Harvard's bonfire could be NZ's foreign student exchange
Harvard University's graduation day takes place amid escalating tensions between the university and the Trump administration.
Photo:
Getty via AFP
One of the world's best universities, a magnet for the globe's brightest brains, is under attack by the Trump administration.
And while Harvard is fighting various funding restrictions and bans on foreign student visas, harsher policies on America's borders are
creating fear from returning students
that they could be arrested by immigration officers and jailed or deported.
International students are big money-makers for universities worldwide - in New Zealand they pay four times the amount in fees as domestic students.
"We could be doing well while doing good," says the chief economist at the policy think-tank The New Zealand Initiative, Dr Eric Crampton.
"It's amazing that America's throwing all this away.
"We aren't the destination market for the best students in the world. But if the place that is the destination for the best students in the world suddenly says 'we don't want them any more' - my God we'd better be ready for that," he tells
The Detail
.
Crampton is Canadian, but spent time in the US on a student visa so knows what it's like to study there. He's also taught at Canterbury University and has experience with exchange students.
He says the American administration has now basically put every student visa under threat, with erratic threats coming from the President, whether over funding or threats to Chinese students on the basis that "they're all spies or something".
Trump's move to bar international students from Harvard by blocking their visas has itself now been
blocked by a court order
, but the situation remains uncertain. At the same time foreign students are getting nervous about leaving the country and trying to get back in, with reports about people randomly getting arrested at the border.
The hit to the US economy is expected to cost billions in revenue, and has been described as an "anti-intellectual spree".
"When you live in America on something like a student visa, every interaction with the state you're reminded that you're less than an American. Even in 2002 it was very clear that you are there by their sufferance.
"It would be awful being there now on a student visa because just imagine it ... you'd be paying $US50,000 per year in international tuition fees, maybe you've already paid for two years of study and you're coming towards the end of it ... and you've got two more years ahead of you ... if they cancel your visa you've wasted $100,000 and two years.
"If you're at a place like Harvard, people wouldn't hold it against you, you could continue your studies elsewhere. People would say 'well, he was admitted to Harvard, he must be really good', but if you're at a mid-tier US university - which is still better than anything New Zealand has - you'll have sunk two years' worth of study and $100,000 worth of cost, and you won't be able to finish your degree.
"It feels like the kind of spot where New Zealand could help. We've always been able to accommodate students on international exchange. We could make it really easy for students to come in that way."
Universities New Zealand chief executive Chris Whelan says New Zealand is
nearly back up to pre-Covid numbers
of foreign students, with our eight universities having about 20 thousand full time equivalent students between them.
"International students help, but they're just one of a number of different mechanisms that universities are looking to for making payroll and keeping lights on," he says.
"We don't want to grow too far ... we want international education to be a genuinely quality and value proposition for both domestic students - giving them the ability to rub shoulders with people from different cultures - but also for the international students, to give them a genuine international experience.
"But if any student did want to, or was forced to, discontinue their studies in the US, there are places like New Zealand that I think would welcome them and would make it as easy as possible for them to get here."
Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail
here
.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on
Facebook
or following us on
Twitter
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
40 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Funding cuts for Pacific and Maori polytech students
Pacific education 20 minutes ago Education advocates have said a government decision to remove special funding for Pacific and Maori students in vocational courses harks back to the days of a one-size-fits all education model. The funding cut applies to a per-student subsidy for Pacific and Maori enrolments at poytechnics and private training institutions. It is used to help fund dedicated support services for these students. Teuila Fuatai reports.
RNZ News
41 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Concern Mark Lundy parole board condition impinges on freedom of speech
Mark Lundy Photo: RNZ Mark Lundy hasn't said or written a word publicly since he was released from prison early last month. That's because the man twice convicted of murdering his wife Christine and daughter Amber in Palmerston North in August 2000 cannot speak to the media, post on social media or blog about his case. Given he proclaims his innocence, there is concern this Parole Board condition impinges on his right to freedom of speech. He's on a life sentence, so potentially could be subjected to conditions for decades. When the Parole Board raised the possibility of banning Lundy from giving media interviews , his response was clear: "I'd welcome it with open arms," he told board members. Mark Lundy was released from prison last month. Photo: RNZ / Daniel Jones He said when he was on bail ahead of his 2015 retrial, reporters swarmed his street and accosted him. Private investigator Tim McKinnel said the parole condition not to speak publicly took away a person's most important tool - their own voice. "I think these conditions that gag or muzzle prisoners who come out of prison, who are maintaining their innocence, are really problematic," he said. "I think there is a real risk that comes from preventing people from speaking out on their own behalf." Such conditions might be well intentioned, but they were a breach of freedom of expression, McKinnel said. That it was the board raising the matter with Lundy, rather than something he brought up, was concerning. "I think that's quite different than having that question put to them by the parole board: 'We are contemplating a condition where you cannot speak publicly about your case, what do you think about that?' "In the context of a parole hearing, you're going to be a pretty brave prisoner to push back on the Parole Board against those types of questions or scenarios." Gail Maney was acquitted for her role in Deane Fuller-Sandys' death. Photo: Jason Dorday / Stuff In some wrongful conviction cases, such as Gail Maney , her public advocacy played a huge role in proving she was not involved in killing Deane Fuller-Sandys in the late 1980s, McKinnel said. "Look at the history of wrongful conviction cases in New Zealand. There is scarcely a case when the media haven't played a fundamentally important role in exposing those miscarriages of justice. "If you take away the voice of the prisoner in arguing for themselves, I think you're at risk of preventing some of these cases emerging." McKinnel is known for his work in helping expose Teina Pora 's wrongful conviction for killing Susan Burdett. Such conditions might be well intentioned, but they were a breach of freedom of expression, McKinnel said. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly Pora was also banned from talking to media when on parole before his conviction was quashed. A progress parole hearing heard he was grateful to live without media intrusion. In a statement, the Parole Board said it had on rare occasions imposed media restrictions when granting parole. It did so in Lundy's case to protect him, after he expressed concerns about media interest in him, and to take into account victims' concerns about news reports from when he was on bail awaiting retrial. Media law expert Steven Price said the restriction on Lundy was wide ranging. "It's not just that he can't speak to the media, he can't go on social media either, and he can't go on webpages his parole officer says he can't go on. "They're pretty wide restrictions and they certainly affect his freedom of speech." The Parole Board could impose restrictions for reasons such as reducing the chance of reoffending, but it couldn't be more restrictive than necessary. Photo: Supplied Price agreed with McKinnel that people up for parole, such as Lundy, were likely to agree with any condition the board suggested. "[Lundy's] been convicted twice of murder in extremely controversial circumstances and he can't talk about that to the media. We can't ask him about that. "We can't ask him about his experiences in prison. He can't even go on social media and join a Facebook group to support social media or the All Blacks." Price said the board should have tailored restrictions on Lundy's speech to limit what would genuinely be harmful, but he acknowledged it's a difficult situation. Koi Tū research fellow Dr Gavin Ellis said he hoped the Parole Board would review Lundy's restriction at some point, given its implications for free speech. "It's the wider principle that I think as a society we need to safeguard. The rights under the Bill of Rights Act were hard won, hard fought for, and need to be protected." Media had a right to be concerned at such conditions, Ellis said. The Parole Board noted that in its decision, it said the following: "On balance, this board is satisfied that Mr Lundy will not pose an undue risk to the safety of the community if released on parole on strict conditions designed to address his risk as well as assist in his reintegration and address victim concerns." Although Lundy's parole conditions were imposed for life, he could apply to have his restrictions varied at any time, and he would have a monitoring hearing to check on his progress in October. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Social media videos promoting ways to game the KiwiSaver system
Inland revenue figures show a record number of hardship withdrawals from KiwSaver is the past year. Between July 2024 and April 2025, more than $389 million's been taken out of KiwiSaver for financial hardship reasons. That's up from $300m on the year before. People can access KiwiSaver retirement funds in significant financial hardship, including for example to pay for food, power or palliative care. However a fund manager told Checkpoint there is a multitude of social media videos full of workarounds to help people qualify for a hardship withdrawls and effectively game the system. General Manager for Kiwisaver Fisher Funds, David Boyle spoke to Lisa Owen.
