Feeling low or anxious? Why moving your body is so good for mental health
But there's one strategy that seems to work for most people and almost all experts endorse, and that's regular exercise.
Decades of research have established that exercise has a positive effect on mental health. In studies of patients with mild to moderate depression, for example, a wide range of exercise regimens has been shown to be as effective as medications like SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) antidepressant medication (though the best results generally involve a combination of the two).
Moving regularly can improve sleep and reduce stress. While there's good evidence for the mental health benefits of exercising for about 45 minutes, three to five times per week, even just a few minutes of walking around the block can have positive effects.
'Is this walk going to do anything?' says Jennifer Heisz, an associate professor at McMaster University in Canada and the author of Move the Body, Heal the Mind. 'Yes! The answer is yes. It'll do way more than you think.'
Loading
Why is exercise good for mental health?
It's hard to find a brain process that doesn't improve with regular movement. Exercise boosts blood flow, decreases inflammation and improves brain plasticity. It also triggers the release of many mood-boosting chemicals, including beta-endorphins and cannabinoids (which both play a role in the 'runner's high' feeling), norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin.
More recent science has found that consistent exercise can change the underlying structure of some brain regions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
4 days ago
- The Advertiser
'Not satisfied': ABC reporter denied compo for Ross River fever mozzie bite
An ABC reporter has been told she will not receive compensation after contracting Ross River fever from a mosquito she says bit her while she was covering floods for the public broadcaster The journalist, who has worked at the ABC nearly 30 years, says she was bitten by a disease-carrying mozzie while working at Coraki in northern NSW on February 14, 2020. But Comcare, the national workers' compensation authority, says Elloise Farrow-Smith was bitten later - when she was on long service leave. It's not disputed that she got the disease, which can cause painful, swollen joints, muscle pain, fevers, headaches, a rash, tiredness and swollen lymph nodes. But the Administrative Review Tribunal found Ms Farrow-Smith did not go to the doctor until April of the same year, a delay she says was because of COVID-19 lockdowns at the time. Meanwhile Comcare says the journalist didn't display symptoms until at least late March, making the offending bite more likely to have occurred later than she claimed. "I am not satisfied that the applicant is accurately describing her symptoms during March 2020," tribunal deputy president Damien O'Donovan said in his decision handed down on July 22. "In those circumstances, I am not satisfied that the applicant contracted Ross River fever as a result of a mosquito bite in February 2020." That meant she wasn't eligible for compensation under the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act, he said. Mr O'Donovan said he doubted Ms Farrow-Smith's contention that she could not remember being bitten by a mosquito between February 14 and April when she was diagnosed with Ross River fever. In her evidence, she said when she was filming in Coraki, which was hit by flooding at the time, she was swarmed by mosquitoes. "I felt mosquitos biting through my jacket on my shoulder blades and on the skin at the back of my neck, as well as biting my neck through clothing," she said. "The mosquito attack went on for about five minutes ... I felt very itchy as I drove back to the office." Ms Farrow-Smith worked for another fortnight, then started long service leave on February 28 when she says she felt unwell with aches and pains and went to a pharmacy and later to Yamba on holiday, where the tribunal concluded she may have been bitten again. "I am satisfied that the applicant was bitten on multiple occasions in the period from February 2020 to April 2020," Mr O'Donovan said in his decision. He said the ABC was concerned the reporter's delay in seeking medical advice "suggests that she may have in fact developed her symptoms later than 28 February 2020". Mr O'Donovan concluded: "In these circumstances, I am not satisfied that the applicant contracted the Ross River fever from which she suffers in mid-February 2020 as a result of a mosquito bite suffered while reporting for the ABC. "It is possible that that is what occurred, but I am not affirmatively satisfied that that is what occurred. "It is more likely, and more consistent with the independently verifiable facts, that the applicant suffered a mosquito bite in March 2020 while on long service leave and developed Ross River fever symptoms in early April following which, her condition gradually worsened." The application for compensation was heard by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in May 2022 and its decision was appealed to the Federal Court which referred it to the Administrative Review Tribunal. The ABC has been embroiled in a long-running legal battle with journalist Antoinette Lattouf. In June Ms Lattouf was awarded $70,000 in damages after winning her unlawful termination case over her views on Gaza in the Federal Court. Taxpayers are facing a $2 million-plus bill for the public broadcaster's failed legal defence. An ABC reporter has been told she will not receive compensation after contracting Ross River fever from a mosquito she says bit her while she was covering floods for the public broadcaster The journalist, who has worked at the ABC nearly 30 years, says she was bitten by a disease-carrying mozzie while working at Coraki in northern NSW on February 14, 2020. But Comcare, the national workers' compensation authority, says Elloise Farrow-Smith was bitten later - when she was on long service leave. It's not disputed that she got the disease, which can cause painful, swollen joints, muscle pain, fevers, headaches, a rash, tiredness and swollen lymph nodes. But the Administrative Review Tribunal found Ms Farrow-Smith did not go to the doctor until April of the same year, a delay she says was because of COVID-19 lockdowns at the time. Meanwhile Comcare says the journalist didn't display symptoms until at least late March, making the offending bite more likely to have occurred later than she claimed. "I am not satisfied that the applicant is accurately describing her symptoms during March 2020," tribunal deputy president Damien O'Donovan said in his decision handed down on July 22. "In those circumstances, I am not satisfied that the applicant contracted Ross River fever as a result of a mosquito bite in February 2020." That meant she wasn't eligible for compensation under the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act, he said. Mr O'Donovan said he doubted Ms Farrow-Smith's contention that she could not remember being bitten by a mosquito between February 14 and April when she was diagnosed with Ross River fever. In her evidence, she said when she was filming in Coraki, which was hit by flooding at the time, she was swarmed by mosquitoes. "I felt mosquitos biting through my jacket on my shoulder blades and on the skin at the back of my neck, as well as biting my neck through clothing," she said. "The mosquito attack went on for about five minutes ... I felt very itchy as I drove back to the office." Ms Farrow-Smith worked for another fortnight, then started long service leave on February 28 when she says she felt unwell with aches and pains and went to a pharmacy and later to Yamba on holiday, where the tribunal concluded she may have been bitten again. "I am satisfied that the applicant was bitten on multiple occasions in the period from February 2020 to April 2020," Mr O'Donovan said in his decision. He said the ABC was concerned the reporter's delay in seeking medical advice "suggests that she may have in fact developed her symptoms later than 28 February 2020". Mr O'Donovan concluded: "In these circumstances, I am not satisfied that the applicant contracted the Ross River fever from which she suffers in mid-February 2020 as a result of a mosquito bite suffered while reporting for the ABC. "It is possible that that is what occurred, but I am not affirmatively satisfied that that is what occurred. "It is more likely, and more consistent with the independently verifiable facts, that the applicant suffered a mosquito bite in March 2020 while on long service leave and developed Ross River fever symptoms in early April following which, her condition gradually worsened." The application for compensation was heard by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in May 2022 and its decision was appealed to the Federal Court which referred it to the Administrative Review Tribunal. The ABC has been embroiled in a long-running legal battle with journalist Antoinette Lattouf. In June Ms Lattouf was awarded $70,000 in damages after winning her unlawful termination case over her views on Gaza in the Federal Court. Taxpayers are facing a $2 million-plus bill for the public broadcaster's failed legal defence. An ABC reporter has been told she will not receive compensation after contracting Ross River fever from a mosquito she says bit her while she was covering floods for the public broadcaster The journalist, who has worked at the ABC nearly 30 years, says she was bitten by a disease-carrying mozzie while working at Coraki in northern NSW on February 14, 2020. But Comcare, the national workers' compensation authority, says Elloise Farrow-Smith was bitten later - when she was on long service leave. It's not disputed that she got the disease, which can cause painful, swollen joints, muscle pain, fevers, headaches, a rash, tiredness and swollen lymph nodes. But the Administrative Review Tribunal found Ms Farrow-Smith did not go to the doctor until April of the same year, a delay she says was because of COVID-19 lockdowns at the time. Meanwhile Comcare says the journalist didn't display symptoms until at least late March, making the offending bite more likely to have occurred later than she claimed. "I am not satisfied that the applicant is accurately describing her symptoms during March 2020," tribunal deputy president Damien O'Donovan said in his decision handed down on July 22. "In those circumstances, I am not satisfied that the applicant contracted Ross River fever as a result of a mosquito bite in February 2020." That meant she wasn't eligible for compensation under the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act, he said. Mr O'Donovan said he doubted Ms Farrow-Smith's contention that she could not remember being bitten by a mosquito between February 14 and April when she was diagnosed with Ross River fever. In her evidence, she said when she was filming in Coraki, which was hit by flooding at the time, she was swarmed by mosquitoes. "I felt mosquitos biting through my jacket on my shoulder blades and on the skin at the back of my neck, as well as biting my neck through clothing," she said. "The mosquito attack went on for about five minutes ... I felt very itchy as I drove back to the office." Ms Farrow-Smith worked for another fortnight, then started long service leave on February 28 when she says she felt unwell with aches and pains and went to a pharmacy and later to Yamba on holiday, where the tribunal concluded she may have been bitten again. "I am satisfied that the applicant was bitten on multiple occasions in the period from February 2020 to April 2020," Mr O'Donovan said in his decision. He said the ABC was concerned the reporter's delay in seeking medical advice "suggests that she may have in fact developed her symptoms later than 28 February 2020". Mr O'Donovan concluded: "In these circumstances, I am not satisfied that the applicant contracted the Ross River fever from which she suffers in mid-February 2020 as a result of a mosquito bite suffered while reporting for the ABC. "It is possible that that is what occurred, but I am not affirmatively satisfied that that is what occurred. "It is more likely, and more consistent with the independently verifiable facts, that the applicant suffered a mosquito bite in March 2020 while on long service leave and developed Ross River fever symptoms in early April following which, her condition gradually worsened." The application for compensation was heard by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in May 2022 and its decision was appealed to the Federal Court which referred it to the Administrative Review Tribunal. The ABC has been embroiled in a long-running legal battle with journalist Antoinette Lattouf. In June Ms Lattouf was awarded $70,000 in damages after winning her unlawful termination case over her views on Gaza in the Federal Court. Taxpayers are facing a $2 million-plus bill for the public broadcaster's failed legal defence. An ABC reporter has been told she will not receive compensation after contracting Ross River fever from a mosquito she says bit her while she was covering floods for the public broadcaster The journalist, who has worked at the ABC nearly 30 years, says she was bitten by a disease-carrying mozzie while working at Coraki in northern NSW on February 14, 2020. But Comcare, the national workers' compensation authority, says Elloise Farrow-Smith was bitten later - when she was on long service leave. It's not disputed that she got the disease, which can cause painful, swollen joints, muscle pain, fevers, headaches, a rash, tiredness and swollen lymph nodes. But the Administrative Review Tribunal found Ms Farrow-Smith did not go to the doctor until April of the same year, a delay she says was because of COVID-19 lockdowns at the time. Meanwhile Comcare says the journalist didn't display symptoms until at least late March, making the offending bite more likely to have occurred later than she claimed. "I am not satisfied that the applicant is accurately describing her symptoms during March 2020," tribunal deputy president Damien O'Donovan said in his decision handed down on July 22. "In those circumstances, I am not satisfied that the applicant contracted Ross River fever as a result of a mosquito bite in February 2020." That meant she wasn't eligible for compensation under the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act, he said. Mr O'Donovan said he doubted Ms Farrow-Smith's contention that she could not remember being bitten by a mosquito between February 14 and April when she was diagnosed with Ross River fever. In her evidence, she said when she was filming in Coraki, which was hit by flooding at the time, she was swarmed by mosquitoes. "I felt mosquitos biting through my jacket on my shoulder blades and on the skin at the back of my neck, as well as biting my neck through clothing," she said. "The mosquito attack went on for about five minutes ... I felt very itchy as I drove back to the office." Ms Farrow-Smith worked for another fortnight, then started long service leave on February 28 when she says she felt unwell with aches and pains and went to a pharmacy and later to Yamba on holiday, where the tribunal concluded she may have been bitten again. "I am satisfied that the applicant was bitten on multiple occasions in the period from February 2020 to April 2020," Mr O'Donovan said in his decision. He said the ABC was concerned the reporter's delay in seeking medical advice "suggests that she may have in fact developed her symptoms later than 28 February 2020". Mr O'Donovan concluded: "In these circumstances, I am not satisfied that the applicant contracted the Ross River fever from which she suffers in mid-February 2020 as a result of a mosquito bite suffered while reporting for the ABC. "It is possible that that is what occurred, but I am not affirmatively satisfied that that is what occurred. "It is more likely, and more consistent with the independently verifiable facts, that the applicant suffered a mosquito bite in March 2020 while on long service leave and developed Ross River fever symptoms in early April following which, her condition gradually worsened." The application for compensation was heard by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in May 2022 and its decision was appealed to the Federal Court which referred it to the Administrative Review Tribunal. The ABC has been embroiled in a long-running legal battle with journalist Antoinette Lattouf. In June Ms Lattouf was awarded $70,000 in damages after winning her unlawful termination case over her views on Gaza in the Federal Court. Taxpayers are facing a $2 million-plus bill for the public broadcaster's failed legal defence.
Sydney Morning Herald
7 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Feeling low or anxious? Why moving your body is so good for mental health
For mental health, most treatments for conditions like depression or anxiety come with caveats. Medications work for some symptoms, but can exacerbate others. Cognitive behavioural therapy is effective for many patients, but not all. But there's one strategy that seems to work for most people and almost all experts endorse, and that's regular exercise. Decades of research have established that exercise has a positive effect on mental health. In studies of patients with mild to moderate depression, for example, a wide range of exercise regimens has been shown to be as effective as medications like SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) antidepressant medication (though the best results generally involve a combination of the two). Moving regularly can improve sleep and reduce stress. While there's good evidence for the mental health benefits of exercising for about 45 minutes, three to five times per week, even just a few minutes of walking around the block can have positive effects. 'Is this walk going to do anything?' says Jennifer Heisz, an associate professor at McMaster University in Canada and the author of Move the Body, Heal the Mind. 'Yes! The answer is yes. It'll do way more than you think.' Loading Why is exercise good for mental health? It's hard to find a brain process that doesn't improve with regular movement. Exercise boosts blood flow, decreases inflammation and improves brain plasticity. It also triggers the release of many mood-boosting chemicals, including beta-endorphins and cannabinoids (which both play a role in the 'runner's high' feeling), norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin. More recent science has found that consistent exercise can change the underlying structure of some brain regions.
The Age
7 days ago
- The Age
Feeling low or anxious? Why moving your body is so good for mental health
For mental health, most treatments for conditions like depression or anxiety come with caveats. Medications work for some symptoms, but can exacerbate others. Cognitive behavioural therapy is effective for many patients, but not all. But there's one strategy that seems to work for most people and almost all experts endorse, and that's regular exercise. Decades of research have established that exercise has a positive effect on mental health. In studies of patients with mild to moderate depression, for example, a wide range of exercise regimens has been shown to be as effective as medications like SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) antidepressant medication (though the best results generally involve a combination of the two). Moving regularly can improve sleep and reduce stress. While there's good evidence for the mental health benefits of exercising for about 45 minutes, three to five times per week, even just a few minutes of walking around the block can have positive effects. 'Is this walk going to do anything?' says Jennifer Heisz, an associate professor at McMaster University in Canada and the author of Move the Body, Heal the Mind. 'Yes! The answer is yes. It'll do way more than you think.' Loading Why is exercise good for mental health? It's hard to find a brain process that doesn't improve with regular movement. Exercise boosts blood flow, decreases inflammation and improves brain plasticity. It also triggers the release of many mood-boosting chemicals, including beta-endorphins and cannabinoids (which both play a role in the 'runner's high' feeling), norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin. More recent science has found that consistent exercise can change the underlying structure of some brain regions.
