Devon holiday park celebrates 50th anniversary
Ms Scott said: "We bought a farmhouse on the park in around 1980 and moved there and I would have been about eight years old." She added it used to be "quiet" and "relaxing" over the winter and "busy summers". "Now things have changed completely - we're open all year round."I think we recognised after so many years if we kept open all year round we could offer jobs all year round, rather than just summer seasonal jobs." She added: "Our focus is looking at what we can do as a family business and we can decide what to invest into certain things and improvements that will make it better for our guests to come back year after year. "Doing everything we can to keep the park sustainable... that's been very important to us for a number of years now. She also said: "Patterns and the way people book has changed. I think they're booking more short break holidays.. Any sort of economic uncertainty will affect the way in which people book."
She explained that when people came to the park for a holiday and the weather was not good, there would be a mixture of reactions.She said: "You get the hardened campers that are in a tent in the rain and loving it and walking around in their flip flops and not a care in the world. And you may get one or two that are a little bit down in the mouth when it's a wet holiday. "I think I always did intend on coming into the family business... and all of us really have gone off and had other jobs and then come and brought those skills into the business, and I think that's been quite important to the business too."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Rachel Reeves must find £50billion in next Budget to keep Britain's finances in check, warn experts
RACHEL Reeves must find £50billion in her autumn Budget to keep the country's finances in check, experts warn. The shortfall is the equivalent of raising income tax by 5p for both basic and higher-rate earners, they say today. 1 The Chancellor has to raise taxes or cut spending to maintain her stated financial cushion of £9.9billion by the end of the decade, according to the National Institute of Economic and Social Research. The think tank warned Ms Reeves faced an 'impossible trilemma' of meeting her own fiscal rules while hitting spending commitments and upholding a manifesto pledge to not raise taxes. Poor growth, eye-watering debt levels and welfare cut U-turns have led to a 'worsening' outlook, analysis shows. Prof Stephen Millard, from the NIESR, said: 'We would advocate building a bigger buffer. To do that requires a moderate but sustained increases in taxes.' The think tank has upped its growth forecast for this year to 1.3 per cent but 2026 is down from 1.5 per cent to 1.2 per cent. It said the UK can expect inflation at a higher-than-expected 3.5 per cent due to bigger wages and the national insurance hikes. Meanwhile, research shows the living standards of the poorest 10 per cent of households fell by 1.3 per cent in 2023-24. They are 10 per cent lower than pre-Covid levels. Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Labour will always reach for the tax rise lever because they don't understand the economy. 'Businesses are closing, unemployment is up, inflation has doubled and the economy is shrinking. And Labour are refusing to rule out more damaging tax rises on investment.'
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JEFF PRESTRIDGE: How to stop millions of pensioners getting taxed on their state pensions
Many pensioners feel victimised by Labour – and understandably so. Deprived last year of their universal right to winter fuel payment, they continue to be hit by a toxic mix of rising household bills and higher taxes on their income and savings. Yet they refuse to lie down without an almighty fight. Buoyed by the Government's partial U-turn on winter fuel payment, they have now set their sights on getting Chancellor Rachel Reeves to lift the freeze on the personal allowance, which has been stuck at £12,570 since 2021 – and is currently set to remain at this level until at least 2028.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pitiful justice from the FCA: It took far too long to put Woodford in the stocks, says ALEX BRUMMER
How jolly good it is that financial justice has finally caught up with disgraced investment guru Neil Woodford and his irresponsible and deceitful management of the collapsed Woodford Equity Investment Fund (WEIF). There is satisfaction to be drawn from the ban imposed on Woodford from holding senior management roles and looking after retail investors' cash. Moreover, Woodford personally will have to cough up £5.8million in fines and his eponymous investment firm some £40million. Yet the process of delivering verdicts for Woodford savers (including this writer), which started when Andrew Bailey was chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), has been exasperating. It has taken six long years to reach this point, and one fears that there will be victims of Woodford's nefarious behaviour who will have missed out on seeing the regulator swing into action. And it is not over yet since Woodford, lawyered to the hilt, is taking the matter to the Upper Tribunal, the FCA's equivalent of the High Court. That means more delays. Much of the material in the voluminous decision documents relating to Woodford Investment Management and WEIF emerged at the time. It was known, for instance, that Woodford sought to cover up a lack of liquidity in his funds by transferring assets to the obscure Guernsey stock exchange. He also sought to shift the blame for what happened to corporate director Link. The FCA found them jointly culpable and Link, now controlled from Down Under, has already paid £230million in restitution for its error. The rules-based system under which the FCA operates needs to be preserved if retail investors and professionals, such as Kent County Council, are to be protected. What is intolerable is the bureaucratic faffing which has taken so long to put Woodford in the stocks. In the interim, Woodford still offers his services as a financial adviser. The FCA has also failed, thus far, to establish how it was that some 300,000 people who invested in Woodford funds were exposed through the Hargreaves Lansdown (HL) platform and its own fund of funds. HL is now owned by a consortium of private equity investors led by CVC. That is no excuse for escaping culpability and facing up to HL's responsibility for misleading savers. Musical chairs Often it is said that the main duty of the chairman is to fire the chief executive. At Diageo, Sir John Manzoni, who took over as chairman early this year, lost little time in disposing of one of the FTSE 100's small gang of women bosses, Debra Crew. Admittedly, at the time, Diageo's share price was in sharp retreat, falling by 30 per cent. Authoritative accounts suggest that Crew was ambushed. When she questioned the assertiveness of finance director Nik Jhangiani with Manzoni, she signed her own resignation letter. The latest results show that, were it not for the Trump tariffs – which cannot be blamed on Crew – the underlying picture was much better than thought with organic sales up 1.7 per cent at £15.1billion. The vital North American market was still robust with sales up 1.5 per cent. This is despite the trend of Gen Z turning away from alcohol. Where does this, one wonders, leave Murray Auchincloss, chief executive of BP, in another part of the corporate forest? New chairman Albert Manifold has ordered a review of the business and costs, and he hasn't even been seated. What that means for the sensible Auchincloss strategy, already under fire from activist Elliott, one shudders to think. Tech leakage No board of directors would dare turn down a bid premium of 104.9 per cent unless it came from the Ayatollah himself. So British scientific instrument maker Spectris has been able to sit back as private equity ghouls Advent and KKR fight it out for control, with the latter back in the driving seat. If the sharp minds at Advent and KKR were able to see the value, where were the British analysts and buy-side investors as Spectris languished in the lower reaches of the FTSE 250? And doesn't a Labour government, committed to a high-tech future for the UK, worry about the escape of British intellectual property overseas? It should do.
