Barnard College settles suit brought by Jewish students, agreeing not to meet with anti-Israel group
The Manhattan college, an all-women's affiliate of Columbia University, will also establish a new Title VI coordinator to enforce against claims of discrimination. Beginning next semester, all students and staff will receive a message conveying a 'zero tolerance' policy for harassment of Jewish and Israeli students.
The settlement was announced in a joint statement by Barnard and lawyers for two Jewish advocacy groups, Students Against Antisemitism and StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice, who brought the lawsuit last February on behalf of some Jewish and Israeli students.
In the statement, Barnard's president, Laura Ann Rosenbury, said the agreement 'reflects our ongoing commitment to maintaining a campus that is safe, welcoming, and inclusive for all members of our community.'
The terms of the deal also drew immediate pushback from some students and faculty, who accused the university of capitulating to a legal strategy aimed at stifling legitimate pro-Palestinian activism on campus.
'This settlement appears to equate criticism of Israel with antisemitism,' said Nara Milanich, a Barnard history professor who is Jewish. 'That is a problem for critical thought and academic freedom.'
As part of the agreement, the college will adopt contentious federal guidance to 'consider' the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism and its examples, which include certain critiques of Israel.
A newly-appointed Title VI coordinator will oversee compliance with the policy and produce an annual report on antisemitism for university leaders.
Additionally, the university's leaders agreed not to recognize, meet or negotiate with Columbia University Apartheid Divest, the coalition behind last spring's student encampments. The group has called on both Columbia and Barnard to sever ties with companies that do business with Israel.
As part of the deal, the university will also affirm that its endowment will not be used for expressing political positions, including 'taking actions for the purpose of penalizing the government of a country or the commercial/financial activity within that country.'
The agreement follows a federal lawsuit brought last February that accused Barnard and Columbia of allowing Jewish and Israeli students to be 'bombarded' by antisemitism during protests that erupted against Israel's military campaign in Gaza.
The litigation against Columbia remains ongoing — though the university has already agreed to revamp its policies around protests, among other concessions made under threat from the Trump administration.
New York University and Harvard University have entered into their own legal settlements following lawsuits focused on antisemitism.
In the lawsuit against Columbia and Barnard, Jewish and Israeli students said they were subject to unchecked harassment during protests by 'mobs of pro-Hamas students and faculty.' Those who participated in the protests, including many Jewish students, have strongly disputed that characterization.
The lawsuit also claimed that students who served in Israel's military were singled out, with some left 'overwhelmed and unable to concentrate in class' after encountering signs accusing Israel of committing genocide and social media posts from fellow students.
Starting next semester, students will be reminded that they can be subject to discipline for off-campus conduct, including social media posts.
Barnard will also restrict where, when and how students can protest. And the university will ban face masks at demonstration used to 'intimidate or interfere with the enforcement' of school policies.
'Barnard's commitment to take meaningful actions to combat antisemitism demonstrates its leadership in the fight against antisemitism and upholding the rights of Jewish and Israeli students,' said Marc Kasowitz, an attorney for the plaintiffs. 'I encourage other colleges and universities to do the right thing and follow Barnard's lead.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ukraine believes Putin has just ‘one card left to play' in ceasefire talks – and it gives Kyiv an upper hand
Vladimir Putin has 'only one card' left to play - to prolong the killing in Ukraine, according to a senior source in Volodymyr Zelensky's presidential office as Europe conducts top level talks ahead of the Alaska summit this week. Zelensky has not been invited to Friday's meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. And there are deep concerns that the US president will emerge from the encounter taking an even harder line on Ukraine. Europe's leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer, have been corralling US officials and White House insiders, and are meeting virtually with the Oval Office to persuade Trump to use the leverage he has over Putin to get him to agree a ceasefire. 'The main thing for Putin is to try to trade land for ceasefires,' the source close to Zelensky told The Independent. 'The ability to kill and to prolong war is the only card Putin has. So, he's trying to play this card.' In February, Trump lost his temper with Zelensky, yelling at him that he didn't 'have the cards' in the conflict with Russia during an infamous press conference in the Oval Office. Now, Ukraine insists, it's Putin who has the weaker hand. Europe's leaders are trying to reinforce that message to Trump so that he feels confident threatening further economic sanctions against countries that import Russian oil - and even to renew arms shipments to Ukraine - to get Putin to suspend military operations. 'Trump does want to finish the killings, it's true, and he has the power to do it. So the question is for him how to do the right thing,' the Ukrainian presidential advisor said. So far Putin has said any ceasefire would have to come on the condition that Ukraine agrees to cede four provinces - Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia - to Russia along with the Crimea. He also wants Ukraine not to use any pause in the fighting to rearm. Ukraine has long agreed to a minimum 30-day unconditional ceasefire and insists that it is willing to discuss grounds for peace. As speculation mounts over what Friday's summit will achieve, Trump has already indicated that he agrees with Russia and that Ukraine should be prepared to agree 'land swaps' of Ukrainian territory. Europe, the UK and Ukraine have ruled out such concessions – especially as part of any deal struck between Russia and America without Ukraine present. Despite the fanfare over the meeting in Anchorage, the US actually has less power, and therefore influence over the outcome of talks, as a result of forcing Kyiv and Europe into taking on more of the burden of the defence of Ukraine. Trump cut all military aid to Ukraine earlier this year. The total US military spend there is €114 billion, which is dwarfed by the EU and UK's current pledged contribution standing at €250 billion. Ukraine's Nato allies now have to buy US weapons to supply Kyiv, but there are now signs that the US could ban that revenue stream. Russia has seen its second largest oil client, India, hit with a total of 50 per cent US tariffs. Twenty five per cent of that was imposed to get Putin to respond to Trump's ceasefire proposals. And if the US decided to open the taps of free military aid again it could tip the tactical balance rapidly in Ukraine's favour. The UK and Europe want Trump to spell this out to Putin. 'Zelensky supports the ceasefire,' the Ukrainian source said. 'The problem is that Putin rejects it and the majority of Ukrainians want to see peace, it's true, but at the same time the majority of Ukrainians reject Russian claims on the territory.'
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How Trump smashed Washington's economy
David is one of thousands of workers in Washington suddenly on the brink of unemployment. He earns more than $80,000 (£59,000) per year but has cut back on spending to save $600 per month. 'I've changed where I buy groceries,' says the 35-year-old. 'If someone's making plans to go out for dinner or go out for drinks, I avoid it.' In preparation for losing his job and potentially leaving the city for good, he recently handed in his notice on his $2,100-per-month rental contract. He is one of many making radical changes after Donald Trump's administration took an axe to the US capital's economy by slashing federal government jobs, funding and grants. The impact of these cuts has so far been delayed as laid-off employees worked through notice periods and severance packages. But unemployment is now beginning to surge, with city residents spending less and the property market coming under pressure. To strengthen his grip on Washington, the US president on Monday took a controversial step to deploy the National Guard as part of a crime purge, claiming the city has become 'overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals'. 'I will make our capital great again!' Trump declared. But away from the drama of the president's announcement, David's situation is emblematic of the fact that the city is teetering on the edge of a recession triggered by Trump's crackdown. In the last financial year, Washington's real GDP rose by 1.5pc. This is expected to fall to 0.9pc in 2025, according to Washington's office of the chief financial officer (Ofco), with a further 1.9pc drop the following year. After Trump re-entered the White House in January, it was Elon Musk who was tasked with slashing $1tn from the federal budget, brandishing a red chainsaw as he got to work. To date, the department of government efficiency (Doge), led by the Tesla billionaire before his falling out with Trump, has claimed savings of $199bn by pursuing mass sackings and offering voluntary redundancy to more than 154,000 federal employees. A strict hiring freeze has also been enforced, which allows only one replacement federal employee for every four that leave. It has also terminated billions of dollars' worth of government grants and contracts, such as all of those with the US agency for international development (USAID). Washington is bearing the biggest brunt of these cuts, with the federal government making up for a quarter (188,400) of all jobs in the city. Since December, the number of federal government workers claiming unemployment insurance in Washington has risen nearly 12 times over to hit 1,502 in July. Excluding short-lived surges during two government shutdowns, this was the highest level on record since 1993. As cuts continue, this number is only going to rise. The district's chief financial officer in February forecast 40,000 federal job losses by 2029. This means that more than a fifth of jobs (21pc) in the city's biggest employment sector will be lost. However, the government extends well beyond the Washington jobs market. A further 170,500 people are employed in professional and business services, which includes government contractors. Another 68,500 work in related services, such as many of the civic organisations that receive government funding. Lucy Dadayan, of the Urban Institute, says: 'The budget cuts aren't just affecting federal workers; there are cuts to grants for non-profits, for research funding, for local government, for health and education programmes. 'And all these cuts, both in jobs and spending have ripple effects that are leading to lay-offs in higher education and hospitals and think tanks and NGOs. 'That's important because a lot of them are heavily clustered in and around DC, and we are starting to see the impact of this in jobs and spending.' Data from Ofco show that Washington recorded a net year-on-year loss of 6,100 jobs in June. Of these, 4,700 were cut from federal government employment, while a further 2,200 disappeared from professional and business services. 'Usually we don't get drops as big as this unless it's a recession,' says Fitzroy Lee, the district's chief economist. Take David as an example. He is not employed by the federal government, but works in international development, a sector heavily reliant on foreign aid. A barrage of federal cuts has meant this sector is now suffering a major downturn, with David's contract soon set to expire. He beat nearly 100 applicants to land his current role and has two master's degrees. But in the last eight months, David has applied for 30 positions and has had no luck. The fact that he is from South America has made his employment status a growing problem, as his visa is tied to his job. When his contract ends, he will have 15 days to leave the country. 'So far this year, I can think of 25 people who I know who have had to leave like this,' he says. Washington's unemployment rate has climbed from 5.3pc at the start of the year to 5.9pc, well above the national average of 4.2pc. Dadayan says the rate could rise as high as 9pc in the next year as more funding cuts filter through. Fresh waves in unemployment are coming in September and another in December, says Yesim Sayin, executive director of the DC Policy Center. Crucially, those losing their jobs are often high earners, meaning they will inevitably be spending less across the local economy. 'There is a multiplier effect for all of those people in the orbit of the federal government,' says Lee. Analysis by ConsumerEdge shows that Washington residents are already cutting back on spending more than the average American. Nationally, residents of major cities cut their spending on restaurants by 4pc year-on-year in June, whereas the drop in Washington was 9pc. The knock-on effects are also showing up in the property market. The number of homes for sale in Washington has surged by nearly a fifth year-on-year, according to Bright MLS. Across the wider metro area, active listings are up by 41pc. However, this rise in supply is not being met by demand. Agreed sales across the metro area were down 1.7pc year-on-year, and properties are taking longer to be sold. This has also led to house price growth slowing to 1.6pc, the slowest rate in two years. Rental landlords also risk being burned as more people like David cancel their contracts. Capital Economics expects the value of managed rental apartments to fall by more than 5pc this year, making the city's rental market the worst-performing in the country. 'Without creating an environment that keeps the talent here, I think the city may kind of go back to the 1990s,' says Sayin. The US fell into a national recession in 1990 and 1991. But while the rest of the country recovered, Washington was then hit by sweeping federal government cuts under President Bill Clinton's 'Reinventing Government' initiative. Between 1993 and 1996, real wages in Washington fell by 7pc – a collective loss of $4bn in today's money according to DC's Ofco. Back then, many federal government jobs were eventually replaced with contractor roles, says Lee. But this time around, that seems unlikely. 'What is on DC's calling card? It's the government. If you take government out of DC, what do we end up with?' says Sayin. 'We lose the glue that holds everything together.'
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump eyes Ivanka for bizarre new White House gig despite her swearing off politics
President Trump reportedly wants his daughter to take on a bizarre new White House role despite her swearing off her involvement in politics. Ivanka Trump has remained steadily in the shadows of her father's orbit since his reelection for a second term last November. However, UFC CEO Dana White says Trump wants to get her involved with plans for a cage fight on the White House lawn. 'When [Trump] called me and asked me to do it, he said, 'I want Ivanka in the middle of this,'' White told CBS Mornings. 'So Ivanka reached out to me, and her and I started talking about the possibilities, where it would be and, you know, I put together all the renderings.' Ivanka has yet to comment on the idea, however she has sat cage-side with her father at multiple fights. White's relationship with the president dates back to the early 2000s, when Trump hosted some of the first-ever UFC events at his exclusive properties. He confirmed to CBS that talks took place with the president Monday night, announcing that the fight would be held on July 4, 2026. Trump, who has attended several UFC fights, said the event would be one of many celebratory acts to unfold to mark 250 years since the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Ivanka's potential involvement would mark a significant return following a three-year hiatus, during which she has appeared to prioritize her two children and husband, Jared Kushner. 'I love my father very much. This time around, I am choosing to prioritize my young children and the private life we are creating as a family. I do not plan to be involved in politics,' she stated in a 2022 social media post after she confessed she 'hates' politics. The mother-of-three and Kushner played a central role in Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. Both were made advisors to Trump when he took over the White House in 2017. However, following Trump's tumultuous 2020 presidential election and the infamous Capitol Hill riots, Ivanka opted to sit out on his second run.
