MoneyHub Unveils The Fleeced Kiwi Awards: Exposing New Zealand's Worst Financial Rip-Offs
Auckland, NZ – 1 June 2025 – MoneyHub today launches the inaugural Fleeced Kiwi Awards 2025, affectionately dubbed The Fleecys, a bold initiative to expose and shame the most egregious financial rip-offs plaguing New Zealanders. From sneaky surcharges to predatory scams, The Fleecys spotlight practices that drain wallets and betray trust, demanding accountability and reform in a cost-of-living crisis.
Since 2018, MoneyHub has saved Kiwis millions by advocating for fairer financial products. Now, The Fleecys turn up the heat, naming and shaming the worst offenders in 2025.
'New Zealanders deserve a financial system that rewards trust, not exploits it,' says Christopher Walsh, MoneyHub's Head of Research. 'The Fleecys are our rallying cry to expose rip-offs—like a $10.50 ATM fee for a $20 withdrawal or $2.3 billion lost to scams on Meta's platforms—and spark a movement for fairness.'
The 2025 Fleecys Winners: A Roll Call of Rip-Offs
The Fleecys call out six practices that fleece Kiwis with hidden costs, deceptive tactics, and unchecked scams:
Debit and Credit Card Surcharges, including PayWave – For slapping 1–3% fees on everyday transactions, turning a $100 restaurant bill into $102.50. 'Paying extra just to tap your card is a rort,' Walsh fumes. 'Shops must show fees upfront, and regulators need to outlaw these wallet-draining tricks.'
Extended Warranties – For pushing $200+ add-ons on a $1,000 TV, duplicating free protections under the Consumer Guarantees Act (CGA). 'Retailers scare Kiwis into buying peace of mind they already have,' says Walsh. 'Know your CGA rights and save your money.'
Ticketing Fees – For ambushing fans with 8% 'booking' and 'service' fees, inflating a $200 concert ticket to $218+. 'Fans deserve transparent pricing for the events they love,' Walsh insists. 'These fees should be outlawed.'
Administration Fee on Road User Charges (RUC) for Electric Vehicles – For charging EV drivers $12.44 to print a sticker, a 16% markup on a $76 eco-friendly commute. 'This fee is a tax on a tax,' Walsh argues. 'NZTA must modernise RUC to stop fleecing green drivers.'
Private ATM Fees – For extortionate charges like $10.50 to withdraw $20, a 52.5% markup. Walsh recounts a personal sting: 'Stranded in Kapiti, I paid $10.50 for $30 cash to catch a bus. That's not an error—it's a rip-off. Operators must lower fees to $2–3.'
Meta Platforms – For profiting from scam ads on Facebook and Instagram, costing Kiwis $200 million to $2.3 billion annually. 'Meta's inaction is a scandal,' Walsh declares. 'They must verify advertisers like in Australia to protect vulnerable Kiwis from financial ruin.'
A Movement for Change
The Fleecys aren't just about naming names—they're a call to action. MoneyHub invites Kiwis to nominate 2026 candidates, share stories with #FleecedKiwiAwards, and report rip-offs anonymously via their secure form. 'Every nomination fuels our fight for a fairer New Zealand,' says Walsh. 'Together, we can force businesses to prioritise transparency and value.'
The awards highlight systemic issues, from redundant warranties to scams devastating pensioners, like a Taranaki retiree who lost $220,000 to a Facebook crypto ad. 'These aren't inconveniences—they're obstacles to financial stability,' Walsh notes. 'In a cost-of-living crisis, every dollar counts. The Fleecys empower Kiwis to fight back with knowledge, like checking CGA protections or reporting scam ads.'
Why The Fleecys Matter
With living costs squeezing households, The Fleecys expose practices that hit hardest when budgets are tight. 'A dairy charging 40 cents for a debit tap or an 8% fee on a family's concert tickets isn't just annoying—it's a betrayal of fairness,' says Walsh. MoneyHub's research, backed by Commerce Commission guidelines and Netsafe data, ensures The Fleecys target widespread, evidence-based rip-offs.
Looking ahead, MoneyHub is developing resources to tackle supermarket pricing, a complex issue warranting deeper scrutiny. 'We're committed to transparency at the checkout and beyond,' Walsh promises. 'The Fleecys are a stand against complacency, driving honest conversations between consumers, businesses, and regulators.'
Join the Fight
Kiwis can shape the 2026 Fleecys by emailing nominations, posting on social media, or submitting anonymous tips. Monthly reviews will culminate in updates by mid-2026. 'Financial literacy is power,' Walsh concludes. 'By exposing The Fleecys, we're arming New Zealanders to reclaim control and build a financial system that works for everyone.'
10 Things to Do Differently with Money in 2025 and 20 Supermarket Ripoffs.
About MoneyHub:
Since 2018, MoneyHub has empowered New Zealanders with guides and tools to save millions through fairer financial products. The Fleeced Kiwi Awards continue this mission, exposing rip-offs and advocating for a transparent, consumer-focused financial landscape.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
When The Privatising Rubber Hits The Climate Change Denial Roads
First a disclosure. I'm the co-owner of a plug-in hybrid car. It cost in the vicinity of $20,000 more than if it had been completely petrol fuelled. A key factor in the purchase decision was to make a small contribution to reducing carbon emissions. Then along came the National-ACT-NZ First coalition government's decision to introduce road user charges (RUCs) for fully electric and hybrid vehicles. It felt like a kick in the teeth to those trying to do their bit for reducing climate change driven carbon emissions. Not just because of this decision, it has become obvious that this is a government that resides within a spectrum between climate change indifference and climate denial. Roads is one of the big areas where this indifference is being played out in real time. But now, following the Government's announcement by Minister of Transport Chris Bishop to replace the petrol tax with road user changes for all vehicles, privatisation is being used to strengthen the Government's 'journey of travel'. On 6 August two helpful explanatory articles spelt out the details of the announcement. One was by James Ensor in the NZ Herald (6 August): Road user changes for all. The other was Bridie Witton in The Post (6 August): Petrol tax replaced by RUCs. In his announcement Minister Bishop called it 'the biggest change to how we fund our roading network in 50 years'. He argued that the 'surge' in fuel-efficient, hybrid and full electric vehicles had eroded the longstanding connection between petrol consumption and kilometres driven. He received 'cheer leader' support from Stuff Political Editor, and a former leading player in the rightwing NZ Initiative thinktank, Luke Malpass in his paywalled article arguing that the decision would bring the country into the 21st century; The Post (7 August): Cheerleader support. There was also strong support from the NZ Initiative's chief economist Eric Crampton who drills down further in a considered Newsroom column (12 August): Better transport funding. Although I disagree with his approach to the issue, I readily acknowledge that it is thoughtful and considered. The announcement Chris Bishop expects the legislation to pass in 2026, with the system becoming operational by 2027. In summary the announced decision involves Scrapping fuel excise duty and move all vehicles to a RUCs system. Charges would be based on distance travelled, vehicle type, time and location. In the name of 'modernisation' the current RUCs paper 'labels on windscreen' system would be replaced by a fully digital e-RUC system. The New Zealand Transport Authority's (Waka Kotahi) dual role as both regulator and RUC retailer will be split with NZTA losing the latter role. Private firms taking over the collection and administration of RUCs charges (the above former role). Distinguishing facts from political fiction Following the initial coverage of the Transport Minister's announcement, Bridie Witton wrote a second cautionary piece casting doubt on the claimed benefits. Published on 8 August in The Post she suggested that most vehicle owners might not benefit: Most vehicle owners unlikely to come out ahead. Witton's piece included Professor Simon Kingham, former chief science adviser to the Ministry of Transport, observing said the new system would to be more expensive to operate. Consequently, the increased costs had to come from somewhere. Kingham, as reported by Witton, explained that: This was because every car would need a transponder or some kind of digital device to track road use and report the data back, potentially to an app, for the easy digital payment Bishop envisioned. He noted the Government's roading ambitions cost more than it was raising in revenue, adding that it wasn't certain whether the Government planned to pass the new costs on to consumers or offset it through taxes. Bishop has confirmed it will bring in more revenue, which suggests people will pay more. Kingham also warned that a distance- and weight-based system could disincentivise people from moving to fuel-efficient vehicles. 'It will be relatively more expensive in fuel-efficient cars, and relatively more cheaper in gas-guzzling cars. If it's entirely based on distance, then everybody pays the same.' He said there was potential for more sophisticated pricing, such as charging more around schools or at peak times, but that could mean every driver has a tracking device in their car, which he said was 'moving into 'Big Brother' territory'. Dropping the fuel tax also made it less attractive for people to transition to electric vehicles, he added. Ideologically driven privatisation Just as Christopher Luxon's government has become increasingly known for its indifference to (and among some, especially NZ First, denial of) climate change, it also has become increasingly known for its ideological preference for privatising functions of public utilities. I have discussed the latter in the context of outsourcing planned surgery which would normally be undertaken by public hospitals. See my Newsroom columns (12 March and 16 June respectively): Increased risk and Follow the money. Also see my health systems blog Otaihanga Second Opinion (14 July): Who benefits. Under the PR guise of 'modernisation' private firms are to take over from NZTA the collection and administration of road user charges. This is based on the simplistic ideological assertion that this will drive innovation and reduce compliance costs by allowing the market to offer high-tech solutions, such as integrations with in-car computers. In Chris Bishop's words: Instead of expanding a clunky government system, we will reform the rules to allow the market to deliver innovative, user-friendly services for drivers. Embellished nonsense! As a reluctant user of NZTA's current system of managing RUCs payments I find it straightforward and efficient. Eric Crampton expresses a similar view in his above-mentioned article. No reason is given as to why NZTA itself could not be allowed to implement the proposed new system efficiently and effectively as private firms might be able to. There is every reason to believe that it could. There is a strong addiction within the government to privatising public utilities. Arguably the most addicted is ACT leader and Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour. This addiction extends to privatising tax collection of RUCs. The biggest beneficiaries will be the private corporates who take their cut to gather the tax. Why should this not surprise anyone! Ian Powell Otaihanga Second Opinion is a regular health systems blog in New Zealand. Ian Powell is the editor of the health systems blog 'Otaihanga Second Opinion.' He is also a columnist for New Zealand Doctor, occasional columnist for the Sunday Star Times, and contributor to the Victoria University hosted Democracy Project. For over 30 years , until December 2019, he was the Executive Director of Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, the union representing senior doctors and dentists in New Zealand.
NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Consumer debt dips to $14.5b but 470,000 Kiwis are behind on payments
'What we've noticed is that consumer arrears across all sectors, retail, energy, banking, credit card, buy now pay later, it's about 470,000 New Zealanders who are currently in arrears,' McLaughlin said. 'But over the last 12 months, that's stabilised at around about that level. We really saw a spike going back a couple of years ago where every year defaults and insolvencies climbed.' Consumer arrears vary across the country according to the latest Centrix Credit Indicator Report, with arrears higher in the North Island compared to the South Island. Tasman District had the lowest level of consumers in arrears at 8.2%, while Wairoa District had the highest at 18.12%. McLaughlin said although past weather events like Cyclone Gabrielle and flooding are factors, he thinks the uplift in the primary industries and the closure of manufacturing businesses are central to the change. A high milk price payout to dairy farmers has bolstered the rural economy. 'The first payments tend to go back to the lenders, back to the banks, because they're carrying a fair bit of debt over the period. 'The second lot went to the IRD and I think it's only now that the rural sector are going to have some disposable income, which hopefully will trickle down into the local economy.' McLaughlin said the South Island was benefiting from lower unemployment, high agricultural gains and lower housing costs, resulting in smaller mortgages. Financial hardship cases increased year-on-year for July, up 7.1%. Almost half (45%) relate to cases of mortgage payment difficulties, with the remainder coming from credit card debt (29%) and personal loan repayments (18%). The highest rate of financial hardship is among those aged between 35 and 49. McLaughlin said households are balancing their budgets a lot better than in the past, and are not spending money on discretionary items as much as they used to. He said buy-now-pay-later purchases and personal loan arrears were not increasing at levels like they were 18 months ago, with buy-now-pay-later arrears comprising about 8%-9% of borrowing. While the situation is good for households, McLaughlin said it places pressure on small to medium-sized businesses that rely on discretionary spending. '[Households are] saying 'if we can't afford it, we're not going to do it now, we're going to be conservative'. That's had a flow-on impact to those small businesses. 'Small businesses rely on their household mortgages to finance their business. They've had increasing wages and other costs going up, they've had interest rates going up and they've had their sales going down because people aren't spending the money.' McLaughlin thinks the current economic climate is affecting more people than during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2008, and said although the GFC affected people who were invested in the sharemarket, the fallout from Covid was across the population. He said the older demographic had been less impacted by what has happened because they are on better salaries, have greater job security and generally have lower mortgages. McLaughlin said the biggest challenge for borrowers at the moment is non-discretionary debt, and the flexibility being able to borrow money provides can help in times of need. Nation of Debt series Monday: NZ nears trillion-dollar debt burden Tuesday: Government debt: Are higher taxes inevitable? Thursday: Student debt: How big? How bad? Tom Raynel is a multimedia business journalist for the Herald, covering small business, retail and tourism.
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
Electricity Authority Moves To Level The Power Playing Field
The Electricity Authority Te Mana Hiko (the Authority) is moving to level the playing field between the four large gentailers (Genesis, Contact, Meridian and Mercury) and independent participants in the electricity market. The level playing field options were developed by the Authority, the Commerce Commission Te Komihana Tauhokohoko (Commerce Commission) and the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment under the Energy Competition Task Force. The Authority has today confirmed three targeted interventions to boost competition, build confidence in the wholesale market, and ultimately give New Zealanders better access to affordable electricity. "Confidence in the market underpins healthy retail competition and affordable power prices," says Electricity Authority Chair Anna Kominik. "We are concerned that aspects of the wholesale market may be eroding the confidence required for independent players to compete, and we are acting to address these concerns." The Authority is progressing these pro-competition interventions at pace, so changes could be in place by mid-2026: 1. Options for requiring gentailers to trade minimum volumes of the new wholesale electricity hedge product introduced in January to help independent participants manage their risk. Regulation would only apply if voluntary trading volumes do not grow. The issues and options paper is now available for feedback. 2. Code changes necessary to introduce mandatory non-discrimination obligations for the four large gentailers, with draft Code amendments published for feedback in October. This will provide greater confidence that the gentailers' wholesale businesses are not treating independent retailers differently to their own retail businesses. 3. A review of 'market making' in the electricity futures market to ensure it promotes healthy competition and transparency. This will be published for feedback in November. The Authority is also ready to intervene with urgent regulation if there is a sudden material reduction in the supply of shaped hedges, to maintain the market while an enduring solution is considered. By fixing costs when energy demand is highest, shaped hedges help retailers manage risk and keep prices stable and affordable, even in tight market conditions. "Targeted and timely interventions are needed to encourage new generators and independent retailers to enter, grow and compete in the market. These initiatives will promote healthy competition, retail innovation and investment in the sector - all of which are essential to deliver a reliable and affordable electricity supply," Kominik said. In February, the Authority sought feedback on options to level the playing field between the gentailers and independent generators and retailers, receiving over 40 written submissions and meeting with more than 20 submitters. The Authority is continuing to consider the broad range of views shared as it develops draft Code amendments for consultation and will respond to those views in the consultation paper. "We know from the conversations we're having that some feel that regulatory change is not happening fast or hard enough. The proposals being announced today target measures that can be rolled out in months, not years, driving timely progress while ensuring all parties can participate in and contribute to the process," says Kominik. "New Zealand's electricity market is undergoing significant change, and the Authority has a clearly signposted programme of proposed reforms and adjustments underway that keep the focus on security of supply and affordability. The Authority is prioritising practical measures with clear benefits and time for input to ensure policy changes are robust and in New Zealand consumers' long-term interests," says Kominik. Commerce Commission Chair and Task Force member Dr John Small says: "These initiatives are designed to work together to promote increased competition in the sector. Combined they increase transparency for market participants transacting with the gentailers and improve access to the wholesale electricity contracts they need. They would also give new players and investors confidence to enter the market and encourage the development of innovative new products and services. We don't expect these proposed changes would materially increase gentailers' costs but do expect they would lead to more choices and lower power prices over the long term." Visit the Task Force webpage to see the Pro-competition policy reform roadmap and read the Regulating the standardised super-peak hedge contract issues and options paper for more information. Notes About our proposed approach to regulating the wholesale electricity (super-peak) product The Authority is now seeking feedback on options for regulating the super-peak product, including market making on the over the counter (OTC) market as its preferred approach, should voluntary trading fail to deliver sufficient competition. These 'shaped' hedge contracts enable retailers to offer stable prices to consumers while managing their exposure to volatile morning and evening peak wholesale prices. This increases competition in the market, brings more power into the system, provides more choice for consumers, and puts downward pressure on retail prices. This type of product is becoming increasingly important as the electricity system becomes more reliant on renewable generation and spot market pricing becomes more volatile. Voluntary trading in the super-peak product began in January this year and while it has already improved availability and pricing, the market remains shallow, with limited seller diversity and low trading volumes. To address this, the Authority is proposing to set clear expectations for robust participation in voluntary trading by the gentailers, who own over 95% of flexible generation (which backs shaped hedge contracts), and signals that regulation may follow if trading does not improve. The Authority is also ready to intervene with urgent regulation if there is a sudden material reduction in the supply of shaped hedges. About our review of market making Market making is a service where a participant will quote prices for two sides of a market (ie both buys/bids and sells/offers) in a particular derivative, with a specified amount of volume and a specified bid-ask price spread. This service provides liquidity by ensuring there is always volume available to be bought or sold. In 2022, the Electricity Authority introduced mandatory market making in the electricity futures market, with the following objectives: To support a robust and reliable forward price curve. To increase the availability of risk management contracts for market participants. This framework was implemented through a combination of four regulated market makers (the gentailers) and one commercial market maker, who are required to provide certain volume of buy and sell offers for specific electricity futures products. The Authority is now undertaking a policy review of market making arrangements to ensure that current settings remain appropriate and aligned with our market making policy objective. As part of this review, we will also explore potential changes to strengthen market making services and ensure they continue to support a resilient and efficient electricity market. The Authority will consult on these proposals in November 2025. About the Energy Competition Task Force The Energy Competition Task Force was established by the Commerce Commission Te Komihana Tauhokohoko and Electricity Authority Te Mana Hiko, with the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, in August 2024 to investigate ways to improve the performance of the electricity market. The Task Force has been considering eight initiatives that will encourage more and faster investment in new electricity generation, boost competition, enable homes, businesses and industrials to better manage their own electricity use and costs, and put downward pressure on prices.
