
Homeownership assistance: How to get help from a variety of sources
Affordability challenges are rampant for home buyers due to the perfect storm of low inventory, high demand, rising prices and mortgage rates stubbornly stuck above 6 percent. For first-time buyers, accumulating the cash needed to become a homeowner can be particularly difficult. Unlike repeat buyers, they don't have a home to generate funds for the down payment and closing costs for a new home.
A fortunate one-quarter of first-time buyers used a gift or loan from a relative or friend for their down payment funds in 2024, according to the National Association of Realtors' 2024 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers. For home buyers without access to financial help from friends and family, there are thousands of programs that provide homeownership assistance from government and nonprofit organizations, employers and financial institutions. As of the fourth quarter of 2024, there were 2,466 programs available nationwide, 81 percent of which were actively funded, according to Down Payment Resource's Q4 2024 Homeownership Program Index report.
'Sometimes people think they make too much money to qualify for homeowner assistance or that they won't qualify for another reason,' said Yvette Thomas, senior director of the homeownership center at Manna Homes in D.C. 'Everyone should ask questions of their lender and their real estate agent and research home buyer programs in the location where they want to buy. In D.C., the maximum income for [the Home Purchase Assistance Program] is $180,800.' Buyers may qualify for the DC Open Doors program with an income of $200,000 or more.
Nearly all home buyer assistance programs require applicants to take a home buyer education class, so Thomas recommends prospective buyers start there. The classes offered by state and local housing finance agencies are usually free or low cost and include information about how to access down payment assistance and other programs.
'At Manna, we offer a closing cost assistance grant program to housing counselor clients,' Thomas said.
A local housing counselor certified by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development can provide advice about home buyer assistance.
'Taking a first-time buyer class is helpful for people to build their comfort level with the process of buying a home, which is complicated,' said Karen Serfis, a HUD-approved housing counselor with the Latino Economic Development Center in Arlington, Virginia. 'The more educated you are about buying a home, the better equipped you are to ask the right questions.'
State and local housing agencies typically have a list of lenders approved to offer home buyer assistance to borrowers, Serfis said. Buyers who don't have a lender can search the lists and interview lenders.
'The important thing to realize is that one size doesn't fit all — there's a lot of variety in what's available and who qualifies,' said Scott Phillips, a branch manager with Embrace Home Loans in Annapolis. 'These programs are intended for low-to-moderate income buyers, but income limits are tied to household size. Some programs are stricter than others, but the main thing is that everyone must qualify for the mortgage as well as for assistance.'
Phillips recommends that prospective buyers research home buyer assistance before they look for a home because qualifying for the down payment or closing cost help can change their price range and financing options.
'If you need assistance to buy, allow yourself at least three months to go through the home buyer education and application process,' Phillips said.
Prospective buyers can search for down payment assistance and other home buyer options at DownPaymentResource.com by location.
'Home buyer assistance for down payment and closing costs can be in the form of a loan or a grant,' said Mike McBride, president and loan officer at GenPoint Mortgage, headquartered in Reston, Virginia. 'Besides getting help from a government or nonprofit organization, most big banks and private lenders offer down payment assistance with conventional financing backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or with FHA financing.'
Home buyer assistance grants do not need to be repaid. Many loans are also forgivable after the buyers have lived in a property for a certain period. Others are only repaid when the property is refinanced or sold.
'The Maryland Mortgage Program offers up to 5 percent of the sales price, but it always must be repaid,' Phillips said. 'Loans for home buyer assistance from the Federal Home Loan Bank are usually forgiven after five years. Grants from nonprofit organizations like the Wider Path Home Foundation are often forgiven immediately.'
In Virginia, a 2 percent grant is available to qualified borrowers from Virginia Housing that does not to be repaid, Serfis said.
'In Arlington County, down payment assistance is available as a loan to borrowers with an income of 80 percent or less of area median income, which only needs repayment when the house is sold,' Serfis said. That income could be as high as $143,600 depending on the household size.
Home buyer assistance programs can often be stacked, so if a borrower qualifies for more than one option, they may be able to accumulate funds to pay all of their down payment and closing costs, Phillips said.
'It's pretty unusual, but I was able to help one buyer in Baltimore qualify for $27,900 from four programs, which came to 17 percent of the $160,000 purchase price,' Phillips said.
However, financial assistance directly from a bank typically can't be stacked the way government programs can, Serfis said.
Depending on the specifics of the program, home buyer assistance funds can be used for more than just down payment and closing costs.
'Some programs allow you to use the funds to pay your buyer's agent commission or buy down your mortgage rate with extra cash at the closing,' Thomas said.
Some home buyer assistance funds can be used to buy a duplex or a building with up to four units, as long as the borrower will live in one as their primary residence.
Even with home buyer assistance, most buyers will need some cash for a deposit when they make an offer to buy a home, McBride said.
Home buyer assistance program details and requirements vary widely and sometimes change. Many, but not all, are reserved for first-time home buyers. However, the federal definition of a first-time home buyer, which most programs follow, is anyone who has not owned a home within the past three years.
'Income limits are usually 80 percent to 100 percent of area median income on a sliding scale based on household size,' Serfis said.
Typically, McBride said, state home buyer assistance programs allow for down payment and closing cost assistance with a second loan of up to 5 percent of the home price when the borrowers qualify for FHA financing.
'Lender-offered assistance is different than the government programs and is sometimes available to households with higher incomes,' McBride said. 'For example, in D.C. you may qualify for assistance even with an income of up to $214,000.'
In addition to income limits, borrowers typically must meet the following eligibility criteria:
'Since some programs run out of funding midway through the year or earlier, ideally borrowers will apply for home buyer assistance as soon as they feel ready,' Thomas said. 'Some programs such as HPAP are now by lottery only, so if a prospective buyer wins that lottery, they will have six months to use the funding.'
A housing counselor and homeownership education help potential home buyers prepare with a budget and savings plan as well as updated information about assistance programs.
'It can be hard to navigate these programs,' Thomas said. 'We get notified if a program is getting low on funds and we prepare our clients so they are ready to apply whenever we identify a program that could help them.'
Researching home buyer programs can be a game changer when it comes to financing a home purchase.
Down Payment Resource's searchable database
Ask a lender to search Freddie Mac's DPA One database
D.C. Department of Housing and Community Development Home Purchase Assistance Program
D.C. Housing Finance Agency DC Open Doors Program
Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development Maryland Mortgage Program
Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development Homeownership Down Payment Assistance Program
Virginia Housing Home buyer programs
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Ted Cruz Urges Trump and Musk to 'Kiss and Make Up'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, is calling for President Donald Trump and Elon Musk to "kiss and make up" as their public feud over Trump's signature legislation continues to escalate. Newsweek has reached out to the White House and Musk via email on Saturday for comment. Why It Matters Musk and Trump initiated a war of words this week after the tech mogul started attacking the House-approved spending bill, which the president has nicknamed the "One Big Beautiful Bill," that will help him launch a wider effort to implement some of his broader economic and social reforms. Musk, who spent four months rooting around the federal government with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to cut "waste, fraud, and abuse," criticized the bill as a "disgusting abomination" and that it was full of "pork," a reference to abundant discretionary spending in a bill, known as "pork barrel spending." Trump hit back on his own social media platform Truth Social by saying he had asked Musk to leave government because he was "wearing thin." Meanwhile, Musk gave over $200 million to Trump's 2024 presidential campaign and called himself his "first buddy." The breakdown between Trump and Musk threatens the unity of the Republican coalition, with Cruz warning that "every enemy of America, every Marxist, every person who hates our country" is cheering for the divide to be permanent. What To Know The Texas lawmaker made the comments on his podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz, revealing that he was inside the Oval Office when Musk began posting his criticism on X, formerly Twitter, and "the relationship between the billionaire CEO and Trump imploded." The feud centers on Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill Act," which would extend his 2017 tax cuts and boost spending on military and border security while making cuts to Medicaid and other assistance programs. Musk has called the legislation "a disgusting abomination," expressing concerns about its estimated $3.8 trillion addition to the federal debt over the next decade. On his podcast, Cruz described witnessing the breakdown firsthand: "These are two alpha males who are pissed off and, unfortunately, they're unloading on each other. And I wish that were not the case, because I think the country does better when these two amazing heroes are working side-by-side for the country." He warned that "every enemy of America, every Marxist, every person who hates our country, every person who hates freedom, is cheering for this divide to be real, to be deep, to be lasting, to be permanent." The senator added: "Everyone who loves our country is cheering for Elon and President Trump to kiss and make up." The lawmaker expressed hope the relationship could be repaired quickly, saying: "I hope it goes back to zero just as quickly" and comparing the situation to "the kids of a bitter divorce where you're just saying, 'I really wish mommy and daddy would stop screaming.'" Amid their fiery dispute on Thursday, Trump warned that the "easiest way" to save billions in the budget was to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts." Musk responded by saying SpaceX, which he is the CEO of, will "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately," although he has since walked that threat back. Cooler heads prevailed Friday, with Musk and Trump refraining from slinging direct insults at each other. However, when asked by a reporter on Air Force One if he planned to follow through on his threat to cut Musk's government subsidies, Trump did not rule it out. "We'll take a look at everything," he said. "It's a lot of money. It's a lot of subsidy. So, we'll take a look at that, only if it's fair for him and for the it has to be fair." Elon Musk speaks with then-President-elect Donald Trump and guests including Donald Trump Jr., Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, and Kevin Cramer, a North Dakota Republican, at a viewing of the launch of the sixth... Elon Musk speaks with then-President-elect Donald Trump and guests including Donald Trump Jr., Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, and Kevin Cramer, a North Dakota Republican, at a viewing of the launch of the sixth test flight of the SpaceX Starship rocket on November 19, 2024, in Brownsville, Texas. MoreWhat People Are Saying Elon Musk wrote on X on Thursday: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate." President Donald Trump on Thursday: "Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore. I was surprised. You were here. Everybody in this room practically was here as we had a wonderful send-off. He said wonderful things about me. You couldn't have nicer-said the best things. He's worn the hat. Trump was right about everything, and I am right about the 'Great Big Beautiful Bill.'" Senator Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican, wrote earlier this month on X: "I do support President Trump, and I support most of the bill. I'm his biggest defender on foreign policy. But at the same time, I want conservative government, so I have to fight for what I believe in." Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, to Fox News' Sean Hannity on Thursday: "I think it's incredibly unfortunate. You and I are both good friends with President Trump and we're both good friends with Elon Musk. They're both extraordinary men, and they've both done extraordinary things for our country." He added: "Elon is an incredible inventor and business leader. His buying Twitter was massively important, his leadership of DOGE for President Trump was massively important. President Trump is doing phenomenal work every single day. His victory pulled this country back from the abyss. I'll tell you Sean, I was in the Oval Office with the president when this back-and-forth began, and it's really unfortunate. They are both, I think, American heroes. They are both incredibly strong leaders. And listen, it's obvious they are both pissed off right now." House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, on Friday: "Do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump. He is the leader of the party." What Happens Next It was not clear whether Trump and Musk would meet or call to discuss the fallout over the bill, which Trump has suggested the Senate should pass by July 4.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Illinois ‘chicken bill' aims to boost small poultry farms, expand access to their products
Legislation would allow farmers to sell their poultry at farmers markets, roadside stands and through delivery By GRACE FRIEDMANMedill Illinois News Bureaunews@ SPRINGFIELD — A bill that would lift long-standing restrictions on small poultry farmers in Illinois, reducing red tape and transforming the way local farmers process and sell their products, is heading to the governor. Under a measure dubbed the 'chicken bill,' farmers who process fewer than 7,500 birds annually would be exempt from state and federal inspections of their poultry operations or from having to send birds to USDA-approved processing facilities — an increase from the previous 5,000-bird threshold. The change, part of an update to the Illinois Meat and Poultry Inspection Act, also allows these farmers to sell their poultry beyond their own farms — including at farmers markets, roadside stands and through delivery — a major shift from earlier restrictions. 'This is important for our small farmers to be able to get their product to the community, and that's what this is all about,' said Sen. Sally Turner, R-Beason, who co-sponsored the bill. The Illinois House voted 116-0 on Friday, May 30, to approve House Bill 2196, and the Senate passed it unanimously on May 22. Turner represents a largely rural district spanning 10 counties. 'Farmers in my community, especially small farmers, are important to me, personally, but also to our whole district,' she said. State Rep. Charlie Meier, R-Okawville, a farmer himself, said the legislation provides local agriculture with a much-needed boost. 'We always want to get the freshest product to the consumer. We want them to know where it came from,' Meier said. 'So what's better than meeting the farmer who's raised those chickens, knowing where they're coming from? They're fresh, and you're getting a good, healthy product.' Initially, the bill faced pushback from some public health groups, which argued for stricter labeling and packaging rules to ensure the safety of poultry products for consumption. The revised bill includes mandated temperature controls during storage, transportation, shipping and delivery. Processed poultry must be packaged in sealed, leak-proof containers to prevent contamination. Each package must also be clearly labeled with the farm's name and address, the product name, net weight and a statement indicating that the poultry was processed under exemption and not inspected by state or federal authorities. 'Everything you see in that bill was done by some of the public health coalitions,' Michael Desmedt, interim director of public health for DuPage County, said. 'I think our voices were heard, and they understood our concerns.'' Ed Dubrick, a poultry farmer and policy organizer with the Illinois Stewardship Alliance, a nonprofit organization that advocates for sustainable agriculture, said he went around the state and asked livestock farmers what they needed to help with the processing of their animals. Dubrick said the current exemption was too limiting because farmers could only sell 'on or from the farm.' 'Expecting someone to come to the farm every time they want some chicken just really isn't realistic,' he said. 'But if we can bring it to a farmers market where the consumers are, that adds an opportunity.' Illinois is one of the few states without more flexible on-farm poultry processing exemptions, Dubrick said. 'In many states — about 40 — you're allowed to process up to 20,000 birds under similar rules. We're only asking for 7,500,' he said. Farmers will benefit, according to Dubrick. 'It gives them the opportunity to drive both their production and their profits on their farms,' he said For consumers, he said, 'I think you'll see an increase in the availability of local poultry, and I don't think you'll see any difference in food quality or safety. Farmers are proud of their product. They're not going to put their name, their reputation, their business on the line.' Anna Morrell, co-owner of The Little Farm at Weldon Springs in Clinton, said the bill could make it more viable for her and her husband to scale up their small operation, which began in 2020. 'This basically just opens up another avenue for getting poultry processed with lower overhead and gives us an avenue of sales into farmers markets,' Morrell said. 'We're currently not operating under the poultry exemption. We take our meat to USDA-inspected facilities, but there are very few processors in Illinois that process poultry.' Morrell said the current law had made it more challenging for poultry farmers in Illinois to sell their products; this bill would decrease the number of miles farmers have to travel to get their poultry processed. If signed, Legislators and advocates say the bill represents a rare collaboration between producers, public health departments and state lawmakers. 'And let's see if we can't keep a few more farm families on the farm and give kids another chance at a future on the farm,' Meier said. Grace Friedman is a journalism student at Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, Media, Integrated Marketing Communications, and a fellow in its Medill Illinois News Bureau working in partnership with Capitol News Illinois. Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
3 Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist in June
American Express has gradually grown into one of Berkshire's top positions. Capital One Financial recently became a more formidable credit card powerhouse. Fossil fuels may be on their way to being displaced by renewables, but that still leaves a long runway for companies like Occidental Petroleum. 10 stocks we like better than American Express › He may be set to step down as head of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A) (NYSE: BRK.B) at the end of this year, but most of the conglomerate's stock holdings are still Warren Buffett's picks. So if you're looking for Buffett-approved ideas, Berkshire's portfolio is still the place to find them. Here are three in particular that you may want to dive into before the end of this month. After nearly two decades of slow and steady (and mostly unheralded) growth, but also due to the recent downsizing of its stake in Bank of America, American Express (NYSE: AXP) has become Berkshire Hathaway's second-biggest holding. With 151.6 million shares, Berkshire owns about 22% of the credit card lender, and that $44.5 billion position makes up 16% of the value of Berkshire's stock portfolio. What's so special about this seemingly ho-hum outfit that's inspired Buffett to not only stick with it for this long, but allow it to become such a major piece of Berkshire's portfolio? It's not nearly as surprising as it may seem at first glance. See, while American Express is frequently lumped together with Visa and Mastercard (for obvious reasons), it's not quite an apples-to-apples comparison. Its business could be better described as a marketing and rewards program that just happens to be centered around a card payments network. Its card holders are willing to pay as much as $700 per year for perks like credit toward streaming services, cash back on hotel stays, access to airport lounges, and other rewards. This is a surprisingly well-protected business model. Although it wouldn't be accurate to say that only affluent households hold Amex cards, the company certainly focuses on the higher-income crowd -- a demographic that isn't as adversely impacted by macroeconomic headwinds like the ones blowing now. For perspective, last quarter, the company's total billed business grew 6% year over year, boosting its currency-adjusted revenue by 8%. Restaurant spending was particularly strong, growing 8%, and underscoring the argument that bigger spenders aren't actually cutting back. American Express is also one of the few outfits that hasn't dialed back its full-year profit outlook. It's still expecting revenue growth of between 8% and 10% to produce earnings per share of between $15 and $15.50. That would be up roughly 14% from last year's earnings of $13.35 per share -- better profit growth than most companies are expected to produce this year. If American Express sits at one end of the consumerism continuum, Capital One Financial (NYSE: COF) occupies a space at the other. Although most people can qualify for a Capital One card, they're well suited for people looking to build (or rebuild) their credit. Still, there's plenty of demand for credit cards from the sections of the marketplace that it caters to, in addition to the piece of the business that Discover served before Capital One's recently completed acquisition of it. Don't underestimate this pairing, either. Combined, those now-merged outfits could loosen the firm grip that industry titans Mastercard and Visa have had on the credit card payments network market for a long time now. See, it's a mostly unrecognized nuance from the consumer perspective, but every credit card payment quietly involves several parties. Card issuers serve as the lenders to credit card-holding consumers, but those issuers also need a means of rapidly approving and processing payments for retailers and other merchants. Visa and Mastercard are the largest of the middleman outfits that provide those networks -- and who collect small fees for every transaction. Capital One has long relied on them, as do all the other issuers of cards with the Mastercard and Visa logos. AmEx operates its own payment network (albeit a smaller one) for its branded cards, keeping everything in house. Discover, however, is a lender that also runs a payments network of its own. Although it's still small by comparison, together, Capital One and Discover have enough scale, leverage, and technical capabilities to serve many customers without the involvement of Visa or Mastercard. There's no way Buffett saw this merger coming back in early 2023 when Berkshire Hathaway first established what is now a 7.1 million share stake in Capital One worth about $1.3 billion. In fact, the conglomerate has actually trimmed its position in the financial services company a bit since early 2024. It's a Buffett holding nonetheless, however, and one that Goldman Sachs recently added to its so-called "conviction list" of tickers that it firmly believes are undervalued and worth owning. Finally, add Occidental Petroleum (NYSE: OXY) to your list of Warren Buffett stocks to buy hand over fist this month. Against the backdrop of renewable energy's proliferation and growing efforts by governments, businesses, and individuals worldwide to reduce their use of fossil fuels, an oil and natural gas extractor like Occidental might not seem to be an obvious holding for a highly traditional and old-school stock picker like Buffett. Yet despite the continued adoption of renewable energy sources, the world will still need more and more oil for a long time. Researchers at Goldman Sachs don't believe we'll reach "peak oil" -- the point at which the average daily consumption of crude oil stops growing and starts shrinking -- until 2034, in fact, and even beyond that point, we'll need lots of it for several more decades. OPEC doesn't believe crude consumption's growth will peak until 2045 at the earliest, while oil giant ExxonMobil is forecasting that oil demand will peak in 2030, but also anticipates that in 2050, we'll still need about the same amount of it that we do in 2030. And it expects that overall, in 25 years, oil and natural gas will still account for more than half of the global energy mix. In other words, there's still lots of good money to be made in the fossil fuel business by a low-cost operator like Occidental Petroleum. To the extent the oil and natural gas industry business is living on borrowed time, though, Occidental is evolving brilliantly. The company's carbon-capture technology (literally) sucks carbon dioxide out of the ambient air. The business just needs scale, which is being encouraged by incentives. That's one of the chief reasons Precedence Research believes the global carbon capture market will grow at an annualized rate of more than 21% through 2034. This stock hasn't been a strong performer since late 2022. Indeed, it has lost nearly half its value since then. That's only because oil prices have been in a slump since then, though, dragging the industry's earnings down with it. Buffett has been unfazed, however. Not only has he stuck with Occidental, he has added to Berkshire's stake, growing it into a 264.9 million share position worth, at current share prices, about $13 billion. That's nearly 6% of Berkshire's stock portfolio and 27% of Occidental Petroleum's entire float. Before you buy stock in American Express, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and American Express wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 American Express is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bank of America, Berkshire Hathaway, Goldman Sachs Group, Mastercard, and Visa. The Motley Fool recommends Capital One Financial and Occidental Petroleum. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist in June was originally published by The Motley Fool