logo
Microplastics are in our food, water and air. How can we minimise our exposure to them?

Microplastics are in our food, water and air. How can we minimise our exposure to them?

The scourge of plastic pollution will continue to grow, at least for now, after talks to strike a global treaty fell apart this month.
It was the sixth round of such negotiations in three years, but despite a last-ditch scramble on Friday, delegates could not reach agreement.
Meanwhile, new research continues to expose plastic's quiet presence in our food, tap water and the air we breathe.
A study published last month found higher-than-expected levels of inhalable plastic particles in a handful of apartments and cars in France.
Recent Australian research found even compost contains teeny plastic fragments, which may eventually make their way into agricultural soils and food crops.
These are a couple of the latest studies into microplastics: fragments or fibres of plastic between a micron (one millionth of a metre) up to 5 millimetres in size.
Microplastics can be created as a result of larger pieces of plastic shedding or breaking apart, or be added to products, such as plastic powders added to some cosmetics.
Along with microplastics, there are also nanoplastics.
These are plastic particles less than a micron wide. For context, a human hair is about 50 microns in diameter.
Being so tiny, nanoplastics might more easily infiltrate human cells and tissues such as our blood, "so they're the ones scientists are interested in", University of Queensland microplastics researcher Cassandra Rauert said.
So considering micro- and nanoplastics are everywhere, from the summit of Everest to the deepest ocean, how can we minimise our exposure without living in a cave?
The short answer is: we don't yet know.
Part of that stems from the fact that we don't know a whole lot about microplastics in general, such as where they come from, how many are in our environment, how they might get into our body, what they do once they're in there, and how much we excrete.
"Unfortunately, microplastics is a very new field of research," Dr Rauert said.
Compared to other everyday pollutants such as pesticides, scientists don't have a good handle on the potential effects of microplastic or nanoplastic exposure.
And current techniques to identify micro- and nanoplastics in various organs "are not perfect".
"We really don't have good data showing that plastics are ending up in our brains or our liver or our placenta and things like that.
"There's a lot of reactive media to those studies and it's causing a lot of concern, which is very understandable, but … we really don't have a good grip on if plastics are actually getting into our bodies yet."
So what do we know? More research needs to be done, but it seems that micro- and nanoplastics can generate inflammation, Dr Rauert said.
It's not just the physical presence of plastic particles in the body that may affect our health — it's also the chemicals they bring with them, she added: "You're getting a double hit when you're exposed to these things."
Such chemicals can be picked up by plastic particles from the environment, or are additives used during manufacturing that make the plastic more malleable, for instance.
These chemicals can disrupt hormones, and "there's evidence coming out now that they're linked to type 2 diabetes", Dr Rauert said.
"It's these chemicals that we … are more concerned about exposure to [than the plastic itself]."
Despite not yet having definitive evidence that microplastics cause harm to our health, researchers suggest avoiding them as much as possible.
That can be hard, considering just how much plastic is all around us all the time.
When it comes to food, there is some good news: there's probably less plastic in what we eat than originally feared.
One of Dr Rauert's students surveyed food a typical Australian would buy from the supermarket and found low concentrations of nano- and microplastics in them.
Any plastic present in food probably comes from the packaging around it.
But it's what we do with the food when we bring it home that can contribute to microplastic levels, Dr Rauert added.
"If you're using a plastic chopping board, every time you use that [and] you can see it's deforming and degrading as you're using it, there are small pieces of plastic that are going to be coming off that board and end up in the food you're eating."
The same goes with plastic ladles and the like. So if possible, try to use wooden chopping boards and metal or wood utensils.
Tap water is a potentially bigger source of microplastics than food.
These plastic particles can come from any number of sources, from the water treatment process to the PVC pipes that plumb your home.
Putting tap water through a filter may be helpful in removing some of the larger microplastics, Dr Rauert said, even if some of the smaller microplastics and nanoplastics slip through.
"I reckon in the next couple of years there probably will be some [microplastic-filtering devices] on the market."
The air inside our home and the dust that settles on surfaces could well be teeming with micro- and nanoplastics small enough to get into our lungs.
Synthetic textiles such as polyester and nylon shed tiny fragments and fibres of plastic, and they are found everywhere from furniture to clothes to manchester and carpet.
"A lot of our carpets are polypropylene, so when pieces of the carpet are just wearing off over time, then you're getting small pieces of polypropylene in the air," Dr Rauert said.
It might sound boring, but wiping down dusty surfaces and vacuuming regularly can reduce microplastics in your home.
Another big source of microplastics in the home, Dr Rauert said, is the clothes dryer, especially if you use it to dry synthetic materials.
As they tumble in the hot air, synthetic materials release plastic fibres that aren't captured by the dryer filter. And if that hot air blows out into your home, it carries all those fibres with it.
It's often not available to people in apartments, but having a dryer that exhausts to the outside environment instead of inside your house can help keep microplastics down, as can avoiding using the dryer for synthetic materials altogether.
Generally, the air outside has fewer microplastics than indoor air, especially in winter when windows might remain closed to keep the warmth in.
So it's worth periodically opening windows and doors to ventilate the air in your home and let microplastics out.
While we can take individual action to keep our home environment as microplastic-free as possible, plastic pollution will continue to be a problem until large-scale changes are made, such as tougher action from governments, Dr Rauert said.
"There are small things we can do, but we really need a bigger, collective global effort to try and really cut down the amount of unnecessary plastic that we keep on producing every year.
"You don't actually consider how much plastic you use in your everyday life. It's always there. It's just you don't think about it."
For more on microplastics, check out the full episode of Lab Notes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Artificial eye maker Jack McDonald ordered to stop providing services while investigation underway
Artificial eye maker Jack McDonald ordered to stop providing services while investigation underway

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

Artificial eye maker Jack McDonald ordered to stop providing services while investigation underway

Artificial eye maker Jack McDonald has been ordered to stop operating while the Health Complaints Commissioner in Victoria continues an investigation into him. The ABC has heard from clients of Mr McDonald who have been unhappy with the artificial eyes he has made for them. The Health Complaints Commissioner, Adjunct Professor Bernice Redley, said she had published the Interim Prohibition Order against Mr McDonald. "An Interim Prohibition Order (IPO) is a measure I can put in place if I reasonably believe a general health service provider has contravened the code of conduct applying to general health services, and I am satisfied that an IPO is necessary to avoid a serious risk," she said. The IPO prevents Mr McDonald from providing or advertising health services for 12 weeks, but it could be extended if the investigation is ongoing and deemed to be needed to avoid a serious risk to the public. "I take any alleged breach of the General Code of Conduct in respect of general health services very seriously and will take the necessary action against providers who put the public's health, safety or welfare at risk," Commissioner Redley said. Previously, Mr McDonald's website stated he was operating out of offices in Sydney, Melbourne, Dandenong, Hobart, Adelaide, Brisbane, Perth, Geelong and Auckland. The Victorian Health Complaints Commission IPO is mutually recognised in New South Wales, Queensland and South Australia. Head of the Ocularists Association Peter Knowles has previously raised concerns about Mr McDonald's work. He has welcomed the decision by the commissioner. "It clearly shows that government departments such as the health complaints commission continue to play a vital role in ensuring that health services are provided in a manner that places patient care and wellbeing first," Mr Knowles said. "My concerns also remain for those many patients who … have outlaid a considerable amount of money and time and received nothing suitable or fit for purpose in return." There are no government regulatory hurdles to clear before being able to act as an ocularist in Australia and no requirement to be a member of the Ocularists Association. Mr McDonald is not a member of the Ocularists Association of Australia, nor is he required to be. Mr McDonald has been contacted for comment. Clients of Mr McDonald have previously shared their grievances against him with the ABC. Ron Clark in Sydney said the eye made for him by Mr McDonald "bulged out of the socket". He said the situation became intolerable after the eye fell out while he was out for dinner. "I was actually chasing [it] around the restaurant floor and the back of the eye was white and so was the tile flooring of the restaurant," he said. Mr Clark spoke to the ABC because he did not want others to "suffer through like I have". Jenny Miller lost her eye to cancer. She told the ABC the eye made for her by Mr McDonald was "hideous" and like a "fish eye". Ms Miller described the process of having an eye made by Mr McDonald as "quite harrowing". She made a complaint with the Health Complaints Commissioner in Victoria. "I just don't want people to go through this," she said. "I am old and weathered and quite resilient, but if you're young and this is something that's happened, it's not a nice thing." The Health Consumers Forum of Australia has previously called on the federal government to bring the sector together with clients and clinicians to talk about how best to improve the situation.

Rosemarie Campbell's post-surgery deterioration score miscalculated at The Wesley Hospital, inquest into her death hears
Rosemarie Campbell's post-surgery deterioration score miscalculated at The Wesley Hospital, inquest into her death hears

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

Rosemarie Campbell's post-surgery deterioration score miscalculated at The Wesley Hospital, inquest into her death hears

A Brisbane nurse who miscalculated a surgery patient's deterioration score the day before her death has told an inquest she was "genuinely surprised" she got it wrong. In February 2022, Gold Coast woman Rosemarie Campbell died at her home of complications after gastric bypass surgery. The procedure was carried out three days earlier by Dr Vahid Reza Adib, the partner of former Queensland premier Annastacia Palaszczuk, at the Wesley Hospital in Brisbane. Dr Adib was quizzed heavily on the first day of a coronial inquest being held into the 62-year-old's death, and on Tuesday registered nurse Teresa Formiatti, took the witness stand. The inquest has already heard Ms Formiatti, who worked in the bariatric ward, had assessed Ms Campbell against the Queensland Adult Deterioration Detection System (Q-ADDS) on the day of her discharge. She determined Ms Campbell was at a score of 0 which does not require escalation to a supervisor before a patient is discharged. However, it was later determined Ms Campbell should have been recorded a level 2 in the morning of her discharge, and at a 1 at the time of her discharge some hours later. Ms Formiatti told the court when she assessed Ms Campbell, she had no temperature, her respiratory rate was normal, her pain was being managed well, she was passing urine, and her blood pressure had improved from the morning. "We take into consideration more than just a single observation, you assess them holistically," she said. When asked about Ms Campbell's oxygen saturation being at a level of 93 to 94, Ms Formiatti disagreed it was concerning. She told the court it was "not abnormal" for a bariatric surgery patient due to how they breathe, and "because she is dry". "[The level] can be a little bit softer, her baseline oxygen saturation was 98," she said. When asked whether the increase in Ms Campbell's blood pressure was cause for concern she also said no, telling the court it was "a little elevated", but still within in normal range. "Her blood pressure was not unexpected," she said. Ms Formiatti told the court, according to her assessment Ms Campbell's observations were "stable" and she was "otherwise well" and was asking to be discharged. "A patient who is very unwell or deteriorating doesn't say they're going to feel better at home … they're saying something doesn't feel right, something feels off," she said. The inquest has already heard on the second night after her surgery Ms Campbell began vomiting and continued to do so up until her discharge. Ms Formiatti told the court although this was "not uncommon" she had decided to escalate it to her supervisor, as current anti-nausea medication was not working. The inquest has already heard Ms Formiatti and her supervisor spoke with Mr Adib about this, and he prescribed her with another anti-nausea medication and approved her discharge. Ms Formiatti told the court this was the only reason she escalated it, "to give her something else" to try and assist with the vomiting at home, not because vomiting was a sign of not being clinically stable. "It's not any unusual presentation," she said. "I was concerned from the dehydration perspective." When asked about the chart error, Ms Formiatti told the court "I was genuinely surprised when I had calculated the Q-ADDS (score) incorrectly". "I'm normally very accurate," she said. Ms Formiatti said regardless, she was of the understanding that a score of 1 did not prevent a patient from being discharged "based on those observations", just that it needed to be escalated to a supervisor. "This is not an abnormal presentation," she said. The inquest has already heard at the time of Ms Campbell's discharge Brisbane was experience a flooding event. Ms Formiatti acknowledged she had been asked to do a 24-hour shift as other staff could not get to the hospital but denied there was pressure to discharge patients due to rising flood waters. "No, we followed due process," she said. The inquest continues.

Queensland Supreme Court judge rules 11-year-old girl should be allowed to have abortion
Queensland Supreme Court judge rules 11-year-old girl should be allowed to have abortion

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

Queensland Supreme Court judge rules 11-year-old girl should be allowed to have abortion

A Queensland judge has ruled an 11-year-old girl should be allowed to have an abortion after weighing up her "physical, psychological and social circumstances". In the latest anonymised decision published by the Supreme Court of Queensland, an unnamed hospital and health service (HHS) brought an application for legal orders to terminate the pregnancy of the child, referred to as 'C'. The decision from April, released today, said the HHS believed, based on the treating medical team's evidence, the girl had some understanding of her pregnancy, but there was concern as to whether it was only a superficial understanding. Under the law, a child is capable of giving informed consent when they achieve a "sufficient understanding and intelligence to enable him or her to understand fully what is proposed". If the child is not "Gillick competent" to give consent to the termination of a pregnancy, there is a risk the medical procedure "may be an assault or trespass to the person and unlawful in the absence of a court making appropriate orders," the court said. Parents are also unable to provide consent on behalf of a child to a termination of pregnancy. In her decision, Justice Frances Williams said the girl's treating adolescent psychiatrist provided some evidence that the girl "may have low cognitive functioning, but has formed the view that there is no mental health issue which forms the basis of [her] being unable to understand". "Ultimately, it is for the court to consider the evidence and undertake its own assessment of the [girl's] competency," Justice Williams said. "In all of the circumstances, I am satisfied that the evidence supports the conclusion that C does not have Gillick competency. However, Justice Williams also said the court needed to determine whether it was in the child's "best interests" to have a medical or surgical termination, considering factors such as C's views, her age and level of maturity, and also the medical evidence. The court heard the girl has "repeatedly" expressed the view that she does not want to continue with the pregnancy. Her mother's preference was also for her daughter to undergo a termination. There was medical evidence that continuing the pregnancy "poses significant risks to the [girl's] short and long-term physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing," the decision said. "The overwhelming medical evidence is that the risks involved in continuing C's pregnancy are higher than the risks involved in termination," the decision said. Justice Williams said the court's "jurisdiction is in relation to the [girl], but not to her unborn child," which has been the clear position in Queensland since 1983. In her decision, she said she had reached the conclusion it was in the girl's "best interests" to make an order, allowing her to have the termination. "This takes into account a number of factors including the increased physical risk to the [child] by continuing with the pregnancy; and the increased mental or psychological risks of continuing with the pregnancy," Justice Williams said. "This is balanced against the risks and impacts of the termination procedures themselves. "I consider that it is appropriate to declare that the termination of C's pregnancy by the therapeutic administration of the drugs … or by surgical operation is necessary having regard to her current and future physical, psychological and social circumstances, and is lawful." It comes almost a month after the Supreme Court published a decision about another case where it ruled a 12-year-old girl could have a surgical abortion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store