logo
Elections in Bangladesh announced, but justice and reforms remain centre stage

Elections in Bangladesh announced, but justice and reforms remain centre stage

Indian Express3 hours ago

The biggest takeaway from the televised pre-Eid speech of Muhammad Yunus must have been a concrete timeframe for when Bangladesh will hold elections. Bangladesh's 10-month-old transitional government — constituted after the July Monsoon Revolution last year — has decided to hold general elections in the first half of April 2026, thereby paving the way for a democratic transition. As we understand, the country's reconstituted Election Commission will announce a specific polling date and roadmap in the run-up to the polls.
The announcement has definitely rekindled hope that over 120 million voters will finally be able to exercise their right to vote after years, following sham elections under the now-deposed Sheikh Hasina. The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), which had ruled the country four times earlier and sees the current tide in its favour to make it five, is not happy with the election timeline offered by the transitional government. It still insists on holding the election by the end of this year (December 2025). Other key political stakeholders are somewhat content with the April 2026 timeline.
But the biggest question on the minds of the average Bangladeshi now is: Was the July Revolution only about holding an election? Or was it something more than that? Wasn't it an aspiration to live in a Bangladesh where rules are justice-based and critical democratic reform agendas are rightly pushed through?
In fact, Yunus rightly tried to address those concerns, reflecting on issues that go beyond the immediate agenda of holding an election. If not more, he is equally interested in seizing this post-July Revolution window of opportunity to push through critical reforms that would have lasting impacts on the country's future democratic adherence. Through his latest speech addressing the nation, his transitional government made it unequivocally clear that it would ensure justice for enforced disappearances and the suppression of dissent during Hasina's rule.
It is to the credit of the Yunus-led government that it has largely managed to enjoy public trust in its resolve to focus on three things before transferring power to an elected government. These, essentially, are justice, reforms, and elections. The Yunus-led transitional government has the mandate of thousands of young revolutionaries who either sacrificed their lives or endured the brutal force unleashed by the regime during July–August last year. The injured and the comrades of those who lost their lives would not allow the transitional government to get away with merely holding an election, without advancing the causes of justice.
In his address, Yunus mentioned that, so far, over 800 people have taken part in public hearings held on hundreds of incidents of enforced disappearances. Injustices, including the fabrication of cases and corruption, are all being addressed as the current government proceeds with a judicial process to try Sheikh Hasina and many of her associates for these offences.
His government wants to introduce a July Declaration, imbued with the spirit and aspirations of last year's Monsoon Revolution, in which all parties would make a formal commitment that, whoever comes to power next, will endorse the minimum agreed-upon reform agendas in the first session of the new elected parliament. Yunus has also expressed his firm resolve not to leave everything to the next government, adding that the interim government has already implemented 129 reform proposals across 54 ministries.
What Yunus and his team essentially want is to ensure that this reform momentum does not lose steam with the departure of the transitional government after the April 2026 election. After all, the people of Bangladesh, irrespective of party affiliations, by and large prioritise the idea of justice, reform, and elections above all else.
The writer is the acting editor of the Dhaka Tribune

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-prez Hamid returns to Bangladesh after medical treatment abroad: Reports
Ex-prez Hamid returns to Bangladesh after medical treatment abroad: Reports

The Print

timean hour ago

  • The Print

Ex-prez Hamid returns to Bangladesh after medical treatment abroad: Reports

Hamid's departure for Thailand on May 8 prompted a protest by the student group Students Against Discrimination (SAD) as he was allowed to leave the country despite being accused in a murder case. The 81-year-old, who served two terms as president during deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina's Awami League regime, arrived at the Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport around 1:45 am, news portal Prothom Alo reported. Dhaka, Jun 9 (PTI) Bangladesh's former president Abdul Hamid returned to the country on Monday after receiving medical treatment abroad, according to media reports. Upon his arrival, Hamid was accompanied by his son and brother-in-law, the Dhaka Tribune newspaper reported. He was brought down from the aircraft in a wheelchair, the report said, quoting airport authorities. Earlier, Bangladeshi authorities promised punitive actions against officials who let the former head of state leave the country. Authorities also suspended two police officers and withdrew another from his assignment in airport immigration on charges of 'negligence of duty'. PTI GRS GRS GRS This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

From Defeat To Denial: Rahul Gandhi's Misdirected War On Democracy
From Defeat To Denial: Rahul Gandhi's Misdirected War On Democracy

News18

time2 hours ago

  • News18

From Defeat To Denial: Rahul Gandhi's Misdirected War On Democracy

Last Updated: Democracy demands robust opposition, not reckless obstruction. Rahul Gandhi's article, if anything, is a manual on how not to lose gracefully Rahul Gandhi wrote a piece titled Match-Fixing Maharashtra on June 7, 2025, in The Indian Express, which caught my attention. This article, riddled with speculative accusations and selective facts, demanded a serious response, not because it was grounded in democratic concern, but because it was laced with contempt for constitutional institutions. Gandhi's allegations, already covered by the Election Commission in extensive detail, deserve critical scrutiny. Not for the sake of rebutting every unfounded claim, but to highlight a dangerous trend: persistent delegitimisation of India's democratic architecture to cover political inadequacy. The Article That Confuses, Not Convinces The central motif of Rahul Gandhi's article is clear: if he cannot win electorally, the system must be rigged. This isn't new. When institutions don't echo his voice, he brands them as compromised. It is the same philosophy that fuels his campaign against the judiciary, the Election Commission, and even the growing voter base. His article, while camouflaged as a democratic concern, plays into the narrative of confusion and distrust. It is a textbook case of the fallacy: if you can't convince them, confuse them. In his haste to cry foul over the Maharashtra Assembly elections, Gandhi overlooked facts already on public record. These facts, when properly understood, dismantle his claims and show that nothing extraordinary occurred except perhaps the electorate's rejection of his politics. Myth 1: Match-Fixing Elections Rahul Gandhi's use of the term 'match-fixing" is not only irresponsible, it is inflammatory. By insinuating that elections were rigged without substantiating those claims with legally admissible evidence, he undermined the very institutions that uphold democracy. The Election Commission had, in fact, already addressed the concerns raised. Gandhi's article made no mention of the 60-page letter dated December 24, 2024, sent to his party's legal representative, which responded to all allegations with data. Moreover, the consistent participation of the opposition in the electoral process, from campaigning to counting, negates the idea of match-fixing. Elections are conducted under the vigilant eyes of polling agents, observers, and the media. Suggesting manipulation without credible proof is not dissent, it's disruption. Myth 2: Bogus Voters Gandhi's next point, voter roll inflation, is neither new nor unique to Maharashtra. He finds suspicious the increase of 31 lakh voters in five years and 41 lakh in five months. But these figures fall well within historical trends. Between 2004 and 2009, 1 crore voters were added; between 2014 and 2019, 63 lakh more were enrolled. In 2024, 40.8 lakh new voters were added, including 26.4 lakh young voters, a logical rise given India's demographic dynamics. Accusing these voters of being bogus is not only defamatory, it is also dismissive of youth participation in democracy. Instead of encouraging voter engagement, Gandhi's statements cast aspersions on millions of first-time voters. That is not a critique; it is contempt. Myth 3: Last-Hour Voting Surge Gandhi claimed that a suspicious voting surge occurred in the last hour of polling, suggesting manipulation. But here's the reality: the average polling rate throughout the day was 5.83 per cent per hour. A spike to 7.83 per cent in the last hour is within the bounds of statistical probability, especially since voters present at the booth by 6 pm are legally entitled to vote. This isn't peculiar to Maharashtra. In the second phase of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, a 5.75 per cent increase was recorded after 5 pm. Why was this not a problem then? Because the Congress won those seats. What Rahul Gandhi calls an 'issue" arises only when the outcome doesn't suit him. Myth 4: Constituency-Level Fixing Rahul Gandhi cherry-picked 12,000 polling stations across 85 constituencies to claim targeted rigging. But if you look deeper, you find a more nuanced reality. In constituencies like Madha, Wani, and Shrirampur, which showed voter surges, candidates from Sharad Pawar's NCP, Uddhav Thackeray's Shiv Sena, and the Congress itself won. Hence, the data doesn't support his hypothesis that a high last-hour turnout favoured only the BJP-led NDA. The selective use of constituency data is a classic case of misdirection. It is not the data that's flawed, it's the analysis, or rather, the lack of it. Myth 5: ECI's Complicity Perhaps the most alarming of all Gandhi's claims is that the Election Commission of India is compromised. Ironically, it was the Congress-led government that, until 2024, unilaterally appointed Chief Election Commissioners. Under Modi, a new committee involving the Leader of the Opposition was constituted as a democratic upgrade. Rahul Gandhi's angst seems to lie in the very democratisation of a process his party previously monopolised. In his world, reform is acceptable only if it serves the Congress party. Anything else is betrayal. Politics Of Perpetual Excuses Rahul Gandhi has, once again, chosen the easier path of blaming systems instead of introspecting on failures. He questions the mandate because he failed to secure it. But elections are not won by slogans or marches; they are won by connection, credibility, and conviction. His refusal to accept defeat gracefully and to instead vilify every institution that upholds our democracy is dangerous. This is not leadership; it is a tantrum disguised as a revolution. Conclusion: From Fiction To Fact Democracy demands robust opposition, not reckless obstruction. Rahul Gandhi's article, if anything, is a manual on how not to lose gracefully. While he fashions himself as a defender of democracy, his words serve only to degrade it. It is time Rahul Gandhi respects the people's verdict instead of mocking it. And if he wants to be taken seriously as a political leader, he must rise above rhetorical sabotage and begin the difficult journey of real introspection. Until then, his speeches and writings will continue to sound less like statesmanship and more like sour grapes. The writer is a technocrat, political analyst, and author. He pens national, geopolitical, and social issues. His social media handle is @prosenjitnth. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. About the Author Prosenjit Nath The writer is an Indian technocrat, political analyst, and author. tags : election commission Maharashtra elections Rahul Gandhi Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 09, 2025, 13:52 IST News opinion Opinion | From Defeat To Denial: Rahul Gandhi's Misdirected War On Democracy

Bangladesh anti-Sheikh Hasina student protester Newton Das found to be Bengal voter
Bangladesh anti-Sheikh Hasina student protester Newton Das found to be Bengal voter

Scroll.in

time3 hours ago

  • Scroll.in

Bangladesh anti-Sheikh Hasina student protester Newton Das found to be Bengal voter

A man allegedly linked to the 2024 students' protests in Bangladesh was found to be a voter in West Bengal's Kakdwip Assembly constituency, The Hindu reported on Sunday. Several images of the man, identified as Newton Das, participating in the agitation in the neighbouring country were widely shared on social media. Das has claimed that he was an Indian citizen but acknowledged that he had actively participated in the protests in Bangladesh, The Hindu reported. 'I went to Bangladesh in 2024 for issues related to an ancestral property and got caught in the revolution,' The Hindu quoted Newton Das as saying in a video. 'I have been a voter in Kakdwip since 2014 but lost my voter card in 2017.' Newton Das said that he had received a fresh voter card in 2018 with the help of Trinamool Congress MLA Manturam Pakhira. He also claimed that he had voted for Pakhira, who represents Kakdwip, in the 2016 Assembly polls, The Hindu reported. The constituency is in South 24 Parganas district. 'This is a conspiracy against me by a particular community,' India Today quoted Newton Das as saying in the video. He did not specify whether he was currently in India or Bangladesh. His cousin Tapan Das, who resides in Kakdwip, claimed that Newton Das was born in Bangladesh and had exercised voting rights in both countries, The Hindu reported. Tapan Das claimed that his cousin had gone to Bangladesh after the Covid-19 pandemic to sell land and had not returned. 'Since he was born in Bangladesh, he is a voter of Bangladesh too,' The Hindu quoted Tapan Das as saying. 'It is his fault that he is registered as a voter in both the countries.' Kakdwip is close to the Sundarbans and India's border with Bangladesh. Political row The incident sparked a political row in the state. The Bharatiya Janata Party's West Bengal unit on Sunday criticised West Bengal's ruling Trinamool Congress claiming that a ' Bangladeshi protester ' was voting in both countries. 'Let that sink in,' the Hindutva party said on social media. 'This isn't an accident. This is the TMC blueprint – flood Bengal's voter rolls with illegal infiltrators and secure elections with ghost votes.' West Bengal 'isn't just lawless – it's compromised from within', the BJP claimed. BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari claimed that lakhs of Bangladesh citizens were registered as voters in the state, The Hindu reported. The Opposition leader claimed that an alleged member of Bangladeshi militant group Ansarullah Bangla was also enlisted as a voter in Murshidabad. West Bengal BJP chief Sukanta Majumdar on Saturday described the incident as an example of the 'so-called Egiye [progressive] Bangla Model'. 'The same Newton who was seen wielding a stick during Bangladesh's quota reform movement is now a registered voter in Kakdwip,' the BJP leader said on social media. 'Thousands of Bangladeshi 'Newtons' voting in Bengal – courtesy of [Chief Minister] Mamata Banerjee's infiltration theory and appeasement politics,' he alleged. 'With illegal voters and these lathi-wielders miscreants as her support base, she's not running West Bengal… she's scripting a blueprint for Greater Bangladesh.' The Trinamool Congress rejected the BJP's allegations and said that the responsibility for border security was with the Border Security Force, India Today reported. The Border Security Force reports to the Union home ministry. 'Whether these people come from land, water or air, the BSF and Union government are responsible,' The Hindu quoted Trinamool leader Kunal Ghosh as saying. 'The state administration will do its role for sure.' The state's ruling party also claimed that the Election Commission was complicit in voter list tampering. In February, Banerjee had accused the BJP of allegedly attempting to add residents of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Punjab and Haryana to West Bengal's voter lists. The chief minister had also accused the BJP of adding fake voters to electoral lists to win the Assembly elections in Delhi and Maharashtra. In 2024, weeks of widespread student-led protests in Bangladesh against Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League government had led to her resignation and her fleeing to India on August 5. In August, weeks of student-led protests in Bangladesh against a controversial quota scheme for government jobs snowballed into a broader agitation against the Sheikh Hasina government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store