
Gloves do not replace hand hygiene: WHO
Most of us never thought twice about hand gloves until the pandemic turned them into a must-have accessory right next to masks and hand sanitizers. But even now, gloves continue to play a quiet but powerful role in reducing infections, especially in medical, caregiving, and food-handling settings. Think of gloves as your first line of defense—blocking direct contact with germs, viruses, and nasty bacteria lurking on surfaces, body fluids, or even raw food. For healthcare workers, gloves aren't optional—they're lifesavers, literally.Gloves have gone mainstream. From salons to street vendors, people are using them more consciously to avoid cross-contamination. The awareness that dirty hands spread everything from colds to E. coli has stuck with us post-COVID, and that's a good thing. The popularity of gloves, especially disposable nitrile and latex ones, has skyrocketed—not just as protective gear but as a signal that someone's taking hygiene seriously.However, WHO has said that gloves do not replace hand hygiene. "While medical gloves serve a vital role in preventing transmission of infection, for example when there is risk of exposure to blood and body fluids, they are not a substitute for cleaning hands at the right time," the World Health Organisation (WHO) has said on World Hand Hygiene Day.'Medical gloves can reduce the risk of infection, but they are never a replacement for hand hygiene,' said Dr Bruce Aylward, WHO Assistant Director-General, Universal Health Coverage, Life Course. 'On this World Hand Hygiene Day, let us double down on our commitment and action to improve hand hygiene in health care settings to ensure the safety of patients and health-care workers.'"Additionally, overuse of gloves contributes to environmental degradation," the WHO report said. "An average university hospital in a developed country generates 1634 tons of health-care waste each year, which is equivalent to over 360 African elephants. Much of the waste could have been avoided if gloves were used properly and good hand hygiene was practiced. Most used gloves are considered infectious and require high-temperature incineration or specialized treatment, adding strain to already burdened waste management systems," it adds.You slip them on, and boom—you feel safe from germs. And yes, gloves absolutely have their place. In hospitals, labs, and even your kitchen, they offer a solid layer of protection against infections. But here's the not-so-glamorous truth: gloves aren't foolproof, and they're definitely not problem-free. First off, just wearing gloves doesn't make you immune to spreading germs. In fact, gloves can give a false sense of security. People often touch everything—phones, doorknobs, their face—with gloves on, thinking they're protected. But if the gloves pick up germs and you rub your eye or scratch your nose? You're still exposed. It's like wearing muddy shoes and walking all over your clean floor.Then there's the issue of cross-contamination. Gloves can transfer bacteria just as easily as bare hands if you're not careful. Ever seen someone wear the same pair of gloves for hours? Yup, not helping. And let's not forget about allergies and skin irritation—especially from latex gloves. Plus, overusing gloves can actually damage the skin underneath, making it dry and more prone to tiny cuts, which opens the door to—you guessed it—infection.Gloves are a helpful tool, but they're not a substitute for good hygiene. Wash your hands. Change gloves often. Don't touch your face. And remember—clean hands, not just covered hands, are your best defense.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Woman faces $20K hospital bills after bat flies into her mouth in freak accident
A Massachusetts woman was forced to pay over $20,000 in medical bills after a bat flew into her mouth. The bizarre incident occurred when Erica Kahn, 33, was on a trip to Arizona, where she was taking photos of the night sky. She is now facing difficulties in managing her finances after undergoing preventive rabies treatment. Massachusetts woman has bizarre encounter with a bat(Unsplash) What happened to Erica Kahn? Narrating her ordeal to KFF Health News, Erica stated that the bizarre incident took place in August last year while she was doing photography in Arizona. At first, she witnessed the bat as it was caught between her head and the camera. She got scared and started screaming. It was at this moment that the bat partially ended up in her mouth. While the incident lasted only a few seconds, Erica's father, who is a doctor, advised her to consider a series of rabies vaccinations. However, she thought that the bat did not bite her during the encounter. Erica told the news outlet that she was recently laid off from her biomedical engineering position. A day after the incident, she went on to buy a health insurance policy online to help out in covering the treatment cost. However, she was surprised to learn that the insurance company denied payments for her treatment, which she sought at multiple facilities in Arizona, Massachusetts, and Colorado. The company cited '30-day waiting period' as its reason for the same. Also read: New COVID variant bizarre symptoms: What treatments are available and how you can protect yourself 'The required waiting period for this service has not been met,' the company allegedly told her, according to KFF Health News. For her treatment, she visited a total of four centers, while her total bills reached nearly $20,749. Erica said that she first thought that the company's denial 'must have been a mistake.' But she later realized that she was being 'naive.' Therafter, she went on to join another company and was later able to negotiate one of the bills, besides setting the payment plan for another one. As per KFF, she continues to appeal for her rejected payments to cover the remaining amount of her debt. Also, it was stated that she previously had a coverage plan, but it lapsed after she lost her job. FAQs: 1. What happened with Erica Kahn? She was on a vacation in Arizona when a bat entered her mouth. 2. When did the incident take place? It happened in August last year. 3. What was the cost of her treatment? Erica's total bills reached nearly $20,749.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
‘25% lung cancer patients are non-smokers, women, youth'
Lucknow: Around 25% of lung cancer cases in the city are now being reported among non-smokers, with a growing number seen in women and younger adults. On the eve of World Lung Cancer Day, experts from KGMU and other major hospitals linked this rise to air pollution, indoor smoke exposure, and late diagnosis. Prof Ved Parkash, head of respiratory and critical care medicine at KGMU, said that about 30% of their lung cancer patients never smoked. "This trend is especially common in women and children exposed to air pollution, smoke from biomass fuels in rural and semi-urban homes, and secondhand smoke in shared households," he explained. He cited a study published last year in Atmospheric Environment, which found that PM2.5 levels in the city regularly exceed WHO limits. The study highlighted pollution hotspots and seasonal spikes in fine particulate matter. In non-smokers, lung cancer was associated with environmental pollutants, indoor toxins, genetic predispositions, and evolving lifestyles. "Women may also be more biologically vulnerable to these factors," he noted. Dr Abhishek Kumar Singh, director of medical oncology at Medanta Hospital, stressed the danger of secondhand smoke and industrial fumes. "The secondhand smoke from tobacco products contains thousands of harmful chemicals. Paint and industrial emissions further increase risk. These exposures can lead to asthma, bronchitis, and various cancers — especially in children and pregnant women. Avoiding smoking in closed spaces and ensuring good ventilation are key preventive steps," he said. Dr Alok Gupta, senior director of medical oncology at Max Super Speciality Hospital, added, "Even non-smokers' lungs show black deposits due to long-term exposure to pollutants. Besides passive smoke, other risks include unventilated cooking fumes, radon gas, and asbestos." Dr Dawar Masud Rizavi, associate director, pulmonology and sleep medicine at Apollo Hospital, said, "Exposure to radon, industrial toxins, air pollution, and poorly ventilated indoor cooking can increase the risk. In some families, genetics may play a role, but many of these exposures are preventable." he said.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
4 hours ago
- Business Standard
Cleanest July air in Delhi for 7 years with AQI dropping to 78: CAQM
Delhi recorded its cleanest July air in seven years with the average Air Quality Index (AQI) falling to 78, in the 'satisfactory' category, the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) said on Thursday. The AQI this July was even better than 2020, when pollution levels had dropped significantly due to restrictions on movement and industrial activity during to the COVID-19 lockdown. According to the CAQM, the average AQI for July in previous years stood at 104 in 2018, 134 in 2019, 84 in 2020, 110 in 2021, 87 in 2022, 84 in 2023 and 96 in 2024. The month also saw the highest number of days with 'satisfactory' air quality, 29 this year compared to 16 in 2018, 12 in 2019, 25 in 2020, 20 in 2021, 25 in 2022, 26 in 2023 and 17 in 2024. For the January-July period, Delhi reported significant improvement in air quality with the average AQI dropping to 184 from 204 in 2024 and 183 in 2023. The AQI during the same period was 209 in 2022, 205 in 2021, 159 in 2020, 215 in 2019 and 217 in 2018. There was not a single day with an AQI above 400 this year. In contrast, such days were recorded multiple times in previous years. The city also witnessed its lowest levels of PM2.5 and PM10 between January and July this year. The PM2.5 concentration averaged 79 micrograms per cubic metre, the lowest since 2018 except for the lockdown year. It was 94 in 2024, 83 in 2023, 93 in 2022, 97 in 2021, 73 in 2020, 99 in 2019 and 103 in 2018. Similarly, PM10 levels averaged 180 micrograms per cubic metre, compared to 209 in 2024, 184 in 2023, 218 in 2022, 210 in 2021, 147 in 2020, 224 in 2019 and 234 in 2018. The CAQM said favourable meteorological conditions and coordinated efforts to control and abate air pollution contributed to the significant improvement. The commission added that measures would be intensified to sustain and further enhance air quality in the coming months.