Fears for vulnerable children as social media ban grows
The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure.
While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees.
"This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP.
"We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them."
This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said.
Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges .
From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube.
Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million.
Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media.
"It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP.
"But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey."
The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account.
Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices.
"They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said.
"Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry."
Limiting children's access to social media could inadvertently harm marginalised children, an expert has warned, as YouTube is roped into Australia's ban.
The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure.
While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees.
"This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP.
"We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them."
This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said.
Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges .
From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube.
Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million.
Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media.
"It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP.
"But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey."
The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account.
Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices.
"They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said.
"Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry."
Limiting children's access to social media could inadvertently harm marginalised children, an expert has warned, as YouTube is roped into Australia's ban.
The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure.
While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees.
"This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP.
"We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them."
This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said.
Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges .
From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube.
Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million.
Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media.
"It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP.
"But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey."
The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account.
Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices.
"They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said.
"Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry."
Limiting children's access to social media could inadvertently harm marginalised children, an expert has warned, as YouTube is roped into Australia's ban.
The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure.
While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees.
"This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP.
"We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them."
This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said.
Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges .
From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube.
Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million.
Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media.
"It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP.
"But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey."
The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account.
Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices.
"They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said.
"Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
2 hours ago
- The Australian
Port Pirie, Hobart Nyrstar smelters bailout a boost for critical mineral capacity
Australia will develop new sovereign capacity in critical mineral production, under a $135m bailout of two key Nyrstar smelters in two states. The rescue package for Nyrstar's Hobart zinc and Port Pirie lead smelters, revealed exclusively in The Australian last month, secures 1400 jobs and could create hundreds more. A rare bipartisan, multi-jurisdiction plan, confirmed on Tuesday, will see critical minerals antimony and bismuth produced at Port Pirie, South Australia, and germanium and indium in Hobart. These minerals are critical in the production of key products for defence, clean energy, transport, advanced manufacturing and technology. 'Through this transformation, Nyrstar aims to explore possible production of antimony, bismuth, tellurium, germanium and indium – minerals vital to clean energy, defence and hi-tech sectors,' federal Industry Minister Tim Ayres said. 'An antimony pilot plant will be deployed in Port Pirie as a priority … This would position Port Pirie as Australia's only producer of antimony metal and one of the few globally, supporting sovereign capability in defence and advanced manufacturing.' Federal taxpayers will contribute $57.5m to the package, the Labor South Australian government $55m and the Tasmanian Liberal caretaker government – with state Labor support – $22.5m. As well as the critical mineral projects, the funding – a mix of new and pre-committed money – will help finance a major maintenance project at Port Pirie and major furnace and wharf upgrades in Hobart. SA Premier Peter Malinauskas hailed the outcome, which follows Nyrstar's claims of market sabotage by Chinese-subsidised industry, as 'an opportunity to transform the Port Pirie smelter and secure its future for the long term'. 'We can modernise the Port Pirie smelter and take advantage of the world's desire for critical minerals,' Mr Malinauskas said. 'The Port Pirie operations have faced challenges from global forces largely beyond its control. But the transformation of the smelter into a producer of critical minerals like antimony would put our state at the forefront of a global supply chain that is vital to clean energy, defence and hi-tech manufacturing.' Nyrstar Australia chief executive Matt Howell said the company's operations in this country had a century of history and could now become 'a new hub for the supply of critical metals – not only to Australia but globally'. 'Port Pirie and Hobart represent a key part of Australia's metals processing infrastructure,' Mr Howell said. 'We have an opportunity to build upon this to create a new source of economic growth, producing metals for defence industries, renewable energy and high-technology manufacturing. 'Through this partnership, Australia is demonstrating that it is at the forefront of taking meaningful steps to retain nationally strategic smelters and partner with industry to provide urgent short-term support, as well as work on solutions for their long-term viability.' As Australia's only lead refiner and the largest zinc refiner, Nyrstar contributed about $1.7bn to the economy each year, he said. The first stage of the package would require an additional 350 contractors and 90 suppliers at Port Pirie, and about 200 in Hobart. While welcoming the support, the Australian Workers' Union called for a broader national smelter strategy to provide longer-term sustainability across the metals industry. Coalition industry spokesman Alex Hawke said the bailout 'ignored deeper challenges with Australian industry'. 'High energy costs and stifling regulation must be addressed to improve productivity and boost competitiveness,' he said. Politics The Productivity Commission has proposed giving tech giants free access to Australian content for AI training, sparking fears creators will miss out on compensation. Economics New regulation risks $116bn in economic gains at risk, Productivity Commission warns Jim Chalmers.
The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
Albanese seeks call with Netanyahu amid Sydney, Melbourne protests
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is continuing to pursue a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as at least 90,000 people marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge calling for an end to the war in Gaza and pressure builds within Labor for recognition of Palestinian statehood. Albanese said on Monday he would use any phone call with Netanyahu to advocate for a two-state solution. Assistant Immigration Minister Matt Thistlethwaite had earlier confirmed that the call was being pursued, as Labor politicians backed the peaceful protest organised by the Palestine Action Group, with at least three members of the federal caucus in attendance. Backbenchers Ed Husic, Alison Byrnes and Tony Sheldon marched with protesters on Sunday, putting further pressure on Albanese to recognise Palestine. At a press conference on Monday, Albanese said he would continue to advocate for peace with Netanyahu. Loading 'I have said to prime minister Netanyahu before, as I've said publicly for a long period of time that I'm a supporter of a two-state solution, and that there can't be peace and security in the Middle East, without there being an advance on that two-state solution,' Albanese said. The government has repeatedly said that recognition of a Palestinian state is a matter of timing. Allies in France, Canada and the United Kingdom have all laid the groundwork to recognise the state at the next United Nations General Assembly in September. Albanese ruled out any further sanctions against Israeli figures, following those already placed on ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich in June for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. Speaking about the Harbour Bridge protest, Albanese said he was not surprised so many felt moved to march after seeing images of 'people being deprived of food and water and essential services' in Gaza.
AU Financial Review
8 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Labor's bailouts for globally competitive smelters a contradiction
The economic reforms of the 1980s and 1990s liberalised and opened up Australia's highly protected economy, which had long sheltered behind high tariff walls. The result was three decades of prosperity broken only by the COVID-19 pandemic. Over the past three years, living standards have fallen amid the nation's steep productivity decline. Jim Chalmers' economic reform roundtable needs to focus on a meaningful tax, workplace, and regulatory agenda to fix Australia's economic malaise by boosting investment in productive and globally competitive businesses. However, what is now gathering pace is Labor's revival of industry policy. Counter-productively, this marks a return to old 'Fortress Australia' days of government intervention cossetting select industries at the expense of the nation's overall international competitiveness.
