Fatal corporal punishment
The savage beating to death of a madrassa student in a Swat village, followed by a ridiculous attempt at covering it up, is a reminder of the pathetic state of education in much of the country, as unqualified teachers sadistically punish children for common negative behaviours. In the Swat incident, three teachers allegedly tortured the child for missing classes — an ordeal that reportedly lasted five hours, according to other students who were forced to watch. The boy later died in the arms of another child who tried to give him water. The teachers then tried to tell the boy's family that he had fallen in the toilet and died, as if that would explain his injuries.
While barbarity is not the exclusive purview of madrassas — we regularly hear reports of schoolteachers employing corporal punishment — the inconsistency of oversight and lack of trained staff at such schools makes them much more susceptible to violence. Most madrassa students are from poorer backgrounds and may lack any alternative options for education, so they tolerate the abuse. It does not either help that religious leaders often push back against attempts to regulate madrassas, though they have no qualms about demanding taxpayer funding to support them wherever possible.
Meanwhile, weak laws mean that beating children is barely an offense. Under the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Child Protection Act, corporal punishment carries penalties of six months' imprisonment or a Rs50,000 fine. And, as we noted, enforcement is nonexistent. The few cases that are actually pursued are ones where children are killed or beaten so badly that they end up in hospital.
If the government is unwilling to address the gaps in the madrassa system, at the bare minimum, it needs to significantly increase penalties for corporal punishment and expand employer liability. If management and owners suddenly faced the prospect of years in jail because a child was beaten by a teacher, we are confident that conditions would improve overnight.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
17 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Challenging dominant ideology of patriarchy
EDITORIAL: That the scourge of toxic patriarchy has long made life a relentless battle for women in Pakistan — curbing their freedoms, crushing their agency and denying them basic rights in homes, workplaces, courts, and corridors of power — is a brutal reality that demands urgent reckoning. It is highly welcome then that the Supreme Court's July 23 verdict directly confronts one facet of this deeply entrenched patriarchal mindset, unequivocally condemning the cruel and discriminatory weaponisation of a woman's infertility as a means to strip her of rights guaranteed under Pakistani law. Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, while dismissing a petition in which a husband had challenged his wife's right to maintenance and dower, castigated him for the sheer cruelty he inflicted upon her, not just in marriage but through prolonged litigation. The petitioner had abandoned his wife within a year of their union and failed to provide any support or maintenance thereafter. Years later, when she turned to the courts seeking recovery of her dowry, maintenance and dower, he responded with some vindictive claims, alleging she was medically unfit for conjugal duties, incapable of bearing children, and effectively challenged her identity as a woman under the law to deny her rightful legal entitlements. This deeply offensive and baseless claim, disproven by medical evidence, formed the crux of his legal strategy. In doing so, he subjected his estranged wife to years of public humiliation, emotional trauma and highly invasive medical examinations through three tiers of court, causing the judicial process itself to become a tool of degradation. In his seven-page order, where the petitioner was also fined Rs500,000 for his malicious assertions, the chief justice made it unequivocally clear that infertility, in any case, cannot be used as a pretext to deny a woman her right to dower or maintenance, nor can it be grounds to question her womanhood. In a country where women are routinely deprived of maintenance on flimsy, fabricated or no grounds at all, the moral clarity and unambiguous reasoning of this ruling decisively shuts the door on all such regressive justifications. The Supreme Court's ruling is a commendable intervention, but more must be done to protect women against such malevolent legal harassment and systemic erosion of their rights. As the chief justice noted, '… women in our society constitute a vulnerable group, whose dignity requires vigilant protection and care'. In an ideal system, the respondent should never have had to defend her womanhood in open court, an ordeal that could have been avoided with greater sensitivity and restraint from the lower judiciary. While the Supreme Court has, in recent years, largely stood firmly on the side of justice for women facing systemic and social abuse, it is the lower courts where the adoption of more gender-sensitive approaches is essential to ensure that the legal process does not become a harrowing experience for female litigants. Therefore, more gender-sensitive training, procedural safeguards and legal protections must be introduced to ensure that women are not re-victimised by the very system they turn to for justice. Here, it is also important to question societal norms that have turned infertility and personal choices around child-bearing into sources of stigma, reducing a woman's worth to her reproductive capacity. This mindset not only fuels discrimination within families and communities but also enables structural injustices to be inflicted upon women without shame or consequence. Breaking this stigma is vital to ensuring women are treated with dignity, both in society and before the law. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
21 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Father, son held in murder case
Police claimed to have arrested a man and his son accused of kidnapping and murdering 72-year-old Farukh Shakeel, a close friend of the main suspect. According to investigators, the victim was invited to the suspect's residence, force-fed Capoten tablets to lower his blood pressure and then strangled to death. The body was later burned near the Jaranwala Motorway rest area in an attempt to destroy evidence. Despite the killing, the suspects subsequently demanded ransom from the victim's daughter, leading to their arrest. Lahore's Investigation Wing has cracked multiple high-profile criminal cases, including murder, abduction, and organised theft, according to a performance report presented by DIG Investigation Syed Zeeshan Raza during a media briefing at Qila Gujjar Singh Police Lines. The report covers the period from January 1 to July 28. In another case, North Cantt police arrested a man accused of murdering his 10-year-old daughter, Iman Fatima. The child reportedly sustained fatal injuries after being beaten with bricks during a domestic altercation and later died at Services Hospital. Sabzazar police arrested three fugitives involved in the shooting death of their landlord, Wajid Hussain. The suspects, reportedly a father and his two sons, had allegedly killed Hussain following a dispute over vacating a rented property and fled to a tribal area. They were apprehended after an investigation led police to their location. In the area of property crime, Gulshan Ravi police arrested three members of a professional theft ring, including its leader. The gang had broken into a garments store at night and stolen merchandise worth millions of rupees. A substantial portion of the stolen items was recovered during the operation. Separately, Ichhra police arrested a suspect involved in a major gold and cash heist from a local shop. The accused, an employee of the store, broke into the shop's locker and made off with 85 tolas of gold and a large sum of cash. Police recovered Rs100,000 in cash and the stolen gold during the arrest.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Case for a living wage
Listen to article The call by the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) to raise the minimum wage to Rs75,000 is neither utopian nor excessive. It is a long overdue response to the crushing weight of inflation that has eroded the very notion of a living wage. In a country where essential commodities now seem to change prices as often as the weather, expecting a working-class family to survive, let alone live with dignity, on the current minimum wage is simply untenable. It is telling that while the ruling elite have over the years approved staggering increases in their own salaries and perks, labourers and daily wage earners continue to be denied even the most basic protections. This widening gap between privilege and penury reflects a moral failure of governance. The current minimum wage does not even begin to account for the real cost of living for a family of five. Expenses related to food, education, healthcare and transport have all spiralled beyond reach. And yet, workers are expected to absorb the shocks of inflation and regressive taxation — often justified under the guise of structural reforms dictated by international financial institutions. A society that deprives its labour force of decent living standards cannot expect sustainable growth, much less social cohesion. Raising the minimum wage to Rs75,000 must be paired with robust enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance across sectors. Furthermore, such a revision must be based on empirical cost-of-living data, regularly updated, and accompanied by measures to formalise the vast informal labour sector. Without implementation, even the most progressive wage laws remain paper promises. Ultimately, a nation's priorities are laid bare in how it treats its most vulnerable.
