Washington state's school funding crisis is far from over
The comedown from the sugar high of stimulus money has hit rural districts especially hard. During the pandemic, Kennewick, Pasco and Richland school districts received more than $137 million in one-time COVID relief. They used that money to fund programs like online learning academies and mental health services, knowing full well they'd have to make cuts without continued assistance.
The problem isn't unique to this region, but districts in wealthy areas around Seattle can more easily pass levies to supplement inadequate state funding. Their larger property tax bases mean they can keep rates lower, too.
Rural school districts must convince reluctant voters to approve higher rates. The Finley School District, for example, needed two tries to pass a recent operations levy and still will have to slash its budget.
This creates an inherently inequitable system in which educational opportunities depend on ZIP codes — a situation that violates both the spirit and letter of the state's constitutional obligation to educate kids.
Rankings by the State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction found that more than half of Mid-Columbia districts are below the state average for financial health. Pasco, Finley, Kiona-Benton City, Prosser and Richland all scored poorly. Kennewick, Columbia-Burbank and North Franklin fared better.
Things could get worse. The Trump administration has threatened to suspend funding for schools that do not conform to White House edicts on race, ethnicity and gender. Washington has staked out positions in support of marginalized groups that run counter to those demands.
The state constitution explicitly declares education to be the state's 'paramount duty,' a responsibility the state Supreme Court reinforced in its landmark McCleary decision. Despite state investment, many school districts face widespread cuts that will directly impact student learning because the state's approach to education funding is fundamentally flawed.
Washington's school funding as a percentage of the state's general fund peaked in 2019 at more than 50%. Since then, it has fallen to about 43%. Meanwhile, operational costs for districts have skyrocketed, with liability insurance up nearly 50% and utilities increasing more than 30% since 2019.
When costs increase and state funding does not keep pace, the effects land hardest on less-wealthy, often rural, districts. It will not be enough for lawmakers to come up with more money. They must find ways to equitably distribute the resources to help school districts that most need it.
The Legislature took a step forward this session by passing Senate Bill 5263 to eliminate the special education funding cap, but that measure falls short of addressing the comprehensive funding needs of schools. The House and Senate compromised on approximately $870 million in additional special education funding over the next two budgets — significantly less than the $2 billion initially proposed by the Senate.
With the 2025 legislative session over, additional state help will not be immediately forthcoming. Hopefully, lawmakers will listen to local school districts in the months to come and understand that they must do more to address the structural flaws in school funding.
Fully funding every Washington school is not merely a policy preference but a moral and legal imperative. The consequences of inaction extend far beyond classroom walls.
Inadequate school funding today means a less-prepared workforce tomorrow, reduced economic competitiveness, and greater social costs for our entire state. Washington's economic future depends on ensuring all students receive high-quality education. This isn't a partisan issue.
The Legislature must stop applying bandages to a system that requires major surgery. It won't be easy. Lawmakers and the governor are coming off a session in which they had to deal with a revenue shortfall.
There wasn't enough money to pay for everything the Legislature wanted. Spending cuts and tax increases ensued.
Moving from one crisis through a period of relative calm to the next crisis is not enough.
Washington needs a wholesale reconstruction of how it reliably funds schools to ensure that all students, regardless of where they live, receive the high-quality education that is their constitutional right.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Perplexity AI offers $34.5bn to acquire Google Chrome
AI-powered search engine Perplexity AI has made an unsolicited offer of $34.5bn to acquire Alphabet's Chrome browser. Perplexity's CEO, Aravind Srinivas, is known for aggressive acquisition strategies, as evidenced by the company's previous offer for TikTok US. Tech industry's giants such as OpenAI and Yahoo, alongside Apollo Global Management, are also showing interest in Chrome. Alphabet is yet to respond to the bid, and Chrome is not currently up for sale. The technology conglomerate plans to appeal a US court ruling that found it held an unlawful monopoly in online search. The Justice Department's case against Google includes a potential Chrome divestiture as a remedy, which could influence the outcome of Perplexity's offer. Despite not disclosing its funding plan, Perplexity has raised approximately $1bn from investors including Nvidia and SoftBank. The company claims that multiple funds are ready to finance the deal in full. Perplexity's proposal, which notably lacks an equity component, aims to maintain user choice and address future competition concerns. However; analysts are sceptical about Google's willingness to part with Chrome, considering its strategic importance to the company's AI initiatives, according to Reuters. The legal landscape also presents challenges, with a federal ruling on the Google search antitrust case expected soon. Perplexity, with its own AI browser Comet, aims to harness Chrome's more than three billion users to strengthen its position against larger competitors. The company has committed to keeping Chrome's underlying code, Chromium, open source and plans to invest $3bn over two years while maintaining Chrome's default search engine, as per a term sheet seen by Reuters. In July 2025, Perplexity AI obtained new funding, bringing its valuation to $18bn. The company secured $100m in fresh capital as an extension of a previous round. "Perplexity AI offers $34.5bn to acquire Google Chrome" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pritzker, Klobuchar, Gallego flock to NH: Are they considering a run for president 2028?
Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Arizona, is set to visit New Hampshire Aug. 22, becoming the latest high-profile politician to fuel 2028 presidential race speculation by making a stop in the Granite State. "I'll be on the ground in New Hampshire... taking on the GOP's billionaire agenda and standing up for working families," Gallego, who was elected to the Senate last fall, said in a July 29 post on X. He follows Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who in April caught attention for delivering a searing speech in New Hampshire aimed at 'do-nothing' Democrats, and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., who in July campaigned for U.S. Senate candidate Chris Pappas. (Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., also visited New Hampshire in July, but then announced her run for South Carolina governor.) They join about a dozen Democratic politicians who have already begun to make moves seemingly towards a 2028 run. Former U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg spoke about existential questions facing Democrats and the country at a veterans-focused forum in Iowa in May, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Kentucky Gov Andy Beshear, and Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., have all trekked through South Carolina. Gallego's New Hampshire visit comes after he toured the Iowa State Fairgrounds on Aug. 8. He has also already visited states like Pennsylvania and Alaska. Gallego and other hopefuls are still being cagey about their intentions. (Gallego said it was "too early" to talk about 2028 in Iowa.) But they are 'testing the waters,' said Andy Smith, the Director of the University of New Hampshire Survey Center. 'And that doesn't mean the Atlantic,' said Smith. 'They're kind of brushing up their reasons to why they should be president, or should consider a run for president, and then trying those arguments out against people here in the state to go out and win an election.' Smith said that candidates often start visiting New Hampshire up to six years before the election year they're aiming for. Rather than trying to win votes, however, Smith said that the politicians are coming to the state to win the support of the people in the state that run campaigns. In New Hampshire, that would be people like Ray Buckley, the Chair of the New Hampshire Democratic Party. 'They're more likely not to try to make their events open to the public widely, because, frankly, they're not pros at this yet,' Smith said. 'This is also a chance for candidates to come up here and try out their message with some small groups of voters and work on the stuff to make it better.' According to WMUR, Gallego is expected to make a Politics & Eggs address to the New England Council, join a town hall with U.S. Rep. Maggie Goodlander and stop at a fundraiser for U.S. Rep. Chris Pappas, who is running for U.S. Senate. New Hampshire should expect to see many more candidates in the months to come, Smith said. An open primary in 2028, on both sides The shadow campaign is leading up to a race that some political observers believe will be among the Democratic party's most consequential presidential primaries in decades. It comes at a time when the 'party's brand is in the toilet,' Matthew Dallek, a historian and professor of political management at George Washington University, told USA TODAY. The party is facing abysmal approval ratings, and the only way to improve it, said Dallek, is through the next presidential nominee. "The stakes, in that sense, are higher,' Dallek said. 'It's not just the presidency. It's not just the nomination. There's a sense among Democrats that they need to do this, and there's a big debate." With no real front runner on either side, Smith expects many Democratic and Republican candidates to join the fray. It will be a far cry from the 2024 race, when former President Joe Biden, former Vice President Kamala Harris and President Donald Trump froze out most Democratic and Republican candidates. While some have said that Vice President JD Vance appears to be the heir apparent to Trump on the Republican side, Smith cautions that line of thinking. He pointed to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who was doing well in the 2024 polls early on but whose message didn't resonate with New Hampshire voters. 'You got to try yourself out on the road and see what voters actually think of you too, and also what the politicos, the people that have run campaigns, tell you whether or not you got a chance or not,' Smith said. 'Pretty evident when somebody comes up and tries to run campaign that may work for them in a different state or in a different environment, they come up to New Hampshire and try to use the same language that just crashes and burns.' Will NH be first in the nation again? Smith thinks it's likely that New Hampshire's first-in-the-nation primary status will be returned to the state in 2028. In 2024, the Democratic National Committee announced that South Carolina would be the first state to vote instead of New Hampshire to have a more diverse state lead the way. However, New Hampshire refused to break tradition and held an unsanctioned primary (before South Carolina's primary) where President Joe Biden's name was absent from the ballot. But through a write-in effort led by Democrats in the state, Biden won anyways, garnering almost 64% of the vote. Smith said that Biden dropping out of the race later in the year gives New Hampshire Democrats a case to argue that if Biden had run in a real primary in New Hampshire like usual, there may have been a different outcome. Contributing: Phillip M. Bailey This article originally appeared on Portsmouth Herald: Presidential hopefuls flock to NH: Are they eyeing a 2028 run?


CBS News
8 minutes ago
- CBS News
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission holding public hearings about Pittsburgh Water rate increase proposals
Two public hearings are being held today where people can weigh in about proposed rate increases for Pittsburgh Water. Pittsburgh Water submitted a rate increase request with the state Public Utility Commission in early June, aiming to increase revenues by more than $84 million over two years. Under the proposed rate increases, if you currently pay around $100 per month, your bill would increase to over $123 in 2026 and over $135 in 2027. Customers with bill discounts would see around an 11% increase in 2026 and around a 10% increase in 2027. The increases would be about 23.5% and 16% for commercial customers. Pittsburgh Water says the rate increase requests are for water, wastewater, and stormwater system improvements and that they allow it to build on things it's already accomplishing. Pittsburgh Water has already removed 13,000 lead service lines and says it's on track to have all lead lines in its system replaced by 2027. The Public Utility Commission says it will review the rate increase proposal and make a final decision. For more information about how to register and join the public hearings, click here.