Macquarie Bank waters down diversity, equity and inclusion language after Donald Trump implements anti-woke agenda
An Australian-based multinational bank has eased back on using language promoting its diversity, equity and inclusion practices as Donald Trump's crackdown forces major companies to ditch the policies.
The US President swept into office and signed an executive order 'terminating radical DEI preferencing in federal contracting and directing federal agencies to relentlessly combat private sector discrimination'.
Macquarie Bank, an ASX-listed investment banking group headquartered in Sydney with operations in the US, has since watered down its DEI language as some major companies back away from the practices.
In its report for the year ended March 31 2025, Macquarie has consolidated its DEI objectives under its sustainability section and does not mention the phrase 'diversity, equity and inclusion' at any point.
Macquarie's report for the 12 months up to March 31 2024, in comparison, has its own four-page DEI section.
The 2025 report also omits specific references to some DEI efforts by the bank in the US that it had outlined in its 2024 report.
'In the US, we offered targeted leadership development programs for Black, Latinx and Asian talent to accelerate their careers and implement strategies to increase contribution and personal growth,' Macquarie said in its 2024 report.
Macquarie also outlined 24 partnerships with non-profits it established to bolster its DEI efforts in this report, however, this is not present in the 2025 report.
Despite this, there are references to Macquarie's 'Reconciliation Action Plan' and discussions of gender equity in terms of female pay and representation in both reports.
Macquarie's 2024 report has a brief section noting the bank has 'been recognised by external community partners as a leading LGBTQ+ inclusive organisation' and referenced its 'perfect score' on the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index in the US.
However, the 2025 report fails to mention this or give any details regarding LGBTQ+ workers at Macquarie.
While Macquarie has eased back on language associated with DEI, the bank's CEO Shemara Wikramanayake stressed the company aims to build diverse teams to reflect the communities it serves in the recent report.
'Our approach has always been, and we remain committed to, fostering an inclusive culture that welcomes a range of ideas and perspectives, values the contributions of all of our people, and which empowers individuals to deliver to their greatest potential,' Ms Wikramanayake wrote in her note to shareholders.
It also mentioned the importance of diversity on its board and noted the company's 'Workforce Diversity Policy' which defines Macquarie's 'diversity commitment'.
According to the 2025 report, the company's board remuneration committee receives reporting on the commitment annually and covers under-represented groups at Macquarie, including women across senior leadership levels.
The softening of DEI language by Macquarie comes after some major companies began rolling back these practices after the US President's inauguration.
Google scrapped plans for hiring targets it established in 2020 in the wake of the killing of George Floyd.
Its parent company Alphabet removed any mentions of diversity in its annual report released in February and scrapped a commitment to DEI initiatives which have appeared in every report between 2021 and 2024.
McDonald's US head office has backed down from its DEI initiatives, however its Australian branches did not follow suit.
Trump's anti-DEI agenda and his 2024 election win was cited as a 'cultural tipping point' by Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg when he announced plans to abolish 'biased' fact-checking on his social media platforms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
23 minutes ago
- West Australian
Labor reluctant to make changes to super proposal
Treasurer Jim Chalmers is remaining firm on proposed superannuation changes, as Labor goes back to the drawing board to negotiate with the Greens. Under the proposal, the concessional tax rate would double to 30 per cent on the portion of super balances above $3 million. The policy aims to curb the number of high net-worth individuals using superannuation for tax deduction purposes rather than for their retirement. Dr Chalmers said the government didn't have the numbers in the Senate to pass the legislation and needed to engage with the crossbench. "Our intention and our preference would be to legislate what we announced," he told ABC radio on Thursday. "We've done years of consultation now. "In this case, with the Greens in the Senate to try and legislate the plan that we announced all of those years ago." With the median super balance for 60 to 64 year olds sitting at roughly $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women, the vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal. It is estimated to affect 0.5 per cent of Australian savers, or roughly 80,000 people according to the Australia Institute. The wealthiest 10 per cent are receiving 40 per cent of superannuation tax breaks, the treasurer says. The 42 self-managed super funds with more than $100 million in assets receive more than $140 million every year in tax breaks, according to reports. But the coalition has vowed to fight back against the policy, as they are opposed to any tax on unrealised gains. Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien said he didn't believe it was a "fair call" and said younger Australians would be caught in the net over time. "Our belief as a coalition ... is that Australia should have lower tax, simpler tax, and fairer tax, and what Labor is putting on the table with its superannuation tax breaches all of those things," he told ABC's News Breakfast. "Every aspect of this is looking awful, and it certainly does not align with our values as a Liberal Party, or indeed, a Liberal National coalition." Critics say the policy's introduction of a tax on unrealised capital gains goes against the fundamentals of the tax system and would have unintended consequences, such as driving investment off-shore and threatening Australia's financial stability. Unrealised gains are 'paper profits' - increases in the value of assets such as properties or shares that haven't been cashed in. On Wednesday, Dr Chalmers said calculation of unrealised gains was not unique in the tax system, and that any losses can be carried forward against any gains. Tax on unrealised gains is already part of the Australian tax system and is, for example, paid under land tax regimes. The Greens support the legislation in principle but want the threshold lowered to $2 million and indexed in line with inflation. Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the ball was in the government's court. "We want a reform to the system that makes it stronger and fairer," she told Sky News on Thursday.
Perth Now
25 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Labor reluctant to make changes to super proposal
Treasurer Jim Chalmers is remaining firm on proposed superannuation changes, as Labor goes back to the drawing board to negotiate with the Greens. Under the proposal, the concessional tax rate would double to 30 per cent on the portion of super balances above $3 million. The policy aims to curb the number of high net-worth individuals using superannuation for tax deduction purposes rather than for their retirement. Dr Chalmers said the government didn't have the numbers in the Senate to pass the legislation and needed to engage with the crossbench. "Our intention and our preference would be to legislate what we announced," he told ABC radio on Thursday. "We've done years of consultation now. "In this case, with the Greens in the Senate to try and legislate the plan that we announced all of those years ago." With the median super balance for 60 to 64 year olds sitting at roughly $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women, the vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal. It is estimated to affect 0.5 per cent of Australian savers, or roughly 80,000 people according to the Australia Institute. The wealthiest 10 per cent are receiving 40 per cent of superannuation tax breaks, the treasurer says. The 42 self-managed super funds with more than $100 million in assets receive more than $140 million every year in tax breaks, according to reports. But the coalition has vowed to fight back against the policy, as they are opposed to any tax on unrealised gains. Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien said he didn't believe it was a "fair call" and said younger Australians would be caught in the net over time. "Our belief as a coalition ... is that Australia should have lower tax, simpler tax, and fairer tax, and what Labor is putting on the table with its superannuation tax breaches all of those things," he told ABC's News Breakfast. "Every aspect of this is looking awful, and it certainly does not align with our values as a Liberal Party, or indeed, a Liberal National coalition." Critics say the policy's introduction of a tax on unrealised capital gains goes against the fundamentals of the tax system and would have unintended consequences, such as driving investment off-shore and threatening Australia's financial stability. Unrealised gains are 'paper profits' - increases in the value of assets such as properties or shares that haven't been cashed in. On Wednesday, Dr Chalmers said calculation of unrealised gains was not unique in the tax system, and that any losses can be carried forward against any gains. Tax on unrealised gains is already part of the Australian tax system and is, for example, paid under land tax regimes. The Greens support the legislation in principle but want the threshold lowered to $2 million and indexed in line with inflation. Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the ball was in the government's court. "We want a reform to the system that makes it stronger and fairer," she told Sky News on Thursday.
AU Financial Review
41 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
KKR CEO: Don't believe ‘private equity is dead' narrative
Scott Nuttall, the global co-chief executive of US private equity giant KKR, has dismissed suggestions the sector is facing a reckoning due to falling investor returns and a dearth of deals, but has warned there will be a growing gap between those firms that can manage through higher-for-longer rates and inflation and those that binged on expensive investments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data released this week by consulting firm Bain & Co showed that after a strong deal activity in the March quarter, deal volumes plunged 24 per cent in April and uncertainty from US President Donald Trump's tariff policy rocked global markets.
