Singapore's CapitaLand Investment launches first onshore master fund in China
May 21 (Reuters) - Real estate investment manager CapitaLand Investment Ltd (CAPN.SI), opens new tab said on Wednesday that it has launched its first onshore master fund in China, backed by a total equity commitment of 5 billion yuan ($692.58 million).
The Singapore-based company said its new fund, CLI RMB Master Fund, will target business parks, retail, rental housing, and serviced residences, with a majority stake to be held by a local insurance company.
"This (the fund) allows us to tap into a rising trend of insurance companies increasing their capital allocation to real estate in China," said Puah Tze Shyang, chief executive officer, CapitaLand Investment China, adding that it will provide opportunities to invest in a diversified and resilient portfolio of stabilised assets with core returns.
The company expects the CLI RMB Master Fund to add 20 billion yuan to its funds under management once fully deployed.
($1 = 7.2194 Chinese yuan)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
This £5k Brighton parking space is an auction bargain, but is it a good investment?
However, the point I want to draw your attention to is: the car parking space is leasehold, with approximately 63 years unexpired. As the sale is by an executor, I'm presuming the previous owner has died, but that this parking space was also at one stage likely tied to a flat in the building. As parking spaces don't carry the same rights of renewal as flats do, there's no statutory obligation for the freeholder to renew the lease – although, as the auctioneer replied: 'In practice, why wouldn't they?' Other people will see the same potential you do Billy Hart's Quay, Barton Road, Plymouth is a completely different find, and I have to be honest, if you're local or into boating, this is a gem of a lot. This is a quayside plot measuring 0.142 acres (6,186 sq ft) with direct vehicular and waterside access. The auctioneers have said it has development potential and, given the amount of residential development around and the picturesque setting, I wouldn't put it past some entrepreneurial bidder to come up with a novel scheme. Besides the residential angle, there's also a commercial opportunity for this quay that was constructed by American troops preparing for the D-Day landings. With hardstanding scrubland and access to Hooe Lake, and onward to Plymouth Sound, the English Channel and beyond, this presents several options for potential commercial operators, such as water sports hire, secure boat storage and motorhomes. The auction details also say there could be opportunity to acquire the adjacent slipway and foreshore by separate negotiation. The watch point on this: I think it's priced at a 'come buy me price'. The guide at £20,000-25,000 will really tempt people who are looking for lifestyle and commercial opportunities. But I think they'll be sorely disappointed in bagging a bargain – I reckon an 'armada' of buyers will be bidding for this, so I expect it to go way over guide. The importance of asking questions My third choice is this mid-terrace house located on St Johns Square, Stoke-on-Trent, guided at £23,000. The reason I selected this is because at first glance this looks like a pub. But then I went on Google maps and saw it was a closed barbers, with the upper floors boarded up and in a sorry state of repair. Understandably, I got confused and asked the auctioneers: 'So where is this house?' They replied: 'It is actually to the rear of the building.' Now, this is an important lesson in buying at auction – you always need to check the legals. As they are not yet available, the auctioneers don't have the title plan, but you can't always go off a photograph and think that's what you're buying. In a bid to find out more (I always say you have to be a detective when buying at auction), I tracked down the EPC (which expired in 2020), and I have learnt the property is a mid-terrace house with 54 sqm (581 sq ft), and it is rated a 'G'. This then comes with a big explanation mark and the accompanying text: 'You may not be able to let this property.' This is all useful information, should you be interested in this lot. However, the main reason I chose this property as a watch point was to highlight that it is being sold by the mortgagees (not in possession). This means the auctioneers will not be conducting viewings and, as yet, have not inspected the property. The emphasis on 'mortgages (not in possession)' is important because it means that the former owners of the property may still be living there. If you are bidding, you need to be aware of this. Also, the fact no viewings will be carried out makes this an incredibly risky buy, as you will not be able to find out what works need doing. The best-case scenario, in my opinion, would be to budget for a full back to brick renovation (and include a new roof) if you don't want to run out of funds. As auction lots go, this is one where you will be relying fully on the legal pack and your own due diligence to decide if the risk is worth the reward.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Shares in private UK companies to start trading this year with 'Pisces' platform
Shares in private companies could begin trading on a new UK platform later this year under plans to boost investment in smaller companies and investor access to the lucrative growth market. Many firms are now staying private for longer, which has contributed to shrinking UK public markets but also resulted in bumper returns for the few investors with access to successful companies. The Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System – or Pisces – will allow private firms to periodically raise capital via auction and access a wider pool of investors, while providing existing shareholders the opportunity to sell their shares. First announced in the Chancellor's Mansion House speech last year, Pisces is intended to help businesses grow without shouldering the costs and volatility associated with listing on London's public markets. Announcing further details of its plans on Tuesday, the Financial Conduct Authority's executive director of markets Simon Walls said Pisces forms part of efforts 'to boost growth and competitiveness' in the UK market. The FCA added: 'There is demand for investors to trade private company shares easily and efficiently in an organised marketplace. 'Pisces meets this demand by allowing secondary trading of these shares. Companies can set the floor and ceiling of share prices, and have a say over who can buy their shares.' However, retail investors will be excluded from buying shares on the Pisces platform, with access restricted to institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, 'sophisticated' investors and employees of participating companies. Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown, said there is 'potential' for Pisces to support greater retail access 'in the longer term', but this could take 'five years or more'. 'It could provide an opportunity to level the playing field between retail investors and institutional investors,' she added. 'Knock-on impact' for shrinking AIM market? Takeovers and delistings have been a common feature of the UK market in recent years, but the impact has been most severe on the junior market. London's AIM market of smaller listed companies is set to shrink by a fifth this year alone, with 61 companies, worth a combined £12.3billion, announcing plans to delist. Companies are also not being replaced, with just 18 new AIM companies listing last year compared to 89 exits. HL's Streeter said: 'Pices could help create a more free-flowing pipeline for IPOs in the City and it could also help with price discovery for valuations. 'The City is struggling to attract and retain listed companies, so the hope will be that this will offer greater support for home-grown start-ups and scale ups.' But managing director of wealth manager Evelyn Partners Jason Hollands said Pices 'may well have a knock-on impact for AIM'. He added: 'Some private businesses who might have previously contemplated joining AIM as the next step, may conclude this is a much better option for the next stage in their evolution. 'It is no secret that AIM has been struggling in recent years, with a dearth of new admissions, private equity buyouts, and other companies moving to overseas exchanges or the main market. 'The Chancellor's decision in her Budget last October to halve the amount of inheritance tax relief of AIM companies will provide a further headwind for the market as investors seeking to mitigate IHT by investing in AIM companies has previously proven a meaningful group of owners for a market of relative illiquid companies. 'Some fund managers expect to see a sizeable exodus of companies from AIM over the next couple of years as a result.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
China's electric cars are becoming slicker and cheaper - but is there a deeper cost?
BBC Go to the comments section at the bottom of this page to share what you think about the rise of these more affordable EVs In China, they call it the Seagull, and it has looks to match. It is sleek and angular, with bright, downward-slanting headlights that have more than a hint of mischievous eyes about them. It is, of course, a car. A very small one, designed as a cheap city runabout – but it could have huge significance. Available in China since 2023, where it has proved extremely popular, it has just been launched in Europe with the name Dolphin Surf (because Europeans apparently aren't as keen on seagulls as Chinese people). When it goes on sale in the UK this week, it's expected to have a price tag of around £18,000. That will still make it, for an electric car on western markets, very cheap indeed. It won't be the outright lowest-priced model on offer: the Dacia Spring, manufactured in Wuhan jointly by Renault and Dongfeng, and the Leapmotor T03, which is being produced by a joint venture between Chinese startup Leapmotor and Stellantis, both cost less. But the Dolphin Surf is the new arrival that has long-established brands most worried. That is because the company behind it has been making ever bigger waves on international markets. BYD is already the biggest player in China. It overtook Tesla in 2024 to become the world's best-selling maker of electric vehicles (EVs), and since entering the European markets two years ago, it has expanded aggressively. "We want to be number one in the British market within 10 years," says Steve Beattie, sales and marketing director for BYD UK. BYD is part of a wider expansion of Chinese companies and brands that some believe could change the face of the global motor industry – and which has already prompted radical action from the US government and the EU. It means once-unknown marques like Nio, Xpeng, Zeekr or Omoda could become every bit as much household names as Ford or Volkswagen. They will join classic brands such as MG, Volvo and Lotus, which have been under Chinese ownership for years. The products on offer already encompass a huge range, from runabouts like the tiny Dolphin Surf to exotic supercars, like the pothole-jumping U9, from BYD's high-end sub-brand Yangwang. "Chinese brands are making massive inroads into the European market," says David Bailey, professor of business and economics at Birmingham Business School. In 2024, 17 million battery and plug-in hybrid cars were sold worldwide, 11 million of those in China. Chinese brands, meanwhile, had 10% of global EV and plug-in hybrid sales outside their home country, according to the consultancy Rho Motion. That figure is only expected to grow. For consumers, it should be good news – leading to more high-quality and affordable electric cars becoming available. But with rivalry between Beijing and western powers showing no sign of subsiding, some experts are concerned Chinese vehicles could represent a security risk from hackers and third parties. And for established players in Europe, it represents a formidable challenge to their historic dominance. "[China has] a huge cost advantage through economies of scale and battery technology. European manufacturers have fallen well behind," warns Mr Bailey. "Unless they wake up very quickly and catch up, they could be wiped out." Cut-throat competition in China China's car industry has been developing rapidly since the country joined the World Trade Organisation in 2001. But that process accelerated rapidly in 2015, when the Communist Party introduced its "Made in China 2025" initiative. The 10-year plan to make the country a leader in several high-tech industries, including EVs, attracted intense criticism from abroad, and particularly the US, amid claims of forced technology transfers and theft of intellectual property – all of which the Chinese government denies. Fuelled by lavish state funding, the plan helped lay the groundwork for the breakneck growth of companies like BYD – originally a maker of batteries for mobile phones – and allowed the Chinese parent companies of MG and Volvo, SAIC and Geely, to become major players in the EV market. "The general standard of Chinese cars is very, very high indeed," says Dan Caesar, chief executive of Electric Vehicles UK. "China has learned extremely quickly how to manufacture cars." Yet competition in China has become ever more cut-throat, with brands jostling for space in an increasingly saturated market. This has led them to hunt for sales elsewhere. While Chinese firms have expanded into East Asia and South America, for years the European market proved a tough nut to crack – that is, until governments here decided to phase out the sale of new petrol and diesel models. The transition to electric cars opened the door to new players. "[Chinese brands] have seen an opportunity to get a bit of a foothold," says Oliver Lowe, UK product manager of Omoda and Jaecoo, two sub brands of the Chinese giant Chery. Low labour costs in China, coupled with government subsidies and a very well-established supply chain, have given Chinese firms advantages, their rivals have claimed. A report from the Swiss bank UBS, published in late 2023, suggested that BYD alone was able to build cars 25% more cheaply than western competitors. Chinese firms deny the playing field is uneven. Xpeng's vice chairman Brian Gu told the BBC at the Paris Motor Show in 2024 that his company is competitive "because we have fought tooth and nail through the most competitive market in the world". 'Naked protectionism' from the US? Concerns that Chinese EV imports could flood international markets at the expense of established manufacturers reached fever pitch in 2024. In the US, the Alliance for American Manufacturing warned they could prove to be an "extinction-level event" for the US industry, while the European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen suggested that "huge state subsidies" for Chinese firms were distorting the European market. The Biden administration took dramatic action, raising import tariffs on Chinese-made EVs from 25% to 100%, effectively making it pointless to sell them in the US. It was condemned by Beijing as "naked protectionism". Meanwhile, in October 2024, the EU imposed extra tariffs of up to 35.3% on Chinese-made EVs. The UK, however, took no action. Matthias Schmidt, founder of Schmidt Automotive Research, says the EU's tariffs have now made it harder for Chinese firms to gain market share. "The door was wide open in 2024... but the Chinese failed to take their chance. With the tariffs in place, Chinese manufacturers are now unable to push their cost advantage onto European consumers." Renault's ultra-modern EV hub European manufacturers have been racing to develop their own affordable electric cars. French car-maker Renault is among them. At its factory in Douai, in northeastern France, an army of spark-spitting robots weld sections of steel to form car bodies, while on the main assembly line, automated systems mate together bodyshells, doors, batteries, motors and other parts, before human workers apply the finishing touches. The factory has been making cars for Renault since 1974, but four years ago, the ageing production lines were replaced with new highly automated, digitally-controlled systems. Part of the site was also taken over by the Chinese-owned battery firm AESC, which built its own "gigafactory" next door. Renault It's part of Renault's wider plan to set up an ultra-modern EV "hub" in northern France. Mirroring the lean production techniques of Chinese manufacturers, the hub cuts costs by maximising efficiency and ensuring that suppliers are located as close as possible. "Our target was to be able to produce affordable electric cars here to sell in Europe," explains Pierre Andrieux, director of the Douai plant, arguing that automated processes "will enable us to do that profitably". But the company is also exploiting something the Chinese brands do not have: heritage. Its latest model, the Renault 5 E-tech, built in Douai, borrows its name from one of the company's most famous products. The original Renault 5, launched in 1972, was a quirky little everyman car with boxy looks and low running costs that became a cult classic. The new design, despite being a state-of-the art EV, pays homage to its predecessor in name and appearance, in an effort to emulate its popular appeal. Security, spyware and hacking concerns But irrespective of how desirable Chinese cars are in comparison with European rivals, some experts believe we should be wary of them – for security reasons. Most modern vehicles are internet-enabled in some way – to allow satellite navigation, for example – and drivers' phones are often connected to car systems. Pioneered by Tesla, so-called "over-the-air updates" can upgrade a car's software remotely. This has all led to concerns, in some quarters, that cars could be hacked and used to harbour spyware, monitor individuals or even be immobilised at the touch of a keyboard. Earlier this year, a British newspaper reported that military and intelligence chiefs had been ordered not to discuss official business while riding in EVs; it was also alleged that cars with Chinese components had been banned from sensitive military sites. Then in May, a former head of the intelligence service MI6 claimed that Chinese-made technology in a range of products, including cars, could be controlled and programmed remotely. Sir Richard Dearlove warned MPs that there was the potential to "immobilise London". Beijing has always denied all accusations of espionage. A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in London says that the recent allegations are "entirely unfounded and absurd". "China has consistently advocated the secure, open, and rules-based development of global supply chains," the spokesperson told the BBC. "Chinese enterprises operating around the world are required to comply with local laws and regulations. "To date, there is no credible evidence to support the claim that Chinese EVs pose a security threat to the UK or any other country." Chinese government is 'not hell-bent on surveillance' Joseph Jarnecki, research fellow at defence and security think-tank The Royal United Services Institute, argues that potential risks can be mitigated. "Chinese carmakers exist in this highly competitive market. While they're beholden to Chinese law and that may require compliance with national security agencies, none of them want to damage their ability to grow and to have international exports by being perceived as a security risk," he says. "The Chinese government equally is conscious of the need for economic growth. They're not hell-bent on solely conducting surveillance." But the car industry is just one area in which Chinese technology is becoming increasingly enmeshed in the UK economy. To achieve the government's climate objectives, for instance, "It will be necessary to use Chinese-supplied technology", adds Mr Jarnecki. He believes that regulators of key industries should be given sufficient resources to monitor cyber security and advise companies using Chinese products of any potential issues. As for electric cars powered by Chinese technology, there's no question that they're here to stay. "Even if you have a car that's made in Germany or elsewhere, it probably contains quite a few Chinese components," says Dan Caesar. "The reality is most of us have smartphones and things from China, from the US, from Korea, without really giving it a second thought. So I do think there's some fearmongering going on about what the Chinese are capable of. "I think we have to face the reality that China is going to be a big part of the future." Top image credit: Reuters
