Major bank slashes interest rates
ANZ this week announced it would be slashing 10-35 basis points off one to five-year fixed home loan rates, a move that has meant it offers the cheapest fixed rates among the 'big four'.
It's come as lending data shows few customers are choosing to fix rates amid wide expectations of another cash rate cut in July, followed by subsequent cuts later this year.
This means most of the homeowners on variable rates have the power to chase the best deals in the market by refinancing to different lenders.
MORE: Homeowners told to brace for rate cut bombshell
ANZ's cheapest fixed rates are now 5.29 per cent and 5.19 per cent for one-year and two-year fixed terms, respectively.
The move has occurred after a range of smaller lenders earlier slashed their fixed rates to just under 5 per cent.
This included Pacific Mortgage Group, which is offering 4.99 per cent for one-year fixed terms, while Easy Street is offering 4.95 per cent for two-year fixed loans, according to Mozo analysis. Variable rates for new customers currently average about 5.74 per cent.
Mozo finance expert Rachel Wastell said ANZ's fixed rate offers were likely a 'strategic first-mover play'.
'ANZ is getting ahead of the curve to lock in borrowers who might be contemplating a fixed rate before the RBA acts,' she said.
MORE: One in six unit projects now 'ghost' towers
'Inflation data has also shifted expectations and the market now sees rate cuts as more imminent, so ANZ could be capitalising on that shift before the RBA confirms direction.
'By slicing just enough to undercut the other majors, ANZ gets to look competitive without actually joining the below 5 per cent pack. So it could also be a positioning move, just as much as a pricing one.'
Canstar data insights director Sally Tindall said ANZ was moving on the assumption more cash rate cuts were imminent.
'This move by ANZ consolidates its lead as the lowest-cost fixed rate lender out of the majors,' she said.
'The bank is factoring in the possibility of further cash rate cuts, which could be coming down the line as soon as next week.'
Ms Tindall added that customers were rarely choosing fixed rates.
'ANZ could also be looking to shore up its loan book by locking in more customers on fixed rate deals,' she said.
'The bank's most recent half year results show that just 3 per cent of its residential mortgage book is on a fixed rate contract.
'This means the remaining 97 per cent on variable rates are free to move at any time without major penalties.'
Ms Tindall said homeowners considering fixing their rates should keep some perspective.
'While ANZ's fixed rates are streaks ahead of the other big banks, particularly on shorter terms, they're still a far cry from the lowest fixed rates in town, with a total of 13 different lenders now offering at least one fixed rate under 5 per cent,' she said.
'If you're looking to lock in your rate, don't go aiming for one that starts with a 5 or a 6. You should be looking in the 4's.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
38 minutes ago
- ABC News
Off the productivity round table: What won't be discussed this week
Problem and productivity. It's a pairing that has become inseparable in recent times, given our productivity growth is the lowest in half a century. It'll also be a major point of discussion at the Economic Reform Roundtable that kicked off in Canberra this week. For a while, it appeared the entire forum would be devoted to the topic with our best and brightest assembled to nut out a way to address it. But solutions generally can only be found if we truly understand the root cause of the problem. And that's where things go horribly wrong when it comes to any discussion around labour productivity. A seemingly simple concept — the amount of product produced over a given period of time by the same amount of labour — understanding what drives it can be complex and prone to misinterpretation. And that's before you consider the difficulties in even measuring labour productivity, particularly in an economy such as ours where the vast bulk of workers, instead of churning out easily countable widgets, are providing services to other people. Professor Roy Green from the University of Technology points to Australian manufacturing's demise — which now accounts for just 6 per cent of our GDP — as a major contributor to our productivity conundrum. There is, he says, "an almost exact correlation between the decline of manufacturing, the decline of business expenditure on research and development and the decline of productivity growth, now at its lowest level in almost 60 years". And then there are factors that are totally off the agenda. For such a pointy headed topic, finding answers often involve traversing areas that are socially, culturally and politically explosive. In many cases, economists — fearing a community backlash — refuse to even mention some of the more obvious topics that have a legitimate bearing on productivity. That involves two other P-words: population and property. Many business leaders and most politicians confuse productivity with profitability. There's a common misconception that, if only we could keep wages in check, our labour productivity problems could fix themselves. True, there's a link between wages and how much we produce but, even then, it's not completely understood. If lower wages were the key to better productivity, company executives should have penalties imposed for underperformance rather than bonuses for turning up. Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock lamented last week's decision to downgrade its labour productivity forecasts for the nation, a move that sent headline writers into a frenzy. Rising productivity, she said, lifts living standards as it provides the scope for workers to earn higher wages without putting pressure on inflation. But there's a catch. Businesses need to invest in new technology to help workers lift productivity. And they'll only do that if wages are rising, so they can reduce costs and boost profit. So, what comes first? Do higher wages lead to better productivity? Or does better productivity lead to higher wages? Just between us, no-one really knows. Luckly for the RBA governor, she declared it well and truly outside her remit. "All the Reserve Bank can do is make sure we have low and stable inflation, and if we have full employment, both of those things are very stable environments for businesses to think about how they might improve productivity, how they might produce more for the same amount of labour and capital input," she said. Once upon a time, there was no such thing as an automated carwash. You either did it yourself or paid people to do it by hand. When the first auto washing machine opened in Australia in 1968, it sparked what should have been a trend to lay waste to the old style, expensive hand washing. Cheaper and quicker, with minimal labour input, it's a perfect example of a productivity improvement. But in the past 20 years, there's been a resurgence in car hand washing operations. You'll find them everywhere, in shopping centre car parks and on highway corners. Why? Perhaps hand washing delivers a superior finish. But the biggest factor may well be that hand washing comes at a competitive price because labour costs are no longer prohibitive. Regardless of the reason, it's a negative for our productivity numbers. Sydney University academic Salvatore Babones penned an interesting piece in the Australian Financial Review this week, sheeting home the blame for our tardy performance in labour productivity to our surging population growth. Most new arrivals, he points out, are not highly skilled, nor are they permanent. "Massive influxes of low-skilled workers are obvious drivers of trends in labour productivity," he wrote. "But they're not even mentioned in recent Reserve Bank of Australia and Productivity Commission reports." Only around half the 1 million students — who make up about 10 per cent of the workforce — in Australia attend a university. The rest are in courses primarily designed to deliver a working visa. The huge influx has artificially kept GDP numbers elevated. But it's been at the expense of productivity. In those proportions, they act as a cheap source of labour which, when combined with a rigid wage setting system, maintains a lid on wages growth, and dampens the incentive for businesses to invest. "If you flood the labour market with low-skilled immigrants, real wages (adjusted for inflation) will fall, and productivity will decline as labour is used less efficiently," he wrote. "It's that simple." As Babones points out, Australia may look down on other countries that exploit cheap, imported labour. But we do the same, under the guise of education visas. As they hunker down in working groups in the national capital this week, the dominant topic for conversation will be tax. There'll be furious debate about cutting the corporate tax rate and increasing the GST. But there is no guarantee either of those measures will lead to increased business investment or improve productivity. That's because businesses that earn bigger profits don't automatically invest the windfall gains. Most of the time they hand it back to shareholders, or at least a large slab of it. Our productivity may be among the worst in the developed world and our business investment woeful. But there is one area where Australians exceed on the investment front. Our obsession with real estate has resulted in a deluge of cash directed into housing. It's why our real estate is so horrifyingly expensive. According to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, as a nation we are in hock to the tune of $2.3 trillion on property mortgages. And that's expected to rise as interest rates ease. More than 2.26 million Australians own an investment property, largely because of favourable tax policies that deliberately direct investment into real estate. It may be a radical idea but altering some of those tax policies, such as negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount, might have two beneficial impacts. It may lead to more affordable housing in the future. And it might result in resources being better allocated to more productive means. Just don't mention it in Canberra this week.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Productivity summit begins with a warning on NDIS spending
Treasurer Jim Chalmers says this week's productivity round table will be about writing "the next chapter of economic reform" as he calls on business leaders, union chiefs and advocates attending the summit to provide "concrete ideas" that help the Albanese government turbocharge the economy. Opening the three-day event in Canberra, Mr Chalmers will urge participants to focus on three objectives: making the economy more productive to lift living standards, measures to sandbag Australia's economy and repairing the budget. "Global uncertainty surrounds us, big economic challenges confront us, and our ambitions must meet this moment," he is expected to say. "Our progress in the near term … gives us the time and space to attend to the bigger, more persistent structural issues." The treasurer will point to pressures in energy, demography, technology and geopolitics, warning that Australia must act despite global instability. "We are realistic about the impact of all of this but optimistic too," he will say. The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is set to loom large over the summit, with Thursday's session on budget sustainability and tax reform expected to examine its rapidly escalating cost. That conversation will come a day after Health Minister Mark Butler is expected to make a significant policy announcement on Wednesday aimed at tightening elements of the disability insurance scheme amid reports that 16 per cent of six-year-old boys are now recipients. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Monday flagged the need for reform, citing concerns about its growth trajectory. "We need to make sure the system's sustainable," he told Sky News. He added that reforms passed last year to rein in NDIS spending growth to 8 per cent was an "interim target", with that growth rate still well outpacing broader GDP growth. With annual costs projected to surpass $64 billion by 2029, the NDIS is on track to become the third most expensive item in the budget, behind only health and aged pensions. The Coalition has signalled it is open to further savings, with Shadow Treasurer Ted O'Brien saying in July the scheme must be made sustainable. The NDIS, as well as defence, debt costs, health and aged care will be among the structural issues up for discussion. In an interview with the ABC, Mr Chalmers framed the productivity discussions as an effort to "work out what additional steps we need to take to make our economy more productive so that we lift living standards over time". He told the ABC his case has been strengthened by the Reserve Bank's downgrade of growth forecasts from 1 per cent to 0.7 per cent last week. "The contribution from the Reserve Bank was confronting but nonetheless welcome because it helps people understand what we're up against," he said. RBA Governor Michele Bullock will address the summit on Tuesday morning. Another looming challenge is how to replace the billions of dollars raised each year from fuel excise as Australians switch from petrol to electric vehicles. A road-user charge is under active consideration, but both the model and timing are yet to be finalised. Government sources told the ABC a likely approach is a tapered model, beginning first with heavy vehicles before being extended more broadly. The aim would be to balance fairness for early adopters with the long-term need to protect the revenue base that funds roads and infrastructure. Mr Chalmers confirmed the issue is on the agenda, but stressed the government is not rushing. "The tax base is going to change dramatically over time … We're in no rush to make changes here. We want to work through the issues in a considered, consultative, methodical way," he said. He added that discussions with state and territory governments have been ongoing since before the election, given their shared reliance on road funding. "We haven't settled a model, we haven't set a time frame. This work will take a lot of time to get right. But a government will address this challenge and we've said we're prepared to grapple with it with our colleagues and that's what we're doing."
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Productivity symposium looks to find the 'secret sauce'
The next chapter of Australia's economic story is set to be written as the nation's top economic minds brainstorm answers to ailing productivity. After weeks of anticipation, the federal government's three-day economic roundtable will kick off on Tuesday in Canberra. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has already been bombarded with proposals ranging from winding back property investor tax breaks to environmental law reform and cutting red tape. But he has insisted all invited parties bring specific ideas and be willing to find common ground as the outcomes of the roundtable will help steer Australia's economic agenda. "Three days to inform three budgets - and beyond," Dr Chalmers will say in his opening remarks. "(The prime minister) has been clear that this is about writing the next chapter of economic reform and I want to acknowledge the leadership he's shown. "We are realistic about the impact of all this, but optimistic too. In this world of churn and change, we like Australia's chances." Even though the Australian economy has made significant progress on wages, inflation and employment, Dr Chalmers has acknowledged there is still more to do. The roundtable is aimed at lifting living standards primarily by boosting productivity, which has stagnated in Australia and other western countries. "Productivity is like a secret sauce," AMP chief economist Shane Oliver told AAP. "If you can get strong productivity, you can have strong profits, you can have strong wages growth and still keep inflation low." Improved productivity can help guard against future cost-of-living crises, which is particularly important during times of global uncertainty. The first day of the roundtable is expected to put a spotlight on ways to build resilience, with Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock set to headline Tuesday's proceedings through her presentation on productivity trends. Productivity reform will feature more prominently on the second day before budget sustainability and tax reform help close out the roundtable on Thursday. Environment groups, the business sector, unions and others have all proposed major ideas, but Dr Oliver is keeping his expectations in check and says a firm commitment to regulation, investment incentives and competition reform could likely be called a success. Former Productivity Commission chair Michael Brennan has urged Australians to be realistic about reforms but said he was optimistic. "The strictures that the government has put around contributions - that they be specific, budget neutral and focused on the national interest rather than the vested interest - have all improved the quality of the debate," the e61 Institute chief executive told AAP. "I'm hopeful that there will be positive outcomes but it's already had a positive impact."
