2,000 job carbon capture project off North Wales coast gets financial backing
Eni has announced it has reached a financial deal with UK Government on a carbon capture scheme under the sea off North Wales. Eni is the operator of the CO2 transport and storage system of the HyNet industrial Cluster, which aims take carbon dioxide (CO2) and store it in depleted gas fields under Liverpool Bay.
The financial close with the government allows the Liverpool Bay CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) project to move into the construction phase. Backers say the project will support the UK's industrial competitiveness for the long term, by safeguarding existing industrial employment and creating new production chains and jobs.
They added that the construction phase alone is estimated to employ around 2,000 people. This significant milestone follows the UK Government's funding allocation of £21.7 billion to be invested over a 25-year period across the first two CCS Clusters in the country.
It will see a pipeline built across Cheshire and north east Wales - linking Stanlow to Point of Ayr in Flintshire. From there the CO2 will be pumped into the seabed.
(Image: ©2007)
UK Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, Ed Miliband, said: 'Today we keep our promise to launch a whole new clean energy industry for our country - carbon capture and storage - to deliver thousands of highly skilled jobs and revitalise our industrial communities.
"This investment from our partnership with Eni is government working together with industry to kickstart growth and back engineers, welders and electricians through our mission to become a clean energy superpower. We are making the UK energy secure so we can protect families and businesses and drive jobs through our Plan for Change.'
Eni CEO Claudio Descalzi said: "The strategic agreement with the UK Government paves the way for the industrial-scale development of CCS, a sector in which the United Kingdom reaffirms its leadership thanks to the promotion of a regulatory framework that aims to strengthen the development of CCS and make it fully competitive in the market.
"Eni has established itself as a leading operator in the UK thanks to its key role in CO2 transport and storage activities as the leader of the HyNet Consortium, which will become one of the first low-carbon clusters in the world. CCS will play a crucial role in tackling the decarbonisation challenge by safely eliminating CO2 emissions from industries that currently do not have equally efficient and effective solutions. Eni confirms its position at the forefront in the creation of this new, highly sustainable business linked to the energy transition."
The Liverpool Bay CCS project will operate as the backbone of the HyNet Cluster to transport carbon dioxide from capture plants across the North West of England and North Wales. The project foresees the efficient repurposing of part of the offshore platforms as well as 149km of onshore and offshore pipelines, and the construction of 35km of new pipelines to connect industrial emitters to the Liverpool Bay CCS network.
They say it will significantly contribute to the reduction of emissions from a wide range of industries across the North West of England and North Wales. This includes companies involved in cement manufacturing, energy from waste plants, low-carbon hydrogen production, as well as additional industrial players who will connect to Eni's infrastructure.
With a storage capacity of 4.5 million tonnes of CO2 per year in the first phase, and the potential to increase to 10 million tonnes of CO2 per year in the 2030s, Eni's CO2 T&S system will make a significant contribution towards achieving the UK's CCS ambitions. Construction of the project is expected to commence this year, ready for planned start-up in 2028, in line with industrial emitters in the HyNet Cluster. Join the North Wales Live Whatsapp community now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Rachel Reeves failed to raise Grangemouth with refinery owner
In a response to an FOI submitted by the SNP, UK Government officials admitted that the Chancellor met with the Grangemouth chief in the same month Scotland's only oil refinery stopped processing crude oil but she did not raise the imminent closure. The UK Government response stated: 'We have identified that a meeting did take place in April 2025 at which the Chancellor and Sir Jim Ratcliffe were present. We can also confirm that the threatened closure of the Grangemouth refinery was not discussed at that meeting". Owner Petroineos announced last year the refinery would be turning into an import terminal, leaving Scotland without its own refinery and posing one of the first major tests of both the UK and Scottish governments in their push for a just transition away from oil and gas. READ MORE: Almost 2000 pubs across the UK stop selling BrewDog beer Repeated attempts to halt the closure ultimately failed, with the loss of around 100 jobs, though plans for future use of the site have been put in motion as both governments seek external investment. The Labour Government went on to ensure the future of the Prax oil refinery in England in June. Given the readily nationalised Scunthorpe Steel, the £100bn spend on English nuclear power plants and the saved refinery in Lincolnshire, the SNP have said this secret meeting 'tells Scots all they need to know about Westminster and where Scotland lies in its priorities.' SNP energy spokesperson, Graham Leadbitter MP said: 'This is a damning revelation. Scots will be disgusted to learn that just days before the Grangemouth doors slammed shut Rachel Reeves held a meeting with the owner, Sir Jim Ratcliffe [below], yet didn't even bother to mention the refinery in her meeting. 'The UK Government only conceded the information after significant pressure which speaks volumes about how desperate they were to keep this under wraps. That's because the truth is that never mind being an afterthought, the fact the Labour Government didn't even think it worthwhile to bring up such a critical issue to Scottish jobs shows Scotland doesn't even register as a thought at all. 'A steel plant in Scunthorpe was nationalised, a refinery in Lincolnshire was bailed out and £100bn is found for English nuclear power plants, yet when it came to a Scottish refinery the UK Labour Government didn't lift a finger to keep it in operation – that tells Scots all they need to know about Westminster and where Scotland lies in its priorities. 'It is this disregard for Scottish industry that leaves a growing number of Scots to wonder just how long we stay tied to this so-called Union of Equals because only with Independence can we prioritise Scottish jobs, Scottish growth and Scotland's people.' READ MORE: For Women Scotland launches legal action against Scottish ministers on gender policy The SNP also accused the UK Government of trying "to evade giving detail of the meeting," with the original request submitted in June. "Your request to extend the deadline until 11th of September 2025 would exceed this by a substantial margin, reaching a potential maximum of 64 working days from the date the initial request was received," the SNP Westminster team stated. They added: "Please be advised that I will now be raising this with the Information Commissioner".
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
How to tell if it's worth getting a wind turbine in your garden
Domestic heat pump uptake surged in the past year, while solar panels – despite a slight slump – are still the runaway leader for renewable energy installations. Homeowner appetite for wind power, however, is down in the doldrums. This is despite Ed Miliband's mass expansion plan for Britain's onshore wind infrastructure, which could involve relaxing planning laws for home installations. The industry's accreditation body, the MCS Foundation, wants homeowners and farmers to be given the right to install 30m turbines without the need for planning permission. But with high installation costs and limited output, is wind power a financially sound investment for your home? Telegraph Money delves into the details. Types of domestic wind turbines Is there a demand for domestic wind turbines? Other costs and upkeep When will you break even? How to boost the money-making potential Do I need planning permission? How much wind power do you need? Could height restrictions change? Types of domestic wind turbines There are two types of turbines that can be installed at domestic properties, with costs varying considerably. They are nowhere near the size of commercial turbines you see out at sea or in clusters on land. Roof-mounted turbine Installed on top of the property's roof or on the gable end, this type of turbine has the advantage of height. However, the top of the turbine cannot be more than 15m off the ground. They are smaller than standalone turbines, so the power is limited. Expect to generate a maximum of two kilowatts (kW) of electricity a day, against the average UK home usage of 8kWh. You'll therefore need to top up your energy from your existing grid supplier. Costs range from around £1,500 to £3,000. Pole-mounted turbine Free-standing turbines work best in a large, open place that's exposed to the wind. They can generate around 6kW of electricity. Those installed via permitted development rights (more on this later) cannot exceed 11.1m in height, but others granted with planning permission can be larger. Costs vary widely depending on the size. For a 1.5kWh turbine, the typical cost is between £7,000 and £10,000. For a 5kW free-standing model, £25,000 is the ballpark figure, while a large 15kW machine will set you back around £70,000. Is there a demand for domestic wind turbines? Since a de facto ban on onshore wind was lifted by Labour a year ago, only a handful of applications for domestic turbines have been submitted. A revolution in small-scale onshore wind has failed to materialise, and experts doubt it will ever become reality. Oxford University's Prof Jan Rosenow, who has advised Ofgem, said: 'Small wind turbines in gardens rarely make sense because of poor wind conditions, low output, high costs, noise, maintenance needs, and better alternatives like solar. 'They're more of a novelty or a statement piece than a practical energy solution for most homeowners.' Ryse Energy, a manufacturer, said more than half of its new enquiries are from customers looking to combine wind with an existing solar panel system at their home to provide year-round energy security (solar predominantly in the summer, and wind in the winter). Other costs and upkeep Aside from the purchase, it also costs to have the turbine installed at your property. Figures from Checkatrade show the price tags can be hefty. The average installation cost for a roof-mounted wind turbine is £1,000, while installing a free-standing wind turbine – where foundations are required – can jump upwards of £5,000. You will need to undertake maintenance checks every few years, at a cost of around £200. The inverter may also need to be replaced during the turbine's lifespan. For a typical 5-6kW domestic turbine, this will cost around £1,000. Additionally, batteries for off-grid energy storage need to be replaced around every five to 10 years. This can also be a four-figure bill. When will you break even? With the purchase being a significant outlay, it will likely take more than a decade to recoup the initial investment. According to Greenmatch, a 1.5kW turbine costing £7,000 will take 14.5 years to break even. A medium-power 5kW turbine will take 18 years, while the large 15kW machine will break even in 15 years. Having recouped your money, you can then enjoy generating electricity essentially free of charge. However, this will most likely be a short-lived period as turbines typically have a lifespan of 20 years before they need replacing. Maximilian Schwerdtfeger, of adviser group The Eco Experts, said: 'For most consumers, a roof-mounted domestic wind turbine on its own will generate between 200kW and 1,000kW of energy a year, which is not enough to make a significant dent in their bills. 'For example, the average three-bed house uses about 2,700kWh of electricity a year. 'What it can do, however, is generate electricity that you can store in a battery to be either used later or exported back to the grid. 'The largest stand-alone wind turbines are only really suited for farms or properties with a lot of land, although these could potentially generate enough energy to cut your bills down to nothing.' How to boost the money-making potential To boost revenue, you can sell excess energy – if you have any – back to the grid. The Smart Export Guarantee (SEG) scheme is a power-selling scheme introduced in 2020 by the Government. This means you get paid for every unit of electricity you feed back to the grid. Your home will need an export meter and a Microgeneration Certification Scheme (MCS) certificate. It will also likely need to have a smart meter capable of providing half-hourly export readings. Providers have to buy everything you sell, but they can set the price themselves and it does vary, so you should look into which one is best for you. The provider you buy your grid power from may offer you a better export deal. For example, Octopus buys power for 15p/kWh for existing customers and 4.1p for new customers. As most small-scale domestic wind turbines will not generate enough power to leave you with excess electricity, the perks of this scheme are limited. SEG is better suited for homeowners with solar panels. Last year, only 19 new turbines were hooked up to the SEG scheme, compared to 283,597 solar installations. The average domestic turbine supplying power back to the grid had a capacity of 50.4kW, with a total of £37,851 paid to homeowners in return for the excess power. The two properties with turbines less than or equal to 4kW capacity received an average of just £17 from the SEG scheme last year. Meanwhile, the 12 properties with turbines between 10kW and 50kW in power received average payments of £2,029 for their excess electricity. How much wind power do you need? Typically, a wind speed of six meters per second is the minimum average speed for a domestic wind turbine to be considered viable. It is the equivalent of a 13mph wind, so with the average UK wind speed coming in at around 9mph last year, the feasibility for a residential turbine in most areas is low. That's without bringing nearby obstructions into the equation, such as trees and buildings, which further hamper turbine wind speeds. Across the UK, renewable wind generation fell by 13pc in the first three months of 2025 due to near record low wind speeds. Do I need planning permission? Rules vary across British nations, with Wales and Northern Ireland having the tightest planning permission laws for turbines. In England, permitted development rights allow a wind turbine to be mounted on to a detached house or an outbuilding without planning permission, if these criteria are met: You don't already have an air source heat pump at the property No part of the turbine, including the blades, protrudes more than 3m above the highest part of the roof, excluding the chimney, or be more than 15m off the ground Blades are at least 5m above ground level, and no part of the turbine is within 5m from the site boundary It is not on land designated as a Scheduled Monument or within the curtilage of a listed building, a National Park, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, an area designated under s41(3) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act, the Norfolk Broads or a World Heritage Site The turbine complies with MCS standards or equivalent. Similar rules apply for stand-alone wind turbines, but these can be installed via permitted development rights within the garden of any house or block of flats. The main difference is the highest part of the turbine must not exceed 11.1m in height. Could height restrictions change? The 11.1m rule is what MCS wants the Government to change by increasing the limit to 30m – which is the height of the Christ Redeemer statue and 1.5 times the height of the Angel of the North. MCS argued that permitted development rights already allow for mobile phone masts to reach 30m in height in non-protected areas and up to 25m in protected areas. Richard Tice, deputy leader of Reform UK, said his party would 'not tolerate' the introduction of 30m domestic turbines. He said: 'Allowing the tripling of wind turbine heights in residential areas is outrageous. This relentless net zero push will trash property values and turn our towns and villages into industrial eyesores.' The National Farmers Union has backed calls for tweaks to planning law. Tom Bradshaw, president of the NFU, said a change 'would cut unnecessary red tape' and allow farmers to 'make the most of clean energy opportunities'. 'Many farmers already generate renewable energy on-site, but access to a reliable power source remains a barrier,' he said. The Government has signalled that height restrictions could be altered in the future. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) said evolutions in onshore wind turbine technology and increased demand for small-scale onshore wind turbines 'may allow for an update' to planning laws last reviewed in 2011. A public consultation on loosening the rules will be launched by the end of the year.
Auto Car
9 hours ago
- Auto Car
A Corvette designed in England? Inside GM's new Leamington Spa base
GM's new European design base was set up by director Julian Thomson Close Ashbourne Drive sounds a bit more like a street full of retired bank managers than the location of an imposing, all-new General Motors advanced car design studio. But then Spa Park, through which Ashbourne Drive runs, isn't your usual British industrial estate either, missing out on shabby factories, Portakabins selling burgers and cars badly parked on every footpath. Instead, GM's new European design base, quietly set up around three years ago on the outskirts of busy Leamington Spa by its director, Englishman Julian Thomson, is a tribute to the designer's art in itself. It is one of those impressive industrial buildings of the modern era designed for maximum interior flexibility – in this case, spacious mezzanine floors front and rear for offices and meeting rooms, a covered working area on one side of the ground floor for around 30 people and huge windows on the other to flood the working area with light. The whole thing provides 25,000 square feet of space, dedicated to unbridled creativity, and outside is a high-walled yard for exterior viewings, complete with its own dark Tarmac, because cars look different on real roads. In the centre of the building – occupying the approximate space of two tennis courts – are spaces for half a dozen full-sized car models in development, overhung by automated milling machines that can shape designs, according to digital instructions, even when the human staff are asleep or away for the weekend. All rooms are sparsely but expensively furnished: this place may have started life as an industrial unit, but there's an aura of warmth and homeliness about it that encourages pride and feeds creativity. 'The amount of work we've done in the past couple of years is immense,' says Thomson. 'We've touched every brand, we've made lots of good friends and contacts in GM and we're already very much part of the process.' Still, the question hangs: why does GM need a design operation in Europe? After all, in the medium term, it will sell only electric Cadillacs, Corvette sports cars and some top-end commercial vehicles here, and these will very much be American cars. There used to be an impressive GM design studio at Luton, back in the heyday of Vauxhall, and an even bigger one at Rüsselsheim in Germany when Opel became the senior brand, but those were swept away when the PSA Group bought Opel-Vauxhall eight years ago. Thomson has no doubts about his usefulness. If you run a multi-branded car company such as GM, he contends, more than anything else you need good ideas. And plenty of them. 'It's no longer good enough to design cars for one territory or another,' he says. 'Your designs must be understood everywhere. You need diversity among designers too – different backgrounds and ages. If you had a studio in just one area, you would get a very strong viewpoint reflecting specific trends, aspirations, lifestyles. GM knows this, and it knows it needs to gather influences from Europe. That's why we're here.' Other foreign locations leave no doubt that GM's global intentions are as strong as ever: there are two studios in the US (Detroit and California), plus one in South Korea and another in China. The establishment in Ashbourne Drive seems to have been driven by when Thomson became available and the empathetic relationship he has developed with Michael Simcoe, GM's vice-president of design. Thomson is very experienced: he trained at the Royal College of Art in London, where he was sponsored by Ford, then joined Lotus, where he took the top job after Peter Stevens left, and famously designed the original Elise. After a couple of years at Volkswagen advanced design in Barcelona, he moved to Jaguar Land Rover, where he formed a happy partnership with Ian Callum, taking the top job when Callum departed. Then came GM. 'They said I could put this place anywhere in Europe,' says Thomson, leaning back contentedly in his Warwickshire office, 'so I suppose we could now be in Nice. But I like this area. It's a real hotbed of car design talent; there are half a dozen other big studios in the area. And I wanted to get things up and running quickly, to make a good impression. I had friends in design here who I absolutely knew were the best in the business so I was able to put a team together quickly. We've got 35 people – designers, engineers, digital designers and clay modellers – and we're a great team.' Thomson acknowledges that he's no architect, but he devised the studio layout himself, using prior experience of other studios, advice from experts and by talking to designer friends in the pub. He sent a detailed proposal off to GM and the bosses agreed to build something very much like it – a decent start. 'Of course there were some tough times,' says Thomson. 'I remember being in Thailand once, turning on a Teams [video conferencing] call late at night and being confronted by a grid of about 10 angry builders wanting to talk about drains and electrical supply. But we worked it out. That was just a low point. We're really happy with what we have now. It's working brilliantly.' Easily GM Design Europe's best-known piece of work so far is their concept for a Corvette C10 – one model beyond the C9 that is approaching production as a replacement for today's C8. It is one of three concepts commissioned by Simcoe as a way of influencing the C9. It's an unusual way of doing things, but the UK effort has evidently been well received across the pond. One of the challenges for Europe is dealing with the issue of Americanness, says Thomson: 'When we did the Corvette, some people thought we would just do a European car with a Corvette badge on it. "But that would have completely missed the point. Corvette has a tremendous history; it's the world's most successful sports car. We had to respect that – but hopefully give it some freshness and some features that would make people think.' The key to this new challenge of doing American cars in Europe, believes Thomson, is to recognise the things Europeans value in American design: 'Everyone watches American films and TV and buys American clothes. Ideas of optimism, of confidence, of entertainment are seen a lot of American design. "You see it in engineering projects like Nasa's Apollo programmes. Our job is to present this from a new viewpoint and not to be stuck in a groove.' The fact that Thomson has been involved in advanced design for much of his career – at VW, at Ford and now at GM – makes him more confident than most might be about the British studio's job of presenting designs that probably won't make production but will probably affect those that do 'We need a certain naivety to be valuable,' he explains. 'We don't know what a [Chevrolet] Silverado is like the Americans do. It wasn't bred into us. We have an impression, but that's a different thing. Our value, part of our brief, is to play the role of the customer and look at the product with fresh, questioning eyes.' I suggest that it's hard not to imagine American design teams, who might be working on their third generation of some well-known model, being irritated by a bunch of British upstarts. But Thomson bats the idea away: 'Our aim is to be surprising with no surprises. We don't want just to annoy people but to stretch their thinking a bit and to present new ways of reaching design goals. Sometimes we're there to shock people.'Thomson has in a long career seen unfortunate examples of an absence of this 'stretching'. He recalls an event at VW when no fewer than 18 full-sized concepts for the next Passat were presented, most of whose creators were intent on 'winning' by anticipating what other teams did rather than presenting their best work. At Jaguar, he recalls, a constant comment on advanced design proposals was: 'That's not a Jag.' This experience is the main reason why Thomson always involves his entire team in formative discussions about every new project. He has seen the value of diverse ideas and the dangers of not hearing them. 'A lot of our younger people are better than me,' he says cheerfully. 'I know how to design a car, but I'm not one of them. There are plenty of times when I don't represent the customer as well as they do. Why would I employ a designer who has just done five years' training just to scribble down what I think? Thomson can't say when – or even whether – a car designed at Ashbourne Drive will ever appear in showrooms, and in a way he doesn't care. But if he comes to recognise certain lines on the C10 Corvette (and on other models that can't be named), he will know that he has fulfilled the brief. Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you'll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here. Next Prev In partnership with
