National Dialogue: The role of NPA, Hawks, and SIU in combating corruption
Image: Simon Makadibodu/IOL
Fighting corruption and giving the NPA, the Hawks and the SIU free rein to investigate corruption cases are some of the things Dr Imtiaz Sooliman, CEO of Gift of the Givers and member of the Eminent Persons Group for the National Dialogue, says must be addressed first for the dialogue to serve its purpose.
Sooliman made the remarks on the sidelines of the National Convention for the National Dialogue at UNISA in Pretoria.
President Cyril Ramaphosa launched the dialogue at UNISA's ZK Matthews Hall on Friday.
Speaking to IOL News, Sooliman defended the dialogue against its critics.
'For me, this dialogue is very, very important. It's not run by the government. It's not run by politicians. It's run by civilians and civilians are now calling upon civilians to come and present their problems. But to be fair, most of us know the problems already,' he said.
The dialogue has been mired in controversy, with several key figures and organisations withdrawing from the process, including former president Thabo Mbeki, multiple legacy foundations, civil society groups, and members of the Government of National Unity (GNU).
Prominent organisations such as the Thabo Mbeki Foundation and the Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation cited concerns over the dialogue's implementation, a rushed timeline, and uncertainty.
'Why are we getting to the civilians? We are saying, cover the problems, but also let's find solutions within ourselves,' Sooliman said.
He emphasised that the country belongs to all its people, not the government.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'We all need to be patriots. We need to fix what we can on our own. Not that we're absorbing the government from their responsibility,' he said.
'But to be fair to the government, there's only 7.4 million taxpayers in this country. The taxes of 7.4 million people cannot look after 65 million people. It's impossible.'
Sooliman said communities can take responsibility in certain areas.
'Simple things. They can assist with reducing gender-based violence. They can support and guide children with ethics, with values,' he said.
'The churches, the schools, the parents, the teachers can get involved. Guiding children to the right path like they did in the old days.'
He added that such efforts would help reduce substance abuse, rampant crime and violence.
'Those things don't cost anything. It just requires an effort from the community to do that.'
Addressing scepticism about the dialogue, he said the Eminent Persons Group had to ensure it serves its purpose.
'Because we are civilians and we have to write the narrative. Not the government telling us what to do. Us telling them what should be done.'
Sooliman said accountability should be the starting point.
'Why is money spent in a certain way? Why is it that money is returned to the fiscus from different departments, from municipalities, from different ministries? Why is it not returned when it's supposed to be spent in the interest of the people? Why don't we have enough trained, skilled people to make a decision?'
He said skilled professionals were needed to run the country like a corporate entity.
'People have been battling for too long. Pre-1994 and post-1994, it's 30 years. It's a very, very long time,' he said.
He stressed the need to act quickly.
'And as our job, as an eminent persons group, is to see that that happens. We have to fight crime and corruption. Give the NPA, the Hawks, the SIU free rein. Don't make a phone call and say, hey, don't investigate this one. Please take those dockets away.'
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), Hawks and Special Investigating Unit (SIU) have faced allegations of political interference in investigations.
'That has to stop. People have to be free. Make sure there's a conviction,' Sooliman said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
3 hours ago
- eNCA
Concerns over transparency, leadership, and inclusivity
People sit next to a sign reading National Dialogue 2025 during the first National Convention at the University of South Africa (UNISA) in Pretoria on August 15, 2025.
Eyewitness News
4 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
The National Convention did not change my mind about the National Dialogue
Malaika Mahlatsi 20 August 2025 | 12:30 national dialogue Cyril Ramaphosa Government of national unity (GNU) UNISA hosted the two-day convention for the National Dialogue at its main campus in Pretoria. Picture: @GovernmentZA/X On the 15th of August, as I left my house in the northern suburbs of Johannesburg and drove to UNISA's main campus in Muckleneuk, Pretoria, to attend the first National Convention of the National Dialogue, there were many thoughts on my mind. I was attending the National Convention as part of the media - an in-house analyst for Newzroom Afrika. The first thought on my mind was that the National Convention should not have been taking place on the day. Days prior to the event, various organisations - political parties and non-governmental organisations had pulled out. These include, among others, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, the Steve Biko, and the FW de Klerk Foundation. The legacy foundations cited concerns over the rushed timeline, inadequate preparation, and a shift towards government control as reasons for their withdrawal. According to the legacy foundations, the National Dialogue was intended to be a citizen-driven and inclusive process, but ran the risk of morphing into a government-led initiative, eroding its legitimacy as a people's dialogue. Parties such as the Democratic Alliance (DA), the second biggest political party after the African National Congress (ANC), and a member of the Government of National Unity (GNU) had already withdrawn from the process (albeit for reasons I deem opportunistic). The Freedom Front Plus (FF+) withdrew just a day before the event was scheduled to take place. Other political parties, including uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP), the biggest opposition party in South Africa, and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), which won nearly 10 percent of the vote in the 2024 general election, the fourth highest after the ANC, DA and MKP, had long since stated their rejection of the National Dialogue. The EFF, in a statement released on the 13th of June 2025, characterised the dialogue as a platform "for failed politicians to rehabilitate themselves under the guise of public consultation". The MKP, which revealed that it was not invited to the dialogue and wouldn't have participated regardless, described it as "a politically compromising gathering" that was aimed at flattering president Cyril Ramaphosa rather than genuinely engaging with ordinary South Africans about the problems facing the country. This is a sentiment is shared by many - and certainly, by the protestors who were gathered on sidewalks near the venue, raising issues around the privatisation of public goods, the erasure of the Khoi people from collective national memory, poor service delivery and high levels of unemployment. It was this group that I first came across as I made my way through the police checkpoint a few meters from the UNISA entrance. On the first day of the National Convention, the venue was abuzz with activity as delegates and the media waited in anticipation for proceedings to begin. The contentious National Convention was flighted on all news channels, and the media was as invested as some South Africans in what the National Convention would achieve given the withdrawal of the legacy foundations and the crisis of legitimacy that exists around the role of the national government in the Cyril Ramaphosa, who delivered the keynote address, was supposed to convince South Africans about the value of the National Dialogue, given the crisis of legitimacy around it. What he did, instead, was confirm the concerns and criticisms that are being levelled against the process. Specifically, he confirmed what the EFF has been raising about the platform being an attempt by the government to rehabilitate itself under the guise of public consultation. Nowhere was this as aptly captured as in the part of his speech where, explaining what South Africans would have to cogitate on, said the following: 'We will need to have difficult conversations about many issues, including: Why do South African women have to live in fear of men? Why do so many people live in abject poverty and so few live lives of opulence? Why, after decades of democracy, are the prospects for a white child so much better than those of a black child? Why do women get paid less than men for the same work? Why, when we have a Bill of Rights, are LGBTQI+ people still discriminated against, stigmatised and harassed? Why do clinics run out of medicine? Why do taps run dry? These are some of the questions that we must be willing to ask and which we must prepared to answer'. It is unconscionable that in 2025, the president genuinely believes that these are issues that a National Dialogue must reflect upon. These issues are neither new – they are the very issues that South Africans have been dialoguing about for decades. More than that, solutions to these problems have been proposed by every stakeholder in the country – from the government itself to the private sector, civil society, unorganised people, the media and multilateral institutions. There is a copious amount of data, a lot of it scientifically rigorous, that engages with and answers these very questions. In public participation platforms such as ward meetings, presidential imbizos, planning processes including the Integrated Development Planning (IDP), labour surveys, data gathering processes for government reports, media platforms including social media, parliamentary committee hearings, and even protests, this data has been provided. How, in 2025, does the president stand before the nation and demand that we ask ourselves why service delivery is failing, why violence against women and children is rampant, why discriminatory attitudes towards the LGBTIQ+ community persist, and all other issues that South Africans have reflected upon, raised on many platforms, made recommendations on solutions for? Does he not read data collected from people by the very government that he leads? Does he not hear these issues at presidential imbizos and other public participation processes? Does the president not read newspapers, watch the news or listen to community radio stations? Why, for goodness' sake, would a president think issues that emerge largely from the failure of the state, a state that he was intentional to make clear at the beginning of his keynote address that he heads, must be preoccupy the minds of South Africans who are living with the consequences of this failure? The tone that the president set for the National Dialogue confirms the sentiments of Sinawo Tambo, the spokesperson of the EFF who once argued on this EWN platform that president Ramaphosa is attempting to make South Africans take collective responsibility for the failures of the party he leads and seeks to mask this scapegoating with the sentimentality of a National Dialogue. Nothing else explains why the president saw it sensible to ask of us why clinics run out of medicines, taps run dry, poverty continues to debilitate millions, and Black people remain on the receiving end of structural violence. The president knows answers to these questions – or at least, he should. I refuse to believe that a Head of State is not being furnished with the data that is constantly being churned out by his own government about these very issues. If that were the case, then there is absolutely no reason for him to remain in office because to not know such critical details about a country that one leads is nothing short of a dereliction of duty. I refuse to believe he does not know. That leaves us with one other possibility – that the National Dialogue is yet another theatre of the performance of democracy, and that the president himself is the main character in the play. If that is the case, then this multi-million Rand process is everything that critics are characterising it as – a rehabilitation centre for failed leadership. Malaika, a bestselling award-winning author, is a geographer and researcher at the Institute for Pan African Thought. She is a PhD in Geography candidate at the University of Bayreuth in Germany.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Examining the inclusivity challenges in Ramaphosa's National Dialogue
President Cyril Ramaphosa has taken a firm stance against critics and no-shows at the launch of South Africa's National Dialogue, saying meaningful change requires participation, not protests from the sidelines. Image: Simon Majadibodu / IOL President Cyril Ramaphosa's National Dialogue initiative has taken a step forward with the conclusion of its first convention, but the process continues facing criticism from various sectors of society. The convention took place at UNISA in Pretoria last weekend, where fewer than 1,000 South African citizens participated. Ramaphosa, in his weekly newsletter on Monday, announced that the National Dialogue, having adjourned on Saturday afternoon, would now engage citizens at a local and grassroots level to discuss daily issues. He encouraged individuals to initiate their own local discussions, which will be recorded and deliberated at the next convention early next year. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He said the convention marked the beginning of a national conversation that will culminate in a second convention in the first half of 2026, aimed at producing a clear vision for the country and adopting a social compact. Ramaphosa emphasised the importance of inclusivity and participation in the National Dialogue, stating that citizens themselves must determine the issues discussed and use approaches that suit their circumstances. He also highlighted the need for constructive and honest discussion on the difficult questions facing the country. He outlined the next steps for the National Dialogue, which include a Steering Committee, consisting of nominees from all sectors of society, that will take the process forward, supported and guided by the Eminent Persons Group. The outcomes of each dialogue will be recorded and collated through a special digital platform However, several organisations and political experts have expressed concerns about the legitimacy and effectiveness of the National Dialogue, with some calling it the ANC's election campaign. The South African Communist Party (SACP), which is aligned with the ANC, has criticised the process for lacking inclusivity, which they believe leads to an apparent legitimacy crisis. "The process under way at this particular moment is marred by questions of lack of inclusivity, which leads to the apparent illegitimacy crisis for the dialogue process itself," SACP spokesperson Mbulelo Mandlana said. Another Government of National Unity partner, the GOOD Party's National Youth Chairperson, Kaden Arguile, who participated, said that the dialogue's potential has been undermined by poor planning, inefficiency, and a lack of structure. "Invitations went missing, communication collapsed, the schedule shifted constantly, and critical discussions were cut short," Arguile said. Despite the criticisms, some believe that the National Dialogue has the potential to strengthen democracy, amplify grassroots voices, and help unite South Africans around solutions. Cosatu spokesperson Matthew Parks said: "We believe citizens will respond to the president's call for a dialogue, in particular at a community level and also at a sectoral level. "The issues facing society are immense, in particular those affecting working-class communities… They require not only discussions but more importantly solutions and their implementation… The dialogue's commencement last weekend was the beginning of a process. It will now be followed by 4,500 ward meetings plus sectoral engagements where the bulk of discussions with society will take place," Parks said. Political Analyst Professor Ntsikelelo Breakfast said the National Dialogue was an ambitious attempt to campaign for the upcoming local government elections. "It's more than being ambitious. Who stands to benefit is not the citizens but the ANC? We must look at the way that it has been framed. It gives me the impression that it's hasty and clumsy… The main discussions that will be held early next year coincide with the local government elections, when the ANC will be campaigning for the elections. "They (ANC) are not being honest about the whole National Dialogue, and they want to rush because they want to frame a development plan… So the discussions that the president is saying will take place early next year will most probably talk about the elections… it's the ANC that benefits from this,' Breakfast said. Another political analyst, Sandile Swana, said that the National Dialogue had started on a bad footing because most South Africans misunderstood what would come of it. "The MK Party, EFF and the DA have not participated in this, and so there is a problem. People were holding rallies in Marikana instead of attending the National Dialogue…so it was not a success at all. "The ANC under Ramaphosa is attempting to use the National Dialogue to connect with South African citizens for electoral benefits and to divert the attention of the citizens to increase unemployment and economic hardship as if they are doing something about it…Meantime, the National Dialogue was supposed to have been led by the citizens themselves with the facilitation of the State. But it has become an ANC of Ramaphosa event," Swana said.
