County council votes against expanded Leicester city boundary
Soulsby said he was disappointed by the result of the vote but that he hoped to continue having constructive discussions with the county council before making final submissions on future boundaries to ministers in November.
The motion was proposed by the county council's Tory opposition group.Tory group leader Deborah Taylor said the proposed expansion ignored the views of residents who could find themselves incorporated in a greater Leicester."Many of our residents moved out of the city into the county and they certainly have no wish to be moved back into the city against their will."This is about land grabbing and council tax payers to prop up a failing city council."She said residents feared their council tax would rise and services would decline should they become part of the city.
The county council's Reform UK leader Dan Harrison described the Tory motion as "grandstanding and waving flags" but added he thought the city boundary would ultimately expand."There's a lot of hype, there's a lot of talk," he added."I am trying to defend our future."[The Tories] would say just sit back and let government decide but believe me with a Labour mayor and a Labour minister - who would get the best deal out of that?"We are trying to negotiate, talk and have realistic conversations."Harrison said modelling was now being done with the aim of getting a clearer picture of future plans by September.Reform UK, which runs the council as a minority administration, proposed having a referendum on local government reorganisation but the move was voted down by 24 votes to 22.Before the meeting, about 40 residents had joined Tory councillors in a protest outside County Hall.
Under its proposal, the city council said Leicester's current population of 372,000 would increase to 623,000 by 2028.Soulsby told the BBC: "In private, all political groups accept the case for extending the city boundary is overwhelming."It would unlock devolution and help meet the city's housing needs. "I've said to Dan Harrison, and the county council, we have to work with them to get a model for appropriate city boundaries."I do understand why people may have concerns but council tax would not be hiked."They would not be taken over. It's about becoming part of another council over which they would have considerable influence."
The city council has proposed the rest of Leicestershire and Rutland should fall under a single council serving a population of 578,000.Leicestershire County Council has already outlined proposals to create one unitary authority for the whole county - replacing itself and the districts and boroughs - sitting around the city's current boundaries.The districts' favoured model is for three unitary councils across Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland.A North Leicestershire and Rutland council would serve the area currently covered by Charnwood borough, North West Leicestershire district, Melton borough and Rutland County Council.A separate South Leicestershire council would cover the areas of Blaby district, Harborough district, Hinckley and Bosworth borough and Oadby and Wigston borough councils.Leicester city would remain unchanged.Authorities are proposing more public engagement in the summer, as final proposals for local government reform must be submitted by 28 November 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour council offers asylum seekers cooking lessons to ‘experience joy'
A Labour-run council is offering cooking classes to asylum seekers so they can 'experience joy'. Cambridge City Council announced a new set of grants for community groups including funding for the lessons and also gardening classes for migrants. It comes as the council became the second local authority to introduce a four-day week on full pay for staff. Sir James Cleverly, the former Tory home secretary, said the move 'speaks volumes that Labour councils are spending taxpayers' money on cooking and gardening lessons to asylum seekers, whilst cutting back on bin collections all the while hiking council tax to record highs.' 'In both Whitehall and your town hall, under Labour – you pay more and get less,' he added. The council denied any reductions in services such as bin collections, insisting that it continues to collect domestic waste, recycling and green waste. Resettlement Community Grants, which were launched on July 23, offer up to £30,000 for 'arts and cultural projects, community crafts, cooking and food, gardening and connecting with nature, sports and other opportunities to experience joy'. The council also pledged to 'extend support to enable more refugees or asylum seekers to settle in Cambridge' after deciding to increase the number of council homes made available to asylum seekers in March. Delowar Hossain, a Tory councillor, was the only member of the council to oppose the move and spoke out about the recent decision to introduce a four-day week. He said: 'Our residents work hard and pay taxes for full services. A four-day work week would mean they get only 80 per cent of the service for the same tax they currently pay.' 'Reducing inequality' A spokesman for the council said Cambridge was 'proud to offer such a range of grants' which allow for 'projects that will help to reduce social or economic inequality for Cambridge residents with the most need'. The Government has already faced criticism for encouraging the adoption of four-day weeks in public services. In November last year, Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, did away with a 'best value' intervention issued by the previous Conservative Government against South Cambridgeshire. The intervention would have allowed auditors to stop the reduced working hours. Instead, her department stated: 'We encourage active and ongoing dialogue with the workforce and trade unions on any changes to local working arrangements.' However, trade unions representing civil servants have increasingly called for more public bodies to adopt moves towards a four-day week, and the PCS union has called for Rayner's own department to follow suit. Last year, its general secretary said: 'A four-day week would give workers an additional day to spend how they like.' The Government plans to introduce a 'right to switch off' for council workers, preventing contact on days off, alongside a potential four-day week rollout across Whitehall and local authorities if union demands are met. Tories argue the four-day week, union demands, and sanctuary city policies lead to higher taxes and worse services for taxpayers.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Chancellor's attempt to intervene in car finance scandal branded ‘disgraceful'
Rachel Reeves' efforts to intervene in the supreme court case on the car finance scandal were 'unprecedented and disgraceful' and send a 'really bad message' to consumers that the government is willing to defend wrongdoing by banks, Treasury committee member and Lib Dem MP Bobby Dean has said. While the supreme court largely sided with finance companies on Friday – helping lenders avoid a £44bn compensation bill – Dean said the chancellor had gone too far to show she was on the side of business. That included a controversial bid to intervene in the supreme court hearing in January, in which she urged judges to avoid handing 'windfall' compensation to borrowers. That attempt was ultimately rejected. 'I thought it was pretty unprecedented and pretty disgraceful,' said Dean, who sits on an influential parliamentary committee which scrutinises City firms, regulators and the Treasury. The chancellor had also been considering overruling the supreme court's decision with retrospective legislation, to help save lenders billions of pounds, in the event that it upheld the entirety of October's court of appeal ruling, the Guardian revealed last week. 'What message does it send to consumers that the industry can do wrong, the courts can support the claim that they've done something wrong, but the government is ready to intervene and defend the industry that's done wrong, instead of defending the consumer? I think that's a really bad message to put out,' Dean said. 'I feel like this government sometimes is too keen to demonstrate it is on the side of business, and is sometimes not understanding the rights of consumer,' he added. Reeves intervention efforts followed intensive lobbying by the car loan industry, which feared that the supreme court would uphold last October's shock ruling by the appeal court. That October ruling suggested commission payments paid by lenders to car dealers were unlawful, unless explicitly disclosed to borrowers. It could have opened the door to billions of pounds of compensation claims against companies including Lloyds Banking Group, Santander UK, Barclays and Close Brothers, and result in a redress scheme that rivalled the £50bn payment protection insurance saga. Lobby group the Financing and Leasing Association (FLA) – which represents car lenders – had warned the government that a big compensation bill could push some lenders into failure, while others would offer fewer or more expensive loans to claw back their losses. That could restrict options for borrowers who relied on credit. City bosses were also warning the Treasury that ongoing uncertainty over the scandal was deterring international investment in the finance industry, and was therefore putting the UK's economic growth at risk The FLA's head of motor finance Adrian Dally said that the lobby group was 'pleased' with the supreme court's ruling, and felt its concerns had been heard by Treasury and regulators. He confirmed the FLA had been speaking with the Treasury nearly every week in the wake of the court of appeal ruling in October, including about its concerns on the car finance case. However, he rejected suggestions the Treasury had prioritised the industry over consumers. 'We absolutely disagree with that because, ultimately, this [car finance] industry is a vital part of the nation's infrastructure, and enables millions of people to get to work, to get to school, and that was put at risk by these court cases. And ultimately, we believe the industry's interests and the consumers' interests are aligned on this.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion But Dean said government interventions set a 'really bad precedent if you're going to intervene on cases of consumer redress on the basis that it might damage industry, because then almost every consumer redress case would fall,' Dean said. Dean added that compensation schemes can give consumers confidence to borrow and invest, knowing will be protected when companies take advantage of customers. 'Obviously, the best industry is one where these redress systems are not needed in the first place, because people play by the rules.' The Financial Conduct Authority is due to confirm whether or not it will press ahead with a compensation scheme before the stock markets open on Monday morning. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'It is vital that consumers have access to motor finance to enable them to spread the cost of a vehicle in a way that is manageable and affordable. 'We respect this judgment from the supreme court, and we are working with regulators and industry to understand the impact for both firms and consumers. 'We recognise the issues this court case has highlighted, and we are already taking forward significant changes to the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Consumer Credit Act.'
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Anti-racism protesters defend London hotel housing asylum seekers
Anti-racism demonstrators have turned out in large numbers at a London hotel where asylum seekers are being housed to counter-protest against those opposed to it being used as Home Office accommodation
