'You Need To Make Adjustments To...': Shardul Thakur Recalls Fond Memories Of Last England Tour Ahead Of 1st Test
India all-rounder Shardul Thakur believes that the touring Indian squad has the potential to win the upcoming five-match Test series against England starting in Leeds from Friday.
Shardul was part of India's squad that toured England last time in 2021-22. India were 2-1 up in the five-Test series before the final Test of the series was rescheduled to next year due to Covid-19. India lost the final Test - in the absence of the regular captain Rohit Sharma - as England levelled the series 2-2.
With Rohit and Virat Kohli moving away from red-ball cricket, the young Indian squad under the leadership of new skipper Shubman Gill will have to do the improbable in the English conditions.
"I think it's very exciting to play in this part of the world where you face different challenges. The first one, of course, is whether. Sometimes it's cloudy, sometimes it's bright, sunny, and as a player, you need to make adjustments to your game, whether you're batting or bowling," the pace-bowling all-rounder said in a video posted on BCCI's social media accounts.
"It's good to have that fresh energy in the team, a few youngsters coming up, and new talents are always exciting. Now that the England team is also playing a different kind of cricket. You know, like to surprise them also that we are here to put up a show, and it's always great to win away series, away from home. And if we could achieve this feat, it would be massive for the entire nation," he added.
Recalling India's last Test tour of England, Shardul said it was "one of the fondest memories" of his. He featured in the three Tests of the series and bagged eight wickets. He also scored two half-centuries in the fourth Test of the series.
"I think the 2021 series, where we won a couple of games. The first one also we could have won, but unfortunately, it rained on the last day and we couldn't chase down the total. But then we won in Lord's, then we won in The Oval, and then we came back for the fifth Test next year. The series was level, but that was one of the fondest memories of mine, one of the best Test series that I have been part of," he recalled.
India are aiming to win a Test series in England for the first time since 2007. The five-match Test series in England will be India's first assignment in the 2025-27 World Test Championship cycle.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
India dealt narrow 1-2 defeat by Australia in FIH Hockey Pro League (Women)
London, June 16 (UNI) The Indian Women's Hockey Team were dealt a narrow 1–2 defeat by Australia in their FIH Hockey Pro League 2024/25 match at the Lee Valley Hockey & Tennis Centre here. Vaishnavi Vitthal Phalke (3') scored the only goal for India while Amy Lawton (37') and Lexie Pickering (60') were the goalscorers for Australia. India took an early lead in the proceedings but Australia made a comeback with a goal in the third and final minute of the fourth quarter to seal the victory on Sunday. India made a bright start to the game as they won three back-to-back penalty corners in the very first minute, adding pressure on the Australian backline. India carried on their momentum and scored the opening goal as early as the third minute to take charge of the match. Navneet Kaur carried the ball forward and passed it to Sharmila Devi on the left who played it to the far post for Vaishnavi as she deflected the ball into the net. India continued to pile on the pressure as Navneet came close to extending the lead but narrowly missed the target. Minutes later, Australia won two back-to-back penalty corners towards the end of first quarter but India did well at the back to maintain their lead. Australia improved their performance in the second quarter and started creating good goalscoring chances. Both sides exchanged possession and battled it out in the midfield but they couldn't be separated in the second quarter as India headed into the second half with a goal in hand. Australia were more dominant in the third quarter and caused troubles for the Indian defence. Greta Hayes came teasingly close to scoring a goal as she struck a shot towards an empty net, however, the ball was stopped by her own teammate by accident. In the 37th minute, Australia were on the attack again but this time, they managed to find the equaliser courtesy of a brilliant goal from Amy Lawton. Amy did well to win the ball from an India defender and then unleashed a powerful shot from the edge of the circle, past the keeper into the bottom right corner. The scores were level as both sides headed into the final quarter of the match. India received a penalty corner but the Australian keeper made a strong save to keep her side in the contest. In the 54th minute, India won four penalty corners in a row but they couldn't manage to find the net. In their third attempt, Neha fired a shot which took a deflection and struck the post, missing the net by a few inches. With 34 seconds left on the clock, Australia converted a penalty corner to complete their comeback in the match. Tatum Stewart played the perfect pass to Lexie Pickering on the right as she took the Indian goalkeeper off-guard and deflected the ball into the net to claim all three points. India next play Argentina on June 17 at the same venue. UNI BM
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
BCCI pleas on arbitration awards dismissed in Kochi IPL franchise case
MUMBAI: In a setback for the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused to interfere with two arbitration awards, directing the cricket controlling body to pay ₹385.50 crore to Kochi Cricket Private Ltd (KCPL) and ₹153.34 crore to Rendezvous Sports World (RSW) in connection with the Kochi IPL (Indian Premier League) franchise. A single judge bench of Justice Riyaz Chagla rejected two arbitration petitions challenging separate arbitration awards passed in connection with franchise agreements executed with RSW in April 2010 and in March 2011 with KCPL – a joint venture between BCCI and RSW. Both the arbitral awards were passed on June 22, 2015. On September 19, 2011, BCCI terminated its franchise agreements with RSW and KCPL over non-furnishing of requisite bank guarantees contemplated under the agreements, after both invoked arbitration clauses. The arbitrator ruled in favour of the franchise owner and the joint venture, and directed the cricket controlling body to pay ₹385.50 crore to KCPL and ₹153.34 crore to RSW along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The BCCI challenged the award before the high court, contending that the arbitral award suffered from several errors apparent on the face of the record, misapplication of legal principles, and findings unsupported by evidence, warranting its setting aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. TN Subramanian, senior counsel, appearing for the BCCI in one of the petitions, submitted that the impugned award having been passed in the arbitral proceedings commenced pursuant to the defective notice invoking arbitration, and hence cannot be sustained and ought to be set aside by the court. Senior counsel Vikram Nankani, appearing for RSW and KCPL argued that the BCCI's move of terminating the agreement was mala fide and that the arbitral award did not require interference by the court. 'There is no patent illegality in the impugned awards which requires any interference by this court,' the high court observed while dismissing BCCI's petitions. KCPL and RSW have been permitted to withdraw the sums deposited by the BCCI after a period of six weeks from the order on Tuesday, on the request of BCCI's senior counsel Rafiq Dada, to allow the cricket body time to file an appeal against the high court's ruling. BCCI officials were not available for comment. Secretary Devajit Saikia did not respond to HT'S query on whether BCCI intends to contest the ruling.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Make the World Test Championship more inclusive in two groups
In the next 15 months, South Africa, World Test champions, play no series at home. This says something important about their win in the final at Lord's where they beat Australia convincingly in what their low-key leader, Tenda Bavuma, the first Black man to captain the country called, 'a win for the 'small' teams. These currently being nine of 12 Test nations outside the so-called Big Three of India, England, Australia who have greater resources, larger talent pools and more victories in ICC tournaments. In England — where the final was played — fans of English cricket (and some players) thought South Africa didn't deserve to be in the final; their cricket board focused on two-Test series like someone forced to meet a requirement while the real thing was being played elsewhere. They had sent a 'B' team to New Zealand and unsurprisingly lost the series while the main players remained at home to play T20 franchise cricket. While other cricket boards at least made a show of encouraging Test cricket, South Africa's gave up all pretense and simply gave in to the current money machine. They played neither Australia nor England in the third cycle of the World Test Championship which now has three different winners, after New Zealand, another small team, won the inaugural final and Australia the next. Twists and turns The final was everything Test cricket is about. Unpredictable, for one, with as many twists and turns as a road to a hilltop. Emotionally draining for supporters, with every possibility alive almost till the end. One moment Australia looked like a team that could not lose, next, like one that could not win. After the first day, Mitch Starc the batter turned out to be more effective than Mitch Starc the bowler. Commentators told us the pitch was slow, it was fast, the ball was coming on, it wasn't coming on, Australia were too far ahead for it to be competitive, perhaps merely giving breath to their biases. Aidan Markham played the innings of his life; so did Bavuma, who went from being a symbol (he was called a 'quota captain' when he took over) to an individual with a big heart and a calculating head. He has won nine of his first ten Tests, leading South Africa to eight wins in a row at the end of it. Does this mean Test cricket will get a boost in South Africa or that the country's reputation of being chokers will no longer apply? The former depends on their administrators and the latter on the players. But what of the WTC itself? Is it time to have at least a three-Test final because a series win is the essence of the format? Importantly, is it time to look at some other changes? We must begin with an understanding — that we cannot allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good. Looking for the perfect system is fine, but waiting till we have one before starting the World Test Championship cycles would have worked against it. That only nine of the 12 countries playing Test cricket are involved in the WTC cycle means that 'lesser' teams ( one step below Bavuma's 'small' teams) will continue to struggle. Most experts are against the notion of splitting the teams into two groups, fearing that this will lead to endless matches among India, England, Australia with the others getting further marginalised. New structure But if the two groups are divided so that every alternate team is in one group – thus, teams ranked in the odd number, one, three five in one and two, four, six in the other, it would mean all twelve get to be involved. Going by the current rankings, therefore, Australia, England, New Zealand, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan would be in one group while South Africa, India, Sri Lanka, West Indies, Ireland and Zimbabwe would be in the other. No promotion or relegation, no greater and lesser group. It will also help with the scheduling too. The cycle could be of three years rather than the current two. And the points system simplified. England skipper Ben Stokes has called the competition 'utterly confusing'. The aim should be to make it less confusing and more inclusive, as any World championship ought to be.
