Somersworth special primary election for state rep. seat is May 6
SOMERSWORTH — A special primary election is planned for next week to choose a new state representative.
The election is to replace Democrat Dawn Evans, who moved out of Somersworth District 12, according to a representative of the city clerk's office.
The primary election will be held on Tuesday, May 6, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. The general election will be held on Tuesday, June 24.
Deputy City Clerk Ammy Ramsey said three people have filed their intentions to fill the seat.
Democrat Billie Butler is running unopposed. Republicans Ken Hilton and Nick Boyle will compete in the primary with the winner facing Butler in June.
City of Somersworth Polling Locations
Ward 1 - City Hall, One Government Way
Ward 2 - Summersworth Historical Museum, 157 Main Street
Ward 3 - Somersworth High School Cafeteria, 11 Memorial Drive
Ward 4 - Idleshurst Elementary School Cafeteria, 46 Stackpole Road
Ward 5 - Romeo J. Messier Building, 218 Main Street
This article originally appeared on Fosters Daily Democrat: Somersworth special primary election for state rep. seat is May 6
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
32 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Former Tennessee state Sen. Frank Niceley dies of suspected heart attack
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Former state Sen. Frank Niceley, a farmer and longtime conservative lawmaker known for his colorful comments on Tennessee's Capitol Hill, died Thursday. He was 78. Jefferson County Sheriff Jeff Coffey confirmed that Niceley was found on a tractor on his family farm in Strawberry Plains on Thursday and later died at the hospital. Coffey said the cause of death is a suspected heart attack. The Republican was first elected to a state House seat in 1988. He served two, two-year terms, then was out of the Legislature until he won a return to the House in 2004. In 2012, Niceley won a seat in the Senate, where he remained until he lost a Republican primary election in 2024 to now-Sen. Jessie Seal. The most recent boundaries of Niceley's district covered Claiborne, Grainger, Hancock, Jefferson, Sevier and Union counties. Niceley spoke 'in a way that makes you laugh, learn, and then Google a few things afterward,' as a resolution passed this year described it. Republican Senate Speaker Randy McNally said on social media that Niceley was the 'unofficial historian' of the Senate and a 'Tennessee original in every possible sense.' 'Fiercely independent, deeply rooted in his community, and unwavering in his convictions, he brought a farmer's wisdom and a statesman's heart to public service,' McNally said. Niceley's meandering stories and commentary sometimes created controversy. He sparked national criticism in 2022 after seemingly praising Adolf Hitler on the Senate floor as an example for people who are homeless while discussing a bill that toughened penalties for camping on public property. The year before, Niceley commented that with the movement of companies from northern cities to the South, 'I think I can tell my grandson the war between the states is still going on and we're winning.' Niceley was in tune with fellow Republicans on many major topics, but he also had an independent streak and his own priorities. He successfully pushed legislation to allow industrial hemp growing. He opposed making cockfighting a felony offense. He criticized the addition of toll lanes on highways through public-private partnerships. And he was against the statewide expansion of a school voucher program.
Miami Herald
37 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Why a Miami lawmaker was one of just two votes against Florida's state budget
When Florida lawmakers finally landed on a finalized budget after over a month of debate and infighting, nearly everyone in the Legislature voted yes — except for two House Democrats. One of them was Dotie Joseph, a term-limited state representative from North Miami who represents Florida's 108th House District. She took issue with a number of budget items, adding that since she has just a year and half left in office, she is especially careful to endorse things that benefit her district. She said a lack of funding for affordable housing and cuts to hundreds of vacant positions were major sticking points for her. The other 'no' vote was Rep. Angie Nixon, a Jacksonville Democrat who cited similar concerns. Lawmakers touted a slimmer budget this year, managing to slash $3.5 billion in an attempt to mirror the Trump administration's efforts to cut down on federal government spending and brace for a possible economic downturn. Still, the Florida budget has swelled by more than 26% since Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, took office in 2019, outpacing population increases and often inflation rates. For Joseph, the state's priorities didn't add up, especially when it comes to affordable housing. State-sponsored efforts to encourage affordable housing development through the Housing Finance Corporation saw major cuts. They amounted to a loss of $223.8 million in areas like the State Apartment Incentive Loan program and the State Housing Initiatives Partnership, as well as the Hometown Heroes program that provides down-payment assistance to first time home buyers. In the current budget proposal, Miami-Dade County does receive $3 million for its own individual affordable housing project, but that doesn't make up the difference, Joseph said. Almost 60% of renters in the greater Miami area are cost-burdened, meaning they spend at least 30% of their monthly income on housing, according to a 2023 Census Bureau survey — the most of any metropolitan area in the country. 'I don't approve of that [the cuts] at a time where we need it quite a bit,' Joseph said. Meanwhile, state and local immigration enforcement got a major boost, including an offer of a $1,000 bonus per officer for any local law enforcement office that agrees to work directly with ICE. The Legislature set aside $3 million for the program this year. The city of Miami controversially voted to enter into the agreement earlier this week. And DeSantis' Florida State Guard, a separate entity from the National Guard made up of volunteers that he has sole control over, nearly doubled its funding to $36.5 million. The guard was not active until 2022, when it was revived to respond to 'man-made and natural disasters,' according to its website. But officials have also discussed its revival in the context of aiding law enforcement with riots and illegal immigration. It has faced controversy in the past for its militaristic training. Those enforcement-based focuses did not align with Joseph's vision for the state budget, she said. She thinks the money could have gone toward state employee salaries rather than slashing 1,700 vacant positions across a variety of departments, the current solution on the table. The positions are empty because the state doesn't pay enough, she said, not because they're unnecessary. 'It doesn't mean that the need goes away,' Joseph said. 'So we just cut the positions? No, you address what the underlying issue is.' She also listed a variety of other issues. The per-student allocation in the education budget, though it was raised, hasn't kept up with inflation. The Florida Forever program, meant to acquire lands for conservation, took a $500 million hit. Though the state's Medicaid reimbursement rate for retirement homes was increased, there are other home healthcare options that don't have reimbursement options. There are some things she takes as a win, like $10 million set aside for sickle cell research and a 2% statewide employee pay raise, which is 'not always the case,' she said. And the cuts she's disappointed in could have been worse, she said. House speaker Rep. Danny Perez, a Miami Republican, was initially pushing for nearly $6 billion in cuts in the House's initial proposal. Those would have targeted what Joseph sees as essential health and human services. 'If this came down to my one vote that would make it pass or fail, I might have voted in favor of it,' Joseph said. 'There are a lot of good things in the budget that I argued for, fought for and even got appropriations for. But because my vote was not critical, I saw no need to vote yes when there are things I absolutely, vehemently object to.'
Los Angeles Times
37 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Supreme Court joins Trump and GOP in targeting California's emission standards
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday joined President Trump and congressional Republicans in siding with the oil and gas industry in its challenge to California's drive for electric vehicles. In a 7-2 decision, the justices revived the industry's lawsuit and ruled that fuel makers had standing to sue over California's strict emissions standards. The suit argued that California and the Environmental Protection Agency under President Biden were abusing their power by relying on the 1970s-era rule for fighting smog as a means of combating climate change in the 21st Century. California's new emissions standard 'did not target a local California air-quality problem — as they say is required by the Clean Air Act — but instead were designed to address global climate change,' Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh wrote using italics to described the industry's position. The court did not rule on the suit itself but he said the fuel makers had standing to sue because they would be injured by the state's rule. 'The fuel producers make money by selling fuel. Therefore, the decrease in purchases of gasoline and other liquid fuels resulting from the California regulations hurts their bottom line,' Kavanaugh said. Only Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson disagreed. Jackson questioned why the court would 'revive a fuel-industry lawsuit that all agree will soon be moot (and is largely moot already). ...This case gives fodder to the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this Court than ordinary citizens.' But the outcome was overshadowed by the recent actions of President Trump and congressional Republicans. With Trump's backing, the House and Senate adopted measures disapproving regulations adopted by the Biden administration that would have allowed California to enforce broad new regulations to require 'zero emissions' cars and trucks. Trump said the new rules were designed to displace California as the nation's leader in fighting air pollution and greenhouse gases. In a bill signing ceremony at the White House, he said the disapproval measures 'will prevent California's attempt to impose a nationwide electric vehicle mandate and to regulate national fuel economy by regulating carbon emissions.' 'Our Constitution does not allow one state special status to create standards that limit consumer choice and impose an electric vehicle mandate upon the entire nation,' he said. In response, California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said 'the fight for fight for clean air is far from over. While we are disappointed by the Supreme Court's decision to allow this case to go forward in the lower court, we will continue to vigorously defend California's authority under the Clean Air Act.' Some environmentalists said the decision greenlights future lawsuits from industry and polluters. 'This is a dangerous precedent from a court hellbent on protecting corporate interests,' said David Pettit, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute. 'This decision opens the door to more oil industry lawsuits attacking states' ability to protect their residents and wildlife from climate change.' Times staff writer Tony Briscoe, in Los Angeles, contributed to this report.
