logo
Khloe Kardashian's Company Demands Cancer-Stricken Ex-Employee Submit to Mental Exam

Khloe Kardashian's Company Demands Cancer-Stricken Ex-Employee Submit to Mental Exam

Yahoo5 days ago

Khloé Kardashian's fashion company, Good American, demanded the cancer-stricken ex-employee suing for alleged discrimination submit to a mental examination before trial, In Touch can exclusively report.
On May 23, lawyers for Good American and Khloé's business partner, Emma Grede, filed court docs, obtained by In Touch, which asked the court to sign off on the former employee, Brooke, being examined by a medical professional.
Khloé, 40, and Emma, 42, launched the company in 2016.
In her suit, Brooke claimed she was hired in 2019 and received positive reviews throughout. She said issues started after she asked for accommodations due to her health.
Good American and Emma denied all allegations of wrongdoing. In her suit, Brooke claimed the defendants caused her to suffer mental and emotional injuries, including anxiety, stress, self-doubt, worry, frustration, depression and embarrassment.
The lawyer for the defendants said Brooke revealed that she had received therapy for her alleged injuries. The attorney said they tried to get Brooke to agree to an independent medical exam by a doctor they selected.
Brooke allegedly refused to engage with the request.
The lawyer argued, '[Brooke's] allegations of emotional and mental distress make it clear that her emotional and mental states are 'in controversy', and as [Brooke] will surely seek to recover such damages should she prevail on his claims. Therefore, good cause exists to compel the mental examination of [Brooke].'
He added, 'The requested examination will allow Defendants to adequately defend themselves against [Brooke's] claims of emotional and mental distress as alleged in [Brooke's] Complaint, and will also allow Defendants to test the veracity of [Brooke's] mental and emotional distress claims.' The court has yet to rule on the matter.
As In Touch previously reported, in her lawsuit, Brooke claimed she was hired by Good American in 2019 as a Marketing Intern.
She said she received various promotions and rave reviews over the years.
In 2023, Brooke, who had previously been treated for cancer (Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma), submitted a doctor's note to her bosses.
The note from UCLA Department of Medicine said Brooke was immunocompromised and had recently been discharged from the hospital.
The letter said Brooke should work remotely until she had finished another round of treatment. Brooke said the defendants were not happy and pressured her to take a medical leave instead of working remotely.
She said she was told her accommodations were undermining the organization.
Later, Brooke said she saw a job listing for her role.
The next month, she said Good American laid her off due to a company-wide 'layoff.'
Brooke does not believe it was a 'layoff' but rather Good American getting rid of her due to her disability.
She sued seeking unspecified damages for wrongful termination, cancer discrimination and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Good American and Emma denied all allegations of wrongdoing in the case.
An attorney for the defendants argued, 'To the extent [Brooke] suffered any symptoms of mental or emotional distress or injury, it was the result of pre-existing psychological disorders or alternative concurrent causes, and not the result of any act or omission of Defendants.'
In addition, the lawyer alleged, '[Brooke] is barred from claiming any injuries or damages because such injuries and damages are the sole, direct and proximate result of [Brooke's] conduct.'
Good American and Emma claimed Brooke had preexisting conditions due to her cancer.
'[Brooke] had preexisting mental distress due to cancer and other alternative causes that existed before she was terminated. Any alleged emotional distress was not due to the alleged actions of Defendants,' the response argued.
Good American claimed all decisions made were business-related and not discriminatory.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scoop: Apple to appeal EU requirement to share info with tech rivals
Scoop: Apple to appeal EU requirement to share info with tech rivals

Axios

time4 hours ago

  • Axios

Scoop: Apple to appeal EU requirement to share info with tech rivals

Apple filed an appeal to the European Commission's specifications around how the company complies with its interoperability requirements, which compel it to share user information with outside developers as part of the Digital Markets Act, per a source familiar with the situation. Why it matters: Apple continues to push back forcefully against requirements imposed by the DMA, which the company has said forces it to give up its intellectual property and compromise user privacy. The deadline to appeal this particular requirement was May 30. How it works: The interoperability requirements are meant to give other device manufacturers and app developers access to Apple features that are normally exclusive to Apple products, including WiFi pairing and notifications on non-Apple smartwatches and headsets. Apple and Meta were the first companies to be hit with DMA fines in April, as Axios first reported. Apple put out a report last December arguing that the DMA's interoperability reports could be abused and expose private user information. What they're saying: "We design our technology to work seamlessly together, so it can deliver the unique experience our users love and expect from our products. The EU's interoperability requirements threaten that foundation, while creating a process that is unreasonable, costly, and stifles innovation," an Apple spokesperson told Axios. "These requirements will also hand data-hungry companies sensitive information, which poses massive privacy and security risks to our EU users." Per the Apple spokesperson, as allowed under the DMA's interoperability requirement, companies including Meta, Google, Garmin and Spotify have requested from Apple user notification content and stored WiFi networks, "giving them the ability to access personal information that even Apple doesn't see." The spokesperson added, "In the end, these deeply flawed rules that only target Apple—and no other company—will severely limit our ability to deliver innovative products and features to Europe, leading to an inferior user experience for our European customers." The other side: Companies that rely on the App Store to distribute their products have welcomed the DMA's requirements of Apple, saying they are long overdue for developers and other businesses to offer customers better features on their apps and devices.

Teva announces results from a study of treatment patterns of tardive dyskinesia
Teva announces results from a study of treatment patterns of tardive dyskinesia

Business Insider

time6 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Teva announces results from a study of treatment patterns of tardive dyskinesia

Teva (TEVA) Pharmaceuticals, a U.S. affiliate of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, announced results from a study of treatment patterns among patients with tardive dyskinesia residing in long-term care facilities, highlighting a critical gap in TD diagnosis and treatment. Key results from the study revealed: Of the residents being treated with antipsychotic drugs, 5.6% had a diagnosis of extrapyramidal syndrome, – a broad term used to describe any drug-induced movement disorder with no wide-treating therapeutic option – while 1.1% had a specific diagnosis of TD. The most common comorbidities observed in residents on APDs at risk for TD included dementia, chronic pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure. Moderate or severe liver disease was observed in less than1% of residents on APDs. Less than half of patients diagnosed with TD residing in LTC settings received the standard of care treatment recommended by the American Psychiatric Association – a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor. The majority were treated with a non-FDA approved treatment, primarily benztropine, and a quarter were not treated at all. Confident Investing Starts Here:

Sounders players protest MLS's Club World Cup ‘cash grab', fair player payments ahead of match
Sounders players protest MLS's Club World Cup ‘cash grab', fair player payments ahead of match

New York Post

time6 hours ago

  • New York Post

Sounders players protest MLS's Club World Cup ‘cash grab', fair player payments ahead of match

MLS players are not letting the fight over Club World Cup bonuses go away. The Seattle Sounders held a player protest over the issue Sunday ahead of their match with Minnesota United, wearing shirts that read, 'World Cup Cash Grab.' 'FAIRSHARE NOW' was written across the back of the shirts. Every member of the Sounders squad wore the shirts during warmups. 3 Cristian Roldan walks onto the field before the Seattle Sounders' match June 1. Getty Images The shirts were in protest to MLS players' concerns over the cut of bonuses they'll receive from their participation in the upcoming Club World Cup, set to begin later this month in the United States. Inter Miami, the Sounders and LAFC will all represent MLS in the 32-team tournament, and FIFA announced in March that MLS teams would get $9.5 million alone just for participating. There are also additional bonuses for teams when they win or tie, setting up the possibility for the MLS clubs in the tournament to come away with large sums of money from the Club World Cup. 3 Seattle Sounders players warm up before their match June 1. IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect However, a clause in the current MLS collective bargaining agreement — Article 10.8 — limits how much players get from non-MLS tournaments, which caps it at 50 percent of the tournament prize or up to $1 million. 'The MLSPA and all MLS players stand united with the Seattle Sounders players who tonight demanded a fair share of the FIFA Club World Cup prize money. FIFA's new tournament piles on to players' ever-increasing workload without regard to their physical well-being. In order to seize this additional calendar territory, FIFA had to commit historic amount of prize money to secure club and player participation. As a result, MLS will receive an unprecedented financial windfall,' the MLS Players Association said in a statement in support of the Sounders' protest. 3 Seattle Sounders players jog onto the field for warmups before their June 1 match. IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect 'Despite the windfall, the league has refused to allocate a fair percentage of those funds to the players themselves. For months, the players have privately and respectfully invited the league to to discuss bonus terms, yet MLS has failed to bring forward a reasonable proposal. Instead of recognizing the players who have brought MLS to the global stage, the league — which routinely asks the PA to deviate from the CBA — is clinging to an out-of-date CBA provisions and ignoring longstanding international standards on what players typically receive from FIFA prize money in global competitions. 'It is the players who make the game possible. It is the players who are lifting MLS up on the global stage. They expect to be treated fairly and with respect.' MLS did not have a comment when reached by The Post. FIFA did not immediately respond to a request for comment by The Post. The Sounders begin the group stage of the tournament on June 15 when they face the Brazilian club Botafogo at Lumen Field in Seattle.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store