Gold's Technical Warning Signs Point to 2011-Style Decline
Gold has maintained levels above $3,000 recently, but mounting technical evidence strongly suggests we're following the 2011 pattern rather than the more benign 2017-2018 consolidation some investors hoped for.
The monthly RSI indicator reading above 80 represents a severe overbought condition seen only at major market extremes - a stark contrast to the mid-cycle consolidation of 2017-2018 when RSI oscillated around neutral territory. Many investors wonder if there are similarities in price patterns since those were also the early years of Trump's presidency, but the technical structure tells a different story.
What's particularly revealing is the percentage similarity between the 2015-2025 rally and the 2008-2011 advance that preceded gold's multi-year bear market. Both rallies demonstrated nearly identical magnitudes, suggesting the current move may be approaching natural exhaustion. Additionally, gold has now reached the upper boundary of its long-term rising trend channel - a strong technical resistance level.
Mining Stocks Signal Distribution Phase
Yesterday's shooting star reversal in mining stocks represented textbook distribution behavior, with early strength giving way to significant weakness by session's end.
This price action typically signals institutional investors using strength to reduce positions. The GDXJ's continued weakness in recent trading further validates this bearish signal.
This pattern of mining stock underperformance relative to gold has historically proven one of the most reliable precursors to significant gold market corrections. When miners fail to confirm gold's strength, it often indicates smart money positioning ahead of a trend change in the broader precious metals complex.
Interestingly, the same thing is happening in silver. The gold-silver relationship often provides critical clues about market direction.
The white metal declined shortly after reaching its 2024 high (there was no breakout) and it's taking place without an analogous daily decline in gold or stocks. Silver is most likely telling us something here.
Also, if you're wondering if silver needs to outperform here in order to confirm a top (as that's what often accompanies tops), I'd say that this doesn't have to be the case as we already saw this kind of outperformance recently. What was likely to happen (silver's brief outperformance), already happened.
Fed Decision Context: Stagflation Fears Reach Multi-Year Highs
Recent markets demonstrated typically cautious pre-Fed behavior, with stocks edging higher and Treasury yields rising modestly ahead of Fed announcements. The Fed is widely expected to maintain rates in the current range while projecting further rate cuts for 2025.
However, the context for these decisions has shifted dramatically. Bank of America's latest Global Fund Manager Survey revealed 71% of surveyed investors now expect stagflation - the highest level since November 2023. This psychological shift among institutional investors creates significant vulnerability for asset prices should the Fed strike a less dovish tone than expected.
Goldman Sachs projects the Fed will raise its 2025 inflation outlook while simultaneously reducing its growth forecast due to tariff impacts - the textbook definition of stagflationary pressures. This deteriorating growth/inflation mix creates precisely the kind of monetary policy constraint that historically precedes major market declines.
During uncertain economic times like these, many investors consider diversifying with precious metals in tax-advantaged accounts such as a Gold IRA or Silver IRA to help protect retirement savings from market volatility and inflation.
Gold's Potential Reaction Pattern
Gold holding above $3,000 suggests market participants remain hesitant to take decisive action before gaining clarity on the Fed's outlook. However, the combination of extreme technical conditions with clear distribution signals from mining stocks creates vulnerability regardless of the Fed's specific messaging.
The interest rate relationship with gold will be critical to watch in the coming weeks as the Fed navigates this challenging economic environment.
The parallel to 2011 continues to strengthen with each trading session. In that instance, gold similarly maintained strength temporarily at psychologically important levels ($1,900-2,000) while miners and silver showed early weakness before all three assets eventually synchronized to the downside. Today's continued mining stock weakness while gold maintains the $3,000 level represents nearly identical market behavior.
Bitcoin's recent behavior reinforces another important parallel - the cryptocurrency's behavior in 2022 preceding major market stress. During that period, Bitcoin demonstrated similar technical characteristics to today's gold market, with extreme sentiment and deteriorating technical underpinnings despite headline price stability.
The take-away is that given a considerable degree of similarity between both periods (technically), we're likely going to see a decline in the precious metals sector when bitcoin resumes its decline. It's now correcting from its rising, medium-term support line, which is quite natural. When this correction is over, the declines in bitcoin and precious metals (and miners) are likely to follow. And given the link to 2022, the upcoming decline is not likely to be small.
Speaking of the USD Index, please note that it's forming a broad bottom, just like it did in September last year.
The November low appears to have stopped the decline. Despite two attempts to move lower (and additional comments from Trump that "should" make USD decline), the USD Index stands firm.
Once the move below the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement is invalidated, we'll know that the bottom is indeed in. This would be likely to translate into declines in gold, silver, miners, bitcoin, and copper. And many other markets.
Geopolitical Wild Cards
Recent news brought additional geopolitical complexity, with Turkey's political situation destabilizing markets in that region and the potential Ukraine ceasefire following Trump-Putin discussions. These developments could create unexpected volatility across asset classes, particularly if they affect energy markets or broader risk sentiment.
Of particular note is oil's decline following news of the 30-day pause in attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure. This demonstrates how quickly geopolitical risk premiums can dissipate - a pattern that could similarly affect gold's recent premium.
During times of geopolitical uncertainty, many investors turn to gold as a safe haven asset, but it's important to recognize when these risk premiums may be priced out of the market.
The current market represents a remarkable technical confluence that demands attention:
Gold at the upper boundary of its long-term trend channel
Monthly RSI reaching extreme levels only seen at major turning points
Mining stocks forming clear distribution patterns (weakness plus clear daily reversal)
Nearly identical percentage gains compared to the 2008-2011 bull run
Major institutions revising economic forecasts to reflect stagflationary pressures
This constellation of technical and fundamental factors suggests we may be approaching not merely a routine correction but potentially a major inflection point for precious metals and broader markets. The price action following upcoming Fed decisions will likely provide critical insights into how these competing forces resolve.
For investors with substantial gold and mining positions, this technical evidence warrants careful consideration of risk management strategies. While precious metals often perform well during periods of economic uncertainty, the historical evidence suggests markets rarely move in straight lines. Technical extremes like today's readings have historically provided important warning signals that prudent investors cannot afford to ignore.
For those looking to navigate these complex markets, professional gold analysis can provide valuable insights into potential turning points and investment strategies.
Thank you for reading my analysis (which is only a fraction of what our Gold Trading Alert subscribers enjoy on a regular basis). If you'd like to stay updated with our other free analyses, I encourage you to sign up for our free gold newsletter today.
Thank you.
Przemyslaw K. Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
31 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
What Canadian investors need to know about the Trump tax bill
If the first six months are any indication, the reign of U.S. President Donald Trump is going to be a rough one for Canadian investors. First, the stock market plunged earlier this spring as Mr. Trump's tariffs started a global trade war. Stocks have mostly recovered, but a new threat has emerged in the form of legislation that would allow Washington to ramp up the taxation of Canadians holding U.S. stocks. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is not yet law – it passed in the U.S. House of Representatives by a single vote but must still pass in the Senate – and may change in scope. For now, it has the potential to more than double the tax applied to dividends from U.S. companies received by Canadian investors and corporations. The ultimate effect of the tax changes could be costly in total but perhaps not so bad on an individual basis. Regardless, it's too early to make changes in your investment portfolio. 'Currently, we're not making any moves, and I'm recommending everyone do the same thing and just wait to see what the information actually is,' said Justin Bender, a portfolio manager at PWL Capital. 'Then we can assess and see if there's any changes necessary.' Wealth managers brace for proposed U.S. tax bill's impacts on Canadian clients What's in Trump's big budget bill? From cuts to taxes and Medicaid, here's what to know Ultimately, Section 899 of the legislation could introduce a withholding tax of 20 to 50 per cent of dividends received by Canadians. There are estimates that this extra tax could cost individual investors, pension funds and others billions of dollars. The point of Section 899 is to give the U.S. a weapon to punish what it considers to be unfair taxes in other countries. Thought to be a target is our digital services tax, which mainly applies to U.S. tech giants generating revenue in Canada. Estimates from Mr. Bender show a worst-case additional drag on returns of 0.46 percentage points from U.S. stocks and U.S. equity exchange-traded funds when the higher withholding tax is fully phased in over four years. Think of this cost as being in addition to the management expense ratio of an ETF or mutual fund. If your return from a U.S. equity fund was a net 10 per cent with the management expense ratio (MER) included, then a higher withholding tax could ultimately leave you with as little as 9.54 per cent. Note that fund returns are always published on a net basis, with the MER included and, where applicable, foreign withholding taxes already deducted. Under existing U.S. tax law, there is a base withholding tax rate of 30 per cent for foreign investors holding U.S. stocks. A Canada-U.S. tax treaty generally reduces this rate to 15 per cent. No withholding tax applies to U.S. dividends paid into registered retirement savings plans and registered retirement income funds by U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs. There's no clear sense of whether this exemption would continue to apply under Section 899. In a non-registered account, you can offset the 15-per-cent withholding tax by claiming an offsetting foreign tax credit. In a TFSA, registered education savings plan, first home savings account or registered disability savings plan, the withholding tax cannot be recovered; it is also non-recoverable in RRSPs and RRIFs if you hold a Canadian-listed U.S. equity ETF. Canadian investors have a massive level of exposure to U.S. stocks directly and through funds. About $60-billion is invested in just four TSX-listed ETFs that track the S&P 500 index. But investing in the S&P 500, and the even more tech-focused Nasdaq, is much more about growth than dividend income. The dividend yield on the S&P 500 right now is about 1.3 per cent, half the level of the yield on Canada's S&P/TSX composite index. 'It's very low, which is why this tax maybe isn't as much of an issue as people are making it out to be,' Mr. Bender said. 'Some extra withholding taxes are probably not going to blow up your financial plan.' Mr. Bender added that the impact is further diminished by the fact that most investors have diversified their U.S. exposure with bonds and Canadian stocks, plus international markets in many cases. Investors who use ETFs for exposure to U.S. stocks can buy funds listed on U.S. exchanges as well as those located in Canada. Among Canadian-listed funds, there are those that hold U.S. stocks directly and those that are effectively a wrapper for a U.S.-listed fund in the same corporate family. Mr. Bender said each of these three ETF types would be affected similarly by higher U.S. withholding taxes. Are you a young Canadian with money on your mind? To set yourself up for success and steer clear of costly mistakes, listen to our award-winning Stress Test podcast.
Globe and Mail
4 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
U.S. and Chinese officials meet in London for high-stakes trade talks
Top U.S. and Chinese officials were meeting in London on Monday to try to defuse a high-stakes trade dispute that has widened beyond tit-for-tat tariffs to restrictions over rare earths, threatening to cripple supply chains and slow global growth. Officials from the two superpowers were meeting at the ornate Lancaster House to try to get back on track with a preliminary agreement struck last month in Geneva that had briefly lowered the temperature between Washington and Beijing. Since then, the U.S. has accused China of slow-walking on its commitments, particularly around rare earths shipments. U.S. economic adviser Kevin Hassett said on Monday that the U.S. team wanted a handshake from China on rare earths after Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke last week. 'The purpose of the meeting today is to make sure that they're serious, but to literally get handshakes,' Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told CNBC in an interview. He said the expectation was that immediately after the handshake, export controls would be eased and rare earths released in volume. The talks, which could run into Tuesday, come at a crucial time for both economies, with investors looking for relief from Trump's cascade of tariff orders since his return to the White House in January. China's export growth slowed to a three-month low in May while its factory-gate deflation deepened to its worst level in two years. In the U.S., the trade war has put a huge dent in business and household confidence, and first-quarter gross domestic product contracted due to a record surge in imports as Americans front-loaded purchases to beat anticipated price increases. But for now, the impact on inflation has been muted, and the jobs market has remained fairly resilient, though economists expect cracks to become more apparent over the summer. Attending the talks in London will be U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, and a Chinese contingent helmed by Vice-Premier He Lifeng. The inclusion of Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls for the U.S., is one indication of how central rare earths have become. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors. Lutnick did not attend the Geneva talks at which the countries struck a 90-day deal to roll back some of the triple-digit tariffs they had placed on each other. The second round of meetings comes four days after Trump and Xi spoke by phone, their first direct interaction since Trump's Jan. 20 inauguration. During the more than one-hour-long call, Xi told Trump to back down from trade measures that roiled the global economy and warned him against threatening steps on Taiwan, according to a Chinese government summary. But Trump said on social media the talks focused primarily on trade led to 'a very positive conclusion,' setting the stage for Monday's meeting in London. The next day, Trump said Xi had agreed to resume shipments to the U.S. of rare earths minerals and magnets, and Reuters reported on Friday that China has granted temporary export licenses to rare earth suppliers of the top three U.S. automakers. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told the Fox News program 'Sunday Morning Futures' that the U.S. wanted the two sides to build on the progress made in Geneva in the hope they could move towards more comprehensive trade talks. The preliminary deal in Geneva sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and U.S. indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses. The S&P 500 Index, which at its lowest point in early April was down nearly 18 per cent after Trump unveiled his sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs on goods from across the globe, is now only about 2 per cent below its record high from mid-February. The final third of that rally followed the U.S.-China truce struck in Geneva. Still, that temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and U.S. complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. While the U.K. government will provide a venue for Monday's discussions, it will not be party to them and will have separate talks later in the week with the Chinese delegation. The dollar slipped against all major currencies on Monday as investors waited for news, while oil prices were little changed.
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Tesla Stock's Outlook Was Already Hazy. Musk's Feud With Trump Makes It Even Worse.
Tesla stock (TSLA) has whipsawed this year amid a mix of factors. The company's recent financial performance has been disappointing, to say the least. Its Q1 2025 deliveries fell well short of estimates, and so did its earnings for the quarter. Along with the dismal financial performance and tepid deliveries, Tesla has been in the news for CEO Elon Musk's political activities. While the billionaire was among President Donald Trump's biggest backers and headed his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) until the end of May, he has since left the White House. While it seemed that Musk's politics would take a backseat now and he would start focusing on his companies, the Tesla CEO has now emerged among the fiercest critics of Trump over his tax-and-spending bill. Musk's Feud with Trump The relationship between Musk and Trump seems to have deteriorated significantly. Musk's bitter breakup with Trump could have multiple implications. Bulls would want to believe that by disassociating from Trump, Musk might be able to placate those on the left of the political divide. The flip side, however, could be that Musk alienates Trump supporters. Tesla is no longer a play on 'Trump trade,' and if anything, the stock might be in the 'penalty box' if Trump retaliates against the company. As for fundamentals, they are a lot less favorable now than they were before Trump's election. Tesla's Growth Has Stalled Tesla is currently battling one of the worst phases in its history, even as I agree with Musk that it's nowhere near the 'many near-death experiences' that the company went through in the past. That said, those were different times, and Tesla was at best a marginal player in the automotive industry. The company has since reached scale, selling 1.8 million cars last year profitably. To Tesla and Musk's credit, they proved naysayers wrong by ramping up efficiently. However, while no one really expects Tesla to go bankrupt, market expectations for the near-$1 trillion behemoth are much different now. Cut to 2025, and Tesla is struggling for growth, and deliveries fell year-over-year in 2024 for the first time in history. The company's deliveries declined 13% in Q1 2025, reaching the lowest level since Q2 2022. The data for Q2 2025 deliveries, set for release early next month, is likely to show yet another yearly decline, given the tepid sales in China and Europe. Tesla was still hopeful for delivery growth in 2025 when it released its Q1 earnings in April, but we should see management take a more circumspect stance when it revisits its guide during the Q2 update. Tesla's once industry-leading margins have since fizzled away, thanks to the steep price cuts, and if not for the juicy regulatory credits it earns, the Elon Musk-run company would have posted a net loss in Q1. Given the ongoing EV price war, it would be foolhardy to expect Tesla to reach those fat margins anytime soon. Moreover, the company's China business continues to face serious headwinds from domestic Chinese companies, and the sales from its China Gigafactory – which include both domestic sales and exports – have fallen year-over-year for eight consecutive months. Tesla Bets on Autonomous Driving and Robotics Musk has virtually withdrawn the 50% annual delivery growth compound annual growth rate guidance he once shared, and Tesla officially omitted its goal of reaching 20 million deliveries by 2030 in its last year's impact report. The demand for electric cars, especially in the U.S., did not turn out to be as strong as many expected, and automakers are learning it the hard way, as they are now bogged down with excess production capacity. With the core automotive business facing a severe slowdown and the energy business incapable of filling the void, Tesla (and analysts bullish on the company) have been instead fixated on other aspects of the business. These include autonomous driving and robotaxis in the short to medium term, and robotics over the long term. Long-time Tesla bull and Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas argues that Tesla might even enter the electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) and drone space, capitalizing on its strength in manufacturing and autonomy. Meanwhile, apart from the robotaxi launch that Musk has confirmed is on track for a launch this month, I don't see many other events that could help drive the stock in the near term. Overall, while Tesla's growth outlook hasn't been this hazy in years, Musk's bitter feud with Trump might end up making things even worse for the company.
