logo
China's Trump card: using rare earth elements as geopolitical bargaining chips

China's Trump card: using rare earth elements as geopolitical bargaining chips

Yahoo17 hours ago
When camouflage-clad, rifle-carrying rebels from the Kachin Independence Army (KIA) led an offensive to seize the northern town of Pangwa near the Myanmar-China border last October, few recognised the international implications.
It marked the latest escalation in a seven-decade-long civil conflict between Myanmar's brutal military regime and hundreds of armed groups like the KIA, rooted in the resource-rich provinces spanning China, Thailand, India and Myanmar.
More significantly, the KIA's offensive consolidated its control over Kachin State, home to nearly all of Myanmar's rare earth mines – and nearly half of the world's supply of the heavy rare earths used in magnets for car motors, electric vehicles (EVs), wind turbines, semiconductors and defence technology.
Over the following months, high-ranking politicians and business executives in Beijing, Washington and boardrooms across Europe sat up and took notice. Ford Motors' CEO Jim Farley said in June that the auto giant had been forced to close one of its plants due to the rare earth shortage. Days later, executives from Toyota and General Motors told the White House their suppliers faced acute shortages that could shut production lines.
Even as KIA spokesperson Colonel Naw Bu said the rebel group had policies in place to continue rare earth mining and negotiate with businessmen, the KIA raised taxes on miners and stifled production of dysprosium and terbium, sending the price of the latter skyrocketing.
The KIA does not have the capability to process the rare earth elements (REEs) mined under its supervision. For that, Myanmar needs China to process the elements into magnets that power EVs and wind turbines around the world. Instead, China has closed trading posts between the two countries.
Beijing's ultimatum
Soon after seizing Pangwa, the KIA turned to Bhamo, another strategically vital town in Kachin State where rebels and the military junta continue to wrestle for control.
Beijing's response was to threaten to halt buying the REEs mined in the territory. In July, Reuters reported that Chinese foreign ministry officials issued an ultimatum to the KIA: abandon the offensive into Bhamo and Beijing would establish cross-border trade, or else face full economic isolation.
Such a move would be a significant blow to Myanmar's already bleak economic outlook, amid a 'polycrisis' of intensifying conflict, natural disasters and deepening poverty. It could also inflict wider turmoil on global heavy REE supply chains.
Not only does China hold the largest reserves of rare earths in the world, estimated at some 44 million tonnes, the country also processes nearly 90% of global REEs, according to GlobalData's Global Rare Earths Mining Review, published in January.
'The cessation of imports could jeopardise not only global supply chains but also the stability of China's domestic industries,' Isabel Al-Dhahir, principal analyst at GlobalData, tells Mining Technology. 'Considering the historic scale of imports from the Kachin State, China's threat of stopping purchases of REEs from KIA-controlled territories is an intriguing negotiation tactic.'
The significance of Myanmar's civil war and China's looming presence will be felt hardest in heavy rare earths, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).
'Today, China and Myanmar together account for around two-thirds of global mined supply of heavy rare earths', an IEA spokesperson tells Mining Technology. '[But] China represents around 90% of global refined heavy rare earths supply.'
While the China-Myanmar border remains strictly controlled, a gradual flow of existing inventories to China restarted in March.
Despite China's inventories of raw materials at refining plants, which come from domestic mines and imports from Laos and Brazil, there are likely to be shortages for heavy rare earth feedstocks at Chinese processors if the border conflict continues, according to the IEA's Global Critical Minerals Outlook.
'Therefore, if the conflict in Myanmar continues, it could lead to a price increase for the medium and heavy rare earths, while the impact on light rare earths would be relatively limited,' the IEA's report predicts.
A Trump card
In many ways, the China-KIA saga is a microcosm of Beijing's willingness to wield its dominance over the processing and refinement stages of the REE supply chain to further its geopolitical aims on the global stage.
However, while pulling the plug on trade can leave beleaguered economies like Myanmar's on the brink of collapse, does China have the same leverage over multi-trillion-dollar economies like the US?
The prevalence of REEs across numerous key industries indicates that Beijing's leverage remains impactfully high, above all on the auto industry. As China and the US continue to verbally and economically spar, REE supply has become an ever more sought-after bargaining chip, as seen with the previous economic conflict around mining exports between Australia and China.
Reciprocal tariffs were Beijing's go-to response when US President Trump imposed universal tariffs on his so-called 'Liberation Day' (2 April), which included a total of 54% total tariffs on Chinese goods.
China's President Xi Jinping retaliated with a 34% tariff on all US imports on 4 April. On the same day, China's Ministry of Commerce announced it would require companies to apply for a licence before exporting seven types of rare earths: dysprosium, gadolinium, lutetium, samarium, scandium, terbium and yttrium.
Both nations spent the following week escalating tariffs tit-for-tat, with the US raising tariffs to 104%, then 145%, and China to 84%, then 125%.
It took until 12 May for Chinese and US officials to agree a temporary reduction in reciprocal tariffs – but the Trump administration would later reveal that China did not ease restrictions on REE exports, which was supposedly part of the deal.
On 26 June, Trump announced that the US and China had signed an agreement on trade, although he did not mention any specifics. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Bloomberg that 'they are going to deliver rare earths to us', adding that the US would 'take down our countermeasures' once Beijing did.
'The sporadic nature of Trump's trade policies and resulting retaliations adds an extra layer of uncertainty to US manufacturers, with some planning month to month,' Al-Dhahir says. 'The restrictions could incentivise the US to expand its domestic production of REEs.'
Could the US bolster rare earth production to compete with China?
Domestic REE reserves are a chink in the US' geopolitical armour when compared to China.
Currently, the only operational mine in the US is Mountain Pass in California. Its production has been 'steadily expanding to account for approximately 15% of global rare earth mining', Al-Dhahir adds.
Companies not traditionally active in the mining industry have identified this potential and begun investing.
In July, Apple announced a $500m investment in MP Materials, the Las Vegas-headquartered REE company that owns and operates the Mountain Pass mine. This investment will secure the fabrication of US-made rare earth magnets from MP Materials' factory in Fort Worth, Texas, as well as the development of a rare earth recycling facility in Mountain Pass.
While deals like the MP Materials-Apple partnership bolster the US' REE supplies, China's dominance looks set to remain undisputed – and Beijing's geopolitical sword-brandishing is likely to continue, with Myanmar and the KIA the latest in the line of fire.
'The prevalence of REEs across so many industries makes them indispensable. Rare earths therefore constitute a significant component of China's geopolitical toolkit,' Al-Dhahir concludes. 'The country's emphasis on REEs can be traced back to the 1980s when the then-President Deng Xiaoping likened the importance of rare earths to China to the significance of oil to the Middle East.'
It seems unlikely that China's current president, Xi Jinping, will play anything but hardball with Myanmar, the US, or any other geopolitical entity as he seeks to quash the unrest and capitalise on the importance of REEs over the decade to come.
"China's Trump card: using rare earth elements as geopolitical bargaining chips" was originally created and published by Mining Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Analysis-Trump may look like he's winning the trade war, but hurdles remain
Analysis-Trump may look like he's winning the trade war, but hurdles remain

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Analysis-Trump may look like he's winning the trade war, but hurdles remain

By Andrea Shalal WASHINGTON (Reuters) -At a glance, U.S. President Donald Trump appears to be winning the trade war he unleashed after returning to the White House in January, bending major trading partners to his will, imposing double-digit tariff rates on nearly all imports, narrowing the trade deficit, and raking in tens of billions of dollars a month in much-needed cash for federal government coffers. Significant hurdles remain, however, including whether U.S. trading partners will make good on investment and goods-purchase commitments, how much tariffs will drive up inflation or stymie demand and growth, and whether the courts allow many of his ad-hoc levies to stand. On inauguration day, the effective U.S. tariff rate was about 2.5%. It has since jumped to somewhere between 17% and 19%, according to a range of estimates. The Atlantic Council estimates it will edge closer to 20%, the highest in a century, with higher duties taking effect on Thursday. Trading partners have largely refrained from retaliatory tariffs, sparing the global economy from a more painful tit-for-tat trade war. Data on Tuesday showed a 16% narrowing of the U.S. trade deficit in June, while the U.S. trade gap with China shrank to its smallest in more than 21 years. American consumers have shown themselves to be more resilient than expected, but some recent data indicate the tariffs are already affecting jobs, growth and inflation. "The question is, what does winning mean?" said Josh Lipsky, who heads economic studies at the Atlantic Council. "He's raising tariffs on the rest of the world and avoiding a retaliatory trade war far easier than even he anticipated, but the bigger question is what effect does that have on the U.S. economy." Michael Strain, head of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said Trump's geopolitical victories could prove hollow. "In a geopolitical sense, Trump's obviously getting tons of concessions from other countries, but in an economic sense, he's not winning the trade war," he said. "What we're seeing is that he is more willing to inflict economic harm on Americans than other countries are willing to inflict on their nations. And I think of that as losing." Kelly Ann Shaw, a White House trade adviser during Trump's first term who is now a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, said a still-strong economy and near-record-high stock prices "support a more aggressive tariff strategy." But Trump's tariffs, tax cuts, deregulation and policies to boost energy production would take time to play out. "I think history will judge these policies, but he is the first president in my lifetime to make major changes to the global trading system," she added. DEALS SO FAR Trump has concluded eight framework agreements with the European Union, Japan, Britain, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines that impose tariffs on their goods ranging from 10% to 20%. That's well short of the "90 deals in 90 days" administration officials had touted in April, but they account for some 40% of U.S. trade flows. Adding in China, currently saddled with a 30% levy on its goods but likely to win another reprieve from even higher tariffs before an August 12 deadline, would raise that to nearly 54%. Deals aside, many of Trump's tariff actions have been mercurial. On Wednesday he ratcheted up pressure on India, doubling new tariffs on goods from there to 50% from 25% because of its imports of oil from Russia. The same rate is in store for goods from Brazil, after Trump complained about its prosecution of former leader Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. And Switzerland, which Trump had previously praised, is facing 39% tariffs after a conversation between its leader and Trump derailed a deal. Ryan Majerus, a trade lawyer who worked in both the first Trump administration and the Biden government, said what's been announced so far fails to address "longstanding, politically entrenched trade issues" that have bothered U.S. policymakers for decades, and getting there would likely take "months, if not years." He also noted they lack specific enforcement mechanisms for the big investments announced, including $550 billion for Japan and $600 billion for the EU. PROMISES AND RISKS Critics lit into European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen after she agreed to a 15% tariff during a surprise meeting with Trump during his trip to Scotland last month, while gaining little in return. The deal frustrated winemakers and farmers, who had sought a zero-for-zero tariff. Francois-Xavier Huard, head of France's FNIL national dairy sector federation, said 15% was better than the threatened 30%, but would still cost dairy farmers millions of euros. European experts say von der Leyen's move did avert higher tariffs, calmed tensions with Trump, averting potentially higher duties on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and cars, while making largely symbolic pledges to buy $750 billion of U.S. strategic goods and invest over $600 billion. Meeting those pledges will fall to individual EU members and companies, and cannot be mandated by Brussels, trade experts and analysts note. U.S. officials insist Trump can re-impose higher tariffs if he believes the EU, Japan or others are not honoring their commitments. But it remains unclear how that would be policed. And history offers a caution. China, with its state-run economy, never met its modest purchase agreements under Trump's Phase 1 U.S.-China trade deal. Holding it to account proved difficult for the subsequent Biden administration. "All of it is untested. The EU, Japan and South Korea are going to have to figure out how to operationalize this," Shaw said. "It's not just government purchases. It's getting the private sector motivated to either make investments or back loans, or to purchase certain commodities." And lastly, the main premise for the tariffs Trump has imposed unilaterally faces legal challenges. His legal team met with stiff questioning during appellate court oral arguments over his novel use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets, to justify his tariffs. A ruling could come any time and regardless of the outcome seems destined to be settled ultimately by the Supreme Court. Sign in to access your portfolio

Secret Nvidia Chip Smuggling Ring Busted -- $1M Payment Traced to China Sparks U.S. Crackdown
Secret Nvidia Chip Smuggling Ring Busted -- $1M Payment Traced to China Sparks U.S. Crackdown

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Secret Nvidia Chip Smuggling Ring Busted -- $1M Payment Traced to China Sparks U.S. Crackdown

Two Chinese nationals have been arrested on charges of smuggling Nvidia's (NASDAQ:NVDA) most powerful AI chips to Chinadespite strict U.S. export controls designed to keep them out of Beijing's hands. According to the Justice Department, Chuan Geng and Shiwei Yang allegedly used a shell company in CaliforniaALX Solutions send Nvidia H100 chips through Singapore and Malaysia, without obtaining the required export licenses. Records show they never received payments from their Southeast Asian partners, but instead collected large sumslike a $1 million transfer in January 2024from buyers in Hong Kong and mainland China. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. The H100s, until recently Nvidia's flagship AI accelerators, require U.S. government approval before being sold to countries considered national security risks. Authorities claim the duo falsely labeled shipments as compliant, despite not having the green light from the Commerce Department. Nvidia, for its part, said it primarily works with trusted partners and that any diverted chips would lack service, updates, or support. Internal messages found on seized devices allegedly show the defendants discussing how to move restricted hardware through third countries, in what investigators believe was a deliberate attempt to circumvent U.S. controls. The case lands at a time when Washington is tightening the screws on China's access to cutting-edge semiconductors. While some headline chip deals grab attention, this case shows the U.S. is just as focused on backdoor smuggling by smaller players. One of the accused is a permanent U.S. resident, while the other is reportedly out of visa status. A judge has released Geng on bond, and a detention hearing for Yang is scheduled for August 12. If convicted, they could face up to 20 years in prison. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Nvidia Slams Backdoor Speculation Over AI Chips
Nvidia Slams Backdoor Speculation Over AI Chips

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nvidia Slams Backdoor Speculation Over AI Chips

Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) is firmly denying rumors that its chips contain secret backdoors or kill switches, calling the idea reckless and flat-out wrong. The company's response comes after China summoned the chipmaker last week over concerns tied to its H20 AI chips. In a blog post Tuesday, Nvidia said it has never embedded backdoors into its hardware and wouldn't, because it would be a gift to hackers and hostile actors. It warned that building in secret kill switches would not only be dangerous, but could erode global trust in U.S. tech. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. There's no such thing as a good' secret backdoor, Nvidia wrote. Single-point controls are a bad idea, and vulnerabilities should be fixed not created. The comments land just as U.S. lawmakers propose tighter controls on chip exports, including adding tech to verify chip locations. Nvidia's H20 shipments to China were recently greenlit under a limited export exemption, following a broader ban in April. Even though Nvidia says there are no backdoors or kill switches in its chips, Chinese regulators aren't totally convinced. They're worried those features might still be possible, at least in part. That puts Nvidia in a tough spot caught between Washington pushing for AI dominance and Beijing demanding full hardware transparency. The H20 chip, built to stay within U.S. export rules, has ended up right in the middle of that power struggle. In the high-stakes AI chip war, Nvidia is drawing a clear lineno hidden access, no kill switch, no compromises on trust. All eyes now turn to how U.S.-China tech relations evolve from here. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store