BCCI pleas on arbitration awards dismissed in Kochi IPL franchise case
MUMBAI: In a setback for the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused to interfere with two arbitration awards, directing the cricket controlling body to pay ₹385.50 crore to Kochi Cricket Private Ltd (KCPL) and ₹153.34 crore to Rendezvous Sports World (RSW) in connection with the Kochi IPL (Indian Premier League) franchise.
A single judge bench of Justice Riyaz Chagla rejected two arbitration petitions challenging separate arbitration awards passed in connection with franchise agreements executed with RSW in April 2010 and in March 2011 with KCPL – a joint venture between BCCI and RSW. Both the arbitral awards were passed on June 22, 2015.
On September 19, 2011, BCCI terminated its franchise agreements with RSW and KCPL over non-furnishing of requisite bank guarantees contemplated under the agreements, after both invoked arbitration clauses.
The arbitrator ruled in favour of the franchise owner and the joint venture, and directed the cricket controlling body to pay ₹385.50 crore to KCPL and ₹153.34 crore to RSW along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum.
The BCCI challenged the award before the high court, contending that the arbitral award suffered from several errors apparent on the face of the record, misapplication of legal principles, and findings unsupported by evidence, warranting its setting aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
TN Subramanian, senior counsel, appearing for the BCCI in one of the petitions, submitted that the impugned award having been passed in the arbitral proceedings commenced pursuant to the defective notice invoking arbitration, and hence cannot be sustained and ought to be set aside by the court.
Senior counsel Vikram Nankani, appearing for RSW and KCPL argued that the BCCI's move of terminating the agreement was mala fide and that the arbitral award did not require interference by the court.
'There is no patent illegality in the impugned awards which requires any interference by this court,' the high court observed while dismissing BCCI's petitions.
KCPL and RSW have been permitted to withdraw the sums deposited by the BCCI after a period of six weeks from the order on Tuesday, on the request of BCCI's senior counsel Rafiq Dada, to allow the cricket body time to file an appeal against the high court's ruling.
BCCI officials were not available for comment. Secretary Devajit Saikia did not respond to HT'S query on whether BCCI intends to contest the ruling.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
BCCI pleas on arbitration awards dismissed in Kochi IPL franchise case
MUMBAI: In a setback for the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused to interfere with two arbitration awards, directing the cricket controlling body to pay ₹385.50 crore to Kochi Cricket Private Ltd (KCPL) and ₹153.34 crore to Rendezvous Sports World (RSW) in connection with the Kochi IPL (Indian Premier League) franchise. A single judge bench of Justice Riyaz Chagla rejected two arbitration petitions challenging separate arbitration awards passed in connection with franchise agreements executed with RSW in April 2010 and in March 2011 with KCPL – a joint venture between BCCI and RSW. Both the arbitral awards were passed on June 22, 2015. On September 19, 2011, BCCI terminated its franchise agreements with RSW and KCPL over non-furnishing of requisite bank guarantees contemplated under the agreements, after both invoked arbitration clauses. The arbitrator ruled in favour of the franchise owner and the joint venture, and directed the cricket controlling body to pay ₹385.50 crore to KCPL and ₹153.34 crore to RSW along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The BCCI challenged the award before the high court, contending that the arbitral award suffered from several errors apparent on the face of the record, misapplication of legal principles, and findings unsupported by evidence, warranting its setting aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. TN Subramanian, senior counsel, appearing for the BCCI in one of the petitions, submitted that the impugned award having been passed in the arbitral proceedings commenced pursuant to the defective notice invoking arbitration, and hence cannot be sustained and ought to be set aside by the court. Senior counsel Vikram Nankani, appearing for RSW and KCPL argued that the BCCI's move of terminating the agreement was mala fide and that the arbitral award did not require interference by the court. 'There is no patent illegality in the impugned awards which requires any interference by this court,' the high court observed while dismissing BCCI's petitions. KCPL and RSW have been permitted to withdraw the sums deposited by the BCCI after a period of six weeks from the order on Tuesday, on the request of BCCI's senior counsel Rafiq Dada, to allow the cricket body time to file an appeal against the high court's ruling. BCCI officials were not available for comment. Secretary Devajit Saikia did not respond to HT'S query on whether BCCI intends to contest the ruling.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Jasprit Bumrah says he had ruled out India captaincy during IPL, informed BCCI before Rohit's retirement
Leeds: The peerless Jasprit Bumrah has revealed that he had ruled out Test captaincy during the IPL itself as part of his workload management , and had informed the BCCI of his desire to prioritise his bowling responsbilities over leadership duties. During an interaction with former India wicketkeeper-batter Dinesh Karthik on Sky Sports Cricket, Bumrah explained the thought process behind his decision to turn down the Indian Test captaincy. "There's no fancy stories to it. There is no controversy or a headlining statement that I was sacked. Before Rohit and Virat retired, I had spoken to the BCCI during the IPL about my workload going forward in a five-match series," Bumrah said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play this game for 3 minutes, if you own a mouse "I've spoken to the people who have managed my back, I've spoken to the surgeon as well, who's always spoken to me about how smart you have to be about the workloads. "And then we came to the conclusion that I have to be a little smarter. So then I called the BCCI and said I don't want to be looked at in a leadership role, because I won't be able to give all matches coming to a five-match Test series ," added Bumrah. Live Events After Rohit's retirement and with Bumrah ruling himself out, the BCCI appointed Shubman Gill as the skipper of the Test team with his first assignment being the five-match Test series against England, beginning in Leeds on Friday. During the interaction, Bumrah stressed on the need for continuity in leadership, particularly in a long series, something he would not be able to offer because of his heavy workload as the team's premier bowler. "The BCCI was looking at me at (a) leadership (role). But then I had to say no as it's not fair for the team as well. It's not fair to the team if in a five-Test series, three matches somebody else is leading and two matches somebody else is leading. "I always wanted to put the team first, even if me being there as a player offers a lot more just not as a captain," Bumrah said. "Captaincy is a position. But you always have leaders in the team and I wanted to do. Obviously, if I'm not careful, I don't know about the future, and I don't want to be in a situation where I have to abruptly go away from this format. "So, I thought that for continuity, and it is only fair to the team that you know the team goes in that direction, where they look at long-term and I could help in whatever way," he added. Bumrah acknowledged that leading the Indian Test team is a huge honour but added that he loves the game more than captaincy. "Captaincy meant a lot. I had worked very hard for it. But, unfortunately, sometimes you have to look after the bigger picture. I love cricket more than captaincy so I want to contribute more as a cricketer and to the Indian team as a player. "Obviously ambitions are there but that's how it is and I called the BCCI and said that I don't want to be looked at in a leadership role," said the magnificent fast bowler. Plan to play three Tests in England As far as his participation in the England series in concerned, Bumrah is planning to play in at least three Test matches, including the opener at Headingley. "Obviously, the number is not decided. First (Test) is definitely on, that is going to happen. Rest, we will see how things are, what is the workload and scenario... but yes, 3 Tests is what I can manage at the moment." India head coach Gautam Gambhir had also said Bumrah could play three Tests in the coming weeks.
NDTV
7 hours ago
- NDTV
Jasprit Bumrah To Miss More Than 1 Test vs England? Pacer Says "What I Can Manage..."
Indian cricket team star fast bowler Jasprit Bumrah has revealed that it is likely that he will play three Tests in the upcoming five-match series against England. There has been a lot of chatter surrounding his workload management and BCCI previously made it clear that he will not be playing all the five matches. During an interview with former India wicketkeeper-batter Dinesh Karthik for Sky Sports Cricket, Bumrah said that the number is not decided but he is looking to play in 3 Tests keeping his workload in mind. However, he did hint that he can play one more Test if the team and situations needs it. 'Plan on the go. 3 Test matches is what I'm looking at,' Bumrah said. 'Obviously, the number is not decided. First (Test) is definitely on, that is going to happen. Rest, we will see how things are, what is the workload and scenario... but yes. 3 Tests is what I can manage at the moment.' Bumrah finally broke his silence on not becoming the Indian cricket team captain for the upcoming Test series against England. In a recent interview, Bumrah revealed that he was a captaincy choice for the BCCI selection committee headed by Ajit Agarkar but the star fast bowler had to turn them down due to 'workload management'. As a result, Shubman Gill was handed the captaincy after the retirement of Rohit Sharma and Rishabh Pant was appointed his deputy for the England series. In the interview with former India wicket-keeper batter Dinesh Karthik on SKY Sports, Bumrah shared his conversation with the BCCI selectors regarding his workload and how hard it was for him to give up captaincy. "Before Rohit and Virat retired during the IPL, I had spoken to the BCCI about my workloads going forward in a five-test match series. I've spoken to the people who have managed my back. I've spoken to the surgeon as well, who's always spoken to me about how smart you have to be about the workloads. So I did speak to him, and then we came to the conclusion that I have to be a little smarter. So then I called the BCCI and said I don't want to be looked at in a leadership role because I won't be able to give all the Test matches in a five-test match series," Bumrah said.
