D.C.'s progressive era is over
D.C.'s progressive era is over — derailed by President Trump, federal job cuts, and local economic woes.
Why it matters: The biggest fights at city hall are now less over experimental ideas like "social housing," and more about megaprojects like RFK Stadium or municipal concerns like local government efficiency and attracting new companies.
The big picture: D.C. is busy playing defense. Local leaders are fighting to preserve every inch of home rule against a GOP-controlled Congress. Making do with less money in an economic slowdown. And dodging Trump threats.
Through it all, the Wilson Building is backtracking on government transparency in the name of pragmatism, enabling secret meetings so that lawmakers can strategize about Trump-era uncertainty.
Council Chair Phil Mendelson is pulling punches, telling me he's holding back introducing certain bills to avoid poking Congress, which has final say over the District's laws.
The city's biggest challenge is next year's budget. The gap could be up to $1 billion. And that's before this current budget mess with Congress that forced Mayor Muriel Bowser to declare an immediate hiring freeze and consider furloughs.
What I'm hearing:"There's a shift" among residents, says Council member Christina Henderson. "They don't want the flashy. They want the bread and butter to work."
That means making sure trash and leaves are picked up on time, having public agencies answer the phone when a resident calls, and ending million-dollar programs that aren't working.
"I hear an increasing level of folks frustrated with just the basic core city services," says Council member Charles Allen.
Flashback: In the latter half of the 2010s, progressives began kicking out incumbents, old-school D.C. Council members who were more sympathetic to the concerns of businesses and prided themselves on being a hotline for residents who wanted to report a pothole.
Replacing the old ward bosses were council members like Janeese Lewis George, who ran as a Democratic socialist in Ward 4, or Elissa Silverman, a pugnacious leader of the lefty bloc who wound up losing reelection in 2022.
The Wilson Building rode a budget boom to check off a big progressive wish list — paid sick leave expansion (2014), $15 minimum wage (2016), paid family leave (2016), Clean Energy D.C. Act (2018), publicly financed elections (2018), George Floyd police reform (2020).
"We actually are further than most cities," says Henderson. "Someone might call universal pre-K progressive. We already have it. I don't see a situation where Trump is telling us that we can't continue that."
What's next: The upcoming RFK Stadium fight will reveal whether progressives, who wince at taxpayer subsidies for businesses, can take on the city's beloved sports team, the NFL, and a mayor's quest for a legacy achievement.
Bowser wants to sink $810 million in taxpayer money for a new Commanders stadium project, per news reports. (The formal announcement is expected soon.)
The plan needs D.C. Council approval. And Mendelson is outspoken against the use of public dollars. "The D.C. treasury should not be paying toward a stadium," he told the Washington Post, estimating the true cost could be over $1 billion.
The next few months will be full of lobbying, intrigue and media frenzy.
The bottom line: It also says something about the era we're in. The nuts and bolts of how to build up a 170-acre site is a throwback to when council members spent more time brokering land deals than fine-tuning wonkish policy.
"We do need to build something on that site," says Council member Brianne Nadeau, who's in Mendelson's camp. "We need housing there. We need community amenities there."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
2 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Consultant on trial for AI-generated robocalls mimicking Biden says he has no regrets
LACONIA, N.H. (AP) — A political consultant told a New Hampshire jury Wednesday that he doesn't regret sending voters robocalls that used artificial intelligence to mimic former President Joe Biden and that he's confident he didn't break the law. Steven Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, has long admitted to orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before New Hampshire's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to the Democratic president's that used his catchphrase 'What a bunch of malarkey' and, as prosecutors allege, suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. 'It's important that you save your vote for the November election,' voters were told. 'Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday.' Kramer, who faces decades in prison if convicted of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate, said his goal was to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. 'This is going to be my one good deed this year,' he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court. He said his goal wasn't to influence an election, because he didn't consider the primary a real election. At Biden's request, the Democratic National Committee dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional early spot in the 2024 nominating calendar but later dropped its threat not to seat the state's national convention delegates. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there but won as a write-in. Kramer, who owns a firm specializing in get-out-the-vote projects, argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll unsanctioned by the DNC. At the time the calls went out, voters were disenfranchised, he said. Asked by his attorney, Tom Reid, whether he did anything illegal, Kramer said, 'I'm positive I did not.' Later, he said he had no regrets and that his actions likely spurred AI regulations in multiple states. Kramer, who will be questioned by prosecutors Thursday, also faces a $6 million fine by the Federal Communications Commission but told The Associated Press on Wednesday that he won't pay it. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement in August. The robocalls appeared to come from a former New Hampshire Democratic Party chair, Kathy Sullivan, and told voters to call her number to be removed from the call list. On the witness stand earlier Wednesday, Sullivan said she was confused and then outraged after speaking to one of the recipients and later hearing the message. 'I hung up the phone and said, 'There is something really crazy going on,'' she said. 'Someone is trying to suppress the vote for Biden. I can't believe this is happening.' Months later, she got a call from Kramer in which he said he used her number because he knew she would contact law enforcement and the media. He also described his motive — highlighting AI's potential dangers — but she didn't believe him, she testified. 'My sense was he was trying to convince me that he'd done this defensible, good thing,' she said. 'I'm listening to this thinking to myself, 'What does he thing I am, stupid?' He tried to suppress the vote.'
Washington Post
5 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Permitless concealed carry in North Carolina faces uphill battle after some GOP pushback
RALEIGH, N.C. — A bill to let adults carry concealed handguns without a permit cleared the North Carolina legislature on Wednesday, however the path to joining the majority of U.S. states with similar laws remains uncertain. The GOP-backed legislation faces a likely veto from Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, as well as pushback from a handful of Republicans who voted against the legislation in the state House. House Speaker Destin Hall acknowledged those concerns after Wednesday's vote.
Associated Press
7 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Permitless concealed carry in North Carolina faces uphill battle after some GOP pushback
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A bill to let adults carry concealed handguns without a permit cleared the North Carolina legislature on Wednesday, however the path to joining the majority of U.S. states with similar laws remains uncertain. The GOP-backed legislation faces a likely veto from Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, as well as pushback from a handful of Republicans who voted against the legislation in the state House. House Speaker Destin Hall acknowledged those concerns after Wednesday's vote. 'I would imagine that — math being math — that it's probably a low percentage relative to other bills,' Hall told reporters. If the bill becomes law, North Carolina would become the 30th state in the country to legalize permitless carrying of a concealed handgun, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. North Carolina would also be one of the last states in the Southeast to implement that legislation. The legislation allows for eligible people with valid identification over the age of 18 to carry a concealed handgun. More than half of states with permitless concealed carry set their age limit at 21 and older, while the rest have the legal carrying age at 18, according to the NCSL. Currently, a person must be 21 and older to obtain a concealed handgun permit in North Carolina. To qualify, an applicant must pass a firearms safety training course and not 'suffer from a physical or mental infirmity that prevents the safe handling of a handgun,' according to state law. Approving permitless concealed carry has been a goal of gun-rights activists in North Carolina for years, with House Republicans historically supportive of the idea. Some see it as the next step after Republican lawmakers successfully eliminated the permit system that required sheriffs to conduct character evaluations and criminal history checks for pistol applicants in 2023. Conservative advocates for the bill say it would strengthen Second Amendment rights for North Carolinians. Republican lawmakers also disputed that the bill would make the state more dangerous, as 'law-abiding citizens' would be the only people that would benefit from the permit elimination, not criminals, Republican Rep. Brian Echevarria said. 'Rights to keep and bear arms are constitutionally inseparable,' Echevarria said. 'If a person cannot own a firearm, they cannot bear a firearm.' The bill's passage tees up one of the first opportunities for a likely veto from Stein if he stays aligned with his fellow Democrats in the legislature. Stein has a more powerful veto stamp than his predecessor Roy Cooper, after Republicans lost their House supermajority last year that allowed them to override vetoes and enact their legislative agenda with relative ease. Now, House Republicans would need to count on a Democrat to join in their override efforts. Reaching that goal seems especially daunting, considering all of the present House Democrats — and two Republicans — voted against the bill. The governor's office didn't respond to a request for comment on the legislation, but House Deputy Democratic Leader Cynthia Ball said in a committee Tuesday that Stein was opposed to it. Several Democratic legislators said it would make communities unsafe by loosening who can carry a concealed handgun without training. Democrats also raised issue with the age limit set in the bill, saying it would put guns in the hands of young people who aren't yet mature enough to have one. 'Do you not remember when you were 18? We are prone and so susceptible to peer pressure, we are hotheaded, we are emotional,' Democratic Rep. Tracy Clark said on the House floor after retelling her personal experience of losing two friends in college to gun violence. Those seeking a permit for their concealed handgun — such as for the purpose of traveling with a firearm to a state that requires a permit — would still be able to do so. The bill also heightens the felony punishment for those who assault law enforcement officers or first responders with a firearm. A separate bill that makes gun safety courses available at North Carolina community colleges for people 18 and up passed in a near-unanimous House vote directly after the concealed carry permit repeal legislation was approved. ___ Associated Press writer Gary D. Robertson in Raleigh contributed to this report.
