
US unemployment falls to 4.1% as economy adds 147,000 jobs in June
Most job gains were in the state government and healthcare sectors. State government employment rose by 47,000, largely driven by a 40,000-job increase in education. The Federal government sector continued to decline, with a loss of 7,000 positions in June, contributing to a total loss of 69,000 jobs since January, BLS said in a press release on the US' employment situation.
US unemployment rate dropped to 4.1 per cent in June, with 147,000 jobs added, driven by gains in state government and healthcare sectors. Federal government employment continued to decline. Long-term unemployment rose by 190,000 to 1.6 million. Wages increased by 0.2 per cent, and the average workweek decreased slightly. Revisions to previous months added a total of 16,000 jobs for April and May.
The labour force participation rate remained steady at 62.3 per cent, while the employment-population ratio held at 59.7 per cent. The number of people employed part-time for economic reasons remained at 4.5 million.
Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rate for Blacks rose to 6.8 per cent, while rates for adult women and Whites decreased to 3.6 per cent. The jobless rates for teenagers (14.4 per cent), Asians (3.5 per cent), and Hispanics (4.8 per cent) showed little or no change.
The number of long-term unemployed individuals (jobless for 27 weeks or more) increased by 190,000 to 1.6 million, making up 23.3 per cent of all unemployed people.
The average hourly wage for private nonfarm payroll employees increased by 8 cents, or 0.2 per cent, to $36.30. Over the past year, hourly wages have risen by 3.7 per cent. Meanwhile, the average workweek for all private-sector employees slightly decreased by 0.1 hour to 34.2 hours.
The number of marginally attached workers—those who want a job but aren't actively seeking—rose by 234,000 to 1.8 million. Additionally, the number of discouraged workers (marginally attached individuals who believe no jobs are available) rose by 256,000 to 637,000.
Revisions to previous months' figures showed the April 2025 employment figures were revised up by 11,000, from 147,000 to 158,000, and the May 2025 numbers were revised up by 5,000, from 139,000 to 144,000. Combined, these revisions show an additional 16,000 jobs compared to earlier reports, added the release.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (SG)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fibre2Fashion
19 hours ago
- Fibre2Fashion
ChinaâUS container volumes down 28% in June 2025
China-origin container volumes to the US remained significantly subdued in June 2025, totalling 639,300 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs)—flat month-on-month (MoM) but 28.3 per cent below June 2024 levels, according to The Global Shipping Report released by Descartes. China's share of total US imports dropped to 28.8 per cent, its lowest since 2021, reflecting the lingering effects of elevated tariffs, sourcing diversification, and the phased revocation of the de minimis exemption. China-origin container volumes to the US stayed flat MoM in June 2025 at 639,300 TEUs, but dropped 28.3 per cent YoY. China's share of US imports hit a low of 28.8 per cent amid tariffs, de minimis rule revocation, and trade rerouting. E-commerce brands face margin pressure, while Red Sea disruptions and tariff uncertainty ahead of the August 10 truce expiry add to trade risks. The marginal recovery in overall US imports in June (up 1.8 per cent from May to 2,217,675 TEUs) was not mirrored by China. Analysts point to uncertainty ahead of the August 10 expiry of the US–China tariff truce, which temporarily reduced tariffs from 145 per cent to 30 per cent. New tariffs on Vietnamese re-exports—often used to bypass direct China sourcing—have further constrained trade flows. E-commerce brands have been hit particularly hard. The revoked de minimis rule, replaced with a 54 per cent duty as of mid-May, continues to erode margins and increase compliance costs. Wider geopolitical tensions are amplifying trade risk. Shipping through the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait remains depressed—nearly 50 per cent below early 2024 levels—as carriers reroute vessels around the Cape of Good Hope, increasing costs and delays on Asia–US and Asia–Europe lanes. The Iran–Israel conflict and persistent Houthi attacks have stalled any return to Red Sea routes. With China-origin imports historically concentrated through West Coast ports, the impact of reduced volumes has been partially offset by tariff-induced rerouting and a surge in trade from other Asian economies. Yet analysts said that unless there is clarity on tariff policy post-August, the slowdown in China trade may extend well into the second half of 2025. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (HU)


Fibre2Fashion
a day ago
- Fibre2Fashion
Italy's Brunello Cucinelli posts revenue of $738.72 mn in H1 2025
Italian luxury fashion brand Casa Di Moda Brunello Cucinelli has generated an outstanding revenue of €684 million (~$738.72 million) in the first half (H1) of 2025, marking a 10.2 per cent year-over-year (YoY) increase at current exchange rates and 10.7 per cent at constant rates. Growth was broad-based across geographies: the Americas rose 8.7 per cent, Europe 10 per cent, and Asia led with 12.5 per cent, driven by strong demand in China, South Korea, and Japan. Channel-wise, the retail segment generated revenues of €435.8 million, up 10.3 per cent YoY and accounting for 63.7 per cent of total turnover. Growth was recorded across all regions, supported by strong like-for-like sales and contributions from boutiques opened in prior months. Although no new boutiques were opened during the period, performance remained robust. The wholesale channel delivered revenues of €248.2 million, up 10.1 per cent YoY and comprising 36.3 per cent of total turnover. Strong sell-through of the Spring-Summer 2025 collection and timely deliveries of the Autumn-Winter 2025 range further reinforced its strategic importance. Brunello Cucinelli has reported €684 million (~$738.72 million) in H1 2025 revenue, up 10.2 per cent YoY, with strong growth across regions and channels. Retail and wholesale rose over 10 per cent each. The brand expects 10 per cent revenue growth in both 2025 and 2026, supported by boutique expansions, innovation, and high collection demand. 'The first half of this year has ended with excellent results; perhaps we are now reaping the rewards of our philosophy of working and living in harmony with creation, always believing in great craftsmanship, quality and exclusivity,' said Brunello Cucinelli, executive chairman and creative director . The company reported strong order intake for its Spring-Summer 2026 Men's collection, presented at Pitti Uomo and Milan Fashion Week, reflecting continued brand momentum. Brunello Cucinelli has confirmed its full-year 2025 outlook, projecting around 10 per cent revenue growth accompanied by fair and balanced profitability, evenly distributed across quarters, regions, and channels. The brand anticipates another year of steady 10 per cent growth in 2026, supported by high-quality collections, boutique expansions, and innovation. Its 2024–2026 investment plan, centred on Italian artisanal production, is ahead of schedule and set for completion by November 2025. Additionally, the company plans to launch a Human AI-powered e-commerce site by the end of the year. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (SG)


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
What is the Voting Rights Act, the 1965 law that changed America — and why it's back in the spotlight now
The Supreme Court is revisiting the Voting Rights Act, potentially altering safeguards against discriminatory voting maps. Justice Clarence Thomas, holding long-standing concerns that the VRA exacerbates racial tensions, finds support among conservative justices. A Louisiana redistricting case, challenging the creation of Black-majority districts, highlights the court's re-evaluation of the VRA's scope and private individuals' ability to sue under it. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why is the Supreme Court taking another look at the VRA? What's the Louisiana case about? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why is Justice Clarence Thomas against it? Are other justices agreeing with Thomas? Can individuals and advocacy groups still sue under the VRA? FAQs Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Supreme Court is revisiting the Voting Rights Act (VRA), a landmark 1965 law, it is a law that prevents practices that deny Blacks, Hispanics and other racial minorities an equal chance to vote, as per a report. Justice Clarence Thomas has long argued against a key part of the VRA because he believes that it worsens racial tensions, as reported by CNN. Justice Thomas first voiced his concerns in 1994, but back then, colleagues considered his position "radical," according to the report. Only Justice Antonin Scalia agreed with him, as per with more conservative justices in the court, views of Thomas, a conservative African American, have gained traction, reported READ: Are you 65 or older? You could get a $6,000 bonus tax deduction under Trump's new law Louisiana redistricting case order from the high court "suggests that it is seriously reconsidering the scope of VRA safeguards against congressional and state legislative district maps that dilute minority votes," wrote CNN in its current dispute involves a Louisiana redistricting map as a US district court found Louisiana's original 2022 map, with a single Black-majority district, which denied Black voters an equal opportunity to elect their preferred candidates, as reported by CNN. Black people make up about one-third of Louisiana's population, and the state redrew the map to create two Black-majority districts , as per the report. However, a group of mostly White voters sued, saying that the state legislature unconstitutionally created a racial gerrymander and adopted some of Thomas' arguments, as reported by Supreme Court will rehear the Louisiana case in the upcoming session that begins in October, and said that they would issue a subsequent order regarding additional grounds to be covered, according to a report. This is a rare move for the justices to order a new argument in a controversy, but when they do, the move tends to expand the possible consequences, as reported by READ: 7 anti-aging superfoods scientists swear by for a sharper brain in your 70s Justice Thomas dissented, wanting the court to rule that Section 2 of the VRA is unconstitutional, according to the report. Section 2 requires considering race to ensure fair voting districts as Thomas wrote, 'I am hopeful that this Court will soon realize that the conflict its Section 2 jurisprudence has sown with the Constitution is too severe to ignore,' quoted believes the VRA has become a tool for "regulating, rationing, and apportioning political power among racial and ethnic groups," as quoted by CNN. He added, 'In short, few devices could be better designed to exacerbate racial tensions than the consciously segregated districting system currently being constructed in the name of the Voting Rights Act,' as quoted in the conservative justices have echoed Thomas' concerns, like Justice Neil Gorsuch has called the court's voting rights jurisprudence a "disastrous misadventure," while Justices Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett have also pressed for a "race neutral" approach, as per the issue is whether private individuals can sue under Section 2 of the VRA, as the 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that only the Justice Department can bring such claims, according to the report. This contradicts other lower courts and lawyers for Native American tribes are appealing this decision to the Supreme Court, reported the Supreme Court is reviewing parts of it, and its decision could change how voting rights are protected, especially for people of color, as per the CNN believes using race to draw voting maps causes more racial tension instead of solving it — and that the law no longer fits today's America.