logo
War Plans Leak Reveals The Shocking Incompetence Of The Trump Administration

War Plans Leak Reveals The Shocking Incompetence Of The Trump Administration

Yahoo26-03-2025
New details in the case of top U.S. officials messaging each other about war plans — and accidentally including a journalist in the conversation — reveal the breathtaking incompetence of President Donald Trump's administration just two months into his new term.
The Atlantic on Wednesday published the full message chain from a Signal group chat that themagazine's editor-in-chief was inadvertently invited to join earlier this month. The messages, which The Atlantic first reported on Monday, discussed plans for strikes in Yemen, along with other sensitive national security matters.
The conversation gives a glimpse into how lax some of the nation's top officials were while discussing those matters.
'We are currently clean on [operational security],' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth texted the group, which included several officials and a number that wasn't known to him: The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg.
Here are some of the biggest takeaways from this national security failure:
The Trump administration's decision to use a third-party messaging app like Signal flies in the face of basic operational security measures.
Even before Monday's bombshell report, a Pentagon-wide email reportedly went out last week explicitly warning against using Signal for communications.
'A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal messenger application,' the email began.
The email added that Russian hacking groups were targeting 'Signal Messenger to spy on persons of interest.' But in this case, Russian hackers had nothing to do with the leaks: The Trump administration did that all on its own.
After Goldberg published his initial story saying Trump's national security adviser, Michael Waltz, accidentally added him to the Signal group, Trump's team pushed back on the claim that they ever discussed war plans.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X (formerly Twitter) on Tuesday that 'No 'war plans' were discussed' and that 'No classified material was sent to the thread.'
And on Wednesday, after The Atlantic published messages in which officials discussed the strike on Yemen, Hegseth defended himself on social media.
'So, let's me get this straight,' Hegseth wrote on X. 'The Atlantic released the so-called 'war plans' and those 'plans' include: No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information.'
'Those are some really shitty war plans,' Hegseth added.
But the former Fox News anchor and current defense secretary had sent some of the most revelatory messages of all in the group chat titled 'Houthis PC small group,' including a detailed timeline of the attack plans. More from Hegseth's texts:
1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)
1345: 'Trigger Based' F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)'
1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)
1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier 'Trigger Based' targets)
1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched.
MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)
We are currently clean on OPSEC
Godspeed to our Warriors.
As The Atlantic pointed out in its story on Wednesday, it could have been catastrophic for U.S. troops if those messages had gotten into the wrong hands.
Just 31 minutes after Hegseth wrote to the group, U.S. warplanes launched to carry out their attack. More from The Atlantic:
If this text had been received by someone hostile to American interests—or someone merely indiscreet, and with access to social media—the Houthis would have had time to prepare for what was meant to be a surprise attack on their strongholds. The consequences for American pilots could have been catastrophic.
As more information has come to light, the Trump administration has remained remarkably consistent on one point: It wasn't their fault.
While testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday, CIA Director John Ratcliffe claimed that using Signal was a policy of President Joe Biden's administration.
'That is a practice that preceded the current administration to the Biden administration,' Ratcliffe said.
But former Biden officials stressed Signal was never allowed on their government phones.
'We were not allowed to have any messaging apps on our work phones,' one former top national security official told HuffPost on the condition of anonymity. 'And under no circumstances were unclassified messaging apps allowed to be used for transmission of classified material. This is misdirection at its worst.'
In an interview with Fox News' Laura Ingraham on Tuesday, Waltz suggested that Goldberg may have intentionally infiltrated the group.
'You've got somebody else's number on someone else's contact, so of course I didn't see this loser in the group,' Waltz said. 'It looked like someone else. Now whether he did it deliberately or it happened in some other technical means is something we're trying to figure out.'
Waltz couldn't seem to answer directly how Goldberg got on the text thread, leading Ingraham to say, 'That's disturbing.'
'That's why we've got the best technical minds, right?' Waltz responded. 'And that's where ... I'm sure everybody out there has had a contact where it said one person and then it said a different number.'
As Trump officials continue to point fingers at everyone but themselves, some Republican lawmakers have acknowledged the staggering incompetence taking place.
'Sounds like a huge screwup. I mean, is there any other way to describe it?' Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) told reporters on Monday. 'I don't think you should use Signal for classified information.'
And Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) may have summed it up best in his response: 'Somebody fucked up.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Says Decision on Marijuana Classification Coming in Weeks
Trump Says Decision on Marijuana Classification Coming in Weeks

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Says Decision on Marijuana Classification Coming in Weeks

(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump said Monday he is considering whether to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug and would decide in 'the next few weeks.' Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis Three Deaths Reported as NYC Legionnaires' Outbreak Spreads Chicago Schools' Bond Penalty Widens as $734 Million Gap Looms To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Trump told reporters that he had discussed the issue with many people and found deep divisions, with some proponents of changing the drug's status stressing its medical benefits while opponents said the move posed a risk to children. 'I've heard great things having to do with medical, and I've had bad things having to do with just about everything else but medical,' Trump said. 'And, you know, for pain and various things, I've heard some pretty good things, but for other things, I've heard some pretty bad things.' Trump told attendees at a fundraiser in New Jersey earlier this month that he was considering the change, the Wall Street Journal reported. The federal government currently classifies marijuana under Schedule I, which is for drugs with no medical use and a high potential for abuse. Reclassifying the drug could make it easier to buy and sell cannabis. Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 Klarna Cashed In on 'Buy Now, Pay Later.' Now It Wants to Be a Bank The Pizza Oven Startup With a Plan to Own Every Piece of the Pie It's Only a Matter of Time Until Americans Pay for Trump's Tariffs ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Ukrainian drone strike kills 1 in Russia ahead of the Trump-Putin summit
Ukrainian drone strike kills 1 in Russia ahead of the Trump-Putin summit

Los Angeles Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Ukrainian drone strike kills 1 in Russia ahead of the Trump-Putin summit

KYIV, Ukraine — A Ukrainian drone attack killed one person and wounded two others in a region some 260 miles east of Moscow, a Russian official said Monday, as fighting continued ahead of Friday's Russia-U.S. summit in which President Vladimir Putin seeks a peace deal to lock in Moscow's gains. Nizhny Novgorod region Gov. Gleb Nikitin said in a statement that drones targeted two 'industrial zones' and caused the casualties and unspecified damage. A Ukrainian official said at least four drones launched by the security services, or SBU, struck a plant in Arzamas city that produced components for Kinzhal hypersonic missiles. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss operations, said the Plandin plant produces gyroscopic devices, control systems and on-board computers for the missiles and is an 'absolutely legitimate target' because it is part of the Russian military-industrial complex that works for the war against Ukraine. Russia's Defense Ministry said its air defenses intercepted and destroyed a total of 39 Ukrainian drones overnight and Monday morning over several Russian regions as well as over the Crimean peninsula that Russia annexed in 2014. Friday's summit, which President Trump will host in Alaska, sees Putin unwavering on his demands to keep all the Ukrainian territory his forces now occupy and to prevent Kyiv from joining NATO, with the long-term aim of keeping Ukraine under Moscow's sphere of influence. Putin believes he has the advantage on the ground as Ukrainian forces struggle to hold back Russian advances along the front. On the front lines, few Ukrainian soldiers believe there's an end in sight to the war. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky insists he will never consent to any Russian annexation of Ukrainian territory nor give up his country's bid for NATO membership. European leaders have rallied behind Ukraine, saying peace can't be resolved without Kyiv. With Europeans and Ukrainians so far not invited to the summit, Germany sought to prepare by inviting Trump, Zelensky, the NATO chief and several other European leaders for a virtual meeting on Wednesday. The German chancellery said the talks would seek additional ways to pressure Russia and prepare for peace negotiations and 'related issues of territorial claims and security.' Steffen Meyer, spokesperson for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, said earlier Monday that the German government 'has always emphasized that borders must not be shifted by force' and that Ukraine should decide its own fate 'independently and autonomously..

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store