Suds2Go Net Worth: From Shark Tank Pitch to Multi-Million Dollar Hygiene Innovation
Suds2Go Net Worth
Suds2Go net worth has become a hot topic since the product made a splash on Shark Tank . Introduced as an innovative, portable hand-washing device, Suds2Go turned a basic hygiene habit into a stylish and convenient experience. But how much is this business really worth today?
What is Suds2Go?
Suds2Go is a dual-function portable hand-washing bottle designed for convenience, especially when soap and water aren't readily available. The bottle includes a soap compartment and a water sprayer, eliminating the need for disposable wipes or sanitizer alone. The product quickly gained traction among parents, travelers, and outdoor enthusiasts for its practicality.
The Vision Behind Suds2Go
Founded by the dynamic duo, Cindy and Gabe Trevizo, the idea stemmed from their experiences as parents constantly struggling with dirty hands while out with their kids. The concept was simple: what if you could carry soap and water in one compact unit? Their invention was more than clever—it was timely, arriving right before hygiene awareness skyrocketed due to the global pandemic.
Suds2Go and the Pandemic Pivot
While many businesses scrambled to stay afloat during COVID-19, Suds2Go soared. Public demand for portable hygiene solutions exploded, and Suds2Go became a household name. Online orders surged, and word-of-mouth marketing did wonders for early adoption.
How Suds2Go Aligns with Smart, Budget-Friendly Living
When it comes to choosing hygiene products, many consumers are looking for solutions that strike the perfect balance between cost-efficiency, convenience, and long-term value. This is where Suds2Go shines. Unlike disposable wipes or travel-sized hand sanitizers that need constant replenishment, Suds2Go offers a reusable, eco-friendly solution that can be refilled endlessly—saving both money and waste.
It's not just about cleanliness—it's about smart spending. In fact, Suds2Go has gained popularity among budget-conscious families, minimalist travelers, and outdoor enthusiasts who want to stretch their dollars without compromising on hygiene.
Shark Tank Debut: A Game Changer
Suds2Go entered the Shark Tank in Season 12 and wowed the sharks with both their pitch and traction. They secured a deal with Robert Herjavec, which gave them not just funding but also access to invaluable mentorship and retail networks. The exposure alone brought in millions of dollars in new orders within days of airing.
Suds2Go Net Worth: Pre and Post Shark Tank
Before Shark Tank, Suds2Go was estimated to be worth around $500,000 based on their sales and early product development costs. After the episode aired and following their explosive growth, the company's estimated net worth shot up to over $5 million in less than a year. As of 2025, recent figures suggest the brand may now be approaching the $10–12 million mark in valuation.
Investor Impact on Suds2Go Net Worth
Robert Herjavec's involvement provided more than capital. It opened doors to logistical support, PR, and e-commerce infrastructure that supercharged their valuation. Investors calculate net worth based on scalability, and Suds2Go's potential to reach global markets makes it a compelling investment.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-US stocks heal from tariff pain but trade news to keep markets edgy
By Lewis Krauskopf NEW YORK (Reuters) -After months of Wall Street gyrations to the twists and turns of U.S. trade policy, signs suggest stock investors are becoming more resilient to developments and cautiously defaulting to optimism that they have weathered the worst of the tariff-related shocks. U.S. equities have edged higher over the past two weeks as they digest a sharp rally that has brought the benchmark S&P 500 within 3% of its February record high, fueled in part by easing fears about the economic fallout from tariffs. A case in point: stocks ended Monday's session higher even as markets had grappled with President Donald Trump's announcement of doubling steel tariffs to 50%. Trump's stunning "Liberation Day" tariff announcement on April 2 sent stocks plunging and set off some of the most extreme market swings since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic five years ago. Since then, volatility measures have moderated considerably, and, with the market's rebound, there are signs that technical damage from the slide has healed. Still, investors are mindful that markets remain susceptible to daily swings stemming from negotiations between the U.S. and trading partners as key deadlines near in coming weeks, with elevated valuations making stocks more vulnerable to disappointments. "What has allowed this almost full recovery in the stock market hinges on the negotiations that are now under way," said Angelo Kourkafas, senior investment strategist at Edward Jones. "Markets, consumers and businesses have vested interest that we get clarity sooner than later," Kourkafas said. "So potentially it's going to be a critical summer that is going to test the market's momentum." After falling to the brink of confirming a bear market on April 8, the S&P 500 has surged back nearly 20% and erased its losses for the year. Near the halfway mark of 2025, the index is now up 1.5%. While Trump's tariffs remain a risk, the market no longer is perceiving them as "this big outlier event," said Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist Advisory Services. "We went through a period where the only thing that mattered for the markets was tariffs," Lerner said. "And now we are in a period where tariffs still matter, but they are not the only thing that matters." Truist is among the firms becoming more upbeat on the outlook for equities, with RBC Capital Markets and Barclays this week lifting their year-end targets for the S&P 500. Deutsche Bank strategists this week boosted their year-end target to 6,550, about 10% above current levels, as they cited a less severe expected tariffs hit to corporate profits. The strategists noted they expect the rally to be "punctuated by sharp pullbacks on repeated cycles of escalation and de-escalation on trade policy." Several investors and strategists pointed to a "base case" on Wall Street emerging for Trump's tariffs - 10% broadly, 30% on China along with some specific sectoral levies. The market "started saying the worst is behind us in terms of this whole tariff discussion," said King Lip, chief strategist at BakerAvenue Wealth Management. "The U.S. and China still have a lot of things to work out, but likely the worst is behind us." MODERATING VOLATILITY Volatility measures indicate calming fears about trade. The Cboe Volatility Index, an options-based measure of investor anxiety, reached 52.33 in early April, its highest closing level in five years, but has steadily receded and hovered at 17.6 on Wednesday, around its long-term median. In another sign, the average daily range of the S&P 500 has fallen to about 75 points, on a 10-session basis, about one-third the size from April during the height of post-Liberation Day volatility. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 has traded above its 200-day moving average - a closely watched trend-line - for about three weeks. The percentage of S&P 500 stocks trading in some form of an uptrend has jumped from 29.4% at the April 8 low to 60% as of last week, said Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist for LPL Financial. "There is a growing list of technical evidence that suggests this recovery is real," Turnquist said in a note this week. Options data also suggests growing bullishness. Over the last month, on average about 0.84 S&P 500 call options traded daily against every put contract traded, the most this measure of sentiment has favored call contracts in at least the last four years, according to a Reuters analysis of data from options analytics firm Trade Alert. Calls confer the right to buy stocks at a specific price and future date, while puts grant the right to sell shares. To be sure, some investors warn the threat of tariff disruptions is not going away anytime soon and are wary of market complacency. "There is still just so much uncertainty," said Matthew Miskin, co-chief investment strategist at John Hancock Investment Management. Indeed, talk of the acronym "TACO" - Trump Always Chickens Out - has spread on Wall Street as a rationale for why markets should not fear harsh tariffs because many believe they will likely be walked back. But some investors are worried about a backlash from the president. BCA Research strategists said they were wary of "relying on a TACO backstop." "Trade tensions may have peaked, but we are unwilling to assume they won't sporadically rise from current levels," BCA said in a note this week. Stock valuations also continue to swell, with the S&P 500's forward price-to-earnings ratio reaching 21.7, its highest level since late February and well above its long-term average of 15.8, according to LSEG Datastream. Stocks are at "a more vulnerable level," said Chuck Carlson, chief executive officer at Horizon Investment Services. "The market is probably going to be a little bit more sensitive to what it perceives as negative news."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US faces vape shortage as China tariffs, seizures hit Geek Bar
By Emma Rumney LONDON (Reuters) -Popular vape brands like Geek Bar may get more expensive in the U.S. - if you can find them at all. Shipments of vapes from China to the U.S. ground to a near halt in May from a year ago, official data shows, hit by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and a crackdown on unauthorised e-cigarettes in the world's biggest market for smoking alternatives. That includes Geek Bar, a brand of flavoured vapes that is not authorised to sell in the U.S. but which had been widely available due to porous import controls. One retailer, who asked not to be named because their business sells unauthorised vapes, told Reuters that one of the store's vape suppliers normally receives 100 boxes of Geek Bar vapes per week, but is now getting just ten. Another supplier imposed unprecedented purchase limits. "There were a lot of supply chain issues' during COVID-19, the person said. "But I've never seen this." The U.S. supplier limited purchases to five boxes at a time due to "tariff-related price increases and limited market availability", an undated notice to customers seen by Reuters showed. Trump's decision to impose steep tariffs on China, now at 30% after peaking at 145% in April, as well as blockbuster seizures of unauthorised vapes, have constrained the supply of Chinese-owned vape brands and Geek Bar in particular, according to five industry sources and notices from U.S. Geek Bar wholesalers reviewed by Reuters. Between May 1 and May 28 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recorded just 71 shipments of products labelled as e-cigarettes or vapes from China, compared with nearly 1,200 over the same period last year. Such imports had fallen between 40% and 60% in February, March and April, after Trump came into office, but collapsed in May, the data show. "Due to increased tariffs, rising production costs, and reduced supply chain capacity, the manufacturer has informed us that they will be reducing supply volume in the near-term," one U.S. regional Geek Bar wholesaler wrote to customers on April 22 in an email shared with Reuters. 'WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NICOTINE HERE' In the meantime, vape distributors expect prices to go in one direction. "With tariffs, it'll definitely go up," said one U.S. vape distributor who asked not to be named. But that might not impact sales much. Unauthorised vape manufacturers enjoy hefty margins, and so can eat some of the cost of tariffs, Luis Pinto, a spokesperson for British American Tobacco's U.S. subsidiary, said. Meanwhile, consumers hooked on vapes tend to keep buying, even as the price goes up. "If the price goes up, the price goes up. We're talking about nicotine here," the vape distributor said, adding unlike other products, addicted users need their fix. Vapes like Geek Bar - priced around $20 currently - would still be good value even with a $5 increase, the person said. Geek Bar manufacturer, Guangdong Qisitech, did not respond to a request for comment sent to its general email address. Pinto agreed the tariffs will increase prices but probably not to the point "where it is a barrier to usage". Many of the vapes landing on U.S. shelves are manufactured in Shenzhen, which meets the majority of the world's demand for vapes. Some factories there make devices for large tobacco companies with the legal licence to sell their products in the United States, such as Japan Tobacco International. Others fuel a booming market for unregulated devices that U.S. authorities say are illegal to import or sell. To mitigate tariffs, illicit vape producers can mislabel or undervalue their shipments or spoof their origin entirely to make it look like they came from a lower-tariff country like Indonesia, Vietnam or Mexico, Pinto said. Vapes from China are often smuggled into the U.S. disguised as other items entirely, such as shoes or toys, to evade officials hunting for unauthorised vapes at the border, according to public statements from the FDA and Customs and Border Protection. Geek Bar was by far the most popular unauthorised vape brand in the U.S. last year, accounting for around a quarter of sales tracked by market research company Circana in 2024 despite lacking a licence to sell from the FDA, which has struggled to contain illegal imports from China. The brand, as well as thousands of other labels often made in China and lacking FDA permission, are stocked by wholesalers and retailers around the country, often sold alongside authorised labels from big tobacco companies like BAT and Altria. PANIC BUYING U.S. tariffs have driven panic buying of vapes by U.S. buyers, higher shipping costs and increased risks at the border, the distributor, a former distributor and a person who used to work for a major Chinese vape company said. Substantial vape seizures were also a big driver of Geek Bar supply issues, two of the sources said. The FDA announced a large seizure in Chicago in February, and new FDA commissioner Marty Makary has pledged to crack down on unauthorised vapes. Government notices on seized goods show further vape seizures in March and April. The growth of Geek Bar and other unregulated vape brands have eaten into the market share of cigarette companies like Altria and BAT, which estimates unauthorised e-cigarettes accounted for some 70% of all U.S. vape sales last year. Altria CEO Billy Gifford told investors in April that he hoped tariffs would lead to "much more enforcement" of vapes at the border. Trump's trade war with China has also seen China-U.S. air freight and shipping capacity collapse limiting shipping capacity for cargo including vapes. The FDA's data only captures shipments properly declared as vapes. As a result, it has recorded declining vape shipments since 2020 even as industry sales have grown. An FDA spokesperson said the agency expects the number of shipments it captures to increase as it ramps up efforts to ensure compliance and prevent illegal imports. Unauthorised vape makers have also been moving production to Indonesia - a shift that prolonged tariffs on China would likely accelerate, the former employee said. Vape makers are "highly adaptable", the person said. "Whatever happens in the U.S., the industry will survive." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
As feds resume student loan collections, states try to catch borrowers before they sink
New York University students celebrate at their graduation ceremony in 2022. After a pandemic-era pause, repayments on defaulted student loans restarted last month, and many borrowers are running into barriers. (Photo by Seth Wenig/The Associated Press) Over the past few months, Celina Damian's phone has been ringing off the hook with one bewildered, anxious question after another: 'What kind of loan is this?' 'Am I in default?' 'Will the government really take my wages?' 'Sometimes they just don't know where to start,' said Damian, California's student loan servicing ombudsperson. 'I'm talking to borrowers from all ages, from new borrowers to — I have 80-, 90-year-old borrowers,' she said. The federal government last month restarted collections on defaulted loans. State student loan ombudspersons such as Damian have become some of the only sources of contact for worried borrowers lost in a tangle of conflicting information at the federal level about their loan status and repayment options. The U.S. Department of Education began collecting on defaulted student loans in May for the first time since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. Federal student loans issued by the U.S. Department of Education come with fixed rates, set repayment plans and borrower protections. Private servicers handle billing, repayment-plan enrollments and defaults. More than 5 million borrowers are in delinquency, and nearly 10 million — about 25% of the federal student loan portfolio — are at risk of default within months, according to data from the U.S. Department of Education. States can't cancel that debt, but they do register and oversee servicers operating in their states, run ombuds offices, tweak tax rules and offer outreach or limited grants — actions aimed at reducing defaults and the economic fallout. Universities try 3-year degrees to save students time, money When borrowers default, states will likely feel the economic impact. They might lose tax revenue as homebuying stalls. They could end up paying more for Medicaid and social services if borrowers need to rely on them. And students with loan debt may be reluctant to go into lower-paying public-sector work, leading to staffing shortages at state agencies. A borrower is considered delinquent after missing a payment to the servicing companies that handle billing, repayment plan enrollments, and defaults. Damian's office, established under California's Student Borrower Bill of Rights, began as a narrow statutory role but now serves as a hub for outreach, 'Student Loan 101' workshops and escalated complaints to federal agencies. Roughly 16 states plus the District of Columbia have followed suit, creating ombuds offices to guide borrowers through confusing paperwork and misinformation. Damian believes these ombuds offices should be in every state, as borrowers across the country will likely have similar questions and little help at the federal level. 'If you don't have an ombudsperson or even just a person at the state level who can educate borrowers, that will make a difference,' Damian told Stateline. 'These borrowers are trying to pay, but the system is broken. No other financial product works this way.' Student loans became a key issue during last year's election race, with President Joe Biden blocked by the U.S. Supreme Court in his effort to offer relief to 40 million Americans. In its waning days, his administration did forgive loans for some 150,000 borrowers under previous programs. But President Donald Trump opposes most loan forgiveness programs, and in May, the U.S. Education Department issued a 'Dear Colleague' letter to higher education institutions, reminding them of their legal obligations to help former students understand repayment responsibilities and access support. These borrowers are trying to pay, but the system is broken. No other financial product works this way. – Celina Damian, California student loan servicing ombudsperson Some conservative economists say that federal loan forgiveness and financial aid hurt all students, offering colleges an incentive to raise tuition or lower their own institutional aid. Winston Berkman-Breen, the legal director at the Student Borrower Protection Center, a nonprofit aimed at protecting borrowers and improving the repayment system, said that more than 2 million borrowers are stuck in a backlog of unprocessed applications for income-driven repayment (IDR) plans — calculated pay structures meant to keep payments affordable based on a borrower's income. Other borrowers have called federal agencies for help only to find that U.S. Education Department staff, including servicer-oversight teams, have been laid off as the Trump administration works toward dismantling the department entirely. 'There was an expectation to repay,' Berkman-Breen said. 'But there was also an expectation that people would have access to affordable plans. That promise has broken down.' States now have three primary tools to address student loan debt, Berkman-Breen said: enforcement actions to protect consumers, such as the 39-state lawsuit against servicer Navient; legal oversight by suing to uphold or challenge federal policy; and direct outreach to help public servants access Public Service Loan Forgiveness and similar programs. Nineteen states now require registration for companies that service student loans, he said. And more than a dozen states align with federal policy to exempt forgiven loan balances from state income taxes. Connecticut state Rep. Eleni Kavros DeGraw, a Democrat, calls student debt 'a drag on the economy,' and said states can't afford to wait for Congress — mired in partisan gridlock over student loan forgiveness — to find common ground. '[Student debt] is stopping people from buying homes, starting families and fully participating in the economy,' she told Stateline. 'That hurts us as a state, as a city, and we can't wait for Washington to figure it out.' Last year, Connecticut created a bipartisan reimbursement program that provides up to $20,000 for graduates of local colleges who make payments and complete community service. The state has distributed more than $2 million so far. More public colleges admit high schoolers even before they've applied Kavros DeGraw hopes the program can serve as a model, and has already talked with lawmakers in other states on possibly developing their own versions of it. 'These were people who were already paying,' Kavros DeGraw said. 'It just made sense. I think it's something that other states could explore this session, and it would provide an immense deal of relief.' Lawmakers in other states also have considered student loan legislation. This year, New Jersey introduced bills to register education lenders and cap interest rates. Lawmakers in New Mexico, New York and North Carolina have proposed Borrower Bill of Rights legislation. Arizona has a registration bill for private servicers. None of these measures has advanced far. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, more than 20 states have enacted laws expanding loan forgiveness, repayment programs and servicer oversight in recent years. Several states are also investing directly in workforce-aligned loan forgiveness: Georgia expanded its service-cancelable loan program to cover dental students working in rural areas. Idaho created a loan repayment incentive for rural nurses. Kentucky now offers $5,000 stipends to attract new teachers. Maryland authorized Anne Arundel County to launch a local forgiveness program for public school educators. Student loan stress is not evenly distributed. Seven states, all with Republican‐controlled legislatures, report delinquency rates above 30% among borrowers required to make payments. Mississippi leads the nation with a conditional delinquency rate of nearly 45% — meaning borrowers who should be making payments are late. That's just ahead of Alabama, West Virginia, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana, all of which have rates above 31%, according to recent data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. By contrast, Illinois, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire maintain delinquency rates below 15%. Experts say this chasm reflects deeper systemic differences, such as lower median incomes in higher delinquency states, along with weaker consumer protections and a higher share of students attending for-profit institutions or leaving college without a degree. States also have promoted the federal Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, established in 2007, that offers help to public service professionals. New Mexico has an outreach campaign that includes prospective teachers and health care workers. Maine has provided guidance to public defenders on how they can take advantage of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program and touts a related state tax credit on a marketing site to lure new residents. Transparency bills seek to reveal the true costs of college 'States can regulate and enforce, but they can't fix the structural problems in how repayment is administered,' said Michele Zampini, senior director of college affordability at The Institute for College Access & Success, a research organization that advocates for students. 'They're helping around the edges, but the core system is still broken.' A November report from the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau found at least 3.9 million borrowers received misleading or inaccurate bills from servicing companies. 'The repayment system is not in a good place to provide the services and repayment options borrowers are legally entitled to,' Zampini said. The Student Loan Borrower Survey, conducted between October 2023 and January 2024, found that 61% of borrowers who received debt relief made a beneficial life change earlier than they otherwise could have. Yet borrower awareness remains dangerously low: Nearly 42% of federal borrowers have only been on the standard repayment plan, and 31% of those didn't know other options, such as an income-based plan, existed. In California, a major part of Damian's job in the past few months has been to help borrowers access existing forgiveness programs. Meanwhile, new federal policy proposals could reshape repayment entirely. The Trump-backed One Big Beautiful Bill Act would consolidate existing IDR plans into a single tiered structure, with lower-income borrowers paying flat monthly rates and higher earners contributing 8% of their income. The bill also proposes extending standard repayment terms to 30 years — raising concerns it could delay forgiveness and inflate total interest costs. The bill passed the U.S. House and is pending in the Senate. Andrew Gillen, a Cato Institute research fellow who recently testified before Congress, argues that any meaningful fix must address the incentives driving rising tuition — namely, federal aid being tied directly to college sticker prices. 'The link between rising tuition and increasing aid is what drives the Bennett Hypothesis, where federal student aid, in the form of loans, can lead to higher tuition costs at colleges and universities,' Gillen said in an interview. 'If we instead use the median cost of attendance to calculate aid eligibility, we remove colleges' incentive to hike prices just to capture more aid.' Even without agreement on blanket forgiveness, experts agree on smaller bipartisan steps: streamlined repayment, stronger servicer oversight and targeted help for borrowers with the greatest need. 'We don't want people defaulting. We don't want payments that are too high for people just out of school. That should be the bipartisan starting point,' Zampini said. Stateline reporter Robbie Sequeira can be reached at rsequeira@ SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
