
Damaged Train For BSF Jawans Row: Ashwini Vaishnaw Announces Suspension Of 4 Officials
New Delhi: The Border Security Force (BSF) personnel heading to Amarnath Yatra duty were in for a rude shock when the train allocated to them turned out to be in a deplorable state. The train, meant to transport the team from Udaipur in Tripura to Jammu, was found to be filthy and in a dilapidated condition, sparking a political controversy. However, the Railway not only replaced the train, but also suspended four officials responsible for this, informed Union Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw.
The BSF team had specifically requested a train with adequate amenities, including AC coaches and proper facilities, to ensure a comfortable journey for their personnel. However, the train that arrived was in stark contrast to their expectations. The coaches were dirty, with broken windows and doors, malfunctioning electrical fittings, and unusable toilets. Cockroaches and dirt were rampant, making the conditions unbearable for the troops.
The incident quickly went viral, with a video showcasing the train's conditions sparking outrage. The Congress party seized the opportunity to criticize the government, with spokesperson Shama Mohamed stating, "This is what happens when the government's entire focus is on PR for a few flashy trains, while the masses are forced to travel like animals." The opposition party's remarks have added fuel to the fire, making this a contentious political issue.
This is what happens when the government's entire focus is on PR for a few flashy trains, while the masses are forced to travel like animals.
Shame on @narendramodi and @AshwiniVaishnaw for providing a filthy train—full of dirt, cockroaches, and broken seats—for our BSF soldiers… pic.twitter.com/XTo6hd1iLw — Dr. Shama Mohamed (@drshamamohd) June 11, 2025
On the other hand, the Youth Wing of the Indian National Congress wrote, "Has insulting the country's soldiers become the priority of the Modi government? BSF jawans are being sent from Tripura to Kashmir… but the train in which they were sent would put anyone to shame."
BSF pic.twitter.com/LT3UAAlQLP — Indian Youth Congress (@IYC) June 11, 2025
Congress party took to its official handle and wrote "Modi's Luxury vs. Soldiers' Misery"
Modi's Luxury vs. Soldiers' Misery pic.twitter.com/FTm04ExF7w — Congress (@INCIndia) June 11, 2025
Following the incident, four officers were suspended by Railways Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, reported news agency ANI.
"Action was taken on this yesterday itself. The train's rake was changed. Four officers who were responsible for this have been suspended," Union Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said.
#WATCH | Delhi | On 1,200 BSF jawans deployed for Amarnath Yatra refusing to travel in the train provided to them, citing poor condition of the train, Union Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw says, "Action was taken on this yesterday itself. The train's rake was changed. Four… pic.twitter.com/UURhTZZguP — ANI (@ANI) June 11, 2025
The BSF clarified the incident when asked about reports of 1,200 BSF personnel refusing to travel for deployment for the Amarnath Yatra and said, "A few coaches of the train initially allotted to our jawans were in poor condition. The issue was brought to the attention of Indian Railways through an official letter. Following this, a replacement train was arranged. The jawans will now continue their journey."
"A few coaches of the train initially allotted to our jawans were in poor condition. The issue was brought to the attention of Indian Railways through an official letter. Following this, a replacement train was arranged. The jawans will now continue their journey," the BSF… https://t.co/5lQTxiAE7f — ANI (@ANI) June 11, 2025
Netizen's Reaction:
The video sparked massive outrage among the public. A user on X shared the video and wrote, "It is with great regret that I have to say that what kind of train has been provided by the Indian Railways to those soldiers who are going to provide security for the Amarnath Yatra, who had defeated the enemies of the country in #BSF Sindoor."
बहुत ही खेद के साथ कहना पड़ रहा है कि जिन सीमा सुरक्षा बल ने Op Sindoor में देश के दुश्मनों को धूल चटाई, उन #BSF जवानों के लिए भारतीय रेलवे विभाग द्वारा कैसी रेल दी गई है, जो कि अमरनाथ यात्रा की सुरक्षा पर जा रहे हैं।#IndianRailway #AmarnathYatra#AmarnathYatra2025 #railway pic.twitter.com/L1yVNboby9 — TIger NS (@TIgerNS3) June 11, 2025
The Amarnath Yatra will be conducted for 38 days and is scheduled to end on August 9.
The Centre has ordered the deployment of a total of 581 companies of the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) comprising about 42,000 on-ground personnel, for the conduct of the yatra.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Wire
33 minutes ago
- The Wire
India Says Reset with Canada on Agenda, Carney Says Nijjar Probe Raised with Modi
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Top Stories India Says Reset with Canada on Agenda, Carney Says Nijjar Probe Raised with Modi The Wire Staff 39 minutes ago Meanwhile, Carney is still facing questions about his invitation to Modi to attend the G7 summit. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal addressing the press. Photo: Screenshot from MEA livestream. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now New Delhi: Ahead of the G7 summit, India said on Thursday (June 12) that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Canadian counterpart, Mark Carney, would discuss a reset in ties grounded in mutual 'sensitivity', even as Carney confirmed raising with Modi the ongoing probes into alleged Indian involvement in criminal plots on Canadian soil. Last week, Carney spoke with Modi and extended an invitation for the forthcoming G7 summit in Kananaskis in western Canada. Modi accepted the invitation, which came just over a week before the summit begins on June 15. It was a dramatic turnaround in relations that had been frozen for 20 months since former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau alleged that Indians agents were involved in killing Khalistani separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police accused Indian agents of targeting Canadian nationals. During the weekly briefing on Thursday, external affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said that the forthcoming bilateral meeting between Modi and Carney would 'explore pathways to reset the relationship based on mutual respect, shared interests and sensitivity to each other's concerns'. He added that India's views 'on some of these issues have already been shared publicly in considerable detail'. In contrast to Modi's announcement that only spoke about working together with 'renewed vigour', Carney had to immediately defend his invitation before the media. 'We have now agreed, importantly, to continued law enforcement dialogue. So there's been some progress on that, which recognises issues of accountability. I extended the invitation to Prime Minister Modi in that context, and he has accepted,' he said last Friday in Ottawa. When asked about Carney's mention of a dialogue between security agencies, the Indian foreign ministry spokesperson stated, 'There are existing mechanisms between Indian and Canadian law enforcement agencies that have discussed issues of mutual security concern over a period of time. This engagement is likely to continue.' India had previously claimed on several occasions that Canada had 'created an environment for illegal migration and organised criminal activities'. When asked whether India would raise this again, Jaiswal first listed points of commonality with Canada. 'I also [said] that we are two democracies. We are bound by the rule of law. We have an expansive economic engagement. We have large people-to-people connections. We have a big student community there. We have companies invested in both sides. We have technology collaboration, so there's a lot more, lots that can be discussed and for both countries to gain from each other's engagement,' said Jaiswal. Then, he said that on 'anti-India activities, whether it is Canada or anywhere else', India 'expect[s] our international partners to take into account our concerns and act accordingly'. Meanwhile, Carney is still facing questions about the invitation. In an interview to Radio Canada, he was asked whether he spoke to the Indian PM about the ongoing police probes, including the Nijjar case. 'Yes, I have,' he said, as reported by CBC News. The Canadian leader added that the legal case will continue and 'India knows that'. He added that Canada had made progress with India bilaterally and that 'they are OK with having a legal process between law enforcement entities'. Carney reiterated that Canada wants to discuss energy security, critical minerals and artificial intelligence with world leaders, and it's 'hard to have those discussions without India'. Ruling Liberal party lawmaker Sukh Dhaliwal, who represents the constituency where Nijjar was killed, had been critical of the invitation. As per Canadian media, he had a meeting with Carney on Wednesday to express his constituents' concerns. Dhaliwal said Carney is 'very strong' and would represent concerns about Indian interference and transnational crime when speaking to Modi. 'I'm saying it's not a good idea, but now he's invited. We have to move forward,' he said. Canada has listed countering ' foreign interference and transnational crime ' as a key priority for the upcoming G7 summit. Besides India, the other non-G7 invitees to the summit are the leaders of Ukraine, Mexico, Australia, Brazil, South Africa, South Korea and the United Arab Emirates. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Ahead of G7 Summit, Canada Lists 'Foreign Interference and Transnational Crime' as Key Priority Marking Turnaround in Ties, Modi Accepts Late Canadian Invitation to Attend G7 Summit Next Week Canada Placed Law Enforcement Conditions Before Modi for G7 Summit Invite: Report Nijjar & After: Facing Flak, Canadian PM says Progress in 'Accountability' Paved Way for Modi G7 Invite As the G7 Clock Ticks, Silence over India's Invite and What it Means India's Disastrous Isolation Around the World As India and Canada's Foreign Ministers Speak Over Phone, Signs of a Further Thaw in Ties Has Trump 2.0 Deprioritised India? The Evidence is Clear. Whose Growth Is it, Anyway? Understanding India's Infrastructure Push View in Desktop Mode About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Trump signs measure blocking California's ban on gas-powered car sales
It comes as the Republican president is mired in a clash with California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, over Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests AP Washington President Donald Trump signed a resolution on Thursday that blocks California's first-in-the-nation rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035. The state quickly announced it was challenging the move in court, with California's attorney general holding a news conference to discuss the lawsuit before Trump's signing ceremony ended at the White House. The resolution was approved by Congress last month and aims to quash the country's most aggressive attempt to phase out gas-powered cars. Trump also signed measures to overturn state policies curbing tailpipe emissions in certain vehicles and smog-forming nitrogen oxide pollution from trucks. Trump called California's regulations crazy at a White House ceremony where he signed the resolutions. It's been a disaster for this country, he said. It comes as the Republican president is mired in a clash with California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, over Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests. It's the latest in an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and heavily Democratic California over issues including tariffs, the rights of LGBTQ+ youth and funding for electric vehicle chargers. The state is already involved in more than two-dozen lawsuits challenging Trump administration actions, and the state's Democratic Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the latest one at a news conference in California. Ten other states, all with Democratic attorneys general, joined the lawsuit filed Thursday. The federal government's actions are not only unlawful; they're irrational and wildly partisan, Bonta said. They come at the direct expense of the health and the well-being of our people. The three resolutions Trump signed will block California's rule phasing out gas-powered cars and end the sale of new ones by 2035. They will also kill rules that phase out the sale of medium- and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and cut tailpipe emissions from trucks. In his remarks at the White House, Trump expressed doubts about the performance and reliability of electric vehicles, though he had some notably positive comments about the company owned by Elon Musk, despite their fractured relationship. I like Tesla, Trump said. In remarks that often meandered away from the subject at hand, Trump used the East Room ceremony to also muse on windmills, which he claimed are killing our country, the prospect of getting electrocuted by an electric-powered boat if it sank and whether he'd risk a shark attack by jumping as the boat went down. I'll take electrocution every single day," the president said. When it comes to cars, Trump said he likes combustion engines but for those that prefer otherwise, If you want to buy electric, you can buy electric. What this does is it gives us freedom, said Bill Kent, the owner of Kent Kwik convenience stores. Kent, speaking at the White House, said that the California rules would have forced him to install infrastructure that frankly, is extremely expensive and doesn't give you any return. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents major car makers, applauded Trump's action. Everyone agreed these EV sales mandates were never achievable and wildly unrealistic, John Bozzella, the group's president and CEO, said in a statement. Newsom, who is considered a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, and California officials contend that what the federal government is doing is illegal and said the state plans to sue. Newsom said Trump's action was a continuation of his all-out assault on California. And this time he's destroying our clean air and America's global competitiveness in the process, Newsom said in a statement. We are suing to stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters. The signings come as Trump has pledged to revive American auto manufacturing and boost oil and gas drilling. The move follows other steps the Trump administration has taken to roll back rules that aim to protect air and water and reduce emissions that cause climate change. The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed repealing rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Dan Becker with the Centre for Biological Diversity, said the signing of the resolutions was Trump's latest betrayal of democracy. Signing this bill is a flagrant abuse of the law to reward Big Oil and Big Auto corporations at the expense of everyday people's health and their wallets, Becker said in a statement. California, which has some of the nation's worst air pollution, has been able to seek waivers for decades from the EPA, allowing it to adopt stricter emissions standards than the federal government. In his first term, Trump revoked California's ability to enforce its standards, but Democratic President Joe Biden reinstated it in 2022. Trump has not yet sought to revoke it again. Republicans have long criticised those waivers and earlier this year opted to use the Congressional Review Act, a law aimed at improving congressional oversight of actions by federal agencies, to try to block the rules. That's despite a finding from the US Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, that California's standards cannot legally be blocked using the Congressional Review Act. The Senate parliamentarian agreed with that finding. California, which makes up roughly 11% of the US car market, has significant power to sway trends in the auto industry. About a dozen states signed on to adopt California's rule phasing out the sale of new gas-powered cars. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
US lawmakers approves Musk's $9 billion budget cut; NPR, PBS, USAID and more to be affected
US lawmakers on Thursday approved a White House request to claw back $9.4 billion from funding already allocated by Congress in a victory for President Donald Trump as he pushes to lock in spending cuts spearheaded by tech billionaire Elon Musk. The vote in the Republican-led US House of Representatives was seen as the first test of how easily Congress could usher into law savings sought by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) -- just days after his acrimonious exit from the government. Also Read: Donald Trump accepts Elon Musk's apology: 'Very nice that he did that' But the saved funds -- targeting public broadcasting and foreign aid -- were unpopular in some sections of both parties, and Republicans in the House of Representatives shoehorned the bill through a razor-thin 214-212 vote. "Under President Trump's leadership, your taxpayer dollars are no longer being wasted," House Speaker Mike Johnson said in a statement. "Instead, they are being directed toward priorities that truly benefit the American people." Also Read: Elon Musk expresses 'regret' over last week's X posts on Donald Trump after feud: 'Went too far' Legislation to grab back money already approved by Congress -- known as a "rescissions package" -- is extremely rare and no such measure had passed in decades. The vote was the first in what Johnson has touted as a potential series of packages codifying the cuts made by DOGE. Musk was tasked by Trump with leading the task force after spending $290 million helping the Republican get elected. Also Read: '…dangerous place': Donald Trump as US to pull some personnel from Middle East amid tensions with Iran The SpaceX boss boasted that he would be able to save $2 trillion in federal spending -- but left the White House under a cloud earlier this month as he feuded with Trump over deficits and spending. DOGE acknowledges that it has saved taxpayers just $180 billion -- and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous inaccuracies in its accounting. The recissions package slashes $8.3 billion in foreign aid, with much of that approved for humanitarian organization USAID, one of DOGE's first targets. The text also eliminates $400 million in funding allocated to health programs including the lifesaving PEPFAR global AIDS program, created by then-president George W. Bush. The package also targets $1.1 billion to be taken back from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps fund National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), as well as more than 1,500 local radio and television stations. Conservatives often accuse PBS and NPR of bias, and Trump signed an executive order in May to cease federal funding for both networks. "For decades, Republicans have promised to cut NPR, but have never done it, until now," Trump said on Truth Social as the vote got underway. "NPR and PBS are a Radical Left Disaster, and 1000% against the Republican Party!" Democrat Dan Goldman and Republican Mark Amodei, co-chairs of the congressional public broadcasting caucus, said cutting the funding will not meaningfully reduce the deficit, but instead dismantle "a trusted source of information for millions of Americans." The package now moves to the Republican-led Senate, where it needs the support of only a simple majority -- 51 members -- rather than the 60 votes usually required.