But they still don't have diplomatic relations, 17 years after Kosovo declared independence from Serbia. And recent normalization efforts have involved the EU more than the Trump team. In many ways, Trump's claims to have ended six or seven wars are typical of a presidency that claims massive wins that often add up to less than what they seem. But there are real achievements in his record, and the possibility of genuine long-term breakthroughs if Trump can maintain application and patience. That's a good lesson for his nascent Ukraine peace drive. This article and headline have been updated with additional reporting.

MTN Group Ltd (MTNOF) (H1 2025) Earnings Call Highlights: Robust Revenue Growth Amidst ...
MTN Group Ltd (MTNOF) (H1 2025) Earnings Call Highlights: Robust Revenue Growth Amidst ...

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

MTN Group Ltd (MTNOF) (H1 2025) Earnings Call Highlights: Robust Revenue Growth Amidst ...

Release Date: August 18, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points MTN Group Ltd (MTNOF) reported a robust financial performance with a 22% growth in service revenue, surpassing medium-term guidance. The company achieved significant cost savings of 1.5 billion rand in the first half, contributing to a cumulative 5.3 billion rand since 2024. MTN Nigeria showed strong performance with a 54.1% increase in service revenue, driven by data and voice growth. The fintech segment experienced a 24.9% growth in revenue, with advanced services growing by 42%. The balance sheet remains resilient with a consolidated net debt to EBITDA ratio improving to 0.5 times. Negative Points MTN South Africa faced competitive pressures, resulting in a modest 2.3% growth in service revenue. The company had to revise its guidance for South Africa to reflect competitive dynamics, particularly in the prepaid market. There are ongoing legal and regulatory challenges, including a DOJ investigation related to past operations in Afghanistan and Iran. The CapEx intensity was slightly above the targeted range, driven by accelerated investments in Nigeria. The company is facing challenges in maintaining market share in South Africa, with strategic initiatives needed to address this. Q & A Highlights Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Signs with MTNOF. Q: Can you comment on your market share ambitions in South Africa and how you plan to achieve them, given the guidance suggests a potential loss in service revenue market share? A: We are widening the lower end of our service revenue guidance to reflect current realities, but our aspirations remain to maintain or grow market share. We are investing more in distribution and dealer commissions to improve competitiveness. Our goal is to capture 30-35% of all net additions in the market. (Ralph Mopita, CEO) Q: What are your plans regarding network as a service and wholesale roaming agreements in South Africa? A: We are cautious about expanding network as a service due to strategic concerns about market dynamics and MVNOs. We aim to avoid a situation similar to Europe where MVNOs disrupted retail pricing. We will pursue retail business but have a walkaway point if pricing lacks sufficient headroom. (Ralph Mopita, CEO) Q: How do you plan to scale Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) and Fiber to the Home (FTTH) in South Africa? A: We will continue to push FWA as long as we have sufficient spectrum and can deliver quality service. For FTTH, we anticipate potential consolidation opportunities in the medium to long term and are not planning to overbuild fiber infrastructure. (Ralph Mopita, CEO) Q: With the significant increase in operating free cash flow and Nigeria's positive equity outlook, is there an opportunity for share buybacks in the second half of 2025? A: Share buybacks are considered a sustainable option and are currently number five on our priority list. We are evaluating the best way to return value to shareholders and will communicate our approach by the end of the year. (Thulu Molefe, CFO) Q: How do you view the impact of Starlink and other LEO providers on your CapEx and CapEx intensity? A: We see potential partnership opportunities with non-terrestrial networks, particularly in sparsely populated areas. However, we do not anticipate these partnerships significantly influencing our CapEx intensity, which remains on a glide path towards 15-18% over time. (Ralph Mopita, CEO) For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

African Union Wants World to Scrub 450-Year-Old Map
African Union Wants World to Scrub 450-Year-Old Map

New York Times

time6 hours ago

  • New York Times

African Union Wants World to Scrub 450-Year-Old Map

Africa is roughly three times as large as Europe, but you wouldn't know it looking at the world's most popular map, the 16th-century Mercator map. Last week, the African Union, a continental group of 55 countries, endorsed a campaign to have organizations around the world replace the Mercator map with alternatives such as the 2018 Equal Earth projection, which supporters say more accurately reflects the true size of Africa. In the Equal Earth map, Africa, shown in its true proportions, dwarfs Europe. 'It might seem to be just a map, but in reality, it is not,' Selma Malika Haddadi, the deputy chairwoman of the African Union's executive arm, said this week in an interview with Reuters. The Mercator projection fosters a false impression that Africa is 'marginal,' she said. That map, created by a German cartographer, Gerardus Mercator, has been under fire for decades. It was drafted to help European explorers navigate the seas more easily, but ended up warping landmasses as a result. In some versions of the map, Greenland, an island of less than a million square miles and fewer than 57,000 people, appears nearly as large as Africa, which has an area of 11.73 million square miles and a population of 1.5 billion. The inaccuracy was spoofed in a 2001 episode of 'The West Wing' where a nerdy group of cartographers campaigns for the United States to make the change. Now, campaigners with a similar mission hope to have your attention. A Correct the Map campaign, led by civil society organizations like Africa No Filter and Speak Up Africa, has pushed for the African Union to call for the switch. The African Union is expected to make an official decision to adopt the Equal Earth map in February, when the group's leaders meet in Ethiopia. In a petition circulating online, the campaign also asks the United Nations and the BBC to adopt the Equal Earth map as a way to 'set a new standard and encourage others to follow suit in ensuring Africa is represented accurately as a critical driver of global growth and development.' The African Union is the largest body to sign on to the campaign so far, a move campaigners described as a major milestone. 'It is more than geography, it's really about dignity and pride,' said Fara Ndiaye, co-founder and deputy executive director of Speak Up Africa. 'Maps shape how we see the world, and also how power is perceived. So by correcting the map, we also correct the global narrative about Africa.' In an internal document shared with The New York Times, the African Union said the campaign aligned with its 2025 theme of 'Justice for Africans and people of African descent through reparations,' adding that the campaign challenged false narratives about the continent and helped Africa reclaim its rightful place on the world stage. But as of Monday, several agencies associated with the African Union still had the Mercator map displayed on their websites.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store