Labour unveils £100m plan to battle housing crisis by training 40,000 builders by 2029
Bridget Phillipson warned the housing crisis was being made worse by a lack of construction workers.
2
2
And she added that Brits, rather than migrants, must fill the shortage.
She will today announce £100million in funding for technical colleges to train 40,000 brickies, roofers and electricians by 2029.
Labour's pledge to build 1.5 million homes by the next election hinges on plugging 35,000 vacancies in the sector.
Meanwhile, 12.5 per cent of all 16 to 24-year-olds — around one million — are not in education, employment or training.
Ms Phillipson welcomed The Sun's Builder Better Britain campaign for 'putting construction on the map' as we bang a drum for the industry.
And she added: 'If you're an out-of-work young person or looking for a career change, get up, get skills and get building.'
She said training homegrown talent was the best way to build the homes, schools and hospitals Britain is crying out for.
The Department for Education last night said the ten new technical excellence colleges would help end the reliance on overseas construction workers.
It said: 'Britain cannot and should not rely on foreign labour.'
David Hughes, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said: 'Today's announcement is very positive news for people wanting good jobs, for the construction employers looking for skilled people and for the Government's ambitions to build 1.5 million new homes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
13 minutes ago
- Spectator
Britain needs Peter Mannion MP
The current Labour government grows ever more farcical. Despite its promise to 'tread lightly' on people's lives, we've seen war declared on farmers, private schools, pubs, humour at work and even allotment owners. This week came the news that drivers over the age of 70 must take compulsory driving tests, with a mandatory ban if they fail – presumably so that, when younger relatives start ushering them towards the 'assisted dying' clinic, they won't be able to make a quick getaway. Starmer, on winning the election, promised the 'sunlight of hope', yet things have rarely felt gloomier. Rachel Reeves may have wept for the nation in parliament last month, but its miseries are so often of her devising. You can't help wondering what The Thick of It would make of it all. In Armando Iannucci's satire on 21st-century politics, which ran from 2005–2012, ludicrous policies like the above, some of them apparently dreamt up on the hoof, might have been all in a day's work for characters like Labour MP Nicola Murray (Rebecca Front) – whose greatest policy idea is wooden toys – or Lib Dem Fergus Williams (who buys a bank 'out of social embarrassment'). But how would Peter Mannion MP, the series' urbane, likeable Tory, react to them? Mannion (as played by RSC stalwart Roger Allam) is an old-school Conservative from the Major or late-Thatcher era. He studied classics at university, still smokes and, though married, has the mandatory lovechild with a parliamentary colleague. Increasingly adrift in the 21st century, Mannion is an analogue politician in a digital world. Dressed stubbornly in suit and tie, he winces at phrases like 'silicone playground' and can't even grapple with the functions on his Nokia dumbphone ('Is this 'settings'? I think I've just taken a photo of my feet'). Called a 'digitard' by one character, he's described by another as being 'tuned 24/7 to the Yesterday Channel watching Cash in the Attic and wondering why it's taking place inside his head'. Much of the comedy in Mannion's scenes comes from seeing this relatively dignified politician (apparently based on David Davis, but with an obvious smattering of Ken Clarke as well) wrestle with the new touchy-feely, hug-a-hoodie inanities of David Cameron's Conservative rebranding. 'I'm modern!' he protests at one point. 'I say 'black' instead of 'coloured'. I think women are a good thing. I have no problems with gays – many of them are very well turned out, especially the men. Why is it this last year I'm being made to feel as if I'm always two steps behind, like I can't programme a video or convert everything back to old money?' 'You've still got a video?' his aide asks incredulously. Mannion is a Victor Meldrew before his time, a man tormented to a state of anguish by the sheer silliness of modern life. He is endlessly afflicted by spin doctors and spads who feel the most useful thing he can do is take his tie off; by newspapers which catch him smoking or holding (catastrophically) a bottle of champagne; by members of the public who leave toxic comments on his blog ('You always have a pained expression on your face. Do you take it up the chutney?'). Frequently, losing his cool, he starts to spit out strings of expletives (you need to hear Allam, a classical actor with a voice as beautiful as Michael Gambon's, snarling the f-word to realise how it's done or why that word even exists). In calmer moments, he lapses into an ironic lethargy several steps beyond despair as though, realising the futility of his existence, there is little else to do but make drawling, jaded asides about it. In a post-Blair world of 'uniparty' soundbites and 'caring' initiatives, conservatism itself seems to be collapsing. Asked by Tory director of communications Stewart Pearson – the bane of his life, whose mission is to 'detoxify' the Tory brand – if he's 'up to speed' with the 'new line', Mannion lapses into sarcasm: Well, I don't know, am I? Because I get people stopping me in the street and saying 'Are you still for locking up yobbos?' and I say 'Yeah, of course we are!' And then I think, are we? Because maybe I missed a memo from you. Maybe I should understand yobbos now… or not even call them yobbos. Call them young men with issues around stabbing. If Mannion, with his grey suits and black sense of humour, represents an age of lost common sense, Stewart Pearson (Vincent Franklin) is the man who has no intention of finding it. A kind of walking rainbow flag, always dressed in brightly coloured shirts (untucked and open two buttons), Pearson is the coming era made flesh. He's the kind of man (we all know them) who drinks ginseng tea, wears a high-visibility tabard to ride a bike, and whose dementing natural habitat is the whiteboard brainstorming session: 'Let's architecturalise this… Let's graphicise and three-dimensionalise our response… Time is a leash on the dog of ideas.' 'What was that word I used this morning?' he demands of Mannion at one point. 'You used a lot of words,' says Mannion wearily. 'It was like a fucking Will Self lecture.' The Thick of It ended in 2012 – a year or two before 'woke' came in to land – but now and then you find it deliciously ahead of the curve. In an episode of series 4, Mannion is summoned by Stewart to attend an out-of-town 'thought bubble' group seminar – the kind of life-sapping, compulsory, organised infantilisation we're now accustomed to from our betters. At one point, the characters take part in a 20-questions bonding game where they must guess the political concept written on their foreheads. Mannion, with the word 'inclusivity' flapping above his eyes on a Post-It note, asks a series of increasingly exasperated questions. 'Am I a sensible, solid concept?' ('No'). 'Would I be comfortable talking to Andrew Marr about this concept on television?' ('No'). 'Am I 'diversity'?' 'Oh for fuck's sake,' he snaps when he rips off the label. 'Inclusivity's practically the same as diversity.' Did the writers know then that in the coming decade these two abstract nouns would batter us over the head until we were gurgling in prone stupefaction? Or that the age of Stewart Pearson – that era of bullying power-play shrouded in bright primary colours – had barely begun? Most of us these days have become some form of Peter Mannion – looking at the wreckage of things we once believed in (Radio 4, the sanctity of certain prizes, Oxbridge, the National Trust, you name it) and, like him, asking in bewilderment: 'How the sow's tits did this happen? Nothing matters any more. Politics, faith, values, whatever your thing is. Nothing.' How would Mannion have survived an era of take-the-knee, pronoun badges and rainbow lanyards, or reacted to a government bent on destroying all that he and his supporters hold most dear? It's certainly kinder to him – though a loss to the viewer – that we were never allowed to find out.
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
JK Rowling reignites row with Nicola Sturgeon in foul-mouthed ‘review' of her memoir
JK Rowling has reignited her feud with Nicola Sturgeon as she blasted her new autobiography in a 'review' posted on social media. The author and gender critical activist posted a picture of scribbled-on pages of ' Frankly ', which was released this week, on X in a continuation of their long-standing clash over the issue of transgender rights. On one page, she scrawled 'Are you f***ing kidding me???' over a page where she accused Ms Sturgeon of 'opining on the need to make the 'public sphere' safe for women and girls'. It comes after years of tension between the pair during heated rows over Scotland's approach to trans rights. In a post on X, Ms Rowling wrote: 'Annotating as I read to review. Might auction my scribbled-on copy, proceeds to go to @ForWomenScot. NB: nobody who's offended by swearing should bid.' While in office, the former first minister doggedly attempted to push through legislation creating a self-identification system for people who want to change gender, which was eventually blocked by the UK government. The ensuing debate partly led to her resignation as first minister in February 2023. Following the proposed reforms in 2022, Ms Rowling wore a t-shirt calling Sturgeon a 'destroyer of women's rights'. Ms Sturgeon later called for both sides of the debate to 'treat each other with respect'. In her book she recalled the incident, after which she received a barrage of abuse, writing: 'It was deeply ironic that those who subjected me to this level of hatred and misogynistic abuse often claimed to be doing so in the interests of women's safety.' They have clashed on a number of other occasions, including after the Supreme Court judgement in April that the legal definition of a woman refers to biological sex. Ms Sturgeon refused to comment on the decision, with Ms Rowling later sharing a social media post including a photograph of the SNP leader in the gym branding her 'Pontius Pilates', an apparent biblical reference accusing her of shirking responsibility. Speaking about the trans rights row that dominated her final few months in office in her memoir, Ms Sturgeon called it a time of 'division and rancour'. She added that while she respected legitimate concerns about women's spaces, the debate had been 'hijacked by voices on the far right'. 'The inconvenient truth', she argued, is that 'many of the most vocal deriders of trans rights, when the surface is scratched, turn out to be raging homophobes too. Some are also racists. And ironically ... more than a few are also deeply misogynist.' However, she said she would have changed her approach to the issue with hindsight, and that while she still believes in the gender recognition reforms, she wishes she had aimed for more of a consensus on the issue.
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Scotland's deficit grows by £5.1bn, Gers figures show
Scotland's Finance Secretary has insisted the country's finances are 'sustainable' as figures showed spending levels were more than £26 billion higher than the amount raised in revenues. The latest Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (Gers) figures reported 'overall public finances in Scotland weakening, as expenditure grew faster than revenue'. For 2024-25, Scotland has a net fiscal deficit of minus £26.5 billion – an increase of £5.1 billion from the previous year – with this the representing minus 11.7% of the country's GDP. The UK deficit for 2024-25 was minus 5.1% of GDP, less than half the rate of Scotland. The Scottish Government report said the 'deterioration' between this year and last was in part linked to a fall in North Sea revenue, but it added: 'The difference is primarily explained by movements in non-North Sea revenue and spending, with Scottish revenue growing more slowly and Scottish expenditure growing more quickly than the UK.' Revenue in Scotland grew by 1.5% in 2024-25 to £91.4 billion. Spending increased to £117.6 billion in 2024-25, up from £111.4 billion in 2023-24. 'As a share of GDP, public spending remained at historically high levels in 2024,' the report noted. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the figures show Scots benefit from higher public spending than the UK average – with this £2,669 more per person north of the border. He said this 'means more money for schools, hospitals and policing, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas' – although he also claimed 'people in Scotland will rightly expect to see better outcomes' for these higher spending levels. Mr Murray said: 'These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK. 'By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average. 'It also means that devolved governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions.' Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison said decisions taken by ministers at Holyrood 'are helping support sustainable public finances'. She said: 'For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure. 'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East.' She also stressed the Gers statistics reflect the current constitutional arrangements, with Scotland part of the UK and 'not an independent Scotland with its own policy, decisions on defence spending and the economy'. Ms Robison said: 'Gers allocates Scotland a population share of reserved UK spending rather than accounting for real expenditure. For example, UK defence expenditure is listed as £5.1 billion, but only £2.1 billion was actually spent with industry in Scotland in 2023-24. 'Being taken out of the EU, against the will of the people of Scotland, has also hit Scotland's revenues by £2.3 billion and the higher cost of UK Government debt adds £500 million to the deficit. 'Falling oil prices and a decrease in extraction present challenges going forward, but we are clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with our climate change commitments and energy security.'
