The Red Sox are getting the full Roman Anthony experience, for better or worse
Here are five major takeaways from this week's series at Daikin Park:
The Roman Anthony Experience
Rookie Roman Anthony's first career trip to Houston offered some exhilarating highs and frustrating lows. It has all happened quite quickly for Anthony, who is already embracing his responsibility as an offensive engine atop the Red Sox lineup. It seems like a lot to ask for the youngest player in MLB — Anthony turned 21 years old in May — but such are the expectations for a supremely talented lefty slugger who has already signed a $130 million extension. It's entirely fair for Anthony's achievements and pitfalls be both celebrated and scrutinized more than the average rookie.
[Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season]
On Monday, Anthony notched two hits, including a two-run homer off reliever Steven Okert, who had allowed just three extra-base hits to left-handed hitters all season, in the seventh inning to bring Boston within one run. But Anthony came to the plate again with two outs in the ninth inning and the tying run on second base and struck out against another tough lefty bullpen arm in Bennett Sousa to end the game. In Game 2, Anthony bounced back from his game-ending punchout in huge way: He became the third-youngest player in MLB history to hit a home run and draw four walks in a single game, with the only two younger being Mel Ott in 1929 and Ted Williams in 1939. Decent company. For Anthony to homer in a second consecutive game after hitting just two homers total over his first 50 career MLB games was especially encouraging.
There's no doubting Anthony's stupendous raw power — his 94.3 mph average exit velocity ranks fifth in MLB behind only Oneil Cruz, Aaron Judge, Kyle Schwarber, and Shohei Ohtani — but actualizing that special juice into over-the-fence production is still something of a work in progress: Anthony's 51.4% ground ball rate ranks near the top of the league and is in line with his career norms in the minors. Finding a way to lift the ball more consistently remains the most obvious way for Anthony's production to take a sizable leap. Add in some elevated swing-and-miss tendencies — Anthony went 0-for-4 with three strikeouts in Wednesday's series finale — and Anthony is a long way from reaching his full potential. At just 21 years old, though, that's completely understandable. And usually when players are this good this young, they tend to make adjustments faster than most. Don't be surprised if Anthony starts launching balls airborne more routinely sooner rather than later.
Life without Josh Hader
Despite a narrow late lead in Monday's game that seemed like an obvious opportunity to use star closer Josh Hader to slam the door, Astros manager Joe Espada opted to use Enyel De Los Santos and Bennett Sousa to secure the final three outs. Though Sousa was able to nail down the victory, his appearance raised questions about Hader's availability, a concern which was quickly validated when Espada revealed postgame that Hader had reported shoulder soreness. Sure enough, Hader went on the injured list on Tuesday with a shoulder strain. Incredibly, it's the first time Hader has been on the injured list in his major-league career (excluding a stint on the COVID-related IL in 2021). Espada said on Wednesday that Hader is still seeking more information about his injury and won't be back in the next two weeks, suggesting that this probably won't be a brief absence.
Hader's removal from the roster at this critical juncture of the Astros' season is yet another gut punch in a season that has largely been defined — but not yet derailed — by injuries. That Houston remains in first place despite such a staggering number of ailments is a credit to every level of the organization, but losing a six-time All-Star in Hader right before the stretch run is an especially daunting proposition. At the same time, this is also an opportunity for Houston to flex its surprising depth in the bullpen. Bryan Abreu — who closed out Wednesday's win for his first save of the season — has a proven track record of being an elite setup man, and is a natural replacement. But the Astros also boast multiple effective southpaws beyond the star lefty in Hader: Sousa (2.57 ERA), Okert (3.23 ERA, 0.849 WHIP), and Bryan King (3.10 ERA) all rate as upper-echelon lefty bullpen arms this season, providing an unexpected layer of lefty protection that most teams losing a pitcher like Hader could not match. To be clear, replacing Hader is no small task. His absence could have a cascading effect that forces Houston's healthy relievers to carry a larger burden of high-leverage innings than they are equipped to handle. But on paper, this isn't a bullpen that should be written off quite as quickly as you might assume considering the circumstances. At the very least, how Espada manages this unit without Hader will be one of the more fascinating Astros storylines moving forward.
Cristian Javier is back, with a new toy
A more positive development in the ever-expanding and exhausting world of Astros injury updates was the return of right-hander Cristian Javier to the rotation on Monday. Roughly 14 months removed from Tommy John surgery that cut his 2024 season short, Javier took the ball for the series opener and threw 85 pitches across five solid innings of work, allowing two earned runs and earning the win. Seeing a familiar face contribute to an Astros victory again after so long was refreshing in and of itself, but Javier's return also featured a new wrinkle: a sinker.
Someone introducing a new offering is hardly newsworthy at a time when pitch design is a staple among modern organizations, but this one stands out more than most considering Javier's prior trajectory and pitch mix. This is a pitcher who rose to prominence thanks in large part to a fantastic four-seam fastball that he threw nearly 60% of the time, one of the highest rates of any starting pitcher in baseball. A sweeper served as Javier's primary secondary weapon, and those two pitches alone were good enough to make him extremely difficult to hit, exemplified most memorably in his six no-hit innings in Game 4 of the 2022 World Series. But Javier's command and velocity wavered in 2023, leaving him especially vulnerable to the long ball and not nearly as effective as he was earlier in his career. He had started to emphasize his changeup notably more last season before his elbow injury, but a sinker, or two-seam fastball, was never part of his arsenal at any point prior to his return this summer.
Javier started throwing sinkers during his rehab outings in the minors, and clearly got comfortable enough to throw it 12 times in his first game back in the big leagues. Starters relying on two different fastballs to keep hitters off balance has become trendy recently, but it's especially interesting to see a pitcher in Javier whose four-seamer is so highly regarded on its own also introduce a multi-fastball approach at this next stage of his career. And if the sinker can help him coax more ground balls — his chief shortcoming as a pitcher, even when he was having success — that would be a massive development for an arm that now projects as especially important for Houston with October approaching.
Dustin May is different now, too
May's second start in a Red Sox uniform since arriving at the trade deadline after nearly a decade in the Dodgers organization was much more encouraging than the first. May lasted just 3 ⅔ innings in his Boston debut against Kansas City on Aug. 6, marking his shortest start of the entire season, but he found redemption on Tuesday with six shutout innings in Houston, his first start of the year allowing zero runs. Though May was consistently eating innings with the Dodgers before the trade, his poor command and inability to coax whiffs or limit hard contact ultimately made him expendable, with Boston instead taking a flier on May to see if he could become more effective in its rotation with the right tweaks. So far, that has meant an uptick in cutters, a pitch that was previously a distant fourth in usage for May behind his sweeper, four-seamer, and sinker. It's just two starts, but cutters have accounted for 24.5% of his total pitches with the Red Sox after he used the pitch just 6.3% of the time with the Dodgers this year.
May's arsenal is already fairly unique considering how sweeper-forward it is — there really aren't any many other starting pitchers who rely on a breaking ball as their most-used offering — but the evolution of the rest of his repertoire will likely play a much larger role in his ability to thrive for the Red Sox during this postseason run. The same goes for the long haul, with May scheduled to hit free agency this winter. Even if the sweeper remains May's best and most used pitch, it's clear he needs to figure out the best balance of his three fastball variants, none of which have been especially effective since he returned from elbow surgery — the velocity simply isn't what it used to be, and that leaves May with less margin for error when attacking with his various fastballs. While the underlying metrics and movement characteristics don't suggest that May's cutter has long been some secret weapon waiting to be unleashed, it sure seems like Boston is intent on finding out if that pitch can help the rest of his pitches play up more in concert with each other. Through two starts, it's been a mixed bag, but that cutter usage will be worth watching with each successive outing down the stretch.
Will these teams face off again in October?
There was no shortage of memorable moments in this week's series, with Carlos Correa's first home game since his shocking trade back to Houston coinciding with his former Astros teammate Alex Bregman's first appearance at Daikin Park as a visiting player. And beyond all the historical context for some of the key characters, all three games offered ample reasons for optimism and concern for both clubs at a crucial time in the calendar. While the regular season series between these two teams may be over, it's hard not to wonder if a rematch could be in store. If the postseason started today, Houston would host the Yankees in the wild-card round, but the standings are close enough that it's easy to envision a shake-up enabling an Astros-Red Sox wild-card series, with either Houston falling out of first place and into the top wild-card spot or Boston falling to the third wild-card spot and facing the AL West champion Astros. We've seen these clubs face off three times in October — the 2017 ALDS, 2018 ALCS, and 2021 ALCS — and based on the potential personnel involved this season, another high-stakes showdown would surely be tremendous theater.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NBA schedule 2025-26: Breaking it down by the numbers, including most back-to-backs
The NBA schedule for the 2025-26 season is out. We've broken down the league's return to NBC and debut on Peacock and the more than 100 games you can watch across this network, as well as the 20 must-watch games of the season. Now let's dive into the details of the schedule and talk about who has the advantage and disadvantage in back-to-backs, nationally televised games and more — including the most bobblehead nights. Which teams have the most nationally televised games? Four teams are maxed out at 34 games on national television: • Lakers• Warriors• Knicks• Thunder The Timberwolves and Rockets follow those four with 28 each. Rounding out the top 10 are the Nuggets (26), Celtics (25), Cavaliers (24) and Mavericks (23). Every team has at least two nationally televised games. With the addition of Peacock NBA Mondays and many NBA Cup games being broadcast on Amazon Prime exclusively, the number of national broadcast games jumped this season to 244, up from 172 a season ago. Once the NFL season nears its end, the NBA will ramp up with nationally televised games nightly. If you remove the games exclusively on streaming platforms from the national broadcast game list, only counting the games on NBC, ABC and ESPN, the teams with the most games are: Knicks (21), Lakers (20), Thunder (20), Warriors (19) and Nuggets (18). Worth noting that both the Rockets and Timberwolves will have 17 of those games. It's also worth noting that all those games on over-the-air broadcasts also will be available on streaming services such as Peacock for the NBC games as well. Which teams have the most back-to-backs? Every team has between 13 and 16 back-to-backs, with the average being 14.4 (down slightly from 14.9 a season ago). The five teams with the most (16) are: • Hornets• Nuggets• 76ers• Suns• Wizards Just as interesting is the number of times a team faces an opponent on a back-to-back. At the top of the list, the 76ers face 18 teams on the second night of a back-to-back, while the Nuggets are at the low end of that scale with 12. Utah, Philadelphia, and Sacramento each have 14 rest advantage games, tied for the most in the league, according to Positive Residual. There are no four games in five nights in the schedule. Other schedule notes • Getting rest before big games. The NBA noted that teams do not play the day before these games: *All opening-week national TV games*All Emirates NBA Cup games*All Christmas Day games*The four-game Peacock/NBC schedule on Martin Luther King Jr. Day*The 10-game ABC Saturday schedule and eight-game ABC Sunday schedule*The 11-game NBC Sunday schedule • Pelicans have toughest NBA schedule. Remember when the Pelicans traded their 2026 first-round pick to Atlanta so they could move up and draft Derik Queen in this year's draft? Keep that in mind as you check out Positive Residual's projections for the most difficult schedule in the NBA this season: Note that an older team in the Warriors is fourth on that list, with the Mavericks fifth. • Impact of Clippers' new arena. Interesting note from The Athletic's Law Murray: • Clippers lead the league in bobblehead nights. Clippers fans love bobbleheads? Kris Dunn is a nice player, but is he bobblehead worthy?
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fantasy Football draft mistakes to avoid: Let's break these 6 bad habits in 2025
The following is an excerpt from the latest edition of Yahoo's fantasy football newsletter, Get to the Points! If you like what you see, you can subscribe for free here. All summer long, we talk about the Do's of fantasy football. Target this player. Trust this offense. Lean into this stat or this piece of film review. Do, do, do. But there's a yang to every yin, some ebb to every piece of flow. Sometimes you have to talk about the Don't side of things, the habits to clean up, the things to avoid. Today, that's the assignment. We will talk about mistakes that are commonly made in fantasy football. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] Mistake 1: Not knowing the basics Sure, not knowing the league rules and settings is obvious. But it's also a common error. I know, because I make it myself sometimes — and there's no justification for it. It's no fun to read the rules or audit the settings, I get it. In some of the leagues I play in, the rulebook is long and unwieldy, a cumbersome read. And like so many fantasy managers, I'm in a ton of leagues (too many to count), so at times it becomes tempting to cut this corner. But if you're not clear on the game you're playing, errors are sure to follow. Let's make sure we put in the work I'm not just talking about checking scoring rules, but every league setting. Example of a common mistake: often managers are unaware of when free agency starts or when the waiver process begins. Thirty seconds in your online calendar today can cover you for a missed opportunity later. Mistake 2: Drafting insurance Modern baseball theory says that sacrifice bunts are rarely a good idea. The game is dominated by launch angles and home runs, to the point that giving up an out and advancing a runner from first to second is rarely the proper play. When you hand outs to the other team, you cap your scoring upside. What does this have to do with fantasy football? Well, when you go out of your way to draft the NFL backups of your primary starters (especially at running back), you're essentially bunting. You're capping your upside. You're playing for the small inning. Tips Early in the fantasy season, I want you to play for the big inning. I want you to try to build the most dynamic juggernaut possible. Sure, you can draft backup running backs, intriguing stash-and-hope runners, but do it when it's not tied to one of your primary starters. Draft the backups that benefit if your opponents encounter bad luck. Build a roster that can spike — not merely survive — when chaos happens. Stop playing it safe and hurting your ceiling. When to get RB insurance The understudy back can make sense later in the year — much like bunting can still make sense in baseball, later in a game. The winning scenario narrows the later we get in any contest, and with that in mind, you act accordingly. If you're crushing the league come early November and you want Tyler Allgeier to insure Bijan Robinson— because your roster doesn't have bigger problems that need solving — I can sign off. In August, that's the wrong way to think. Your goals should be much loftier the day you start assembling your roster. Mistake 3: Anchoring to previously-held opinions Fantasy sports are essentially a game of opinions, your best guess against my best guess. The top fantasy managers are going to have plenty of takes. You compete for a few years, take down a trophy or two, you get some confidence and even some ego. Things to remember The NFL is a snow-globe league, the American sport with the most year-over-year variance. It's also the fantasy sport where context matters the most.A journeyman running back might become fantasy royalty if he lands in the right a walk-in Hall of Famer like Randy Moss can fall off the planet when he's on a shipwrecked team like the 2006 Raiders. My philosophy I have plenty of strong player and strategy takes today, just like I did a month ago, three months ago or six months ago. But everything's written in pencil. When the facts shift, I'm certainly willing to change my mind. And when overlooked angles are brought to my attention, I'm willing to change my mind then, too. The goal Figure out the new season before your opponents do. And with that in mind, you have to be willing to be selectively aggressive when opportunities arise. Mistake 4: Being paralyzed by fear Paradox of Choice is a fascinating concept, the idea that otherwise-smart people can be overwhelmed by alternatives. It's not uncommon for a fantasy manager to tell me they prefer a roster of minimal depth over a roster of fantastic depth, because they aren't forced to make difficult choices each week. (Obviously, a deep team can allow for trades to build an even better starting lineup, but let's ignore that for now.) Some managers are afraid to bench a player because said player was a high pick, or required a lot of FAB on the waiver wire. Some managers are afraid to make a trade or a free agent move because they're obsessed with how bad they'll feel if the decision turns out to be wrong. Friendliest Loss remains a pox in our decision-making world Too many fantasy players will settle on the choice that will give them the least amount of pain if it doesn't go as planned — no matter if that choice reflects what they view the most likely winning scenario. Don't be afraid of making a mistake, friends. Tricky decisions are like bluffs in poker — if you don't have one blow up on you every so often, you are playing far too conservatively. Fortune favors the brave. I'm not suggesting you do wacky things just for the sake of it. I still want you to make good decisions, sound decisions. But focus on the likelihood of your decision working, and what the payoff may be. Don't get tripped up on what the regret will feel like if you're wrong. That's not how successful people think. Mistake 5: Not updating your queue during the draft I generally don't touch the preset rankings in any draft applet, because I want to know what most of the league is looking at. But that doesn't mean I rest back in my chair and scroll through emails between picks. I'm constantly working on some kind of list, be it an off-applet list I'm maintaining, or adding and arranging players in my online draft queue. Reasons to stay active during the draft A tidily-arranged queue will be your best friend if you get bumped offline mid-draft — and will spare you a possible-disastrous autopick. It's a good way to keep late-round sleepers fresh in your mind, especially with names who might be buried on the site's preset ranks. If you're doing an offline draft, you can still maintain a queue — a pen and sheet of paper will do. Just keep it away from curious neighbors. I'll also add that many of the new Yahoo Fantasy Plus features can help managers on draft day and all season long. Mistake 6: Ignoring ADP It's common to hear established fantasy players zealously proclaiming their disdain for average draft position, noting how they draft to the beat of their own drummer. And hey, I get it, at some point, you have to go get the players you believe in. But you at least want to have a general idea of where those players might come off the board in a typical draft. How to use ADP to your advantage When I examine ADP, I like to focus on the trending market, how rooms have been drafting in the past week or so — something you can track on Yahoo. Deeper-rooted ADP is going to be more buggy and less useful. At the end of the day, you want to undercut the market slightly on the later-round picks you covet, not blow the market out of the water. Don't take your hidden gem in the sixth round when context clues make it clear you could have waited until the 10th round or later.
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NCAA says Michigan's sign-stealing violations 'required' a postseason ban. So why didn't the Wolverines get one?
For whatever hardship the NCAA's penalty for the Conor Stalions saga will cause the University of Michigan — a few new t-shirt slogans in Columbus, some slightly postponed redecorations to a couple stadium luxury suites — the larger truth is this: the Michigan case has revealed how fragile the NCAA's authority is now. The NCAA handed down its penalties in the Stalions sign-stealing controversy on Friday, and they ran pretty much as expected: a few years' probation, a substantial financial hit, plus heavy penalties for the coaches involved. But as the NCAA itself admitted, the landscape of college football has changed more rapidly than the regulations designed to oversee it, rendering ineffective or inappropriate many of the weapons it once used to enforce compliance. In its report released Friday, the NCAA indicated specifically that due to the severity of the violations and Michigan's status as a repeat offender, 'a postseason ban is required in this case.' However, just a few lines later, the report notes that 'a postseason ban would unfairly penalize student-athletes for the actions of coaches and staff who are no longer associated with the Michigan football program. Thus, a more appropriate penalty is an offsetting financial penalty.' That's it right there. The NCAA isn't hammering schools with program-wrecking postseason bans, it's just serving them with bills. And given the vast resources pouring into the game now, that's not a punishment that will leave a mark. There's no love lost between the NCAA and Michigan, and the NCAA swung as hard as it realistically could at the Wolverines. But the penalties will hit with all the force of a well-swung pillow. There's no better indication than this of how the NCAA's enforcement authority has dwindled in the face of mega-programs and the era of NIL. Not so long ago, even an accusation of impropriety was the equivalent of a guilty verdict for a program in the NCAA's sights. Guilty until proven innocent ran the mantra, and almost no program ever proved itself innocent. Nowhere was this more evident than in the case of SMU, which the NCAA literally blew off the college football map in 1987, hammering the Mustangs with a two-year 'death penalty' for constant and repeated recruiting violations. SMU remains the only school ever to receive the death penalty, in large part because the NCAA realized just how much power such a verdict held. The Mustangs needed decades to recover from the effects of the penalty, not returning to national relevance until just last season. (More on this in a moment.) Schools from Alabama to Penn State have stared down the barrel of the death penalty, but the NCAA held off from exercising that power. Instead, the NCAA has employed a combination of financial penalties, vacated wins and titles, scholarship reductions and postseason bans to discourage illegal activity. It's impossible to prove a negative, so it's impossible to know how well the NCAA's threats have discouraged illegal activity, but what's absolutely crystal-clear is this: What was once illegal is now very much legal, encouraged and celebrated. So many of the recruiting violations that hobbled, crippled or devastated programs in the past are now completely legal under the banner of NIL. Players don't need to meet bag men with suitcases full of cash in a Waffle House parking lot anymore; they sign a couple documents in boardrooms and arrange for perfectly legal direct deposits. Not only that, the revenue sharing model created in recent months under the House settlement protects that revenue from NCAA fines. In other words, the NCAA can't use fines to cut into the revenue designated for current and future student-athletes — meaning the $20-plus-million pool Michigan has set aside for the Classes of 2025, 2026 and beyond won't lose a drop to the multimillion-dollar fines levied against the university. Now, about those fines. Some are direct, like the $50,000 fine plus the equivalent of 10 percent of the school's budget for the football program, and the equivalent of 10 percent of the football scholarships in 2025-26. Others are based on future anticipations — specifically, the loss of all postseason competition revenue from the 2025 and 2026 seasons. Given the vast sums of cash flowing into college football now, all that combined makes for a substantial hit. Each Big Ten school will receive a $6 million CFP share in 2025, and that number will grow to $21 million in 2026. For an athletic department with a total budget projected at $266 million — including $15 million in assistance from the university at large — that's a significant hit. However, here's where SMU re-enters the picture. The Mustangs joined the ACC two years ago by, in part, forfeiting nine years' worth of ACC media revenue. But thanks to a remarkable outpouring of support from donors, surpassing $125 million in fundraising and reporting $65 million in donations for the 2025 fiscal year alone, SMU is back in business. The Mustangs reached the CFP last year, and kept the $4 million they received from that berth. So Michigan will still have the opportunity to play in the postseason; the Wolverines enter the season ranked 14th in the AP poll. And like SMU, Michigan's alumni possess extraordinarily deep pockets. There will be some more pointed donation letters going out to alumni this year, but there will be some larger checks headed Ann Arbor's way, too. (Worth noting: Michigan also counts more than a few lawyers among its alumni. Any attempt to alter the program's record book or future schedules would be met with an absolutely overwhelming blizzard of legal action.) The coaches served with show-cause penalties could suffer on an individual level. Thanks to a prior show-cause order and a mandatory one-year suspension, Jim Harbaugh will effectively be barred from coaching in the college ranks until 2039 — not that the current Chargers coach is likely to ever return to the college ranks. Conor Stalions, the centerpiece of this entire scandal, until 2033, unless he and whatever university hires him make an effective case for his employment. The days of coaches setting fire to a program and then walking away appear to be over. But so too are the days of the NCAA carpet-bombing an athletic department into submission with penalties, scholarship reductions and bowl bans. There's no better indication of the new era of college sports than this. The game has grown too large for its regulators to regulate.