HC ‘satisfied' with probe into Balasore girl's suicide case
2
3
4
Cuttack: Orissa high court on Tuesday expressed satisfaction with the ongoing probe into the recent self-immolation of a girl in Balasore while admitting a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking a court-monitored probe by a
Special Investigation Team
(SIT).
The court also issued notices to BJD and Congress for staging protest on the issue in alleged violation by Supreme Court guidelines.
The PIL, filed by HC lawyer Shivsankar Mohanty, was taken up by the division bench of Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak. Mohanty, who appeared in person, sought a "time-bound" SIT probe under the direct supervision of the court.
However, after perusing a status report on the ongoing investigation by the State CID-Crime Branch submitted in a sealed cover, the bench expressed "satisfaction with the progress made so far."
At this stage, an SIT probe is not called for, the court observed. The matter has been posted to July 22 for further hearing, with a direction to the CID to submit an updated status report on the investigation.
Appearing for the state, advocate general Pitambar Acharya submitted that the probe is being supervised by a senior IPS officer of inspector general rank and assured the court that the govt is taking all possible steps to ensure justice.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Speed up your Mac and free up storage with Space Lens
MacPaw
Read More
Undo
He informed the court that both the accused — the college principal and the head of department of education — have been arrested, placed under suspension, and disciplinary proceedings have been initiated against them.
The court issued notices to the presidents of the Odisha Pradesh Congress Committee and BJD, following allegations by the petitioner that both political parties had staged demonstrations over the girl's death in violation of Supreme Court directives, prohibiting such activities during ongoing investigations.
The petitioner has also sought directions to the University Grants Commission (UGC) to place on record the report of the fact-finding committee it constituted on July 15, and to take appropriate action against any erring officials or institutions. Taking note of this, the bench issued notice to the UGC.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
36 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Drop harsh provisions against teen sexuality
At the heart of the ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court on the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act of 2012 is the question of the age of consent for sexual relationships. A strong case has been made to reduce the age of consent from the present 18 to 16 in view of the current realities of adolescent behaviour, social change, and the consequences of the existing law. The law criminalises a sexual relationship between those under 18 in any circumstance. The Act aims to protect children from sexual abuse and prevent crimes like child trafficking. But the law is also used for parental and social control of children and to inhibit their natural growth and punish them for it. .During the hearing, the Central government opposed the lowering of the age and granting of any exception for consensual sexual relationships between adolescents as it would dilute 'the statutory presumption of vulnerability' underlying the POCSO Act. It said that an exception would increase the risks of trafficking and other forms of child abuse. The government has taken a hard patriarchal position in line with its socially conservative thinking on man-woman and family relationships. Senior lawyer Indira Jaisingh, the amicus curiae appointed by the court, has told the court that consensual sexual relationships between adolescents should not be criminalised. She has urged the court to read a close-in-age exception into the law. The Law Commission, in a recent report, said some changes were required in the law, though it did not recommend the lowering of the age of consent. .No law should be rigid, and laws should move with the times. Adolescents now attain puberty earlier than in the past and form romantic and sexual relationships of their choice. It is wrong to curb their freedom and natural development. But such relationships lead to criminal prosecution with boys being sent to jail and girls to shelter homes. Going by the law, a kiss between a boy and a girl can lead to a 10-year jail term for the boy. Parents of girls usually lodge complaints when the boy and the girl elope. The law needs softening--consenting physical relationships should be decriminalised. In 2022, the Dharwad bench of the Karnataka High Court sought a review of the criteria in view of 'ground realities''. The Justice J S Verma commission report, which led to changes in the POCSO Act, favoured the lowering of the age of consent. The legal age of consent is 16 or lower in many countries. The law needs to be more human and realistic.
The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Dalit left groups to start protest from August 11 seeking immediate implementation of Nagamohan Das panel report on internal quota
Amid pressure on the Karnataka government to hand over the H.N. Nagamohan Das Commission report on internal reservation to a Cabinet sub-committee to study it, several Dalit organisations, under the banner of Federation for Social Justice for Scheduled Castes, will start their indefinite protest from Monday morning, seeking immediate implementation of the report. The government has postponed a decision on the committee report to the next Cabinet, asking Ministers to study the report before initiating the discussion. Dalit right not happy While the Dalit right (Holeyas) is understood to be unhappy with the report's findings, and have pointed out at their reduced population and flaws in distribution of internal reservation, the Dalit left (Madigas) and other groups have welcomed the report and have sought immediate implementation. The commission has sliced the 17% reservation matrix with 6% given to the Dalit left and 5% to the Dalit right, besides 4% to touchable groups, As much as 1% each has been given to microscopic communities and those who have identified themselves as AD, AK, and AA. Sources in the Dalit left groups said that the report should not have the same fate as the A.J. Sadashiva Commission report submitted earlier but not implemented. If there are flaws, it could be rectified and implemented, sources said. 'Every community will work to protect its interest and it was expected also. But government should not yield to such pressure to stall the implementation.' CM should take a stand Basavaraj Kowthal, convener of Federation for Social Justice for Scheduled Castes, said that they will not withdraw their protest unless the government issues an order to this effect. 'Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has to take a stand. If he goes on seeking consent from all caste groups, there will be no end to it. The report prepared after a scientific survey and robust data collection should not be wasted. Our demand for internal reservation has been three decades old and the Supreme Court has cleared it. The survey has been done according to the Supreme Court order. Not only have the caste numbers been considered, but also the extent of backwardness. We will not abandon the protest site until the government takes the report to its logical end,' he said.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
No legal mandate to publish list of excluded voters: ECI to Supreme Court
Synopsis The Election Commission of India (ECI) informed the Supreme Court that it is not legally obligated to create or distribute separate lists of individuals excluded from draft electoral rolls, nor to disclose reasons for non-inclusion. ECI shared the list of approximately 65 lakh electors, whose names have not been included in the draft roll, with political parties. Agencies The Election Commission of India (ECI) has told the Supreme Court that the law does not mandate it to "prepare or share" any "separate list" of names of electors not included in the draft electoral rolls. Also, ECI has argued that the law does not require it to "publish" the "reasons" for non-inclusion of an individual in the draft electoral rolls. "The statutory framework does not require the commission to prepare or share any separate list of names of people not included in the draft electoral rolls, or publish the reasons for non-inclusion of anyone in the draft electoral rolls for any reason," the affidavit reads. This has been submitted by ECI in response to an application filed by Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) seeking details of 65 lakh names dropped from the recently published Bihar draft electoral roll as part of an ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR). Pertinently at the outset, ECI, in its affidavit, has submitted that the list of approximately 65 lakh electors whose names have not been included in the draft roll has been shared with political parties. It has further submitted that since "neither the law nor guidelines provide for preparation or sharing" of any such list of previous electors whose enumeration form is not received for any reason during the enumeration phase, "no such list can be sought by the petitioner as a matter of right."The poll body has said that the petitioner (ADR) "can reach out" to political parties to "gather" the said list. Noteworthily, ECI has said that "exclusion of a name from the draft electoral roll does not amount to deletion of an individual from the electoral rolls". It added, "The draft roll simply shows that the duly filled enumeration form of existing electors has been received during the enumeration phase."Elaborating, the poll body has submitted that "but, on account of human involvement in execution of this exercise of scale, there is always a possibility that an exclusion or inclusion might surface due to inadvertence or error. It is for this reason that the law provides a remedy that if the Electoral Registration officer (ERO) is of the view that owing to inadvertence or error during preparation, the names of any electors have been left out of the draft roll, the ERO has the power to take remedial action."It added, "It is for this reason that issuance of reasons for exclusion of names from the draft rolls is not contemplated in the statutory framework governing the preparation of electoral rolls." Giving reasons for not preparing or sharing reasons for exclusion of electors in the draft rolls, ECI has submitted that "no inquiry is done for the inclusion of anyone's name in the draft rolls, and each and every individual whose, enumeration form, has been received, has been included in the draft rolls, without any reservation or exception."
