Why is Ishiba Letting Trump Call the Shots in Tariff Talks?
There seems to be no end in sight for the Japan-United States tariff negotiations. With such slow progress, President Donald Trump has been stepping up his criticism of Japan.
Trump has said that it is "unfair" that US auto exports to Japan are at such a low level and has rebuffed Japan's requests to scrap or reconsider the 25% additional tariffs his administration has slapped on Japanese cars. The President has also complained that the Japanese imports of US rice are insufficient.
Trump has been pointing to both of these issues for quite some time. Nevertheless, the reason why he has recently intensified his criticism of Japan by name is likely a desire to shake up Tokyo. He wants to force major concessions from Japan in order to start eliminating the bilateral trade deficit.
Of course, the self-righteous US criticism regarding motor vehicle imports is unacceptable. Additionally, Japan imported 346,000 tons of American rice in 2024, more than twice the amount from the next largest external source, Thailand. At the same time, rice production constitutes the foundation of Japan's food security. So there is no need for our nation to blindly comply with US demands for increased imports of American rice. Japan should remain undeterred by Trump's provocative words and actions and continue to negotiate tenaciously.
What is worrisome is the fact that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has been out of the picture. Minister Ryosei Akazawa leaves the meeting with Commerce Secretary Robert Lutnick on June 27 in Washington. (©Kyodo)
Trump personally calls the shots as to whether the US will revise its tariff measures. The only person who can directly influence this impasse is the Prime Minister. So why is there no sign of Ishiba becoming proactively involved in the negotiations?
After agreement could not be reached at the June summit, the parties decided to continue negotiations at the Cabinet minister level. However, leaving the negotiations to Ryosei Akazawa, Minister of State for Economic Revitalization, does not solve the problem. Akazawa is not in a position to negotiate directly with the President.
Ishiba has a responsibility as prime minister to protect the national interest. If he just allows Trump to dictate the pace of negotiations, he will be unable to fulfill that responsibility.
Currently, the Japan-US tariff talks remain stymied over the additional tariffs on Japanese motor vehicles imported into the United States. That sector is a priority for Japan.
Akazawa visited the US at the end of June for the seventh ministerial meeting. However, he was unable to even meet with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is overseeing the US side in the talks. Trump's moratorium on the imposition of additional "reciprocal tariffs" is due to expire on July 9. Yet, no progress has been made in the negotiations, including regarding the possibility of extending the deadline. Prime Minister Ishiba answers reporters' questions on June 22. (©Sankei)
Trump unilaterally established that deadline. The US President also mentioned that he might send a letter to Japan ending the negotiations and setting the tariff level. It is problematic that Trump continues to unilaterally impose his will without fairly considering the ministerial-level talks and other input.
However, it is also questionable whether the Ishiba administration is capable of managing such Trump-style dealmaking. The Prime Minister must demonstrate the leadership necessary to break the impasse. That, of course, includes arranging a telephone summit with Trump, as well as writing him directly.
The time has come for Prime Minister Ishiba to prove his ability.
Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun
このページを 日本語 で読む
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
With sanctions lifted, Syria looks to solar power as more than a patchwork fix to its energy crisis
DAMASCUS, Syria (AP) — Abdulrazak al-Jenan swept the dust off his solar panel on his apartment roof overlooking Damascus. Syria's largest city was mostly pitch-black, the few speckles of light coming from the other households able to afford solar panels, batteries, or private generators. Al-Jenan went thousands of dollars in debt to buy his solar panel in 2019. It was an expensive coping mechanism at the time, but without it, he couldn't charge his phone and run the refrigerator. Syria has not had more than four hours of state electricity per day for years, as a result of the nearly 14-year civil war that ended with the ouster of former President Bashar Assad in December. Syria's new leaders are hoping renewable energy will now become more than a patchwork solution. Investment is beginning to return to the country with the lifting of U.S. sanctions, and major energy projects are planned, including an industrial-scale solar farm that would secure about a tenth of the country's energy needs. 'The solution to the problem isn't putting solar panels on roofs,' Syria's interim Energy Minister Mohammad al-Bashir told The Associated Press. 'It's securing enough power for the families through our networks in Syria. This is what we're trying to do.' Restoring the existing energy infrastructure Some of the efforts focus on simply repairing infrastructure destroyed in the war. The World Bank recently announced a $146 million grant to help Syria repair damaged transmission lines and transformer substations. Al-Bashir said Syria's infrastructure that has been repaired can provide 5,000 megawatts, about half the country's needs, but fuel and gas shortages have hampered generation. With the sanctions lifted, that supply could come in soon. More significantly, Syria recently signed a $7 billion energy deal with a consortium of Qatari, Turkish, and American companies. The program over the next three and a half years would develop four combined-cycle gas turbines with a total generating capacity estimated at approximately 4,000 megawatts and a 1,000-megawatt solar farm. This would 'broadly secure the needs' of Syrians, said Al-Bashir. While Syria is initially focusing on fixing its existing fossil fuel infrastructure to improve quality of life, help make businesses functional again, and entice investors, the U.N. Development Program said in May that a renewable energy plan will be developed in the next year for the country. The plan will look at Syria's projected energy demand and determine how much of it can come from renewable sources. 'Given the critical role of energy in Syria's recovery, we have to rapidly address energy poverty and progressively accelerate the access to renewable energy,' Sudipto Mukerjee, UNDP's resident representative in Syria, said in a statement announcing the plan. Sanctions crippled the power grid While the war caused significant damage to Syria's infrastructure, crippling Washington-led sanctions imposed during the Assad dynasty's decades of draconian rule made it impossible for Syria to secure fuel and spare parts to generate power. 'Many companies over the past period would tell us the sanctions impact matters like imports, implementing projects, transferring funds and so on,' al-Bashir said. During a visit to Turkey in May, the minister said Syria could only secure about 1700 megawatts, a little less than 20%, of its energy needs. A series of executive orders by U.S. President Donald Trump lifted many sanctions on Syria, aiming to end the country's isolation from the global banking system so that it can become viable again and rebuild itself. The United Nations estimates the civil war caused hundreds of billions of dollars in damages and economic losses across the country. Some 90% of Syrians live in poverty. Buying solar panels, private generators or other means of producing their own energy has been out of reach for most of the population. 'Any kind of economic recovery needs a functional energy sector,' said Joseph Daher, Syrian-Swiss economist and researcher, who said that stop-gap measures like solar panels and private generators were luxuries only available to a few who could afford it. 'There is also a need to diminish the cost of electricity in Syria, which is one of the most expensive in the region.' Prices for electricity in recent years surged as the country under its former rulers struggled with currency inflation and rolling back on subsidies. The new officials who inherited the situation say that lifting sanctions will help them rectify the country's financial and economic woes, and provide sufficient and affordable electricity as soon as they can. 'The executive order lifts most of the obstacles for political and economic investment with Syria,' said Qutaiba Idlibi, who leads the Americas section of the Foreign Ministry. Syria has been under Washington-led sanctions for decades, but designations intensified during the war that started in 2011. Even with some waivers for humanitarian programs, it was difficult to bring in resources and materials to fix Syria's critical infrastructure — especially electricity — further compounding the woes of the vast majority of Syrians, who live in poverty. The focus is economic recovery The removal of sanctions signals to U.S. businesses that Trump is serious in his support for Syria's recovery, Idlibi said. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. 'Right now, we have a partnership with the United States as any normal country would do,' he said. Meanwhile, Al-Jenan is able to turn on both his fans on a hot summer day while he watches the afternoon news on TV, as the temperature rises to 35 degrees Celsius (95 F). He doesn't want to let go of his solar panel but hopes the lifting of sanctions will eventually bring sustainable state electricity across the country. 'We can at least know what's going on in the country and watch on TV,' he said. 'We really were cut off from the entire world.' ___ Chehayeb reported from Beirut.
The Market Online
3 hours ago
- The Market Online
The 5-Minute Investor Podcast, Ep. 18: Theatre stocks post-COVID - recovery, or just for show?
This content has been prepared in collaboration with Cineplex Inc. and AMC Entertainment Holdings, third-party issuers, and is intended for informational purposes only. As the world gradually reclaims its pre-pandemic rhythms, the cinema industry—once among the hardest hit—has begun to flicker back to life. For investors, this resurgence presents a compelling opportunity to reassess the prospects of two of North America's most prominent theatre chains: Cineplex Inc. (TSX:CGX)in Canada and AMC Entertainment Holdings (NYSE:AMC) in the United States. Cineplex: A Canadian comeback story? Cineplex, Canada's largest movie theatre operator, has shown notable signs of recovery since the pandemic's peak. In its Q4 2024 earnings, Cineplex reported: Revenue of C$362.7 million , up 15 per cent year-over-year , up 15 per cent year-over-year Earnings per share (EPS) of $0.05, a significant turnaround from a loss of -$0.14 the year prior of $0.05, a significant turnaround from a loss of -$0.14 the year prior Box office revenue per patron rose to C$13.26, while concession revenue per patron increased to C$9.41 Fast-forward to Q2 2025, the theatre chain recently reported nearly 170 per cent growth compared to last year's Q2. Attendance has steadily improved, with January 2025 box office revenue nearly matching that of January 2024, signaling a stabilization in consumer demand. Cineplex stock has responded positively. Cineplex is also diversifying. Its location-based entertainment segment and Scene+ loyalty program are helping to drive engagement beyond traditional moviegoing. A recent refinancing initiative aims to extend debt maturities and reduce equity dilution risk, setting the stage for potential dividend reinstatement. Cinepelx stock (TSX:CGX) has fallen 5.6 per cent since the year began but is up 36.54 per cent since this time last year, last trading at C$11.51. AMC Entertainment: From meme stock to market resilience AMC, the world's largest cinema chain, has had a rollercoaster ride since 2020. After surviving the pandemic with the help of retail investors during the 'meme stock' frenzy, AMC has focused on operational efficiency and strategic closures. In Q3 2023, AMC posted its best quarterly earnings in its 103-year history, driven by the massive success of films like Barbie and Oppenheimer , which grossed a combined US$2.3 billion globally. Key highlights include: Revenue of $1.4 billion , up over 45 per cent year-over-year , up over 45 per cent year-over-year Closure of 156 underperforming locations, offset by 57 new openings Rent renegotiations yielding tens of millions in annual savings Despite these gains, AMC still carries a deferred rent balance of $74.2 million and a significant debt load. However, its leaner operations and improved cash reserves suggest a more sustainable path forward. More recently, AMC's Q1 2025 numbers had total revenues of US$862.5 million compared to US$951.4 million for Q1 2024, coupled with a net loss of US$202.1 million compared to net loss of US$163.5 million in Q1 2024. CEO Adam Aron blamed it on the poor performance of the box office at large from January to March this year, which he called 'the lowest it has been since 1996' in a media release. He went on to explain, 'If that level of activity were to continue, of course it would be highly problematic for movie theatres. But to the contrary, since April 1, movie theatre demand has been booming AMC stock (NYSE:AMC) has fallen 25.88 per cent since the year began and is down 41.35 per cent since this time last year. It has seen some growth in the past three months, rising 11.74 per cent since May. AMC last traded at US$2.95 (C$ 4.01). The investment angle: A slow but steady return to the big screen Both Cineplex and AMC are navigating a transformed entertainment landscape. While streaming remains a formidable competitor, the enduring appeal of the theatrical experience—especially for blockbuster releases—continues to draw audiences back. Cineplex offers a more traditional recovery play with a focus on operational diversification and financial restructuring. AMC, on the other hand, presents a higher-risk, higher-reward scenario, buoyed by its brand recognition and aggressive cost-cutting. The cinema industry's revival is far from complete, but the trajectory is promising. As attendance rebounds and studios ramp up content pipelines, both Cineplex and AMC are working out a way to benefit. Investors should dig deeper—analyzing debt levels, content slates, and evolving consumer behavior—to determine which stock best fits their portfolio. Whether you're drawn to Cineplex's steady Canadian comeback or AMC's bold American reinvention, the curtain is rising on a new act in theatrical investing. Here's a list of past episodes: Thanks for listening! The 5-Minute Investor is on Spotify, YouTube, iHeartRadio, Podbean, Stockhouse or wherever finer podcasts are found. Join the discussion: Find out what investors are saying about The 5-Minute Investor Podcast and this week's stocks in focus on the Cineplex and AMC Bullboards, and make sure to check out the rest of Stockhouse's stock forums and message boards. Stockhouse does not provide investment advice or recommendations. All investment decisions should be made based on your own research and consultation with a registered investment professional. The issuer is solely responsible for the accuracy of the information contained herein .
Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus activists faces federal trial
BOSTON (AP) — A federal bench trial begins Monday over a lawsuit that challenges a Trump administration campaign of arresting and deporting faculty and students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations and other political activities. The lawsuit, filed by several university associations against President Donald Trump and members of his administration, would be one of the first to go to trial. Plaintiffs want U.S. District Judge William Young to rule the policy violates the First Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act, a law governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations.
