Britain cannot grow without ‘fighting fit' finance sector, Rachel Reeves says
She said the Government was delivering on its pledge, made at last year's Mansion House speech, to 'regulate for growth and not just for risk'.
The Treasury announced a package of reforms on Tuesday aimed at attracting more investment to the UK, and among individual consumers, to help grow the economy.
Ms Reeves said this involves 'rolling back regulation that has gone too far in seeking to eliminate risk', with plans to cut red tape in the City and reform banking rules including the ring-fencing regime.
The UK is currently an outlier in forcing banks to separate their retail and investment banking activities, so reforms are hoped to make Britain more competitive globally.
Ms Reeves also highlighted efforts to boost retail investment which she said is currently presented 'in a negative light, quick to warn people of the risks without giving proper weight to the benefits'.
Plans include potentially changing the language of risk warnings on investment products to encourage more people, particularly women, to take the leap.
The Leeds Reforms – named after one of our financial services' hubs and a city I'm proud to represent – will deliver the biggest package of reforms to financial services regulation in a decade.
Kickstarting economic growth and putting more pounds in people's pockets. pic.twitter.com/efN8YEHLPZ
— Rachel Reeves (@RachelReevesMP) July 15, 2025
Furthermore, the Chancellor said new powers to mandate pension funds to invest in UK assets were 'sending a clear signal' that the Government and industry want to deliver higher returns for savers and more investment for the economy.
'But I am confident that I will not need to use that power because firms see the urgency and importance of this as clearly as I do,' she said.
The 'Leeds reforms', unveiled in the West Yorkshire city, are set to be the biggest set of reforms to financial services for more than a decade, according to the Government.
But the Chancellor concluded her speech by saying: 'As I look ahead, it is clear that we must do more.
'In too many areas, regulation still acts as a boot on the neck of businesses, choking off the enterprise and innovation that is the lifeblood of growth.
'Regulators in other sectors must take up the call I make this evening not to bend to the temptation of excessive caution but to boldly regulate for growth in the service of prosperity across our country.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
38 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Care home director warns of impact of visa restrictions
Kevin Edwards, from Meddyg Care, which runs two dementia care homes in Gwynedd, has written to Wales's First Minister, Eluned Morgan. He warned of the 'potentially devastating impact' of the UK Government's decision to end the Health and Care Worker visa. Mr Edwards believes the move could lead to care homes and domiciliary care companies shutting down. The issue is particularly severe in rural areas, which are already struggling to recruit local workers. Mr Edwards highlighted official statistics showing that 15 per cent of registered care workers in Wales were born outside the UK. He said: "The social care sector in rural North Wales is already under significant strain, grappling with high vacancy rates, an ageing population, and limited local workforce availability. "The Health and Care Worker visa has been a critical lifeline, enabling care providers to recruit international workers to fill staffing gaps." He has called on the First Minister to pressure the Westminster Government into either reversing the policy or implementing a transitional scheme for critical workers in social care. Mr Edwards is also advocating for more investment in training and pay levels to attract local workers and stronger measures to stop exploitation of international workers. He said: "The withdrawal of this visa will exacerbate existing challenges in rural North Wales, where geographic isolation and a smaller pool of domestic workers make recruitment particularly difficult." The ban on care workers bringing dependants, introduced in March last year, has already caused an 83 per cent fall in visa applications, with monthly applications dropping from 129,000 to 26,000 in a year. Mr Edwards said: "This sharp reduction demonstrates the policy's immediate impact, and the complete termination of the visa route will likely deepen the crisis. "The loss of international workers, who bring diverse skills and dedication, threatens to destabilise care homes and domiciliary services, potentially leading to closures." He extended an invitation to the First Minister to visit the care homes to see firsthand the impact of the potential closure of the visa scheme. The issue has also been raised by Care Forum Wales (CFW), who have branded the policy 'half-baked.' READ MORE: Ysbyty Gwynedd: 'Systemic challenges' but 'positive improvements' in ED Historic church on Anglesey with a 'lost well' in bid to extend graveyard The organisation warned that the policy, which came into force on July 22, risks 'extreme workforce shortages'. CFW Chair Mario Kreft MBE said: "This ill-thought through policy has come as a double whammy because it coincides with the increase in the employers' National Insurance contributions which amounts to a 37 per cent rise. "I'd also like to quash the myth once and for all that international workers are cheap labour because the exact opposite is true."
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Minister insists fuel supplies not under threat despite oil refinery closure
State Oil – the parent company of Prax Group, which owns the Lindsey refinery in North Lincolnshire – collapsed into administration last month, putting hundreds of jobs at risk. Michael Shanks pledged to support the workers who are facing redundancy, but said there is little action the Government can take to improve the statutory redundancy offer. Speaking in the Commons, he said: 'We have worked urgently to ensure the safety of the refinery site, the security of fuel supplies and to protect workers. 'This has also allowed time for bidders to express an interest in the site. 'Following a thorough process, the official receiver has rigorously assessed all the bids received and concluded that sale of the business as a whole is not a credible option.' He added: 'A package has been offered to all those directly employed at the refinery, which guarantees their jobs and pay over the coming months. 'And alongside the usual support that is offered to workforces in insolvency situations, the Government will also immediately fund a comprehensive training guarantee for those refinery workers to ensure they have the skills needed and the support to find jobs, for example, in the growing clean energy workforce.' The Lindsey site is one of only five large oil refineries remaining in the UK after the recent closure of the Grangemouth plant in Scotland. Prax Group is led by majority owner and chairman and chief executive Sanjeev Kumar Soosaipillai, who bought the Lindsey oil refinery from French firm Total in 2021. Shadow energy minister Andrew Bowie, who tabled the urgent question, claimed 625 jobs are at risk as he pressed the minister for an update on its investigation into the collapse of the company. He also asked: 'What, if any, assessment has been made into the UK's resilience given the steep reduction in our refining capacity over the past six months? 'What, if any, assessment has been made on the increased reliance on imports that will be necessary as a result of the reduction in British refining capacity?' Mr Shanks said fuel supplies had 'adjusted' in the past few weeks, adding: 'Our assessment suggests there isn't an immediate risk to fuel supplies locally or in the wider area, but we'll continue to monitor that.' On the investigation, he said: 'There is not much I can update the House on at the moment, because the insolvency service is carrying out that investigation.' Conservative MP Martin Vickers, whose Brigg and Immingham constituency includes the oil refinery, said he wanted to see 'the maximum support given to those workers'. Mr Shanks replied: 'We have looked and pushed and pushed to see if there is more action Government can take to change or to give any additional payments. 'It's not possible for Government to do that, not least because the insolvency service has to follow very specific rules in terms of creditors and what their parameters are to operate in the event of an insolvency. 'But I do think the owners of this company have profited from this business, and they should do the right thing by the workforce that delivered that for them.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
More economic trouble is coming. And there's only one escape route
Unfortunately, although politicians say they like economic growth they generally have no idea how to nurture it and often act in ways which seem designed to slow the economy down. The UK Government's latest Employment Rights Bill is a perfect example. There are many things which encourage faster growth: a stable and not stifling regulatory regime, opportunity, social attitudes to wealth creation. In general the direction of travel for these factors is unhelpful but there is another obvious key factor - arguably more powerful than all the rest - which is curiously overlooked. That is the availability of money. For an entrepreneur to turn a great idea into a fledging business takes money and to grow that business into a company which creates jobs and wealth takes more money still. If we look back to the last period of really strong growth in the UK economy, the mid-1980s to about 2007, a lot of favourable factors were at play but the one which mattered most was that money was available in a way which it isn't today. During that time of strong growth Scotland was extraordinarily lucky to have the Bank of Scotland as its key economic facilitator. RBS may have been bigger but it never fostered growth in the same way as the Bank of Scotland did. A business person needing money for growth could go to see their local bank manager, who actually existed and whose job was to grow the bank's business from their branch. If the amount needed was bigger, you went up to the Head Office on the Mound to see somebody, probably called Gavin, Peter or Colin, who took time to understand your business and provided funding to support its growth. There would have been no Stagecoach or Sports Division able to grow rapidly whilst the founders retained control without Bank of Scotland providing finance based not on lending against assets but against the expected cashflows of the business. No public subsidy was involved, no stupid questionnaires to make sure woke targets were being met, just sensible people making commercial decisions which enabled hundreds of companies to get off the ground and grow. Read more It's time to cast aside prejudice and go for the cash Can anyone truly say the Scottish Parliament been a great success? I can't Who will tell the truth? Economically, we are in a mess The financial crisis of 2008 put paid to all that funding for growth and it has never been replaced. What sank RBS and HBOS was not supporting entrepreneurs but the same good old mistake behind almost all banking crises: too much lending against overvalued property. The price of the state bailout though was the dismantling of a support system which had served us well. The UK and Scottish Governments have tried to put in place schemes which provide sources of investment. The SEIS and EIS schemes where investors receive tax relief when investing in young companies is effective, the various government-backed banks including the Scottish National Investment Bank, rather less so. These new schemes provide equity finance whereas most entrepreneurs want debt; they don't want to give up too much control of their companies. Where debt finance is available for companies it now nearly always requires a personal guarantee from the directors of the borrower which acts as a deterrent and negates the whole point of having a limited liability company. What is needed to increase significantly the supply of money to fund growth is to switch the banking system back on as a major provider of risk funding. This won't happen on its own, the UK Government has to give it a shove. The former Bank of Scotland HQ on The Mound (Image: Newsquest) Each of our banks should be given targets for entrepreneurial lending and their progress monitored and reported on regularly. Entrepreneurial lending needs to be defined but its definition should be broad: lending to a company of up to £10million, the company must be a trading company and not own property or land. No personal guarantees allowed. Keep it simple. What the bank should get in return for this lending is that the interest and fees they earn are not subject to corporation tax. One or more banks will see the opportunity to get tax-free revenue by extending loans which are risker in order to help businesses grow. The regulator's instinct to do everything possible to stop such lending must be curbed. Mistakes must be allowed to be made. Not a spectacular initiative for a politician to announce, no ribbons for them to cut but if something like this was introduced it really would help growth.
